Federer vs Agassi | US OPEN 2004 (QF)| Court Level & Slow Motion 

I prefer the high angle that they use to use in the 90s - You can at least see the whole court and both players equally well at the same time as well as gauge their game better.

I agree! At this angle, you can actually see the speed and spin of the ball. I remember watching a Graf match once; from a high level, it looked like her slice was floating around, and I couldn't understand why here opponent wasn't smashing it. But then when they showed the lower angle, you could really appreciate what a knifing shot that backhand was --- totally different perspective on the game. Same is true for the extreme topspin of today; at a high angle, you can't see the arc, you just see a slower looking ball.

It be like that sometimes lol

@@rupertgordonii6623 This guy knows content

crucial however was the shot of Federer's hairy chest at 19:50

This isn't highlights, it's court level points.

maybe to do with copywrite issues?

Because it is early of Federer career against American legend . If they met after 2010 for example , not body like Federer in crowed support

@@abdullaha1764 I think Federer also became more popular once Nadal came along and started to give him trouble. I remember disliking Federer back then because he was so dominant and made tennis so boring. There must have been other people who felt as I did. He won almost every tournament he played; people forget that nowadays. And yes, Agassi was an American legend + the underdog, and Americans love cheering for the underdog.

ya fed was still new and this was an American legend

Much of that has to do with the camera angle(s). Can’t figure out why (tennis) TV has regressed in that respect.

@@rodrod959No it’s a fact, tennis is slower today

Due to copyright, the uploader cannot show the match point...