She gave a clear view on her stance on these issues. She doesn't have to be a activist. Why don't these players mature and stop there childish auctions.
I do think Clark took a proper position against these negative views. Does she have a responsibility to be a activist? I am unsure if that's what she should do at this time. Not everyone can be an activist. She just wants to play basketball. I think as long as it's clear she's against the negativism and reinforces her stance when the negative shows itself, that is adequate for now. Yes, it would be better if she did more. But, right now, she is dealing with the pressure of not being as effective of a player as she was in college. People thought that she would instantly lead her team to victory and show signs of being the greatest of all time. That's a heavy load to carry. She may never get close to being that player, but she certainly has star potential. Basketball is her life, and she wants to work toward being the best player she can be. Only after she is in a good place as a player can she be a true activist for the league against the negativism. You have to be right in yourself before you can truely give yourself to others.
haha.....no one cares abot the WNBA...i.t's Baseball season now........the only reason people are going to the WNBA games of the fever is becuase of Caitlin....so cudos foor her to bring a crowd out .....but honetly I cou'dnt telll you one name over than Caitlin Clark on the WNBA....:P
.for sure..I'd never go to a WNBA game if the tickets were free..except to see CC play..the rest of those dykes can keep playing to a crowd of maybe 1000 people ,and that includes the players coaches and everyone else there because of a job
