Fiona Harvey (Baby Reindeer) Caught Lying | Body Language Analysis 

Do you prefer to watch videos with or without the embedded captions? Let me know what you think.

You missed the great part, where she says she has a photographic memory and then said she couldn’t remember her law degree results!

"It was a joke" said every narcissist ever

How on earth did the actress portray her so uncannily without having met her?

On the 41k emails thing - there's an old twitter account of hers which was active for 18 months from 2016 to 2018 and she made 53.4k posts many of which included photos. So she's clearly capable of sending that volume of emails...

“None of it’s true! I didn’t have a reindeer toy. Okay, I did, but that’s it, it was a joke. I never sent him messages! Well, just a few emails, banter.” WILD.

Im sorry but that pronunciation of Edinburgh is a crime against Scotland

"I didn't send him anything" "Maybe a handful emails, 18, maybe 10" plus twitter, facebook, voice messages "I don't even know his adress" "I sent him one letter" "I didn't see it at all" "They portray me as .. and .. and .. and make me look like .. and .. and .. and i have never done this and that and that, the girl of someone have seen it and told me .. your staff told me .. " "I have a photographic memory" "I don't remember this .. i don't remember that .. i don't remember my marks i got on my degree, i did alright, not the best of the year .. " Piers:"so you accuse them of lying, netflix and Richard?" "No." Piers:"but you said that this it's not true and that netflix and Richard lied about the whole thing" "Okay ,Yes, they're liars!" "I have like 6 different emails adresses. Maybe 4, probably 6. It's 6." "I have never been at any show of his" "I may have been to one show" "No one i know has seen the movie" "I've been told from people who have seen the movie (..)" "I didn't sent so many emails, not 41000 .." " .. but even if a did (..)" P:"How many relationships did you have?" "More than Richard!" "I don't know how many relationships he had" "I don't really use technology that much" "I have 6 email adresses, 4 phones (..)" "I have never seen the actress .. " *knows her exact looks, her age, her accent, everything "We are friends (..)" "We're not friends" "I don't have his number" "I DOUBT that he has voicemails (..) maybe 1" "I'm not at all like Martha" *is EXACTLY like Martha* "They're lying! I'm gonna sue them" P:"so, do you challenge him to come out with proof and show the proof" "NO! "I didn't see it at all" *knows that she is being depicted and comes to Piers and says it's not her and even quotes things from it* "I have a lot of friends (..)" "My work friends, my professional friends and others.." "I didn't watch it at all .." *has facebook post about watching it* "I have seen him 2 or 3 times .." " .. 5 or 6 times .." *knows his exact work schedule and claims he had recorded her* P:"would you wanna take a lie detector test?" "Yes, yes! Probably .. yes. I have to talk to my lawyer about that .. but what for?!" I could go on and on. That interview but nothing but a try to deny everything and gaslight the whole world into believing that she is the victim but failing SO miserably and lying SO badly, it completely backfired and proved so many things of the documentary 😁 she's a 100% guilty of something, without a doubt. And she'll not sue anybody for sure because then they'll get to the bottom of things and track everything back, she doesn't want any proof to come out and said it herself. She is clearly lying and is for sure guilty of most of the things, if not all, clearly. Sent from my iPhon

"I never had his number so how could I leave him voicemails" "actually, there was one voicemail" "he must have recorded my phone calls" "but I never had his number" giiiiiiiiiiiiiiirl...... wtf

*She has a law degree. She’s unemployed and living on benefits. She’s NOT a practicing lawyer.

“I only sent him 13-14 text messages” Later... “I didn’t have his number”

THE biggest tell (& i've worked w/law enforcement) is that when Piers offered a simple solution to prove she's telling the truth: having Gadd show the emails, voicemails etc., her immediate response is "No." And then she adds, "I just want them to leave me alone." A) if you are telling the truth you would say: YES! let's see the proof B) when you are not telling the truth the LAST thing you want is for them to show proof you are lying C) If you want them to leave you alone, you don't go on TV, talk about a lawsuit, seek out publicity. You hope & pray it all just goes away. And even though the sleuths found her, she could not engage which quickly puts out these type of fires. She WANTS and NEEDS this attention. In it, she perhaps sees the hope of re-igniting her "relationship" with Gadd.

To any men out there that are experiencing abuse, stalking, or toxic behavior, it doesn’t make you any less of a man. Speak up, ask for help, find your village. You don’t deserve to suffer because you’re a man and society has certain expectations set on you❤

She says the Netflix show is untrue because the actress doesn’t look like her and the actress playing her doesn’t have a good Scottish accent. 🤔

You can read in her face when she says something then her brain screams at her “TAKE IT BACK! SAY SOMETHING ELSE!” then she walks it back. It’s painful.

Richard Gaad mentioned on an interview, that the messages used on the show are real, but the unravelling of the show was done in a way that showcases his emotions rather than being an accurate depiction of facts..

When I was a teenager I stalked a teenage boy. I was obsessive. It started as a crush and got out of control. I later grew up and was diagnosed with borderline-personality disorder, and have spent my entire adult life trying to learn (through meds and therapy) how to emotionally regulate myself in more healthy ways. I find it interesting that as an adult (we are in our 40’s now) he Facebook requested me. I accepted but have never communicated with him. I do still get a weird fix from knowing he’s in my Facebook friends. I don’t know him, never had a conversation with him in the last 25 years, yet would feel upset if he suddenly deleted my Facebook friendship. Mental health is so complex. I believe from my experience that these two (Gadd and Harvey) are still getting supply from each other. 🤯

She is unemployed....therefore she absolutely had time to stalk this man. Like she literally had 24 hours....everyday at her disposal to make richard her job.

let me get this straight. she's gonna sue him for defaming her in a show that she didn't watched. ok

FOUR to SIX phones ? We can barely keep track of ONE !

She’s not a lawyer. She has a law degree. When she tried to work as a lawyer, she was fired after two weeks.

"I don't lie". Immediate vibes of "I don't sweat" 😅😅😅

When she says she doesn't know him, and then says they were all friends 😅🙈 also doesn't know where he lives but sends him a letter 🙈

-"Do you challenge him to show proof" - "NO" Why not? I'd say "YES ABSOLUTELY"

I saw her Facebook page she posts VERY frequently on the daily about similar/same topics, the way she types and spells on her Facebook page is EXACTLY the same as what was depicted on the show. I think she’s absolutely done everything she’s been accused of. The woman is incredibly unwell and terrible at lying

I was waiting for this! I knew you'd cover it. Excited! - Sent from iPhoen

I didn’t know him I only met him two times at most. But only sent one letter to him and emailed him a few times. He didn’t show interest in me because I’m pretty sure he was a homosexual. He tried to sleep with me. What?

‘sorry to hear you were ra*ed kind of thing’ letter, oh yes how stunningly empathetic of her 🤦‍♀️ good lord! 🙄 this woman! 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Her claiming he may have recorded her in the bar is wild, when you remember in the show she had recorded almost all of their interactions

That pronunciation of Edinburgh genuinely threw me for a loop. Took me a solid 10 seconds to realise what you were actually saying 😂

It's embarrassing how obvious her lying is 😬

The "4 phones, 6 emails" thing hits me. My mom's the same way, she's paranoid and deals with major bi-polar disorder (bipolar 1). That admission just confirmed that this is probably the "unwell" person Gadd was dealing with, and still dealing with obviously.

Her insistence that he could have recorded her and passed it off as voicemails tells me she knows he has recordings. No ones first response to "did you leave voicemails" is an alternative explanation of how he might have them. She's trying to eplain away evidence that she's claiming he doesn't have. Wild.

The way she smacks her mouth open before every heated question like she can't breathe and needs to rush it out right away but reminding herself to maintain a calm demeanor is so weird

The Netflix show is “based on a true story “ not “everything depicted in this show is true” but it seems Fiona can’t wrap her head around that concept

She seemed stuck on the fact that she was never arrested or convicted, but Gadd has also said that part was fabricated for dramatic effect and to provide a kind of closure to the viewer. He said that in reality, he would not prosecute because she is mentally unwell and he sees her as a victim of a failed system.

My father is a Narcissistic Sociopath, I have PLENTY of experience with Nutters and the expert is right, she will NOT be able to take responsibility for her behaviour, everyones out to get her, she WILL play the victim.

Obligatory "for a lawyer, she's an awful liar" (followed by the obligatory, "that's probably why she's not a lawyer")

Although the show says "this is a true story" Gadd has said the show reveals an "emotional truth" that's been based on real experiences. Perhaps when the show starts with "this is a true story" they meant this emotional truth, because it was the emotional truth that was more important to the art/story overall - afterall the show is ultimately about trauma. And one important detail that everyone seems to have missed is that in the credits of episode 7 the show literally says "BASED on real events" . Gadd/Netflix never lied to us.

That's the worst pronunciation of Edinburgh I've ever heard 😂

So she wants to sue Netflix for a show she never watched and for a character that isn’t her. Ummmm okkkk

YESSSS I JUST FINISHED WATCHING THE INTERVIEW and could not stop thinking about how brilliant it would be to see her body language read!

Leaving 8 hours for sleep, 112 emails per 16 hour day in a year is only 7 emails an hour. If those emails are things like 'I just ate an egg' then that'd be pretty easy to do.

She sent him a letter, but doesn’t know where he lives? Huh…

Am I the only one who finds that ex-prison warden and psych guy really annoying? She's already stalked the guy who wrote an article about her and said some of the same things she says here. Her put-downs of Gadd are the same as they are in the show. She's clearly ill and needs help, but that doesn't mean Gadd doesn't have the right to tell his story. What's scary about the interview is that you can see glimpses of her behavior as it's depicted in the show. Frightening. She needs help, let's hope she gets it.

Can’t imagine ppl giving my ex a platform. He has been stalking me for years. Luckily he is in another state and he hasn’t reached out since I changed my number and deleted my social media, but when I finally decided to file a restraining order against him and tried asking his friend for his address to serve him, the friend said that my ex said I was the one stalking him. I was shocked and livid. Let’s see receipts. I have all the receipts. He has nothing.

I'm a little sad you didn't include the discussion about her schooling and grades...that was wild.

This is the behaviour and speech pattern all narcissist's use. Having a conversation with them is "word salad". NOTHING makes sense, the avoidance tactics, never answering a straight forward question, excusing terrible behaviour (verbal and physical ( as a "joke"...then telling you to get a sense of humour and not be so sensible, when you react as anyone would (taken aback, offended, upset...) Pierce did a fantastic job, he is completely unflappable. Nothing gets past him, he can see right through any lies and insincerity.

Just as a reference point: I wrote around 250 emails (sometimes very long) per work-day (8h) in my customer service job and did calls and other tasks as well so 100 short emails per day is really not absurd

I had no problem with her body language, but she lost me when she tried to pronounce "hyperbole".

I really, really pray that she doesn't start stalking him again after all this. He's been through more than enough for one lifetime ❤

Never thought I'd say I appreciate Piers Morgan for conducting an interview. Her answers here will strengthen Gadd's case if she does try to take him to court.

I heard heterosexual and not hypersexual. Im the only one?

Ive tweeted him ‘a couple’ of times…Well 14 or 18 times.Piers; “Thats quite a lof for someone you don’t really know” Fiona;“We were all friends”.(30 min. later)Piers; Were u friends? Fiona; “No!” What technology do you use? A very old smartphoen that’s it.(a view mom. Later) Pierce; How many phones do you use 2day? ;”I’ve got 4. I like to keep ppl on seperate phones.” I’m not a liar, I only tell white lies to save ppl cause I’m such a good person , (taking zero accountability for literally anything.)

I think she said heterosexual, not hypersexual.

She is a dangerous person.

Excellent! Was hoping her body language would be studied! She gives me vibes of Kathy Bates in Misery. There was something very off about her interview with Piers.

Yessssssss! On popcorn 🍿 planet’s live w/ the Piers interview everyone kept saying we need a body language analysis & here you are!!!

Psychology in Seattle and Observe in one video?! 😮😮

Him: You calling them a liar? Her: well I ain’t calling them a truther!

Wow this lady is scary, I only watched the Netflix series yesterday and I can't even pretend to understand how terrified he must of of been

I was watching this interview earlier today and wanting you to review this.. this came out fast!!! Thank you!

Side note-she said hetero sexual not hyper. Sent from iphone

The eye raising during the question being asked about the emails was like she was searching in her mind if the figure was correct.

I’m sure she sent the emails the way she posts on fb. One thought at a time in rapid succession. She’s nonstop. And scary.

Richard Gadd came out and said that some things in the show were fictionalized! Do your research before you say things that can make a victim look like a villain, there is no such thing as a perfect victim!

Small correction: at about 42:00, she said she was “heterosexual”, not “hypersexual”. It’s a bit difficult to make out if you’re not familiar with her accent, plus she and Morgan were talking over each other.

Thank you for including the clips with the criminology expert and Dr. Honda. I think it's so valuable to have that type of context before this interview. It really helps people process their own feelings around people like this.

When she says things like "we were trying to encourage him (Richard) with this first show or something like that..." she uses WE several times. Who is "we"? Is she referring to herself in the 3rd person plural or is she trying to imply that she was sending these messages in conjunction with other unnamed people?

The coverage I’ve seen of this on mainstream American media today has me livid. They present the interview as if she was entirely credible and it’s a he-said-she-said. GMA didn’t even entertain the idea that she might be lying and the hair-brained anchor ended it with “That show is so cringey, lol.”

Would have liked you to look at her weird body language when she watched about court dates and pleding guilty and the sentencing ... there was definitely something about her body language there

That is the most insane pronunciation of Edinburgh I’ve ever heard 😂

She did mention being a diabetic - constant thirst being a symptom of uncontrolled diabetes. So yes, a dry mouth would explain the water drinking, and shouldn’t be explained away through body language analysis. Please note that dry eyes are also a symptom, and can explain rapid blinking in some instances.

at the end credits of the series, it does note that some names, incidents, places, etc have been changed. so it’s a true story but with some artistic liberties (her going to jail) . i’d love to see her take a lie detector test. and i’m hoping you did some research and know she’s not a practicing lawyer.

Your pronunciation of Edinburgh (ed-in-buh-rah) was physically painful to me as a Scot.

Clinical psychology student here-that psychologist’s take was wildly incorrect. Narcissism is correlated with both parental neglect AND parental overevaluation. The psychologist mentioned neglect as the main causal factor (which is not always the case) and completely failed to account for the significant role of overevaluation as well. Also, the notion that borderline personality disorder underlies all narcissistic personality disorder is ABSURD. BPD is completely distinct from narcissistic personality disorder. They can be comorbid, but are entirely distinct. Martha is likely someone who suffers from BPD, not NPD. That psychologist needs to catch up on research in the field before he goes around spreading misinformation. (Edited to account for research that correlates neglect with NPD)

I was waiting for this video! Just watched the interview, what a roller-coaster in it self.

Total lack of transparency, denial of information someone with a photographic memory definitely would know, redirecting, evasiveness, obfuscation, and all she’s there to do is tear down the story Gadd has told. If she were an innocent “victim” falsely and libellously portrayed, she’d tell her side and her side would offer a clear and plausible a ternate explanation. I doubt that, I don’t know - lawyer speak that leaves room later if caught out to say I never said definitively that did t happen. I said I didn’t know for sure. It’s been a long time. I guess I’d forgotten.

She’s done herself a real disservice by doing this interview, it hasn’t put her in a good light. She’s not coming across as credible.

The pronunciation of Edinburgh is hurting my soul right now 😫

The fact that she thinks recordings of someone talking in a pub could be confused for voicemails is absolutely hilarious. A voicemail is a very, very specific context. Somebody conversing in a pub has never in this universe resembled a voicemail message. Sounds to me like she knows those voicemail messages will be used against her in court and her defense will be "that's just a recording of me in the pub". Which will be absolutely hilarious. No jury on the planet is going to confuse voicemail messages with raw pub recordings.

I mean 1. RG said it was a true depiction of his emotional experience. Not an exact play by play of events 2. He flat out stated that changes werr made to key antagonists to protect their identities. 3. He asked people not to track down the real Martha as she's unwell and he does has empathy for her. No matter what the truth - i am having trouble seeing grounds for defamation. If Fiona isn't the basis for Martha and there are no emails texts etc that link her to that character then the case can be made that shs wasn't the inspiration for Martha,, Richard never claimed she was, etc. If the emails, voicemails, and such do exist then it's the truth and therefore not defamation.

I’ve been checking your channel everyday waiting for this vid, I’m so excited dude 😭

yo i have never wanted to see your video as fast as i did when i found out about this interview! Isn't it just so fascinating! ps im Scottish and the Law Degree she speaks of is a simple 2/3 years at college with a certificate to say you passed. It is entry level qualification that allows you to work in the legal field... BUT this is NOT the same as a Law Degree from University that allows you to actually practice law. If that makes sense. In other words, she definitely lied.

i have bpd and the part where the psychologist was explaining npd hit me really really hard, i related to every single bit, made me realise how much crossover and similarity there is between cluster bs, i'm sorry for anyone who had to grow up this way and has to deal with these disorders, it's a living hell but we can get through it

She is going to start stalking Piers next. Watch out.

I find it odd that she would even agree to interviews in the first place...not because it's surprising, but because it's exactly what a stalker would do. This is not a good look for her at all.

I noticed a few things watching yesterday-obv the contradictory nature of things she said, answers were all over the map. Her blinking I took note of, maybe it meant nothing but at times she blinked a lot & some of her answers were bizarre for no reason & just seemed SO odd but not to her. 6 emails, 4 phones which initially she says are for diff reasons- utilities, almost like bill collectors, close friends but then when he asks again why she has 4 she says 3 are broken which is a wildly different version of the answer though both are odd.

Yes I was praying you would analyse this interview. Thank you so much. You're amazing xxx

My thoughts are, yeah she’s probably like the character in the series and embarrassed as well as delusional and in denial about what transpired between her and Richard - but what about the man who sexually abused Richard Gadd? The man he had PTSD/revelations about that prompts him to personally admit that he should actually be reporting that man to the police rather than a lonely, mentally-ill, woman who was so infatuated and obsessed with him that she ultimately stalked and harassed him, which is also considered criminal behavior, which she obviously needs diagnosed and treated for the mental illness that drives her actions. What about the sexual assault from the man in the tv and film industry who actually committed the crime of raping Richard Gadd? Why aren’t the Internet sleuths searching, stalking, and threatening him? I’m sure he could be found, too, especially if Richard’s friends during that time leaked the man’s name. I would like to see him try and explain himself in an interview/interrogation like this woman.

Oh my gosh, Logan! The pronunciation of Edinburgh 😂😂 hurt my head but eh, it is what it is! Glad you covered the interview =D

Oooooo I was waiting for this as soon as I heard about her interview!

love seeing Dr. Honda (Psychology in Seattle) on other creator's videos! Such an amazing therapist and content creator.

Immediately starts to sow the seed that she "wrote the show in her sleep" and came up with the title

Thank you for shouting out Dr Kirk Honda! (Psychology in Seattle) he is so great at what he does, and I VERY much feel he more recognition!!

Did you make anything of the repeated comments about his staff? She said several times "your staff mentioned that" or "I heard that from your staff" or "your staff asked me that". Just something that stuck out to me a bit, although I don't know if it indicates anything.

A friend just recommended the interview and while watching I thought: 'Man that'd be GREAT material for Observe' - And here you are already, very excited for this analysis.

47:39 She’s the only one who doesn’t want to accept how “stalky” she’s been. She rolling her eyes, sighing and being blatantly annoyed says it all. 🤷‍♂️

The only person to have come forward with ‘The whole truth’ on record is Fiona. Two things are true of the show. One is that the show states ‘This is a true story’ in the beginning of the series. The other is that at the end of every episode is the disclaimer ‘This is based on a true story: parts of this story, names, places, situations are fictionalized for dramatic purposes.’ it lets me know that the truth is probably somewhere in the middle, if there is anything true at all. Thank you for posting content that gives your expertise/opinions of understanding if Harvey is potentially misleading the public in her truth. Personally I’ll not pass judgement on if I think Fiona or Gadd is lying. My question for her is why take this interview at all? If her plan is to challenge Netflix or the creator in court then why show your hand and go on record. Would this interview be a valid point of evidence if the truth does not support Fiona’s statements? This story is fascinating. Perhaps the actual truth will come out one day.

sorry she didn't say hyper sexual... she said heterosexual. 41:56