No video :(

Flir Thermal DMM: Flir DM284 VS Fluke 289 Part 2

Joshua Palmer

Подписаться 1,5 тыс.

Просмотров 22 тыс.

50% 1

Видео Поделиться Скачать Добавить в

What are you getting with the new Flir DM284 and how does it compare to a multimeter in the same price bracket?

Опубликовано:

11 мар 2017

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 15

@oorcinus 4 года назад

nS is nanosiemens, i.e. conductance measurement, not nanoseconds

@emigdioalaniz 5 лет назад

Now the biggest difference is the accuracy and certainty of value. Fluke got the lowest error, meaning it will give you up to 1/1000 accurate

@intrinsicskorn 5 лет назад

With the AC+DC function, there are some applications where both AC and DC are coupled on the line. Would be interesting to see that.

@RiccoFX 6 лет назад

Proper comparison would have been against the Fluke thermal multimeter, these both have different features for different uses... this is a fail LoL

@fartknockers747 6 лет назад

RiccoFX Not all of us have the money to randomly purchase a unit just to review it. Go on Flukes website if you so desperately want to see the features.

@RiccoFX 6 лет назад

Then what's the point of doing a comparison review like this? You might as well compare it to a BANANA just because you have one and its cheap.... :P

@Hamlocks 6 лет назад

Lol, no doubt. Such different devices. Here is an apple and here I have an orange! No mention the plotting extra features on fluke, but mention the camera on flir.

@netspock 6 лет назад

Joshua, Can you comparate with Fluke 279 (thermal multimiter)

@emptech 6 лет назад

So you say the Fluke measures nano seconds, where did you get that info? Is is possible you don't know what you are talking about and you really meant nano-siemens? You do know what a siemen is?