Flying the 2022 Cessna 172S Skyhawk

Подписаться 44 тыс.

Просмотров 218 тыс.

50% 1

The most successful plane in the history of general aviation, in its most current form. This 2022 Cessna 172 Skyhawk is a gem in the sky, and the ideal private pilot trainer.
0:00 Intro
0:30 Engine Start
0:37 Takeoff
1:36 History
4:49 This Plane
5:17 Maneuvers
9:25 This Plane / Asking Price
9:59 History
12:56 VFR Traffic Pattern Entry
14:36 Landing
15:58 Outro
16:18 Contact
#cessna #cessna172 #aviation #aircraft #pilot #pilotlife #privatepilot #pilottraining #maneuvers #garmin #bose #boseheadphones #boseaviation #avionics #vfr #ifr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: All videos are for entertainment purposes only. Do not refer to them as instructional videos due to heavy editing and clips being edited out of context.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instagram: flying_with...
Website: ocraviation.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cameras - GoPro 4 Black, GoPro 7 Black, GoPro 8 Black, iPhone 12 Pro Max, Sony A7s mk.III
Suction Mount - Novoflex
Microphone - Rode Wireless Go
Contact:
Rich Manor
(562) 413-3251
Sales@ocraviation.com

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

8 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 346

@MichaelVanHeemst Год назад

New airplane prices are absolutely insane

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Can't fault the manufacturers for getting what they can based on production numbers - thanks for watching!

@Ty05031 Год назад

It’s going to ruin general aviation, if it already hasn’t

@mattfgln Год назад

Yes, especially for a plane designed 70 years ago with basically nothing new inside it except for the avionics

@jj6457 Год назад

Nah it’s expensive because these days only rich people and their shit snob kids with daddy’s money can afford to fly GA and unfortunately pushing out the lower class. That’s the world we live in now, rich up on their high horse.

@bobloblawslawblog5104 Год назад

@@jamesforrester6941 Yep, nail on the head

@thevictoryoverhimself7298 Год назад

Seriously the ultimate airplane. A child could fly it. Sometimes they do. Criticizing not changing the design is like wondering why your soup spoon doesnt have a computer-guided laser sight. Sometimes a design just works and has been figured out.

@garybono 3 дня назад

..and it's a better trainer than the Cherokees because they are TOO easy to fly and ate very difficult to stall.

@mitchellfamily3899 Год назад

It was always fun to get it into slow flight and fly it backwards. Also, recovered on it's own from incipient spins, just really gentle to fly. Great for teaching wing down, top rudder in crosswinds. All round winner to learn basic flying technique.

@carlmclelland7624 Год назад

I would argue whether the 172 or the 150/152 trained more pilots, but stepping up to it from a 150 was like the day I went from a PA28 to a PA32-300. WOW! Got my instrument ticket in a 172... single nav-com with glideslope and an ADF. Things were sure simple in the 60s. Hey, you take us for lots of rides in things that go higher, faster and further. Now, you show me my 'real dream' of flying... Low and Slow, and look out the windows to navigate! Thanks Rick! I enjoyed today's flight............

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you! Lots of fun flying low and slow and looking outside!

@Spyke-lz2hl Год назад

When I started almost 30 years ago now, we flew those late 70’s, (77-79) 152’s and 172’s. The new ones, although they look essentially the same, are so much more well built and better airplanes than those of 45 years ago.

@docpalazola491 Год назад

Great video, Rich, once again you make us feel like we're riding along. Love that Skyhawk!!

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you! Wonderful airplane for sure.

@mustang1191 Год назад

The Skyhawk history is fun to hear.

@frankreinmiller848 Год назад

Love the History talks Rich,Great flight.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@enzopedro8298 8 месяцев назад

quality of the video was there, great vid!

@ajmplaneshelicoptersrocket3542 6 месяцев назад

Good video. Beautiful airplane. Tks for posting.

@josephjolly1936 Год назад

Nice flight, the interior looks great.

@seapilot4042 Год назад

🛩 All shiny and new, gotta love it! Some Great camera angle's too. Really enjoyed this video, Thanks for sharing.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@MACF75 7 месяцев назад

Love it. Thanks.

@m.candan6935 Год назад

great Video Rich. Thanks

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@fivesfilms Год назад

Great video as always!

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@Jacktherookie_ Год назад

Damn 3 standby instruments into single instrument! Outstanding

@felipemorla8972 3 месяца назад

Great video!

@stuartvorster4911 Год назад

That was really pleasant to watch - Thanks

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@itsJordaan Год назад

I just did my discovery flight a couple hours ago. This was the one we flew in. Got to take off and because it was windy, it made us feel like we were free falling. Didn't really like that feeling too much, but the experience was unlike anything I've ever experienced. Haven't been in an airplane in about 15 years and I'm nervous of heights, so it felt good to crush that fear.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thanks for the message. I hope you stay with it!

@FreedomFlight1 Год назад

Nice job, great camera work.

@spectech7640 Год назад

Man.. I love watching your videos!

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@eelb53 Год назад

When I learned to fly almost 50 years ago in a Cessna 150, and then flew a 172, I was amazed at how benign the stall behavior was compared to the 150. Just by appearance, I thought the 172 was just an up sized 150, but they handle differently. I guess the additional weight has a lot to do with it.

@GaryMCurran Год назад

I went from the 150 to the 182. What a difference, but the Skylane was just a dream to fly. I mean, nothing wrong with the 150, if you don't mind a cramped, two seat leaf in the wind, but the Skylane was a 'let's go half way across the country today! kind of airplane.

@steveprice4779 Год назад

Thanks for the memories Rich. My dad was a Piper/Cessna dealer in Spokane Washington back in the 60's and 70,s. I learned to fly in a Cherokee 180, a 172, and a Cessna 182. My best landings were always in the Cherokee. When he decided to sell the business he suggested that me and my brother who was also flying might want to by one of the many new aircraft we had in stock at the time. My cost for a basically new Cessna 182 in 1975 was around 25k if I remember correctly. Boy have things changed. I was a sophomore in college and decided to pass. OPPS...My grandfather was also a Chrysler Plymouth Imperial dealer and I could of bought Hemi Cuda's at cost too.....who knew😫

@jumpinjack1 Год назад

25k in "75" is $138,341.54 today I would still pass if it was me lol

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thanks - sounds like great memories!

@arielcabalin2746 Год назад

I love Cessna 172, so easy to fly it !

@skaytv3368 Год назад

I love that they still made it with the classic yoke rather than the joy stick

@rgeno6091 Месяц назад

"What a treat to Fly" great airplane..thanks for sharing the video.

@peternelson8861 Год назад

Always enjoy your anecdotes Rich, entertaining and informative, cheers, best wishes for the Holiday season.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you - Merry Christmas!

@jeff27X Год назад

Great video Rich. The first airplane I ever flew was a Skyhawk back in 1980. I now own that same airplane - a 1962 172C Skyhawk, the last year before the "Omnivision back window" you mentioned. I agree, there's nothing better for learning to fly. Happy Holidays.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thanks for the message. Merry Christmas!

@crustypilot7627 Год назад

Jeff...I have the same plane -'62 172C Skyhawk 145hp Continental 300-D. I love it! Crusty

@philipgledhill7227 Год назад

I buddy hope you are well. And ready for Christmas. Cessna 172 sky hawk what a awesome plane.would love to buy one and take some lessons. You never no in the near future I could do that. Take care and have a awesome festive season phil.

@robtebay1 Год назад

I was expecting a 60° turn then! Always love your videos, Rich. They're informative and interesting. I'm going to buy another lottery ticket, just in case!

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@lonnieclemens8028 8 месяцев назад

A very interesting video to watch.

@georgej7077 5 месяцев назад

Love the 172. Docile aircraft and If you accidentally enter a spin they recover very easily as well. I wonder if the new engines are as indestructible as the old O320. Great vid, keep em coming!

@touchandgomx 8 месяцев назад

It's beautiful, the Cessna 172 is my favorite plane. greetings from Mexico.

@FlyingwithRich 8 месяцев назад

Greetings!

@bernardanderson3758 Год назад

Merry Christmas to you and the entire team in bringing in all types of most wanted aircraft that you have demonstrated and for that one day I’ll be your onboard camera man

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@jordiegundersen1465 4 месяца назад

A fine plane with an impressive reputation.

@andrewderousseau2160 3 месяца назад

Your videos are the best

@FlyingwithRich 3 месяца назад

Thank you!

@harshrajchauhan123 Год назад

Love from India 🇮🇳

@firecop7912 Год назад

Great aircraft , 172 is one of the best personal planes out there! if not t h e best .

@brandonaviationhd 11 месяцев назад

I’ve flown the M, RG, and Newest S model and they all handle exactly the same if anything maybe some slight differences. Cessna definitely likes by the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” mantra

@tericaclark4871 Год назад

I wish he was my instructor ❤️❤️💪🏾💪🏾

@Dunwyche Год назад

Alright! My daily dose and it's my fav ride!

@pilot.sergio4 Год назад

Aye I think I saw you take off, I fly out of LGB as well. Nice and clean aircraft there.

@RealNoahMC Год назад

In 1970, the MSRP of the cesna 172 was $12500. Adjusted for inflation, that would be about $96k today. Pricing has been way over inflated for these and is a shame since it's what is killing the private pilot industry.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

True, but I think there are a lot of other factors to consider when examining airplane prices rather than applying inflation numbers. Thanks for watching!

@theaustralianconundrum Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich Noah didn't include near on a $100,000 of Garmin 1000 NXi's! LOL. I LOVE flying these.

@mrbojangles8133 Год назад

it's a good entry level airplane

@markyanh6630 8 месяцев назад

Great

@gtr1952 Год назад

That was great, some things I didn't know about 172's. I may have to borrow the land-o-matic thing. 8) Thanks Rich! --gary

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thanks for watching!

@mattf49006 Год назад

Flying a Skyhawk out in the practice area off PV...brings back great memories out of southwest skyways @ TOA

@jumpinjack1 Год назад

Good vid, liked your history, 5000 planes produced in 3 years in the late 70's and the last 26 years to make 5000 more with a lot less model types. Times definitely have changed and hard to compete against a $69.00 Southwest ticket.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Good point - sad how GA has declined.

@JohnsonAviation Год назад

This plane is now at my University! Flew it the other day

@noah5889 Год назад

“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”!

@rightrudderkurt Год назад

Another great video Rich. May I trouble you for a video on your mounts for GoPros for all the different planes?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

We will have something coming soon on that - Thanks for watching!

@Cazador60140 24 дня назад

THe Cessna 172 id a good ship almost flies by itself . My solo after 8 hours of training on CG-UJS .

@morphsia2056 11 месяцев назад

amazing plane!! my uncle is going to start teaching me how to fly with his skyhawk so damn excited i just cant sit still! lol

@FlyingwithRich 11 месяцев назад

Have fun!

@FlywithDK Год назад

I hate stalls but this aircraft stall really nice.

@johnfitzpatrick2469 Год назад

Merry Christmas Rich from Sydney Australia. I didn't know sales and education could co-exist. 🌟 🌲

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Merry Christmas! I didn’t really know either, didn’t really think of sales and education but seems like it works ok - thanks for the message!

@jeromehiggins3001 Год назад

It just kills me, how much a Cessna cost these days. A new one 400K, a used one, 50 -80K, and some over 100K, assuming it has a low Airframe time and a good engine that has less then 2000 hours and updated avionics. Now you can build a plane or buy a used one that can fly faster, higher and out performe a Cessna 172 with half the cost.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

People place value in different places so what might not make sense to you makes a lot of sense to others!

@jeromehiggins3001 Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich Will see how much value is in my Cessna 172M that has a damaged firewall and a prop strike from a porpused landing from a guy I had leased to fly. The repair cost 90K Will see how much they insurance company gets when they auction it off!

@skyepilotte11 Год назад

Amazing transformation of the 172...panels are nothing like the legacy planes with steam gauges...so is the price of admission..lol Thanks Rich for the new plane demi and history...

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thank you!

@mikhailjairnisbett441 Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich It is possible to buy a 2022/23 steam gauge 172?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Nope - all G1000.

@BazzasAviation 4 месяца назад

Glad Cessna still makes the 172!

@FlyingwithRich 4 месяца назад

Me too!

@DOGOID Год назад

The Fender Strat of the sky

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Very cool comparison. Thanks for that!

@bernardanderson3758 Год назад

3 years waiting list Rich

@heindirksmit Год назад

It might be different for you, but I’ve been trained to never do special maneuvers above water (or crowds/residential areas/restricted areas), because of the reduced possibilities for landing out in case the engine does not turn back on. That means also no stalls over water. I fly in the Netherlands

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Our training areas are over water here. I would rather ditch than try to land pretty much anywhere in the LA basin off airport. Thanks for watching.

@heindirksmit Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich makes sense! Thanks for your reply

@FlightSimDude Год назад

👍👍👍👍👍

@glenwilliams5818 Год назад

Well happy flyen folk! Like food the prices go up ! But a hard time going down

@whsprague Год назад

We certainly had an exciting adventure at the restart in Independence. Do I remember the price in '97 shocked the press at $135K? Do you remember that I flunked my flight check with Kirby? I couldn't figure out the ILS! Navy pilots got no experience with ILS. It was all GCAs.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Hey Bill - I was thinking $140,700 for a loaded Skyhawk!

@budowens6478 Год назад

I love my 1960 Cessna 172. A brand new 1960 172 was 9000 bucks.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

That's a bargain any time!

@701Builder 5 месяцев назад

9000=93000

@1wwtom Год назад

1/2 a Mil? That's Insane! When I started my private training in the early 70's a C-150 rental was $17/hr wet! We didn't even have transponders yet just stayed on Unicom and all we had to do was keep clear of the class 3 airspace of the main airport some 20 miiles away. I gave it up a couple years after getting my private ticket and I hit 200hrs but the rental had gone up for the 150s to over $20/hr. If I remember you could get a used 150 in good shape for around $10K or so back then. I just wish my own salary would have increased over the years as everything else has! Now I'm Old & Retired.

@bernardanderson3758 Год назад

The used prices on these are going at $250 and up to $500 plus

@legendarydaniel_.6883 Год назад

How did you get audio talking to ATC ?

@scott5747 Год назад

My Dad, a WWII bomber pilot, had a 172 in the early 60's. We lived in the SF East Bay at the time. One time we took our dog for a flight. We use to do a turn over my uncles in Berkeley hills. I've heard that dogs don't know height. That dog pissed all over. He'd look out the window and pee.

@DaBladePwn Год назад

😂 Thank you for this comment i havent laughed that hard in a minute

@lcprivatepilot1969 Год назад

Textron-Cessna, should reintroduce the 177 in a FG and RG model with modern optional features, as it still doesn’t look dated at all imho.

@renardinosrenard9581 Год назад

Back to the roots ?! :)

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

That’s for sure!

@c172inthesky 8 месяцев назад

love klgb

@robertsadler1275 Год назад

Just a thought and i have always wondered! I never seen one but has any Cessna 150 and 172 models had deicing boots fitted or has it ever been tried and tested?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Not to my knowledge - airplane lacks the capability for the systems required to provide de-ice protection. Thanks for watching!

@rmshivo Год назад

Awesome machine. Does the AOA indicator come standard?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Not sure but I'm pretty sure optional or even after market install. Thanks for watching!

@sey1yes2 Год назад

flew in a new one in 1958. A lot cheaper then. A half mil now is, uh, nuts!

@toms9844 11 месяцев назад

u can get a used one for 15k

@henryroif8537 Год назад

1.- GREAT VIDEO!!!!! 2.- ISN'T SHE BEAUTIFUL!!!! I used to fly 172 variable and fixed pitch loooong time ago......wow, however what caught my attention is how much the pilot trust the engine, I would never fly a single engine so far away from the coast line (Unless you fly "really" high), 3 - 4 miles from the coast @ 3000ft....you lose your engine...let's say you go to 640 fpm you will end up swimming, hopefully.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Thanks for watching!

@chrissanchez9935 Год назад

Sir, do naturally-aspirated piston-engine aircraft tend to cause piston ring flutter when cruising at long periods at altitude with manifold pressure lower (let say 11,000 ft ISA or warmer less than 20 in Hg) of what is recommended in the POH during cruise?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

I have not experienced that and am not aware of the issue with rings. No specific recommendation in POH that I am aware of except recommended power settings.

@chrissanchez9935 Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich, Thank You, Sir.

@stanktail Год назад

Now if Chevy would only reproduce its 1957 Bel Air. Complete with modern electronics, a/c etc Chevy could charge a huge pile of money for an antique frame with modern stuff, just like Cessna.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Maybe Chevy (or some other car maker) should build airplanes and show show them how it’s done. Maybe employ some new way to make a wing fly?

@josu911 Год назад

Yo recuerdo q estaba estudiando el POH de un 172S y mi examen era del 172R ☠️

@Desmodromic916 Год назад

Fuel injection made carb heating obsolete, which improves safety and makes it easier to use, but they could add variable propeller pitch command.

@antialt3498 Год назад

and rudder trim🙂

@MrBe787 Год назад

They did, R172K back in the early 80s, they weren’t popular.

@OldCarsAreFun Год назад

This month I will have an introduction flight on a cessna 172. I hope i dont like it, because it probably is the start of an expensive hobby...

@MattMorris481 Год назад

People say Cessna is behind or slow but piper and Beechcraft is doing the same.

@user-mb6pi3iq7w 5 месяцев назад

What happened to once you hear the the stall warning you quickly have to be very quick and YAW to the LEFT ! I did not see him do that in the video. When I was in ground school I was 19 years old got my student air man certificate and my flight instructor taught me in a 150 Cessna when u go into a stall and when u hear the stall warning u quickly take the yoke and YAW to the left. I didn't see him do that in the video ! Is this something new since it's a newer plane ? I going to look in Jeppsseny book

@wallymurray620 Год назад

Hey, loved the video, love the 172. Not a pilot myself, just someone who’d love to be. Please excuse the ignorance but is this plane fuel injected? If not, why not? And if it is, why do we still have a mixture control? I’d assume a few O2 sensors and such and a computer could continuously give us optimal mixture or am I missing something? I know some are going to say cost but let’s face it, the automotive industry has been purely FI for years if not decades so it’s not like they need to invent a new technology. And yes while cars don’t see the altitude changes a airplane this just means a larger scale range in the calculations, nothing more. Thanks.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

It is fuel injected. As far as why we still have mixture control, I presume it boils down to economics. In other words, getting FAA certification on an electronic fuel system for a Skyhawk or IO-360 is cost prohibitive. Not realistic to compare automotive manufacturing with FAA certification and airplanes. People who don't understand those economics already complain about high cost of airplanes, would they pay even more for electronic fuel system that provides an easier starting sequence or not having to lean for altitude?

@kimberlywentworth9160 Год назад

Ouch!

@mikeabc5355 9 месяцев назад

If it only had an inexpensive but effective TKS anti-ice system.

@CrooklynPilot Год назад

Love the 172. Recently got my PPL flying one. But half a million greenbacks for a 2022 version, Yikes!!

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

I'd take a 172S over half a million greenbacks for sports car but everyone has their personal preferences!

@CrooklynPilot Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich that’s checkmate! 😉

@jbw3 Год назад

Rich, curious as to what you are seeing in the aviation sales industry? My guess would be slight price decreases?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

I don't see prices decreasing a lot honestly. I project they will stay pretty flat across the board. Thanks for watching!

@cherifbar Год назад

is that an AOA indicator on the top of the panel next to the compass?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Yes. I forgot to point that out.

@cherifbar Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich wow! Just amazing for a light GA airplane.

@phan5302 Год назад

Bro really said $545,000 with a straight face.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Bro sold it.

@phan5302 Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich a piece of paper can sold for a million dollar and be labeled art. Still not a good purchase.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

So a seller and buyer agree to it and sell at a price but you are the dictator of what is a good deal. Th aka for letting us know.

@Rooisve Год назад

가격과 유지비용은 얼마나 되나요?

@easttexan2933 Год назад

very nice......guessing around 500K with the G1000's?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

$545K

@bernardanderson3758 Год назад

Rich how did you get this one ?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Local airplane.

@Darren4352 Год назад

The sad thing is that after World war II there was a push to have an airplane in every garage along with your car and they were actually affordable in that way then. Now, the cost of a lightly used single engine trainer like the 172S is basically six times the cost of the two-story brick home I bought in 2007. Essentially, the common person simply cannot afford an airplane, either to operate it or to maintain it. Nor is it really feasible to even rent one. It's really sad and frustrating because I loved flying. All 120 hours of it. 😭

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

I certainly wish it were less expensive as well!

@sportaholic4482 Год назад

It looks like you’re trying to stall the plane with ESP active. It appears as though you were getting an under speed notification and ESP was fighting you and kicking in. I’m guessing this plane, being as new as it is, has ESP and maybe you didn’t disengage it? If that’s the case, it’s going to recover itself pretty much.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

You're guessing wrong. Thanks for watching.

@billiondollardan Год назад

What needs to be done to fix the state of GA? How do we get more planes into circulation?

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Tough issue - major barrier to entry just learning to fly, plus majority of population really has no interest.

@billiondollardan Год назад

@@FlyingwithRich adding something to public schools might help idk

@jaimeduncan6167 Год назад

I agree with most of what was said, but in. 2023 it's time for Cessna to, without compromising the reliability add the parachute. I prefer a plane that most of the time does not need the parachute, like the 172, but you never know when a plane is going to suffer an accident.

@FlyingwithRich Год назад

Purely a cost/benefit relationship. If you look at number of fatalities as a measure of which airplanes need parachutes the most - I believe the 172 would be way down the list. Ironically, the airplane that would be high on the list is the SR22, which has a parachute.