FM 3-0: An Introduction to Multidomain Operations 

Thanks Ryan. We plan on breaking the full length video into chapter segments and posting, but wanted to get the finished flick out first so everyone would have access. You’re spot on, the shorter vids are more palatable and tend to work better for classes and LPDs.

Recommend adding time stamps to the current video. This will facilitate a focus on a specific topic and still maintain the ability to see how it is all connected.

​​@@usacaddhi 👋 I appreciate the attempt to make it easier to navigate, but I think you misunderstood what they meant in a way that has made your page more cluttered & difficult to navigate. What they meant by chapters is that there is a feature on here where you can add timestamps to a RU-vid video with descriptions of what's at the point in the video allowing people to quickly navigate long videos without having to guess where in the video core topics are discussed. If you break it up into multiple videos instead of having to search back & forth in one place you have to jump between entirely separate videos in a playlist which gets really tedious & counterproductive tbh.

The slide depicts the warfighting functions. Mission command would be incorrect as command and control (C2) is the warfighting function. Mission command is the Army's approach to command and control that empowers subordinate decision making and decentralized execution appropriate to the situation. Refer to ADP 6-0, Mission Command (July 2019) for more information on C2 and mission command.

The slide deck is posted to the Central Army Repository (CAR) at: atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/go/100.ATSC/F94902EA-F266-49F7-B592-2D6D41A729C4-1675182085899?page=1

@@usacadd thank you

@@usacadd is there another place where you don't have restricted acces?

@@corina-rubinibotoc5576 you can access and/or download the entire video at: atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/go/100.ATSC/75C1AA17-7392-40DC-9503-E5DC3BBF1B12-1675177928721?page=1

We're working on ADP 3-0 now and expect it to publish later this FY.

Most of our publications are written at the unclassified level. There are some that are more strictly controlled, but we've made an effort to make Army doctrine more accessible to the Force. None of the videos we produce deal with sensitive subjects. Likewise with our podcast, Breaking Doctrine, we make sure to do a OPSEC scrub before posting. Finally, Army doctrine is subjective, not directive. We don't tell Commander's specifically how to operate, but give them the tools necessary to make sound decisions, plan and execute successful, doctrinally based operations...and that keeps the threat guessing on what we may do.

There’s not much in this video or FM 3-0 that is an opsec issue

Adversaries will have access to this and more regardless of the public knowing how it works there isn’t much OPSEC to be broken. If actual immediate plans were being divulged I’d get it but the matter of doctrine is rarely ever fully classified. You have channels like Battle Order that go into excruciating detail on unit structure so keep that in mind.

Corporations milking the government and taxpayers.

RU-vid nonsense I’m afraid. Now even “unmonetized” videos can get commercials unless the Uploader goes out of their way to unmonetize them. Even then, it seems like a bit of a crapshoot. Of course, I’m only a third of the way through. If General Beagle up there takes a moment to talk to us about Raid: Shadow Legends, I might have an aneurism.