Тёмный

FM 3-0 (Part 1): The Big Idea 

U.S. Army Combined Arms Doctrine Directorate
Подписаться 9 тыс.
Просмотров 10 тыс.
50% 1

What is the big idea behind FM 3-0: Operations? Following an introduction by LTG Milford H. Beagle, Commander, U.S. Army Combined Arms Center, COL(R) Rich Creed, Director, Combined Arms Doctrine Directorate (CADD) explains the new FM 3-0 and the Army's operational concept, Multidomain Operations (MDO).

Опубликовано:

 

2 фев 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 11   
@chris5483
@chris5483 3 месяца назад
Thanks for these videos as they are very informative. If deploying as Divisions, what plans are in place to support the local economies surrounding many US military installations along with all the civilian support jobs that would seemingly be impacted for 9-12 months at a time while nearly an entire installation would seemingly be deployed on rotations or large scale combat missions?
@EASpiritualOracleSports
@EASpiritualOracleSports 7 месяцев назад
❤ABSOLUTELY! Spiritual Domain let's Goooooooooo!
@vicrobertson3
@vicrobertson3 Год назад
Appears to me that we are reorganizing tried and true concepts and capabilities into different combinations enabled by a few new ones. MDO updates operational doctrine to exploit these new combinations-which is exactly what armies have always done with new technology. This is not a criticism. I think we are doing the right things for the right reasons.
@nextjin
@nextjin Год назад
We just added EW, Cyber and Space layered it all together with the other domains and exploit weaknesses with "new" TTPs using all domains to our advantage simultaneously. A lot of new terms, re arranging, etc. but yes. The biggest real difference is we are finally focusing on near peer threats again instead of counter insurgency which is a huge ask considering less than 10% of the entire force was even in when we trained for that environment. The problem still though is over reliance on technology. A few key atmospheric nuke dets and the ensuing EMP puts us back in WW1 or earlier against a near peer that now has 5x the manpower. NTC has shown that if you take away the tech our maneuver units get killed or lost fairly easily. If our peer threats were smart, they could build their vehicles/equipment to protect themselves from an EMP attack knowing thats what they will do if engaged in a conflict with the US.
@MC-pt8kv
@MC-pt8kv Год назад
​@@nextjin Yeah, if they launch nukes, guess what we'll probably do? Also, do you think a tank works when an EMP goes off? Does an F16 work but an F35 doesn't? What is the point of EMP hysteria except to have a seemingly valid critique that will only convince the uninitiated? Do you want the military to function entirely with rifles and bicycles or something?
@Calico_1234
@Calico_1234 Год назад
Cool
@johndilivio2770
@johndilivio2770 Год назад
I saw a quadrature rotor with a machine gun wipe out of a company infantryman
@johndilivio2770
@johndilivio2770 Год назад
Will drones overhead will destroy an army
@johndilivio2770
@johndilivio2770 Год назад
Guy in a foxhole overhead drone dropping hand grenade drop on him
@MISSINGYEARS
@MISSINGYEARS Год назад
Where are the internment camps located?
Далее
FM 3-0: An Introduction to Multidomain Operations
1:27:31
#kikakim
00:23
Просмотров 16 млн
Contemporary Military Forum #8: Multi-Domain Operations
1:41:58
Understanding Combined Arms Warfare
42:06
Просмотров 214 тыс.