Every single one of your demo's is fantastic ... I wonder if there is anything that you can make sound bad 😊 Your playing and demosongs : heaven on earth ! Congrats and thanks
Thank you, I'm really happy that you enjoyed the music!!! Here you can find an extended version of the demo song: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2_YtxedSW1M.html
I have owned both. Sold the AXE FX. Ultimately I went with Kemper due to the amount of profiles of various amps from so many free and purchase sources. For instance I could never create the EVH Brown Sound or the Boston Tom Schulz sound on the AXE FX to my satisfaction but there are several people out there who sell their profiles of these sounds for Kemper that are spot on.
Hi Gary, thank you for sharing!! It's a good point. I would only add that currently I'm really enjoyining the high tweackibility of the FM3...it's like going to school and learning how the amps work. Nevertheless the Kemper is a great tool... Thank you for your message!!!
I understand the axefx comes with some good default presets / sounds good out of the box. That's the most important thing to me... getting good tones quickly. For kemper you need to try a lot of profiles before you get something good or you need to pay for them. Both are great units.
First of all: cudos, your playing is 👏 ... fantastic! As für the sound: I really thought you played one same smp when I closed my eyes during the song. Great units that show that you don't have to carry around real amps, any more.
Hi, just to inform you thath I've uploaded an extended versione of the demo song here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2_YtxedSW1M.html
i own the Axe 3 and the Kemper Stage and for me both devices are awesome,last night i was playing with the Axe 3,and today in the morning i was playing with the Kemper Stage,both devices are winners.
I guided myself from the musicians who use both, in this case, Matt Bellamy has used both with a Mastermind 22 and boss volume. And live they sound too beautiful and clear with their myriad sound changes. Everyone has their own thing, but the one who had the most sound in my head is with the Fractal by Vai, Bellamy, that I hear so much. Even my neighbor has the ll version to play progressive metal (he had diezel, EVH and Marshall) and it doesn't really sound any different at all. Thanks for the video!
Well, first of all, it was a great playing and feeling, so congratulations Leo! I have owned kemper for more than 10 years and i love it. At the beggining, i wanted to buy a Fractal, but it was not available in Chile, so i bought my kemper. To my ears, the kemper is raw and sensitive, and the fractal is a more refined sound (maybe too perfect) too much sometimes, but both sound great
To my ear the FM3 sounds cleaner overall, while the Kemper has a non-appealing distortion that makes it sounds muddy and less pristine. Your review really helped me to decide which one I'm going to buy. Thank you and like everyone else, I concur, you're an amazing guitarist!
Kemper sounds as good as the profile quality you use.. I have my profiles on my Kemper Stage and it kicks ass of all fractals and Helix and some tube amps too as playing live on stage with real loud band behind me..
Very good match, i prefer the FM3, more effects and sensation for me. The kemper is great too. Thanks for your job, very good player. Stéphane from France
Thank you, really appreciated!!! Yes, I preordered the QuadCortex...so, subscribe and hit the bell...not to miss the review and the comparison with the FM3...😊😊😊
Nice video as usual, Leo. I had Fractal XL+ and was happy with the sound but not with the weight and the size of unit and controller. And tweaking the sound in Fractal Edit took too much time as well. Last half a year I have Kemper Stage and I would say I forgot about tweaking and carrying the weight to rehearsals and gigs. One disappointing thing that I had to buy audio interface for my computer. But despite this I’m all the way on the Kemper side. Amazing sounding device and quite compact. I had a lot of processors before from Helix Line6 to Mooer but Kemper is winning. I think you can change your mind if you try good paid profiles for Kemper.
Thank you, really appreciated and thank you for sharing your opinion. I totally understand you, and yes, maybe in future I will change my mind...but right now I'm just a little bit more on the FM 3 side...thank you for your message!
Waiting for FM3 vs Helix - specifically quality, accuracy and feel of amp models compared. That's the most important thing to me - then drive models, then time effects...then everything else. (of course interface is also very important). But really looking for some thoughts on modeling quality (either through power amp into guitar cab or with same IR)
Thanks for this, you've put a ton of effort into this comparison and I believe anybody can make a well informed decision which to buy based on this, Cheers!
I had the Kemper for a year and I concur, to get the best out of the Kemper, one should buy some 'pro' profiles that have been created in perfect conditions. But I immediately here in the Kemper clips why I sold it: it adds so much 'hair' to the sound that you need to dial out using low pass and high pass and reducing presence which in turns kicks you out of the mix completely, especially in a live situation... I had the Fractal Axe FX Ultra, then Kemper, then Axe FX 2XL, but now I use the marvelous Mesa Boogie Mark IV with the Fractal FX-8 in 4cm... IMHO, no modeler can attain the natural sound of analogue gear, let alone a mighty tube amplifier like that plexi of yours... I'm no tube snob but I really think that the clips of the real Plexi sounded so nice with wonderful dynamics, the fm3 a close second but the Kemper profile you made, I didn't like for the reason stated above... Thanks for your video, I'm no longer in the running for any modeler (had a 'digital' journey for more than two years) but still come back to your channel for your equisite playing and to remind me that my Mark IV is still in the race. Keep up the good work!
Hi, thank you for sharing your experience and opinions: appreciated! The Mark IV is such a wonderful amp...I'm in love with basically every Mesa Boogie amp...😊
I made exact the same experience. Nothing comes close enough for me. Had the axefx II then the AX8. After buying the GT-1000 It was a surprisingly good unit in therms of feel, but the sound not authentic enough for some Bands :-(...then the Kemper Stage. Good sound and dynamic, but muddy. Made several profiles with really professional Equipment, but still muddy/hairy. Can‘t get rid of it. ...For small or Party Jobs I still use the GT-1000!!! Otherwise I play my Amps :-)
I completely agree. I followed a similar path. I had Ax-FX2 twice and Kemper 2 times. I ended up buying Friedman JJ Junior + Fractal FX8 + Capture X. It's the perfect combination!
Thank you so much, this is really a great compliment!!! I did an extended version of that song, that you may want to check out here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2_YtxedSW1M.html Thank you once more!!!!
Nice review Leo, It would be great a review comparison of the FM3 with one from the Helix family (LT, Stomp or POD Go, considering they sound almost the same) :D
@@LeoGibsonGtr Uhh great Leo! I think that will be the definitive one for me, I hope jajaj. Multieffects are in a good level now to think much about buying lots of pedals an amps, of course they're the best of option in sound and feel but in terms of money and convenience... Sometimes you just want to plug one thing and start composing before the idea goes away forever jaj.
How come i just got to know you, such a fine guitarist..i use Zoom G5n which is a toy compared to both the Kempler and FM3 but i am magnetized by the FM3
I prefer the FM3 for it's rich and smooth, yet dynamic tones. I thought the Kemper tended to sound grainy and harsh. In my own gear, I find that the more physical switches there are, the more the tone seems to suffer.
The only area where I noticed any kind of significant difference was in the very first (cleanest) plexi clip. The plexi has that pleasant sharpness we’ve grown to love. Was the plexi micd the same/same speakers? Subscribed, I like your style of quick intro, then the excellent playing, followed by the detailed analysis, so people can skip that if desired, well thought out!
The kemper is starting to show its age, and seems to be muddy compared to both the real amp and the fractal. The fractal is doing something that I can't put into words other than to say it sounds right, but it also cuts through the mix in a pleasant way. I guess I'm still sitting on the FM9 waitlist and playing my old elevenrack in the mean time.
Very good video also with great playing. The re-amping and audio switching are perfect! That said, please allow me to analyse what I consider the not so good point, always with the objective of future improvement: I would have lost a bit more time trying to equalize the sounds, especially in the non-Tube Screamer parts. The Marshall sounds the best although I believe the others can be made to sound very similar; the FM3 sounds almost the same as the Marshall, but lacks some live; maybe with a little more gain or bright it would sound better; the Kemper had too much drive, which would be very easy to compensate.
To my ear the FM3 was a closer match to the real amp. The Kemper was close but didn't sound as clear /open. Full disclosure: I'm a Fractal Audio products user, so it may just be biased. I prefer the component level modeling philosophy. I like the ability to build and tweak a new rig on a whim rather than having to find (or create) the right profile for the sound I want.
Thank you. Very informative video and wonderful playing. For my main purpose of home recording, my question is can you route the stereo Reverb/Delay to separate outputs so they can be recorded (printed) and processed separately from the main guitar /amp sound. I would not always have the unit hooked up to the DAW and having separate tracks would allow fine tuning of reverb/delay levels and EQ during a mix.
Hi, I really understand what you mean and I have the same exact need! Unfortunately I didn't find a way to do it (I also pointed it out in my demo review of the FM 3 that you can check out here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SmePfkkF9Go.html) If someone knows how to do it, please let us know!!! Thank you for your message!!!
I think both units sounded great. FM3 sounded better - BUT I'd say that the Kemper profile you used was not so great - the kemper is totally dependant on the quality if the profile - and Michael Britt profies are the go to profiles for many sounds. I have a Kemper (not FM3) and love it. You missed one of the great feature of Kemper is the extra Kabinet feature, that gives you an amp in the room sound -- it is devine and has 19 different specialized speaker IRs.
I'm a bit late to this discussion... If you're using the built-in profiles on the Kemper, you won't get the best results. There are a ton of amazing profiles out there for very little cost. Your Kemper Marshall demo has too much hair on it. You are spot on with the flexibility comment - if you like tweaking, modellers are the way to go (though I sold my Helix as it sounded too sterile and digital). The Kemper has a limited signal chain as you say. However I'm a guitar-and-amp guy, and on the Kemper, once I'd found the profiles I loved, I stopped looking, tweaking and started playing instead. That never happened with the Helix and I am guessing I would disappear down a rabbit hole with the FM3 if I got one, too! Your playing is amazing, by the way!
Awesome video, can’t wait for my turn on the FM3 waitlist! Question: I know the FM3 lets you create patches for piezo/electric guitars where you can have both signals going at the same time through two mono inputs (1&2L) as seen in the manual. Can you create a similar patch in the Kemper stage where it can process both signals at once?
Hi Luis, I don't think you can do it in the Kemper: in the FM3 you have a matrix of 4 x 12 where in the Kemper you have 1 x 12...so in the Kemper, as far as I know you can't use parallel block of effects or input. Obviously if someone knows something different, please let us know!
Leo Gibson thanks for the reply! Do you know if that piezo/electric combination is possible in the Neural DSP quad cortex? Looking to make one purchase for an all in one floor modeler and after your reply i think the Kemper isn’t for me. Right now I’m torn between the FM3 and Neural DSP quad cortex.
Hi Luis, I don't have the quad Cortex, so I still don't know (I'm sorry for that). I have ordered one...so, as soon I will be able to put my hands on, I will make a full demo review and some comparisons videos. Thank you for your message!
Leo Gibson sounds great, thank you! Can’t find too much information on the quad cortex but from what it sounds like it should be able to do both signals. Still on the FM3 waitlist and unable to register for the quad cortex at the moment. I’ll keep my eyes out for that comparison video here soon
Thanks Leo! But in this video I didn't like your Kemper patch. It is profiler so you should find correct profile, in your case similar to your Marshall + Royer. It's very fast and easy even with free profiles. As for Axe , it is very frustrating in terms of making your own patches, etc. You will have latency while switching cabs, multiple IR's loading is pain in the ass, etc. But it sounds awesome and has so much effects.
Hi, I'm sorry for that. I just would like to tell you that actually the Kemper profile was done using the two microphones used for recording the real Marshall, I mean the Royer 121 and the SM 57 (and also the same two preamps: the chandler and the neve). I've spent some times trying to figure it out how to profile two microphones at once. This is what I get... maybe it can be done better, but I was using the exact same settings for doing the Kemper profiles as the ones used for recording the real Marshall. Thank you for your message!
Leo Gibson aahh. So it's YOUR OWN profile? It may be tricky. I have friends who sold their profiles as commercial stuff. And they've said that some tones can't be captured because of complexity. Kemper is awesome but it can't be used for reamping stereo guitar tracks or qudra tracks. That's sad, limited by DSP.
Hi, yes, it's my own profile of the exac same configuration of the Marshall (same mics, same preamps) used in the demo song....and I really went crazy to find out how to capture two mics....:) ... and maybe a video about it could be useful.... That's also the reason why I left untouched the sound of the Kemper, without tweaking the level of gain (as some of you has requested in the comments). The sound of this Marshal is pretty hard to replicate, as it has a lot of dymanics and in the demo song I'm picking with different nuances, touching harder the string and then softer, to test the dynamic response of the Modelers (the one of the Marshal is amazing in my opinion). Thank you!
Well, because these are among the best modelers in the market and so I wanted to push them to the limit. And I really enjoy the sound of the couple SM57 and Royer 121...which is a golden standard...so I wanted to see how these modelers can replicate that sound!
Great playing, great video! Thank You! Can You teach us How to make our own impulses responses with good Quality? Also can You show us, step by step, How to make a good Kemper profile? Thank You.
Hi, actually I have already done such videos: how to make IRs: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aIjuF6k5xXs.html how to make Kemper Profiles: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nwfTSkk-d70.html Thank you for your message!
Great video. Tomorrow I’ll see it complete!... How much is the spillover on the FM3 when changing presets? When I had the AX8 the silence between presets was really annoying, while on kemper stage there wasn’t silence at all (and delays tails didn’t cut) I’m interested considering that both presets have different amps, volume and effects. Kemper changed that with no problem, but fractal was horrible at that point. Regards!
Hi, thank you, really appreciated. Actually, in the studio I'm going from the Kemper or the FM3 into my Apollo interface and them I'm listening the sound with the studio speakers. Thank you for your question!
Hi Leo, thanks for always great content and videos. My question is that which one of the units felt more like a real amp on your fingers when played? Thanks
Hi, thank you so much!!! This is a pretty hard question..they both sounds great...I'm a long term user of the FM3...so I would go with that...but it is just a personal opinion...also the Kemper is great. Thank you!
Great review! Amazing pieces of technology, but I prefer the real deal. The real plexi sound much better to me. The FM3 sounds a little muffled and the Kemper adds a harshness to the sound (to much gain?).
Hi, thank you! If you want, you can check out an extended version of the demo song played with the Marshall following this link: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2_YtxedSW1M.html Thank you for your message!
Hm, I find it strange that in this video the Kemper sounds so far off the real amp, even though you profiled it yourself? I usually get the chain that I profile sounding almost the same as the source, with a little fine tuning. Coming from a pedal board with analog dirt pedals, from time to time I feel the desire to check out the latest and greatest multi FX offerings. But when I stumbled upon your comparison video with the Fractal against the Line6 I was really surprised how similar both units sounded and how bad they sounded against the Marshall. And I thought to myself with my Kemper I never experience such big differences with profiles that I made from my own analog chains. I would like to have a small multi for practicing, rehearsals or small gigs. But another thing I notice about those boxes is that the more FX you stack, the more „digital“ the tones will sound. With my pedal board I am sometimes stacking 3x drive (tube drive into BigMuff into Fendery amp), sometimes with a compressor in front. Sounds georgeous in the analog domain, sounds artificial in BIAS FX, Helix or Axe... But when I take a profile of that chain with my Kemper, it is one digital sound it needs to reproduce and that seems to work better than one digital effect going into another digital effect going into another digital effect... So yeah, I am a Kemper fan :) But if I did not have my analog chain which I wanted to recreate digitally and if I would not work with complex FX chains, I would probably go with the FM3 or a small Helix :)
Hey Leo, very very Good Videos!!! Thank you so much for your hard work!!! ...is there a chance you could do some videos about profiling, especially if you find a way to get rid of the muddyness of the Kemper compared to the original? Regards :-)
Hi, thank you!!! Actually, I did a video about the Kemper profiling procedure, that you can check out here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nwfTSkk-d70.html Please, let me know if this is what you are looking for Thank you for your message!
I'm using a fantastic converter to monitor. In this video and your other video, the FM3 sounds bland, non-dynamic, non-harmonic, and slightly muddy. The Kemper sounds far better and much closer to the juicyness of the real Marshall. I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned, it's clear as day here. Great video nonetheless, really enjoyed it.
I have and tried all of them and Kemepr Stage won so far as real amp sound on stage with real band situation hands down.. I'm happy with it and this surprices me cause I'm long time tube amps user.. But it works and is small and easy to fly etc.. Good job Mr, Kemper ! Tried FM3 lately but on real stage its for now so far eway from real tube amp sound, comparing to Kemper (I made my own profiles of Victory Super Kraken and my Friedman BE Deluxe and that alone is amazing ! ) Nuddling in home at my studio FM3 sounded, nice but not with my band behind me..
which one FEELS more like playing a traditional amp? All of the modelers and kemper etc sound great but which one FEELS the best? When you have that really responsive feel, like you are more connected to your guitar, it increases inspiration greatly. your opinion please? including mooer ge300 and helix etc. I would really appreciate your opinion. I watch your videos all the time! thank you!
Hi, this is a very hard question to answer, as the FEEL is pretty personal personal (in my opinion) and it's hard to give an unbiased opinion. I'm trying to find a way to give an opinion based of fact, like for instance the management of the dynamic range of your playing, how the modeler cleans up or breack up according to your touch, etc.... I'm working on some videos about this topic... Sorry if I'm not answering right now, but I need time and some more experimentation ... Thank you for following my channel, I really appreciate it!!!
@@LeoGibsonGtr First of all, thank you for giving me a thoughtful reply. : ) By feel, I mean lack of latency, the same connection you feel with a tube amp. I'll give an example. I remember being excited to try out the Headrush at the local guitar store. It was plugged into a super reverb reissue. probably not the best test but that was how it was set up. I really hated the feel . There was a disconnect - I guess it was some degree of latency. It felt flat and although the tones were okay and even though I was playing through a tube amp, it just was very disappointing. I then plugged the same guitar into a Marshall DLC 40c - and amp I had heard good things about but with which I was not familiar. Felt fantastic. the guitar sang and I was very "connected" to the instrument. It's probably a combination of very slight latency and harmonic overtones? Just guessing because I can't explain it much better. Another example is playing through a Katana 50. Very very tight response. Almost too immediate - no sag feeling. Still, I liked the feel better than the Headrush. But for some reason, no guitar stores near me seem to want to set up any of the high end modelers/kemper etc effectively - which I really don't understand - seems like a very obvious thing to do. run them into a FRFR cab etc. I'm not sure because I have no experience actually being able to play through such a rig. And I obviously don't have the money to just buy on a whim. That is why I ask these questions. I am glad you are working on videos to address this. you are providing such a helpful service. thank you again!
Got to try it yourself... headrush is not in the same league as these units. Problem with most digital tech is how you set it up.. including what cab, PA or direct out options you choose will result in a different experiences. Also wanted to mention some amp parameters like sag is a configurable parameter.
@@kenmasters007 believe me, I would if I could. I would pay just to go somewhere where they were set up well with different options and try them. Relying on videos only is very frustrating despite my gratitude for their existence. Why music stores don't do this beyond me. They used to many years ago. Big ol racks stuffed with gear and switching units for easy comparison.
In a mix it was really hard to tell which was which. However, once the band was gone... I'll take the plexi. But then, I want a vox. And then a princeton. And then a blues jr. And a two rock... maybe I'll stick with a profiler.
The downside of this is that many Kemper profiles are not very good, so you would have to find the very best one to provide a head to head comparison to the FM3
You really can’t go wrong with either of these units. Before I invest in another modeler, I’m going to wait to see what you think of the Neural DSP Quad Cortex when it comes out later in the year.
Both units are great but are out of my price budget. Are your going to do a comparison with the Mooer products? How does the Synth of the GE300 compare to the FM3 Synth?
Hi John, I'm working on other comparison videos...maybe I will do also a comparison with Mooer. I've not compared the synth and actually I'm not using them too much....I will check them out! Thank you for your message!
Thank you for sharing!!! I'm in the waiting list for the FM9 since a long time...they just email me telling me that because of the chip shortage they are delaying ... I hope they are gonna solve their problems.. Thank you!
Hi, thank you for letting me know!!! Actually I didn't expect such an high appreciation of this song...I'm working on a longer version...I'll keep you informed...thank you once more!
Hi, just to inform you that I've uploaded an extended version of the demo song here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2_YtxedSW1M.html Thank you for your suggestion!
Hi Leo.. I need your preference.. I just have my money around $1.700 USD for buy best one of them. Which one should I buy, Kemper rack profiler (Used condition) or Fractal FM3 (without foot controller) ? For sure best powerful unit for all situation.
Hi, I think it depends. If you want a simpler unit, with the possibility to profile amp, and you are not an effect geek (for instance you are not into highly complicated effects chain): go with the Kemper. If you like to explore, to dig parameter, to tweak knobs, learning how an amp deeply work and you also an effect geek, that build complex effect signal chain: go with the FM3. They are both great units and you can obtain great tones with both of them. Thank you for your message!
Hey Leo, I just found your channel a few weeks ago and it’s awesome man!! I’m looking to upgrade from my mooer ge 200, and wanted to get your opinion on what might be a good option. I play a lot of reggae inspired songs, so I’m looking for a unit that has a good variety of clean, chimey, spacey, and dreamy tones. Having a drum machine would be nice, but I suppose it’s not crucial. And looking for 4 or 5 foot switches Been looking at the various units you review like boss gt 1000, headrush, etc. but finding it difficult to choose. Thanks for your time!
Hi, if money are not an issue I would go with the Fractal FM3 + midi pedalboard. Otherwise, all the other options you have mentioned are fine. I would consider also the Mooer GE 300 lite (if you don't need an exp pedal) or the GE 300 if you need exp pedal. Thank you for your message and for following the channel! I would appreciate if you will tell us your final decision and why...I think it's gonna be interesting for other guitarists!
In this comparison I liked Fractal the most, Great but Ima buy the Fm9. Just think the Fm9 should have tone capture, I think the technology is going far and the tone match is a feature I think every model should own !!
@@LeoGibsonGtr ı mean i have a looper rc505 looking for a good multi effects pedal, for example mod duo x, line 6 helix, tc helicon voicelive 3 extreme or mooer ge 300, sy300
Finally someone comparing them who can actually play! That was beautiful! But they still sound fake, unfortunately. Not that much better than a crappy boss pedal, in my opinion.
Hi Leo, great comparison, I don’t own any of them, however by my listening to both of them -in your review and other reviews- I got the conclusion that even though the FM3 have more options but I see the Kemper has more dynamic and responsive tone, this is a really serious point that was not considered in the comparison, what do you think?
Hi, thank you! Well, it's very difficult to give an unbiased answer as the feel and dynamic of a unit is a very personal experience and may vary depending on amp and cab chosen..this is the reason why I tend not to evaluate the feel and dynamic... I think both the units are just fine and I would not have any problem in playing live with any of the two. Maybe in the future I will do a video about this topic...as it is pretty interesting even if really subjective! Thank you for your question and for the appreciation of the video: it's really important for me!!!
Hi Leo, thank you for your wonderful videos...I'd like to know if your songs were recorded DI or did you mic an amp (and if so, what mic and amp did you use)? If DI, then omg I have to get one of these babies (probably the FM3). Thank you so much!
Hi, the real marshal has been recorder with a real cab, two mics (an sm 57 and a Royer 121), with two mic preamps into my Apollo x 16. Both the FM 3 and the Kemper Stage have been recorded via their XLR output into the Apollo. Thank your message and your appreciation of the videos!!!
Hi Ricky, thank you so much for letting me know...Isole is a pretty old song...I'm really happy that you like these songs!!! ...currently I'm using the majority of the musical ideas for the gear review....Maybe I will upload more songs in the future...
It appears to me that the only reason to choose Kemper over Fractal is for a (fairly wealthy) touring musician who has a collection of amps that they could profile and all the foot controls. As for sound, I cannot choose one over the other as they are both top of the market. Thanks for another great analysis.
Hi, it is the nut...honestly I like it...it gives a good vibe and touch to the tune...like when you hear tha hands moving in an acustic guitar. Thank you for your message!
Bravo Leo, il video mi è piaciuto molto!!! Non conoscevo il tuo canale e devo farti i complimenti davvero! Onestamente, da quello che hanno ascoltato le mie orecchie nei vari video, sui suoni clean ed overdrive/mid crunch il Kemper mi da più la sensazione di suonare un ampli a valvole, mentre sui crunch più spinti e sui lead high gain la FM3 mi soddisfa di più. Soprattutto sui suoni a più alto gain il Kemper sembra diventare più secco e freddo nei toni. Ho avuto la giusta sensazione, oppure è solo una questione legata alla profilazione?...purtroppo non li ho mai provati di persona e non saprei che sensazione danno sotto le dita...grazie in anticipo 👍
Ciao, grazie mille, sono felice che il video ed il canale ti siano piaciuti! In generale io trovo a volte il Kemper un pò più pesante sulle medio basse, mentre l'FM più piacevole sulle alte...ma non vorrei generalizzare. Entrambi devo dire mi piacciono sotto le dita. Per me la più grande differenza sta nel fatto che l'FM3 è il paradiso dei "sperimentatori"...hai tantissimi parametri da poter modificare e tanti ampli con cui giocare...è una palestra per imparare come funzionano gli ampli. Il Kemper è meno "sperimentale"...non hai tanti parametri quanti l'FM3... Ovviamente questa è un'opinione totalmente personale. Grazie!
@@LeoGibsonGtr grazie a te, quindi mi pare di capire che entrambi danno alla pari la sensazione di suonare con un ampli analogico, non esiste un vincitore tra i due sotto questo aspetto, corretto? Devo provarli e scegliere quello che soddisfa al meglio le mie esigenze
