Friend’s Mom Signed Off on Tattoo for Teen! | Part 2 

Seems like the Plaintiff doesn’t want to parent her children. That’s what happens when you pawn your kid off on someone else.

Lol right

sure. keep your kids in your house too.

@@nanjones3973no fr. How is everybody missing that. She pushed her kid on someone else. She was there for two months lol

@@HoneyBee0219 While the lady was heavily medicated 🤦🏻

Yes, heavily drugged. Pfffft.

And letting a minor drive her car 🤬

​@@elliebellie7816defendant appeared to still be on some type of medication. Some Dr's over prescribe meds.

You see Your Honour, I was so high on drugs that I had to let a 13yo drive the car to get her tattoo done where I pretended to be her mother and illegally signed a bunch of forms. So....do I win now? 🤣

She did 😂😂😂😂😂

Amen! 💯💯💯💯

Be both!

@@DyNaStYCaRl There's the correct answer! That's what you need to do in 21st century.

AMEN!!!

AMEN 🙌🏽

BOTH the plaintiff and defendant are completely irresponsible!

@@jasonrodgers9063 Its the parent's job to raise and monitor who their children spend time with. The plaintiff let the defendant raise her kid for two weeks, while she was at home unemployed.

@@syckles That's why they said BOTH genius. Because what adult in their right mind would ever sign for someone else's child to get a tattoo and piercing? That is text book irresponsible. You cannot give her a pass just because the plaintiff is also a failing parent and adult. Two dumbos don't make a genius.

Absolutely 💯

@@elvickRULES You got any words in your vocabulary besides genius, genius?

I don’t know if she’s the “cool” mom. I think she’s the “out of it” mom. She couldn’t even remember part of the things JJ was asking her. The tattoo artist remembered everything exactly😂

​@texasplayboy23 She remembered everything, I assure you. She was definitely one of the moms trying to be "cool". I had one and knew others as a kid. That lady smokes weed and drinks with kids. Don't let the haircut, glasses and vest fool you.

She acted lime it was totally normal to be for her 13 yeaol old to be driving. Could you imagine what a cop would say with the mother in the back seat??? This could have ended a lot worse than a tattoo

Her mother isn't any better letting her live with a stranger for almost 2 months without even speaking to them 🤦

@Frosty0762 It was 2 weeks and she said she talked to her every day

This is from like 30 years ago. lol

The daughter had a look, a demeanor, that indicates she would have some issues around men.

This is almost three decades ago. I'm sure they've settled into their way.

She's probably long dead, by this point.

She's fresh out of rehab by now.

She is not fit to be a parent. The Plaintiff is also irresponsible for letting her 13 year old daughter go live in so stranger's house for weeks.

Defendant doesnt know what planet shes on lol

Too bad there's not a where are they now update... The 14yo looks like 18yo.. Tattoo man is zeroing in on the 14yo

iykeharrison9161: that's what I was thinking as well. The plaintiff says that the defendant is a drug addict, yet she allowed her barely-teenage daughter to live there for two weeks? (Not buying the two months) Let's see, during that time she got to drive a car (with an adult who was under the influence), got a belly button piercing, and a tattoo. Makes me wonder what else she tried while there...weed? Alcohol?

I hope there was also a criminal case filed for child endangerment for allowing a 13 year old to drive.

The daughter might not want it removed, but you can bet your boots that the mother wants it gone.

@@artistjohshe should’ve been at home with her mother. Not with strangers. Mother’s judgment is flawed

⁠@@HoneyBee0219come on really?? Whoever thinks a child should get a tattoo & piercing has the flawed judgement.

That’s exactly what I thought. It was all over her face. She was trying not to smile… “yeah, ok!! 👌🏻 “ didn’t buy it.

Exactly

This is from the 1990s! Those girls would be adults by now... 🙄

CPS is so dangerous. The outfits tell me this is about 1996. These girls are 40 today.

Absolutely

That's what I thought was the norm, that you have to be 18 to get one independently or 16 with parental consent.

But this was back in the day

Yep.

Here in Australia it's against the law to tattoo anyone under 18 years of age. It's also illegal to tattoo anyone who is intoxicated.

Not where I'm from. I got 2 tattoos when I was 16 without any adult's permission. I did have to wait til I was 21 for piercings though.

Yoooo😂😂😂😂 I screamed not fighting for 1st place

The defendant clearly is dealing with some mental health issues. She still appears in a fog. Some medications will do that. Thank God, she's not driving, but allowing her 13 yr old to drive is another bad idea.

Darwin awards aren’t solely for stupidity, one has to remove themselves from the gene pool and she already has a daughter.

​@@HelenByrd-yf9cfThat's so cute that you are buying into her charade. The defendant abuses drugs and alcohol and let's her child and her friends do whatever they want. She is in disguise, not a victim

😂😂😂

Agree, and I still think the adult who lied and who allowed a 13 year old to drive is more at fault in this case.

@@justcogitating Me too. That little girl's brain won't be fully developed until her mid-twenties and she was under the defendant's care. If responsibility should be shared, it should have been $2,000 from the adult fraudulent defendant and $1,000 from the plaintiff; not the other way around.

I really thought she was going to split it down the the middle and do $1,500 each or $2000 defendant, $1000 plaintiff. I was a bit surprised.

😂 I kept waiting for her to say that!

I'd be so roasted by JJ... I'm a very (too much) respectful person, but any time I have to think (for example, to explain something that happened to me), I cross my arms. x)

😂😂😂😂😂😂

100% correct

Both mothers are irresponsible

@@iykeharrison9161 agree 💯

That’s why her daughter looks like TROUBLE

Which one the blonde one or the brunette?

@@arioniscool both

I wanted that so badly!

😁

Me too!!!!

One of them had been taught a good lesson: she's responsible of her action. So, it surely helped her to become a good person. :) And her friend might have had a 2nd hand good lesson too.

Exactly. At least they could send the check straight to the clinic where the removal would be done.

Because?

Agreed. Minors cannot make contracts legally.

And that’s why you’re not a judge 😂 no one should listen to you

Right, that lady that gave the consent should take full responsibility for the removal of that tattoo. In fact, if I was the mom I would have even made a police report that she fraudulently signed a document pretending to me my daughter's mom. The girl Crissy I agree should get some sort of punishment from the mom for her disobedience, but that tattoo would not have been on her no matter how much she begged and begged if that lady didn't sign the consent form.

This case would have been influenced by the Gillick principle. Even though not an adult, a child who is sufficiently competent and understands the procedure can consent, even if it is contrary to the parent's wishes.

I Agree applying Gillick in this USA case if she was 15 and wanted to secretly have intercourse with her 15 yo BF and she didn't want to get Pregnant and asked her Dr. for a Birth Control Pill Prescription and she wasn't Catholic... Gillick refers to Medical procedures and I can't Associate Tattoo as a Medical Thing a ma jiggy 🤕

Nah you’re off base. The girl is immature of course, but she admitted herself that she knew EXACTLY what she was doing, and what the friends mother was doing when she lied about being their mom and signed a consent form.

Well 13 year olds can get your parents sent to Jail nowadays for calling them with the wrong "pronoun". Also just because someone is incapable of good judgement does not relieve them of responsibility completely. And that's exactly how Judge Judy meted the punishment... A third, a third, a third.

Yea I caught on to that too

💯

I mean she was 14 then…most 14 year olds need to mature…

No?

Well she’s 44 now?

This is a TV show, not a real court 🙄

And yet they can go and get their twigs/berries & bits/bobs cut off without consent 🤔 work that out

Yeah, many teens lie to get away with stuff like this. It really should've leaned the other way with the defendant paying the majority and the 14-year old girl paying a reasonable amount where her mother wouldn't have to more likely than not pick up the majority of the bill if she really wanted the 14-year old girl herself to pay for it. It's not like the lady was signing a consent form for her to go on a school field trip while the parents were out of town. She signed for a permanent tattoo. Wild that JJ didn't slam the defendant with at least $1500 if not $2500 where it might actually be realistic that the plaintiff's daughter could actually earn enough babysitting to get it removed.

Butterfly or a rose. But probably a 🦋

❤

☠️ 👈🏻 This comes to mind

That's what I was going to say​@@brocktoon8

​@@Trapper_Creek_2024 😆

No it doesn't. Production costs are budgeted for the show. There's already money in that "cookie jar" - owned by CBS. It's not like JJ would get what's left over at the end of the day.

@@wintercame Ultimately it does. do the math. If her budget is too high by awarding too much over time, guess what happens?

@@VisualizeHealing Now you've got me chuckling. A couple thousand bucks from the production budget when they are paying Sheindlin $47 million a year? That amounts to 4/ one hundredths of a percent!! Numerically it's 0.00425%. That's the math, you're welcome. 😅

Lolll she gets paid by contract you muppet. Just because you don’t agree means you go and slander someone with zero evidence? Shame on you

Definitely not true. I'm a millenial like the girl in this video and my students these days are gen z and they are very responsible. I think it is just the history of humanity that older generations dump on younger ones. It's always been that way and always will. Every generation has responsible and irresponsible people in it.

@@justinenicole3926 I meant that everyone who appears on JJ/courtrooms one generation later (as in 2024) NEVER admit to being wrong. Even when the evidence is overwhelming. It is ALWAYS someone elses fault, and they ALWAYS have a lame excuse/story. But 30 years ago, at least a few of the people in the courtroom had some basic common sense.

right?! I thought she was a bit nicer in her older episodes!

Nope, she shouldn't have kids if she is going to pawn them off for weeks at a time with some strung out stranger.

She paid a third.

No. Kid is 14, lied outright to the defendant. Deserves 1/2 responsibility. Actions have consequences.

You do know that no one pays anything on this TV SHOW, right?

Kids aren't held responsible for anything anymore.

@citytrees1752 I don't think you understand how the developing brain works. Your brain is constantly going through changes and it doesn't stop until you're around 25. They can't make permanent decisions like this. Little stuff that doesn't matter, absolutely yes, hold them accountable, but for the big adult stuff like tattoos and 2k in fines, no, that's adult stuff.

Yes, the 13-year-old should get some responsibility. Like being grounded, or do community service, or get taken away something major that she likes, but that lady should have paid the 3K because she impersonates that child's mother. That tattoo would have not been there no matter how much that 13-year-old wanted it if that lady didn't sign the consent form.

How many 14 yo teens do you know that make smart, mature, rational decisions? I'll wait.