FSR 3 Console Frame-Gen Tested... And It Works! 

Thanks bro. We appreciate follow game players like you 👍

​@@MrInuhanyou123quiet console peasant

Given that a lot of developers focus is on consoles if consoles do embrace this wholesale it will just mean that PC implementations will broadly improve as well I think.

Not true. This helps for games that are gpu limited. Cpu limited games it does not work. FFXVI is cpu limited as hell and is already using FSR, but can't hold 60fps at 720p.

@@ImGonnaFudgeThatFish incorrect, this especially helps for cpu limited games like ms flightsimulator

​@@ImGonnaFudgeThatFishFSR and frame gen are different things. This could help a lot of games that have quality modes that run around 40~50 fps when unlocked achieving 60+ fps.

@@ImGonnaFudgeThatFish Literally the opposite is true. Frame Gen is done on the GPU, it works best in CPU limited games.

@@TheGreatBenjie not if your cpu limits at 35 fps

He just got an email from the postal service that they dropped his 'New in Box' Sony FW900 off the back of the truck. It is now an ex-monitor.

@@TransoceanicOutreachfor real!? That’s disgusting, I hope they paid him back for that.

You wont get them until it’s too late

Yes!

Probably a few added milliseconds of latency

In my experience for frame GEN on PC it’s negligible

John said he didn't even feel it

Are you sure only up to 80fps? I played this on PS5 and I even get above 100fps sometimes

@@Sejuani89 Dont really care at all ,,as long as it's over 60fps ,,im good 👍🏽

You can clearly see it goes over 100fps in section on the series X he stated 75% FPS increase on average lol

It does. But the biggest problem is still that recurring microstutter. Not sure if Respawn will ever address it.

Im playing on performance mode and havnt noticed any micro stutter. Im towards the end too.

It does? Its been pretty stable after the performance update

​@@SamBlipsConsidering their track record they won't, respawn just sucks at optimizing their own games now which is funny considering how smooth Titanfall 2 ran

does it? maybe for pc, at console worked pretty fine at my series s.

Yes that is the plan. With PS5 PRO coming up late this year maybe, it will be even better because you can render 60fps natively on a more powerful console. Regardless. This will hopefully get rid of the 4K native locked 30fps "quality" modes that has been implemented in many AAA games today. They just need to ix the artifacts which I am sure they will

@@TheEdmaster87 I figured the pro might have something to do with it. But considering how the base ps5 can utilize FG, hopefully more games will take advantage of it soon enough, rather than just wait for the pro.

@@BigJugsRule92 Yes. FSR3 works better the higher base fps there is, it also minimizes the artifacts seen. So a PS5 Pro will have enough GPU power to render st least 60fps. But even the base PS5 today can actually render 60fps using AI upscaling like DLSS, then use FSR3 to double the frames enabling 120fps upscaled to 4k without image loss. So the devs need to update this. Also Sony is working on their own upscaling technology but we wont see it this year. But we will see more FSR3 supported games, just like we have on PC. And frankly speaking this is better than checkerboarding rendering Sony has been instructing developers to use on PS4 and PS5 lately. So its about time this comes to the consoles too. I am sick and tired of those 30fps locked AAA games when I know they can unlock it, AI upscale it which will give it more frames, then use FSR3 to double the frames. Of course this will not be native 4k but 1200,1440,1600p upscaled to 4k without noticing image quality loss but also having fps to 120 potentially will be a total game changer for consoles as it has been for PC users for the last years.

@@TheEdmaster87 thanks for the clarification!, it definitely helped wake my brain up this morning lol. I don’t really care about the ps5 pro and Sonys own upscaling tech, considering it’s a ways off. I just simply want this new tech to start rolling out to existing games, as well as ones scheduled to release this year. I’m ok with upscaled 4K. I already know it’s gonna look good in clarity with the higher fps, compared to how choppy a native 4K game looks that’s locked in 3”fps, which I think it’s a crime to only have that option. Etc- most Xbox games now.

I wouldn't be surprised if they used it on PS4 to try and get 30FPS games to 60, and drag out that generation even further.

Unlike VR headsets, TVs and monitors need to account for any number of viewers looking at any spot on the screen simultaneously. Especially for recorded videos going out to a wide audience.

We have that already. It's Variable rate shading, and the implementation this generation has been mediocre at best.

100% agree, VR is sick, and i honestly can’t wait until sets like the bigscreen beyond become the normal.

XD

Many hardly do anymore regardless

Lol

Games are usually built around consoles first unless it was on pc first… that’s the whole point of dev kits… lots of games are held back by this

I thought framegen would be shit, but I've been using it quite a lot to compensate for my weak CPU and for me it's working great in terms of input latency, as long as the base framerate is at least 40-45 FPS. Of course it's not good for competitive FPS, but I play most games with a gamepad and it doesn't bother me nearly as much as I thought.

Frame gen is not on consoles sdk so games with it will be exception.

@@user-qg7oq6qw5c that will change. This is the first game to use it, more will come.

@@user-qg7oq6qw5c that will change. This is the first game to use it, more will come.

@@andyward8430 I dont think so. Devs now must work really hard to port framegen from pc. Fo some tech reason its hard to port tech from pc sdk to consoles sdk.

@@user-qg7oq6qw5c this isn’t a pc exclusive feature anymore. This IS the official amd fsr3 frame gen that is now available for console. Developers aren’t porting over a pc feature. It was announced months ago for console and this is just the first game to implement it. It isn’t like ascendant are some technical wizards that hacked a non compatible feature into their console versions of the game. It is supported on console the same way fsr2 is. It will take time before more games use it but if this studio can use it there are plenty others that will as well.

FG no funciona bien con vsync...

errr....

Its doesnt come often on my ps5 and it doesnt bother me. The increased fluidity weighs more than the minor hiccups

Nah

Both of those games look so awful in performance mode. I am really surprised both the new big budget FF games have so many graphical problems.

@@redfoxsports4749 doesnt fsr help to improve image quality and framerates?

@@cured_bacon647 Yes they do. Performance mode looks like shit.

​@@cured_bacon647 u played ff16 glichy has hell

AMD wants FSR to be pushed more.

Checkerboarding only managed to look good because it was upscaling from high resolution ( ex 1800p) to 4k otherwise it's far more flawed than fsr and it is worse at lower resolution than fsr

PS4 Pro used checkerboarding where as the Xbox One X was often a native resolution of 1800p-2160p we were genuinely getting games running at or near 4K at medium to high settings on Xbox One X where as now we are getting high settings at 1080p-1440p on Series X and PS5

@@AzaiaMonota Some games are upscaling from 720p or lower 💀(Immortals is one of them I think...)

Checkboard rendering is crap

I suspect it would need to be at least 40fps minimum pretty consistently for FSR3 to be feasible. In Immortals I've noticed that there does appear to be some visible artifacting (could also be that I was actively seeking it out which might bias things) when the underlying framerate dips (cutscenes and particle heavy moments in particular). DD2 can barely hold 30 in its current state so FSR3 would probably make things worse. Though overall I was still super impressed with the implementation in Immortals.

Dragons dogma, yes.

Can it be applied to those games?

Just download the latest update, then frame generation can be toggled in the graphics menu.

​@@ignaciojaramillo6232in game or console?

Frame gen is on both consoles.

You have no clue what you're talking about. Any system can use FSR + Frame Generation since it's software-based technology. Do some basic research

The Pro will still have ML based upscaler and 3x RT that your console won't. Cry and get over it.

@@RandomGamingMoments925 Being that I play PC more often than my XBOX Sony is still crap compared to that lol

FSR3 works on PS5 too, dmbass

Im already getting between 80-120 fps with vrr on starfield on series x. All they need to do is fix the fps in 2 of the cities in the game honestly

@@duppypixels Indoor areas can hit 100+ fps on Performance mode. Visuals mode not at all. It is mostly at or below 60 except for indoor areas reaching 70-80 fps. Frame Gen would help a lot.

Interesting. I have a C2, but I'll take the extra frames to use that 120Hz screen

I have my PC hooked up to the C3 and since I only have a 3060 T.I, I use the interporlation option on the TV to reach 120 hz. Then Upscale to 4K from 1440p using N.I.S It looks beautiful without any noticeable artifacts. It's nearly identical to native 4K 120hz Only downside is that TV won't allow any interporlation if the system is on PC mode. And if you turn on Gsync and VRR it'll automatically put into PC mode. I tried Gsync though and I wasnt impressed. The TV's interporlation looked way better.

lol no it doesn’t run better than the two better machines

@@cured_bacon647 It could be better than PS5, not series X. PS5 has major issues with this technology.

​​@@neilwilson5785Major issues? Lmao. Im playing this game now on ps5 and it felt super smooth without any noticeable downside. With average framerate 80-100 fps. Ignorant!

It's running better than the X and PS5 due at low res and settings

Good point. 60fps will be possible with FSR3. If not at launch, maybe a few months later.

I think GTA will still be 30fps due to cpu limitations

Hmm probably not. First of all it's Rockstar, they'll want some margin for the inevitable PS6 enhanced version to make it feel like a big step. Plus, I think it has issues when trying to generate frames from 30fps targets. Works better 60 and upward.

@@LouSassol69er ps5 version will be 40fps with frame gen,thats around 80-90fps

@@RonniSchmidt-mi7pd that's a bit optimistic. I don't think so. Not with global illumination and ray tracing present from the trailer. 30fps it will be.

Yes it works on PS5 too

Yeah it’s on PS5 also. That means AMD must have came up with a work around for the DX frame generation since PS5 doesn’t support DX. My guess is they or maybe Epic UE5 uses an api to mimic DX for Sonys machine. There is more than likely some downside for the ps5 because it doesn’t support DX in hardware but maybe only like 10% performance hit compared to PC and Xbox.

@@Whoozurdaddy Dont say bulshit. Fsr 2 upsampling is on ps5 sdk not different than on series x.

Switch2 meets the system requirements for FSR3. On the contrary, with the advent of FSR3.1, upscaling can use frame generation without changing DLSS. I can't use DLSS3 because of stupid Nvidia though.

Maybe for a lot of games yes but for beat aaa titles don't thinks so they just do more good stuff with frame gen

Pc gaming lingo at the hands of the masses = regarded conversions.

Did you not watch the video? Game has to hit 60 for frame gen to even work

You need a crappy underpiwer ps5 crap to has what we already has on xbox, what a shame

Bait

​@@acevedoaandres Forgotten our meds today, have we? The PS5 already trades blows with the Series X "The MooSt PoWeRfUul ConSul". The Pro will obliterate the X. Dead console and dying platform.

@@acevedoaandres Dude... get help.

from df????😅😅😅

He had good reason for not thinking it would work lol, no reason to hate on Alex.

@@redfoxsports4749 If the reason was real, it wouldn't had worked now. So no good reason. He just despise consoles.

@@CrashBashL Sounds like you are using personal bias against him rather than logic. He does not hate consoles he just has a realistic mind set of them being pretty limited hardware which they very much are. There is a reason a TON of ppl didn't think frame gen would work well on consoles, not just alex. You are just hating on him b/c you think he hates a plastic box that you like.

@@redfoxsports4749 True. He hates them. He has woke ideology, and is on Nvidia's payroll. Anything else you want to know about him?

@@CrashBashL LOL oh good lord... just realized who I'm talking to. Silly me...

Is it something that I have to enable in the settings or is it automatically on?

Funny you say that when... it didn't work. Like, it literally wasn't working. Turning it on did nothing, and I don't know if they already fixed that.

Ok 20 years ago is a bit far haha, but I’m with you on all the fake stuff and lack of optimization. It does need to improve.

Only 4k with quality dlss I find. Acceptable otherwise it is so bad

@@ottomaticallyawesome Over 20 years ago I was playing on PC on a View Sonic A70 with a resolution of 1280x1024 and games looked crystal clear on it some games on consoles these days are dropping below that resolution and are using blurry textures and effects that make it hard to see we were genuinely getting a sharper and clearer image over 20 years ago

@@AzaiaMonota well we’re talking about consoles here. Sure a PC will do better, but the video and my comment were talking about consoles.

@@ottomaticallyawesome Yeah but when we are talking about PC from 20+ years ago to current gen consoles it should be of no contest for the console to come out on top in every possible aspect

Input lag isn’t noticeable with a controller? LMFAO!

@@cured_bacon647 that's not what I said. Thanks for trying

Because it's FSR 3, not DLSS 3. FSR 3 doesn't work that well with only 40 fps, but now we have this...

And still have a better price as any pre config pc.

@@Starfey Because PC sellers dont make money off games

But with completely different software that require games to sometimes be very different under the hood

@@Starfey Of course. Economies of scale... and subsidizing with software sales. Consoles will always be the better choice for someone who just wants convenience and plug-and-play, and doesn't need the best possible power. Same as PC will always be the better choice for those who want maximum power and freedom.

@@Starfey Not once you factor in paid online at which point you can build a PC 2X the power of the consoles for the same price

Like the remake station 5

Bait

​@@rerjr007Still more successful IPs and exclusives than the Lbox

@@RandomGamingMoments925 you sound like a moron. How can L station have more successful ip when Xbox own call of duty the biggest and most successful ip in the world. And Sony doesn’t have exclusives anymore everything day and date on pc

Just parroting the CPU nonsense like everyone else. Most games are GPU bound, and most games run at 60 or more fps just fine

@@RandomGamingMoments925 you got me there buddy 🦜🦜 pukawwwwwww

iirc the PS5 pro was designed for VR, where it is very much GPU bound.

@@Jaap-Relou You facepalm as if you just outsmarted Sony's engineers with no effort. You simply lack knowledge. The biggest bottleneck by far is the GPU. It would be great if you could upgrade both, but if you had to choose one, it absolutely makes no sense to upgrade the CPU over the GPU. And then there's backwards compatibility. The PS5 is using a custom Zen 2 chip. The only way to guarantee 100% backwards compatibility, is to use the same chip design but allow for higher clocks. However, the chip is running on 6 nm, so clocking it much higher, is not really possible. Adding more CPU cores would create thermal issues and not all games are programmed to take advantage of more CPU cores. However, it's very easy to make a game take better advantage of a faster GPU. Combined with better upscaling, I suspect all games will look 4K-ish with very little artifacts.

And ps5 will see nothing because the console is trash and they are trying to make it works like vrr that runs like a dream in xbox and ps5 vrr implementation is trash!

​@@acevedoaandresThe only trashing PS5 does is trashing the Series X when comparing exclusives, controllers, VR and performance.