Fuji XF 70-300mm vs. XF 100-400mm | Fujifilm Zoom Lens Showdown

Подписаться 2,8 тыс.

Просмотров 10 тыс.

50% 1

Are you a Fujifilm camera owner looking for the perfect zoom lens to capture stunning photographs and videos? Look no further! In this video, we'll be comparing two of the most popular zoom lenses from Fujifilm - the XF 70-300mm and the XF 100-400mm - to help you decide which one is right for you.
If you're a nature photographer or a wildlife enthusiast, you know how important it is to have a reliable zoom lens. The XF 70-300mm and XF 100-400mm are both great options, but they have their differences. In this video, we'll be taking a closer look at their features, specifications, and performance to give you an in-depth understanding of what each lens can do.
By the end of this video, you'll have a clear idea of which lens is best suited for your photography needs.
So, if you're ready to find out which Fujifilm zoom lens is right for you, hit that play button and let's get started with the XF 70-300mm vs. XF 100-400mm Fujifilm Zoom Lens Showdown! Don't forget to like and subscribe for more photography content.
✅ Website: www.stevemellor.com
✅ Instagram: / steve_mellor
✅ Facebook: / spmellorphot. .
✅ Twitter: / sp_mellor
#fujifilm #photography #zoomlens

Опубликовано:

21 мар 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 57

@barrymayes6712

Great review Steve. I’ve owned the 100-400, 55-200mm and immediately sold them when I got the amazing 70-300 which surpasses these other two lenses in all sorts of ways. I particularly like its portability and its lovely bokeh which is amazing considering it’s f5.6. Get the -xt5 and crop like crazy for super long shots!!

@lizgibson9897 Год назад

I'm happy to see your video! You've always provided great information that helped me when I first bought my XT-3.

@jasonf2252

Thanks so much for your terrific videos, and especially this one Steve. I am in the process of choosing between these two and this was a splendid comparison that showed what I was looking for. Keep up the great work.

@creativeliving3455

Thank you so much Steve, you read my mind and answered ALL my questions about these two (three) lenses. Much obliged! 😀

@DEKarting 9 часов назад

Hi Steve just wanted to say thanks for your videos around the Fuji lenses.

@giuseppegrimaldi19 Год назад

Great review !🙏

@CharlesFBI

Just found your channel through this video and I'm really liking it! And I tend to be a bit critical. No 1 minute intro with sleepy music or other pretentiousness, straight to the point and I love it. Your presentation and narration is also excellent and great information about the products themselves, that's what I'm here for! Every now and then you don't hesitate to press the subscribe button right away. Keep it up!

@rogermant5290

I have the 70-300 on an XT3 and its a lovely lens. Was going to hire a 100-400 for bird photography but the weight is putting me off. The 70-300 is so easy to use and as you mention is sharp. Thanks for the review.

@keithdavies7167 Год назад

Good to see you back Steve. I've been looking at the 100 to 400 2nd hand. However there is the Tamron 150 to 500 out there but that comes in at £1400 which is a bit beyond my budget so I'll stick with the Tamron 18 to 300 for the time being.

@laurelb8372

Am in same dilemma, having shoulder issues. My big FF camera & lens weighs over 2kg. Looked at M4/3 options, around 1700gr, then compare old Xt2 with 70-300+ 1.4tc, 1227gr. Interesting. Images hold up well with latter lens. Now wondering whether need newer Xt model but don’t like Xt5 due to noise & q menu. Hope the tendonitis eases soon, look after yourself and thanks for this video

@timnightingale4325 Год назад

I was just thinking I hadn't seen anything from you for a while and five minutes later you pop up with this. I don't have the 70 - 300 lens, but I do have both the 100 - 400 and 150 - 600mm lenses. I like the 100 - 400, it's my go to lens for travel and is good for wildlife and plenty of landscapes. The bigger lens is a handful and ot especially fast, but it is of course good for small birds or a distant fox or deer. Then again, it only just fits in my bag with one other small lens.

@simonandhelenb Год назад

I've got both lenses. When I switched to the 100-400 was the only really long option without looking at adapting glass from other manufacturers. I like it but the size and weight make it a bit of a PITA to carry round, especially if you're only carrying it on the off chance that you might need it rather than knowing you will (e.g. family days out). Plus the minimum focusing distance can be a challenge in some of the places you might want to use it.

@wildlifegoa Год назад

Thank you

@stephanjurgens3766

Hi Steve, I hope you will fully recover from the tendinitis conditions soon! Thanks for this review. I got bot the 70-300mm and the 100-400mm, mainly for surf photography. Not only does the extra reach matter in my case but the focus accuracy with the 100-400mm is really amazing. I hardly miss a shot even when I have to quickly zoom in or out, which is a well documented problem with the 70-300mm. For occasional sports photographers the 100-400mm might still be the best Fuji option as you can get used copies for 900-1000€. This actually made me decide to go with the Fuji lens as opposed to the new Sigma or Tamron options.

@dronephotoprint Год назад

I have the 70 -300 and have just bought the 100-400 arriving tomorrow so hoping it meets my expectations. I have both teleconverters although I almost despise the 2x. Where I live the marshes and rivers are wide open spaces. I have struggled sometimes to get tight enough on shy Herons which always lurk on the far shore. Even with 40Mp sensor the 70-300 is stretching a bit too far too often and I don't like it on my tripod (will mention more on that later).

@danielschmaderer Год назад

I’m going to defend the 100-400 on this one. If you add a 1.4x teleconverter, it’s extremely close to the 150-600 in focal length with a similar aperture as the 150-600. The 100-400 becomes a 140-560mm at f/6.3-8 which is 1/3 stop slower on the wide end. I fell the 100-400 isn’t worth swapping out for the 150-600 if reach is a question when a tele will get you very close, unless you need the extra 40mm for some reason.