Agree it should be loud and aggressive, but too much mud-slinging to the point that we look out of control. I thought Mehdi Hasan / Lowkey did have an assertive approach without the playground tactics.
Will talking about matches and a candle to rationalise the creation of an unlimited universe? And a PHD for this? Anything this complicated and convoluted to explain can't be the true religion.
Not a Muslim, will never be a Muslim, L Islam. But Mohammad Hijab’s tactic and explanation of his tactic during the Piers Morgan debate was nothing short of brilliant. It’s always nice to see people point out the fact that an ad hominem in of itself does not necessarily represent or negate one’s argument.
You are such a liar I watched these debates.you came off as an immature loudmouthed bullying bigot,you can bluff the idiots that follow you but not the others
