Full Interview With Mark Brnovich | The Problem With Jon Stewart | Apple TV+ 

Wow… thanks for the update! That’s a bummer

I think he had already withheld previous investigations that showed there had been no fraud.

SO Was OJ innocent? According to law yes he is.

@@ValentinaRacing1 wtf are you talking about. Irrelevant to this.

exactly !! Was OJ innocent?

AG Mark can not and will not break ranks with the standard Republican response, that being our election is not secure - so they can change the election laws to undemocraticaly suppress voting rights to unfairly favor their party.

This is nuts. Brnovich IS pushing back against election deniers Kari Lake and Mark Finchum in Arizona. Watch 60 minutes from last night.

To be fair, if I were an elected official and an interviewer asked me to call 70% of the voters crazy, I wouldn't either.

@@oldman_thompson Then you shouldn't have the job. Facts are facts, especially for an AG.

@@oldman_thompson 70% of republican voters is what he said. If that's even so pair that remaining 30% with a 100 % of everyone else then you have a win for dems tomorrow . Man I hope my math is right. lol

I am actually impressed by political culture in which such interviews can even exist. In my country, politicians would avoid such media as Dracula garlic. And if they were pressed like this, they would leave or unleashe bullshit you cannot even imagine. You can have tough and intelligent interview only if both parties are sane. Sadly, i do not see many sane people in politics. Would love to see John havin interview with Donald or Joe.

i wish more of the other networks and their esteemed anchors/journalists would hold feet to the fire

All without shouting and ad hominem attacks.

Problem is you have to be smart and you have to do your homework to pull an interview of this caliber. Too many in media are more concerned with looking good on camera and creating click-bait. They don't take time to do the grunt work of researching the issues as well as the guest they're interviewing so that all the bases are covered when they sit down to do the interview.

SO Was OJ innocent? According to law yes he is.

crazy that our country has existed for well over 200 years and perhaps the biggest threat to our democracy since its founding in the 1770s is these clowns rioting at the capitol and denying a peaceful transfer of power

SO Was OJ innocent? According to law yes he is.

I think it's so long as the lie benefits you what is the point of correcting it?

True, but it still doesn't mean the effort to convince someone of the falsehood is not essential, especially coming from Arizona's chief legal officer. He's knowingly spreading that lie to the people who are most receptive to hearing it, he's not challenging them or providing them with supporting evidence that is contradictory to their feelings. How long would Brnovich last as a prosecutor in a courtroom setting if he continually brought cases forward based on no evidence at all, just "feelings"? What's irritating to me is he's using a valid argument to scrutinize the results carefully for accuracy, but juicing the scant findings voter fraud to the nth degree, and suggesting to only a fraction of the audience that the lack of fraud must indicate a larger conspiracy of an effective coverup. We know there's no monsters under the bed, and so does he, but he keeps putting that fear in the mind of the kid sleeping in that bedroom that there *might* be something he missed, and it's good that the kid sleep with a baseball bat next to the headboard "just in case".

@@fruitsyfarms5115 so you're equating Jan6 to what on the dem side in your opinion 🤔

EXACTLY

@@randominternetuser2888 fiery but mostly peaceful protests

Jon is the master at that

I wish this were the case. But unlike Jon, those reporters have to worry about being fired from the corporate overlords. Jon is doing his own show and thing. I say that to say this, more reporters would dig in if given the long leash or true freedom to dig in on their questions and follow ups.

@@Blackronin357 apple isn't a corporation? Nice conspiratorial thinking you got 👍

I totally agree. However, I think mainstream journalists are stuck at not trying to be to overtly partisan. While it clear to the majority, at least on this issue of election fraud, that it is totally one sided, if they push too hard, they might loose the folks that they really need to get to. Yes, I think it sad that we have to gentally give folks information so not to upset them or hardening their view, but we have to try. If we stop trying, it will only lead to violent to resolve these matters.

@@randominternetuser2888 I understand where blackronoin357 is coming from. But reporters need to take a stand too. The corporate media is messed up and cannot be trusted.

John is the goat ... been loving him since he obliterated Carlson on crossfire and Bill Oreilly on the factor

That's because he spews nothing but fallacy. He most certainly edits these videos too, to make people look dumb.

@@anthonycadena8947 Did you just say that Jon "spews fallacy"? Such as?

⁠​⁠@@anthonycadena8947it has been 5 months, answer@eberkovich.

Your paranoia got you? @@anthonycadena8947

Cuz he is all those things while not allowing you to weasel around with your words or behavior. Not you obvs but you know what I mean.

SO Was OJ innocent? According to law yes he is.

​​@@ValentinaRacing1what are you talking about? According to the law he is not guilty. For laymen i guess its the same but legally they have significant differences in meaning. Mainly being not guilty is simply stating the prosecution was unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. TLDR not guilty means even if you did it the prosecution cant meet the burden proof needed for a conviction. OJ still lost in civil court btw.

Yessss 😂

He's more than an interviewer. He's like batman in a cape.

Jon don't bs. He gets to the point and just destroys these idiots.

It's so sad that this is behind the paywall of apple tv+ and not on nationalTV

@@Mitsoxfan Exactly

Jon

@@r.p.mcmurphy6623 Thanks, my bad!

It's sad that the only guy we have who is bothering to stick his finger in the dike of our sinking, below-the-waterline country is Jon Stewart. Literally no one else is roaming around DC getting s**t done except one lone, semi-retired comedian. Ukrainians can probably relate.

@@btarczy5067 Fun fact: "Jon" is his correct name, but his close friends call him "John" 😀

@@gr8dvd Definitely why I wrote John, I just changed it so people won‘t be jealous 🌝

Professional bullshitter

I try to explain this to people. The problem is the average American is a lazy-thinking coddled imbecile.

And that's assuming that none of the election workers (who, I believe, are constituted in great part by volunteers!) have any scruples or any sense of what participating in electoral fraud would do to the country. As if that matters now, since it's apparently enough that somebody SAYS there was electoral fraud for all the frenzied imbeciles to start sending death threats.

We also just don't have fraud. We never really did.

​@Benedict Holland well...fraud exists just not at the extreme levels they keep touting.

@Michael out of the 87 million votes cast, less than 10 might have been fraudulent and nonaccidental. It's not an issue. We never really had fraud. We actually repected our elections, for the most part. It tuned out that voter rolls are a difficult system to abuse. Like, don't get technical here. We don't have fraud in our elections. When we start down the path of we have fraud in our elections it sounds like a Russian election were a president wins more votes than people in the country.

After 5 …yes I said 5 recounts…….

Unfortunately, most of the Trump supporters will not see this.

@@teresaamanfu7408 even if they do see it, they won't care. Most of them truly don't believe it, they just hate the perception of Democrats so much, they would rather destroy democracy than lose 4 years again.

It’s much easier to believe a lie that you want to be true than truth you don’t want to be true. I don’t know how we get passed this point in time. This time of broken logic.

I have a sibling who is still insisting that the fraudit found evidence of fraud because cyber ninjas couldn't verify 50,000 names because they were using a defunct system that not even state election offices use. But to my brother, it confirms the claims.

They wouldn't allow Jon's way of questioning in congressional hearings or whatever they're called...he'd be called for attacking character too much

SO Was OJ innocent? According to law yes he is.

...because corporate media sure as hell won't.

I'd prefer that Jon Stewart was a candidate. You might not like his views, but he's honest and can defend.

DeSantis will send Stewart to the closet to hide. That will be your next presidential election interview. But if Stewart could pull his head out of Biden’s ass and do an honest interview without a teleprompter that would be an interesting interview. Biden’s handlers would never let him interview him.

@@BTBEV3469 most of his views are fair and smart.

By not letting the interviewee finish a sentence?

@@stimproid Shady guys like that know how long the interview is and they know that if they can keep talking bullshit, they will run out the clock, John did exactly what a good interviewer should do, cut off the bullshitter.

@@thomasgriffiths6758 you nailed it man. I feel like people that used to watch Jon on the daily show for many years have been trained to see through the BS.

@@stimproid Yes. A good interviewer should redirect the answer once he hears the bs begin to flow. Half answers and deflections are how we have arrived where we now are and cannot be allowed to stand. Interesting how one of the best interviewers in the country began his career as a comedian...

@@stimproid No by calling out the hypocrisy and the bullshit.

💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

The word “patriot” is irretrievably sullied for me.

@@jennifer7685 Don't let the toxic win, don't let them take away what's important to you simply because they misrepresent the nature and meaning of those ideals, such as, supporting one's nation and it's success and any future progress i.e. patriotism. Just because they care more about culture wars, corporate greed, spreading hate, and divisive rhetoric more than any of those ideals, doesn't mean you should allow that level of ignorance sully something as concrete to a nation's success as genuine patriotism, because nationalism is not patriotism, and I'm assuming you're referring to those type of faux patriot nationalists who masquerade around as patriots.

He's just a smart guy. I think we need to let go of the idea that someone is a true patriot. Who decides what means? Each one of us has our own definition of that. No one gets to claim what a 'true patriot" is.

I'm imagining Jon and Marjorie TG. prob never happen at least .. not without a referee. 3 minute rounds. 3 round max. in Vegas on pay per view

I dislike the openly communist new left, but I don't call leftists names like magats. It is concerning that some so many on the left are so eager to dehumanize anyone who isn't pro communism. This has happened before, and more people died than the holocaust. I hope you have peace and joy in life. Please remember we are all humans. If the media wasn't so blatant in its lies, on left and right, maybe we would have peace. I'm a human, not a magat, even though I voted for the lesser evil in 2020.

We had a decade of the media saying elections weren't secure, but on this election, suddenly it's a big lie. Biden won, but Time published an article about a shadow cabal that "saved" the 2020 election. As a historically literate individual it's pretty sad to see my home country high-jacked by a political religion that has killed tens of millions of people in the last hundred years. China and Russia suffered greatly under communism. I truly hope that the suffering, that is coming to the west will bring you and many others to Christ. I had to suffer before I let Christ find me, so I get it. Now I see miracles and couldn't deny God if I tried. God bless you friend. I voted for Trump, but I'm a human, just like you.

@@travissharon1536 Do you genuinely not see the irony in calling us communists like some Mccarthy era stooge and, in the same breath, complaining that we use harsh words to describe you? You and your ilk have been referring to the left as the most heinous s***, including but not limited to: *Demons *Darksided *Pro-Murder *Baby killers *Degenerates *Groomers *Communists, etc. For decades now. Don't want to be called a magat? Maybe don't act like one.

@PoliticalAndTheologicalStudy I choose my words carefully. Maybe you are not a communist.... That said, Anti-racism, is literally Marxism with "whiteness" and "privilege' replacing capital. I am quite certain that neo-communism is the proper word. The media is also following Mao's playback to the letter. Again you may not be a communist, but I can't take you at your word, because critical theory(neo-marxist) writers and theorists condone bold lies in service of the revolution.

And unfortunately its working

They know they've long lost the popular majority. Dictatorship is the only way they see to keep their power.

Ikr? “If we don’t suppress voters and democratic bills; we won’t be the second most powerful voice in the nation and that’s not fair!” 🤪🤦‍♂️ it’s like people don’t actually believe in equality 🙁

I'm curious how are votes being suppressed in your country, in India it's through brutal murders, machetes, petrol bombs, etc. But not everywhere in India.

The conspiracy that the election was stolen and the conspiracy that suppression is based on racism are two side of the same wooden nickle. There is a voter apathy gap, where it takes more motivation to get Dems to vote. Since neither side will admit to this gap, they make up conspiracy theories. The GOP made up the fraud lie to make suppression palatable to their base. The Dems also made up the racism lie to make ease of voting more palatable to their base. I understand the idea that only people who care should vote, but I see no evidence that caring increases a voter's ability to pick the correct candidate.

Not Trump, his boss, the people of Arizona.

@@theBear89451 Then he’s pushing the “Big Lie” to his constituents unfortunately and he’s giving Trump supporters a reason to question the integrity of the voting process. That’s dangerous

Agreed. Others in the comments are saying he seems like a nice guy. He does. He appears reasonable, yet he can't say the election was legit while also saying they found only 20 cases of voter fraud. I don't care if the guy is so sweet that he bakes me a birthday cake, if he's willing to sell this country down the river for clout, he's the worst.

@@theBear89451 🤣LMAO GAWD you luv dropping those BS nuggets dont ya? 😂

It’s hilarious 😂

Same.

@@vishalvenkat6 Same squared

It is simple 2yrs later and 20 cases stop the bullshit Trump lost he KNEW he lost those enabling him are just as bad. The GOP and Republicans are so weak and afraid of a spoiled rich boy. Call out the bullshit

Yeah desperate

@@justjackie7272 We know so little about Kari Lake Who will be in her cabinet What will happen with mail in voting What will she do on so many important issues. But then another question showed up... We heard Lake voted for Obama was a Democrat and a reporter for 20yrs ... Did Kari Lake vote for Hillary and for that matter did she vote for Biden too... Does anyone recall her campaigning for Trump in 2020?

@@wkrp6886 We know she's crazy.

SO Was OJ innocent? According to law yes he is.

He is digging a hole he won't be able to climb out of. The truth always prevails

I think Jon could have let him finish one answer before objecting and throwing more questions at him. I love Jon, and I agree with him that what’s happening is crazy. But I also would have liked him to let Mark finish a few more of his sentences without interrupting.

@@l.w.4701 I think the job of the interviewer is to cut down on the BS. As long as Mark wasnt trying to serve BS, Jon would have been ok to let him answer freely.... but once the BS starts, yeah, its his job to cut that down.

@@l.w.4701 Mark throwing out useless statistics like "70% of GOP in Arizona think the election was stolen" to justify all the crap statements that he has and continues to perpetuate as the lead law enforcement official in Arizona is patently ridiculous. No, "People are not free to draw their own conclusions," when Brnovich is in a position to gather evidence and present conclusions to the public about the Big Lie. Is there any doubt that all of his hedging about the Big Lie is 99.99% politically motivated BS?

@@yanstev it just seemed to me (and I know I could be wrong - presenting my first reaction) with that being the case, to maintain the confidence of those saying “is this true?”, Mark may need to be able to document to them that due diligence was done on his part. Speaking as a person that believes those in power in the GOP are doing their utmost to deceive the voting public.

It is simple 2yrs later and 20 cases stop the bullshit Trump lost he KNEW he lost those enabling him are just as bad. The GOP and Republicans are so weak and afraid of a spoiled rich boy. Call out the bullshit

The Problem With Jon Stewart is that much like Colbert (but not quite to the same degree yet,) he became the very thing he was fighting against. The pinnacle of Stewart's career was perhaps his interview with Tucker Carlson. Tucker actually reflected on Jon's wise words from that interview and became a better person - to the point where he is now the very best and most honest and influential news peronality in the MSM. Jon, on the other hand, has devolved into just another partisan, jinogistic, war-mongering, shit-Lib. Shame. ...& the irony.

You do understand that mark Brunovich is actually pushing back against Kari Lake and mark Finchum in Arizona, right. Jon's interview completely misses the point. Watch 60 minutes from last night.

@@afshinshahzamani2297 All kinds of stupid there, but just the fact that you think TC has anything to do with news says it all.

@@afshinshahzamani2297 So Jon Stewart is partisan and a war monger(apparently you never watched the daily show in the early 2000's), but tucker carlson is a good honest journalist who is,"just asking questions that people are thinking." Just to be clear between stewart and carlson only one of them has ever had their lawyers fight all the way to the supreme court that it is unfair to hold them accountable for factual reporting because no logical person would listen to him and believe what he is saying? So tell me which of those two was it that asked for that to be found true in a court of law so that they could not be held liable for the hateful rhetoric that they spew on fox news on a daily basis. you should really just be quiet or try knowing what the fuck you are talking about with your remedial ass

It is simple 2yrs later and 20 cases stop the bullshit Trump lost he KNEW he lost those enabling him are just as bad. The GOP and Republicans are so weak and afraid of a spoiled rich boy. Call out the bullshit

EXACTLY!

This interview doesn't accurately portray the fact that Brnovich is pushing back against Kari Lake and Mark Finchum in Arizona.

Wish granted!

He said it twice during this video like us tax payers are all supporting beliefs over actual law enforcement and officials that are doing their job with competence and professionalism and truth.

He has the information required to make that statement now. He knows it, we know it, he knows we know it and yet he also knows that if he makes that statement his party will suffer for it and therefore he will be cast aside for someone who will lie better. He is dancing on the edge of a razor blade trying not to get cut.

It is simple 2yrs later and 20 cases stop the bullshit Trump lost he KNEW he lost those enabling him are just as bad. The GOP and Republicans are so weak and afraid of a spoiled rich boy. Call out the bullshit

At least he made a promise. Seems like most repub’s either fully deny or double down… Mitch McConnell’s reach is grossly powerful, and they have to report to him I’m pretty sure.

@@It-b-Blair promises are meaningless without follow tgrough

'as vehemently as needed' - I see a spark in his eye at 9:43 . There is an escape clause.

It is simple 2yrs later and 20 cases stop the bullshit Trump lost he KNEW he lost those enabling him are just as bad. The GOP and Republicans are so weak and afraid of a spoiled rich boy. Call out the bullshit

It may give Texas a run for it's money, but you can never dethrone Florida

As far as election denialism goes, I would say Arizona is the gold medalist. Maybe not if you include the pommel horse, vault, and uneven bars. Florida probably wins the all-around. But for election denialism Arizona is probably your winner.

@@joellahrman4557 unfortunately you are probably right... There are a lot of truly dumb people blinded by bias

It is simple 2yrs later and 20 cases stop the bullshit Trump lost he KNEW he lost those enabling him are just as bad. The GOP and Republicans are so weak and afraid of a spoiled rich boy. Call out the bullshit

Hahaha Yes I got a reply that was removed! Got em.

@@MahkyVmedia1 Noice! ^^

Brnovich IS pushing back against Kari Lake and Mark Finchum. Jon Stewart is misleading a lot of people

@@jdmasur732 Sure again... Pushing back against two loud wako's doesn't justify being silent on all the other crazies... YOUR trying to mislead people. Stop being a tool

I doubt he believes a word of it. I think people like him see that this "game" works for Trump, and it can work for them too. Easier, in fact, because by merely hoisting the Trump banner they have a built-in support system that consists of about half the country. The man knows he's selling bullshit, but it's lucrative bullshit.

He clearly does not believe his own lies. He was half chuckling with Jon on some his more ridiculous answers.

@@Adamroable He's partitioned his mind. You can see him wincing throughout the interview as John bashes down that wall with a hammer.

No, it’s a strategy. None of these grifters except for a handful actually believe this shit

Former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich is facing a mounting pile of complaints to the state bar against him after his successor, Democrat Kris Mayes, revealed that he sat on evidence his own staff had uncovered that debunked election fraud conspiracies.

Peter! Ouwe snoeperd

Stiggy, I have the same impression. He seems like a likeable person except for his step-timing long that thin line.

That's what makes people like him so dangerous. At the very least this kind of double-speak by cowardly officials enables election deniers to make it easier to undermine democracy. It also gives the impression of legitimacy to the illegitimate taking points of election deniers. Which then perpetuates the pro-insurrection fascist circle jerk of tyrannical Trumpism.

I really wonder what impact the timing of this interview had on his 60 Minutes interview last night. I haven't listened to the whole interview yet, but he seems to have shot straight from the articles I've seen.

I agree as well Stiggy. Mark appears to mean well. But in his drive to appeal to both sides, he's giving credence to falsehood and lies, which as Jon points out, exasperates the threat to our democracy.

What a liberal response for the defense of a fascist tryin to set mechanisms in place to overturn the electoral count through legislatures.

LMAO! And he's a Democrat. It's like walking a fine line between reality and the "truth." When Democrats can't even fall in line you know it's all bullsht.

Pilate.

This is so so true, and probably explains more than 50% of what's wrong with today's US government. "Oh it's not me it's somebody else's problem!".

He’s clearly been working on this.

It is simple 2yrs later and 20 cases stop the bullshit Trump lost he KNEW he lost those enabling him are just as bad. The GOP and Republicans are so weak and afraid of a spoiled rich boy. Call out the bullshit

Corporate America owns our mass media and they have an interest in keeping the division and the fighting amongst the people going, the longer the better for the their bottom line...

Jon

@@r.p.mcmurphy6623 The queen and her ilk/litter were good friends with Epstein. Rest in piss

Still sounds more sane than the clowns who use the term BIRTHING PEOPLE

@@karankapoor2701 does the existence of trans men blow your mind so much that you're cool with the end of democracy?

@@karankapoor2701 lmao, this is what you choose to do with your time?

The trumpies all sound the same, they know they are lying, but want the power!

@@era_s I might be wrong but I don't think Karan is arguing with you. It seems to me that people who say "Birthing people" are further down the same side of the spectrum as Alex Jones. I mean, either way, I have no idea what either AJ or "birthing people" users are talking about.

Especially when they lean in nonverbally when confronted on their lies. They try to imply emphasis with their body to support their beliefs, but it instead looks disingenuous and pleading/defeated.

And people need the truth to draw their own conclusions, if their conclusions are to be worth anything. What a total cop-out phrase.

@@lkrzzie Stewart Is right. You don't draw conclusions from fiction. If it is raining and somebody says it isn't raining, what do you say, " draw your own conclusions"?. Either it is raining or it isn't. It isn't a matter of opinion. If this guy found no evidence of fraud, he can' t say , well decide for yourself. Facts are facts.

Too bad his facts aren't facts .

​@@gianthillsprojecting much

@@FineWine-v4.0 wow, did you come up with that all on your own?

@@gianthills Yes unfortunately for you, Debunk all of his points then with sources

@@FineWine-v4.0 1. "Cyber Ninjas first said Biden won Az. " Not true. They said the number of ballots cast for Biden were more than those cast for Trump. This was not the final result of the audit, simply the ballots cast before any analysis of them had taken place. But CNN lied and presented this as though it was the final result of the audit.