Gas Warfare in the First World War - an Overrated Weapon - or an Underrated One? | Gary Sheffield

Подписаться 21 тыс.

Просмотров 12 тыс.

50% 1

In this presentation, which was delivered 'live' to an online audience, Prof Gary Sheffield takes a close look at the use of gas as a weapon in the Great War.
Gas warfare is seen by many as a terror weapon that sets the First World War apart from all other conflicts. Yet as a weapon of destruction gas lagged well behind artillery, and in spite of initial beliefs that it could be a war-winner, in this respect it proved a disappointment for both the Germans and the Allies - but it still had a significant role to play in the Allied victory of 1918.
In this lecture Professor Gary Sheffield, Hon. President of The Western Front Association, looks at why gas gained such a fearsome reputation, during the war and subsequently, and how chemical warfare developed over the course of 1915-18.
We hope to host more 'live' webinars. If you would like to take part in these, please do consider joining The Western Front Association.
If you enjoy this video, please subscribe to our RU-vid channel !
The Western Front Association is a UK registered charity.
The Western Front Association:
www.westernfro...
Become a member:
www.westernfro...
Find 100s of Articles on the Great War of 1914-18:
www.westernfro...
Find a local Branch:
www.westernfro...
#greatwar #westernfrontassociation #ww1 #worldwarone #gas #gas_warfare

Опубликовано:

2 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 16

@AlexG-xl1cc 3 года назад

Sooo happy these are still going up, really helping me get through lockdown

@alganhar1 3 года назад

I have a replica box respirator, I would hate to have to wear that thing for more than ten minutes while sat down comfortably. Wearing it for hours in a combat environment would be distinctly uncomfortable!

@0ldb1ll 2 года назад

It is obvious that Professor Gary Sheffield has never experienced the effects of unprotected exposure to gas. Being able to breath is a fairly basic requirement to life; being deprived of that ability is a rather sharp shock. Being deprived of the ability to see whilst in a battlefield is also a fairly debilitating experience. The fact that the German troops did not wish to endanger themselves by deliberately putting themselves into such an obviously life depriving environment should be hardly surprising.

@EXO9X8 3 года назад

This is honestly of higher quality and more articulate than many of the online lectures i have been through this year which were paid for....

@joeyj6808 2 месяца назад

Excellent talk. Could have used some visual aids. But being online, I was able to look everything up, so I guess the point is moot.

@coreyjackson5403 Месяц назад

“They said they mechanized the war…so what the hell are we marching for?!”

@darthbigred22 3 года назад

The issues with CW or BW is you need too many right conditions with the weather. You drop Sarin off in a room with some people great but trying to blast an entire division unless they're enclosed in some building it won't really work unless it's a perfectly calm day without too much windy, rain, etc

@IanCross-xj2gj Год назад

Thankfully Germany didn't use chemical weapons during WW2.

@vinz4066 4 месяца назад

Well Not for Militaricly reasons.

@3vimages471 2 года назад

So a flamethrower attack is not a gas attack .... thank you for that wise observation.

@brucevilla 3 года назад

Thanks for Uploading.

@phildyrtt6433 Год назад

March, 2023: Outstanding illumination of this terrifying flavour of warfare. Thank you. Although not a feature of the Great War, this discussion reminded me of the possibly fatuous and expensive distribution of civilian gas masks in 1938+ urban centres in the UK. I had always viewed this maneuvre largely one of attempted civilian mobilisation, similar perhaps to our recent government efforts.