Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/a86fe2f4 Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!
I hope he also deals with the diplomatic conflict between France and Turkey with the whole terrorism and cartoons situation in France. Found agreat vid that goes into the whole conflict and the debate between free speech and religion in the context of the France attacks: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ahlJXAaH59w.html&ab_channel=MyTake
@@abhishekanshuwali3808 Search up any recent Mathologer video and you'll see that there are timestamps and "Chapter Markers" when you tap / hover over the video. These correspond to timestamps in the description
there are so many many comments saying the look forward for the battle in the comments that one cant actually find the battle in the comments... truly ironic
@@adolfhitler3342 No, the channel is doing so - my comment disappeared before I could even edit it to add a link. It was not a troll comment or anything, just mentioning the Balfour discussion by those Israeli historians this week which I was coincidentally listening to.
@@choochootrain3807 No, this is common nowadays. People are so used to topics like this becoming inflamed that the expectation comments typically end up outnumbering the actual flame wars. You'll find a few long comment threads with said wars, but hundreds of comments anticipating them.
I enjoy the cold, hard geopolitical analysis without letting emotions or biases reflect. Good job Shirvan, I am sure at least half of the comments are going to be negative, emotional claims.
emotional claims? im guessing you mean central banking, which is not a claim but rather facts. it is factual that 3 families are behind the creation of the federal reserve (technically 2 since one was killed off on the titanic) it is factual that madison refused the bank charter of 1811 and that Nathan Mayer Rothschild responded with "Teach those impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to colonial status." it is factual the Napoleonic wars started over the nationalization of Frances market (which includes there central bank) it is factual the protocols of the learned elders of zion was banned in every single nation except for Russia. it is factual the ussr charged Russian citizens with antisemticism if they spoke out against the government, which was punishable by death. it is factual that Epstein and most people around him were Jewish. it is factual the frankfurt school caused the downfall of American ideals
One may appreciate the geopolitical realities and imperatives without losing sight of the lack of a legal basis. The lack of legal basis is a weakness for Israel as it means that Israels survival depends on the law of the jungle: The strongest wins. If the Arab world ever gains it's footing, the fortress under siege is doomed. This is aside from the phycological impact of living in a besieged city and the impact that that has on the character of the people
@@guyarrol582 japanese have that and some other country your comment makes no sense theres a good reason to why israel is a ethnic jewish state you can google it called holocaust
you should do a report on the current situation in Ethiopia, since all mainstream worldwide news companies are presenting a very false frame for the current situation .
Oh yeah someone really needs to cover that better since there's a Canadian-American historian that mentioned this situation and talked about it a bit better than any news I've seen, i bet Shirvan would talk even better
Not long ago he made a video about Ethiopia geopolitical problems and aspirations that gives some context to the reasoning behind the tensions there: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NbKoXlYUNY0.html It would be nice to see a more in-depth look at the current conflict, though
Yep. And modern culture proves yet again to be AT LEAST 90% dumb edge lords pretending to be better than those who actually care about things by pretending there's no point caring about the things truly important to others' livelihoods. In other words, fishing for praise by demeaning people's real concerns.
@@codybell6882 or something like Egypt being a proxy state of both Emirates and Suadi Arabia -who themselves are proxies of the US and Israel - AND also France and the US and basically anyone who gives them free loans ! Leading to pretty laughable messes
This is the first RU-vid video I’ve seen about Israel in years that actually has a fresh perspective on the issue. Also this is one of the most consistently excellent channels that I’ve found on this platform period.
it's also filled with lies. for instance the fact that israel started the 1967 war, or that israel in 1948 had a significant advantage over the Arabs states in terms of manpower, logistics, and equipment.
@Ladey Babey haha you're so naive. An institution can be American and be against official US State department objectives specifically for the appearances. Do you think it's by coincidence veto power except for China and Russia in Security Council is given to American allies? Permanent pro American majority in the security Council. Anyways look up the History of "the league of Nations" the whole concept of a world body that is supposed to represent every nation state is an American one. Do you think the US is naive enough to HQ an anti American institution in NYC? 😆😂
@@BoqPrecision They've been apparently pro-China on a number of issues. Also there's the issue of the UN being pro-American policy, but still anti-American values. Globalism doesn't jive with red-blooded American patriots.
@iqbal sahibil My friend as much as Balochistan is considered its is a desert and dry region there had never been an empire or a sense of nationalism there. The people there were natives and resolved there problem and matter through jirgas (sittings).Where Elders and landlord and stake holders come together to discuss issues . On the creation of Pakistan The Shah i Jirga of Quetta passed the resolution for joining PAKISTAN. As far as declaring Independent goes it was nothing more than India trying to cover up its Military occupation of the states of Kashmir, Hyderabad, Junagarh , Manavadar.
@iqbal sahibil bro there is an element of separatism i never denied that but the significant portion is not demanding separate status they want infrastructure and health care and proper education...
Back when Israel was under a demographic threat, that offered a Palestinian state on 95% of the West Bank multiple times. The Palestinians rejected it, largely because they wanted the right of return. Now that Israel is going to win the demographic war due to a surging population, the new plan will likely be to wait until there is a Jewish majority in the West Bank and then absorb it.
That ending was just summarizing what a ridiculous video this was, ''Surviving by whatever it takes against any human values and international laws'' then what about Israel nuking their every single neighbour?? Or what about we all nuke each others until there is only one nation left on Earth as we don't care about human lives and international laws at all??? I hope they got good money for this nonsense video as nobody should sell their souls cheaply... By the way im not defending those arabic nations at all as they are guilty of creating this hostility at first place and the region would be very different today if they never attacked Israel but this doesn't mean Israel has any right to keep committing more atrocities.
It's not for Israel to give it, but for Palestinians to take it with the support of anyone willing to help them. Time and tide changes. Nagorno Karabakh is an example
@@ggoddkkiller1342 The issue is how is Israel behaving in relation to their enemies. The enemies insist on attacking Israel's civilian centers. Israel expands in response to create buffer areas. Israel has offered various peace deals, which included returning over 95% of the West Bank. Israel was met with more aggression. You can call setting up a settlement in a formerly Jewish town an "atrocity". How does this compare in relation to an attempt to kill every Israeli citizen?
Is the coverage perfect? Obviously not. Is it miles ahead of virtually any mainstream media? Absolutely. Am i commenting to boost engagement? Primarily
this coverage is really not good, he made A LOT of mistakes: some remarks: 1. a lot of what he said about the coastal plain is wrong: his map of the coastal plain is wrong: it does NOT extend as far east as is shown, it's only 10-20Km wide and jerusalem is well outside of it (something like 40 KM outside). also, technically the plain extends as far south as Rafah, though that's not exactly part of israel proper. also, israel can be divided into much more than just 3 regions: the coastal plain alone can be divided into 4 sub-regions. Haifa is right on the border of the plain, I would say that it's not really part of it, since most of the city is a coastal cliff, rather than being flat not all of the seaports are on the coastal plain : the port of eilat is not on the plain at all 2. some of the things he said about the Negev are also wrong: a.none of the gaza strip is withing the Negev. b. the northern negev is also of importance : it hosts Be'er sheva, Dimmona and vaious other well populated cities and towns c. the eastern most area on the map : the thin stretch of land between the dead sea and Eilat is actually a separate region called "the Arabah". it's actually even drier and more inhospitable than the negev 3. what he said about gaza is extremely over-simplified: it's not "israel neglected it, therefore extremism". actually, israel had a pretty much open border with until the rise of Hamas. 4. some of what he said about the gallilee is also wrong: a.he completely omitted the southern half of the area- the lower gallilee from his map. b. his map includes the golan heights, which is actually a separate geographical region c. most of israel's agriculture is actually located in the northern negev and not in the gallilee. 4. about israel's lack of legal claim for the so called "occupied regions": while that is technically true, those regions were gained through wars of self defense, so I wouldn't exactly say that holding them is unjust. also, about them acting as defensive buffers: while that *is* true, I wouldn't say that israel *can't* exist without them. it has existed without them for the first 19 years of its life, and it was still fairly well defended 5. in 1948, lebanon also fought against israel 6. I wouldn't exactly say that israe no longer faces existential threats: iran is a very real threat, and lately egypt has been massively strengthening its army. while egypt and israel have a peace treaty, most egyptians citizens consider it an "on paper only" agreement, and a populist gov't may very well attack israel
The video was good up until that statement. Once he said that, I realized that he doesn't understand each governments ideology/motives. The current Iranian regime will never make peace with Israel.
@mohamed emara It was not our choice to retreat the UN told us to retreat or we would face economic sanctions that will hurt us, we could have moved further but there was not an ideal to go to beirut as our enitiative was to carve a safe zone in lebanonese territory so there stupid civil war will not drip into our territory anymore.
@@endurovro why wouldent we, israel is basically a US base... we will also defend the uk canada australia and japan to the last american too, the only difference is israel is in danger because its a free democracy with gay rights full of jews and surrounded by theocracys
@@Wildboy789789 No, we won’t. Those countries are not allowed to willfully kill US soldiers (the USS Liberty being the most well known example), leak US government secrets, threaten the US (see the message Israel gave to Nixon during the Yom Kippur War and the Samson option topic in general), and receive an exorbitant amount of US Tax money annually and get away with it. There are a lot more things Israel does against the US with the US government just going along with it at the expense of the American people but I don’t have time to write multiple paragraphs.
@mo poppe From a military standpoint you are factually wrong, most of the great wars of the past(48,56,67,69) were fought with 0 U.S support. the exception was the 1973 yom kippur war, but at that time the arabs had the USSR to balance the U.S. The real and most substantial help from the U.S is its diplomatic pressure and veto power at the UN security council. "birthrate alone of the arabs" that was once true(this is why Israel didn't annex the west bank) today its the opposite. Jewish birthrate surpassed the muslim one, and there is no longer a demographic danger to the Jewish majority.
"although there is no legal validity to Israel's occupation over these strategic hights" How so? They were taken in a war of self defense (1967). Israel tried to return them in exchange for peace, as it has done with Sinai, but Jordan and Syria rejected the offer.
Despite existing in one of the most hostile region of the world and all the uncertainties surrounding it, Israel has managed to emerge as one of the strongest and advanced nations on Earth. This the an impressive feet to achieve in those circumstances.
It’s because when Jews came to Israel, those Jews had lots of money from many businesses they had in other nations, they came to Israel and money was with them, that’s why they’re so advanced
@@regularman5914 not nesecerally. when Israel was founded, mostly holocaust survivers from Europe and Jews from the Middle East and North Africa moved here. most were stripped out of their money and property by the Nazis, other Europeans and Muslims. Tho Israel started to become really wealthy and prosperose in the 1990s when a huge wave of skilled mmigrantes from the formar USSR arrived here and it really helped to contribute to the economy. Since then imigration of skilled workers has been very high, so that helped the economy.
@@regularman5914 wow this is like.. the opposite from the truth. most jews lad litterly nothing, israel started to become more financlly stable only at the beggining of the 21th centruy.
It's more like 60 to 1 . There are about 350 million Arabs in the Middle East and just about 6 million jews in Israel. That's without counting 80 million Iranians who are not Arabs and are mighty friendly towards the Jewish state.
Great video! I think this is one of the best examples of why it is important to analyse the geo-strategic situation of a country not only as an observer, but also from the country's point of view. Otherwise, the picture is incomplete.
Gaza was not neglected, it was given independence due to constant terror attacks coming from Gaza. Sadly, Gaza civilians elected very bad leadership named Hamas. That's what brought so much agony to Gaza.
The content is about "Geopolitics of Israel", not the region. It shows exclusively what are priorities of Israel, how the government and its citizens were shaped by events in the region and what advisable to do for Israel government. The content demonstrates current reality for Israel.
I was genuinely expecting the comments to be a warzone.instead ive seen some of the best discussion and commemtary that ive ever seen on RU-vid. Thanks Caspien report for fostering such a good environment
Excellent analysis, Shirvan! Israel is literally stuck between a rock and a hard place. Blame the British for not ensuring that the Palestinians had a home too, but also Israel needed to consolidate its borders, but this had the effect of removing Palestinians from their lands. Both nations have a right to exist in peace (yes, I regard the Palestinians/Palestine as a nation), but the balancing act is so tricky that just normalizing relations with Israel's external neighbors is a massive challenge, in and of itself. Internal politics are hard enough to overcome, especially with a hard right wing government in charge. How in the heck do you normalize relations, get the Palestinians onside, defend your borders and yet appease your own population at the same time? Especially a population so hard wired into the notion of being under threat at all times that any change in policy could come across as a massive risk? The psychology of it alone, is utterly frightening. TL;DR: the whole thing is utterly fucked.
You move the Palestinians from the West Bank to another place(the Golan heights are pretty solidly under Israeli control.. We are talking 2million people, that has been done before. The question is were to move them too. Maybe Sinai, if Egypt attacks again or Jordan. Maybe another country also could take them. Sudan could use some Arabs to strengthen control on Dafur. That would obviously worsen relationships with the Arab world, but Israel would be pretty secure. That would allow for improving relationships with the Aabs. The security also would lessen the percieved threat and move the population more to the polictal center.
Agreed, it's a fuster cluck, but remember, the Palestinians were originally screwed in this deal because it was their land FIRST. Imagine some newly formed government kicking you out of your house that your family has owned for generations. Would YOU like that? No offense, but the average person doesn't have a clue of the entire history of this region. This is why there are terrorist organizations in the area fighting Israel. I'm not saying they should resolve their issues that way. I'm stating the 'why'.
I noticed that, but I think there is a rationale. The war did not result in the exchange of any territory, and the video is based around territorial concerns. Although you could argue that it ultimately led several years later to the Egyptian peace deal and returning the Sinai peninsula.
@@yairweinberg1647 why you are not accepting that after the first week of the war gold Mayer asked henry Kiesinger to open air bridge to them because Egyptian army wrecked their army and why you don't believe that we accepted the settlement because we figure out we are fighting USA not Israel. you guys need to stop converting lies to truth make the west believe you keep saying the 6 days war and say yes we defeated our army was useless in this time and you was smart to use the opportunity. but when it comes to 1973 you keep saying nothing happened we just left Sinai and went back tel aviv try to realistic and understand that we get our land back I don't think if you won we will get our land back Israel is good in steeling others land. did those veteran told you they were crying on last day leaving from Sinai unbelievable.
@@yairweinberg1647 I've never seen a discussion about such historical topic on RU-vid as productive as this before, both you and Mohamed I wish you good life good bless you such a good discussion without bias and insults just plain facts I love you boys god bless you
This video is a rare example of good journalism - presenting both the good and bad sides of the story, describing the actual facts without strong affection to one of the sides. Thank you for your efforts
"This video is a rare example of good journalism" it really isn't, he made a ton of mistakes: 1. a lot of what he said about the coastal plain is wrong: his map of the coastal plain is wrong: it does NOT extend as far east as is shown, it's only 10-20Km wide and jerusalem is well outside of it (something like 40 KM outside). also, technically the plain extends as far south as Rafah, though that's not exactly part of israel proper. also, israel can be divided into much more than just 3 regions: the coastal plain alone can be divided into 4 sub-regions. Haifa is right on the border of the plain, I would say that it's not really part of it, since most of the city is a coastal cliff, rather than being flat not all of the seaports are on the coastal plain : the port of eilat is not on the plain at all 2. some of the things you said about the Negev are also wrong: a.none of the gaza strip is withing the Negev. b. the northern negev is also of importance : it hosts Be'er sheva, Dimmona and various other well populated cities and towns c. the eastern most area on the map : the thin stretch of land between the dead sea and Eilat is actually a separate region called "the Arabah". it's actually even drier and more inhospitable than the negev 3. what he said about gaza is extremely over-simplified: it's not "israel neglected it, therefore - extremism". actually, israel had a pretty much open border with until the rise of Hamas. 4. some of what he said about the gallilee is also wrong: a.he completely omitted the southern half of the area- the lower gallilee, from his map. b. his map includes the golan heights, which is actually a separate geographical region c. most of israel's agriculture is actually located in the northern negev and not in the gallilee. 5. about israel's lack of legal claim for the so called "occupied regions": while that is technially true, those regions were gained through wars of self defense, so I wouldn't exactly say that holding them is unjust. also, about them acting as defensive buffers: while that *is* true, I wouldn't say that israel *can't* exist without them. it has existed without them for the first 19 years of its life, and it was still fairly well defended 6. in 1948, lebanon also fought against israel 7. I wouldn't exactly say that israe no longer faces existential threats: iran is a very real threat, and lately egypt has been massively strengthening its army. while egypt and israel have a peace treaty, most egyptians citizens consider it an "on paper only" agreement, and a populist gov't may very well attack israel
It doesn't make you (slkjv...) an expert on the subject if you write a comment like this on a video that someone has worked on for hours and then edited and uploaded for hours. Shirvan is a person who researches and presents the Geopolitics of the whole world. Maybe you know this much than him because you are a Middle East Geopolitics expert. It was enough to say that there are mistakes and shortcomings and give just a couple of examples. Such a lengthy and arrogant comment, in my view, only harbors malicious intent. And from here, those who read this comment can only deduce the purpose that is to vilify the channel owner. If you're a geopolitics expert and you see that many shortcomings, you can let Shirvan know by sending him an e-mail. Just because you try to humiliate him like that here doesn't make you a noble, an expert, or a great person. It just makes you a spoiled, an arrogant and a rude person.
Wow this video is the first video that actually explain Israel's predicament without demonizing the Israeli people. Amazing Job CaspianReaport keep it up.
But isnt being biased the true human nature in us? The more we reject our humanity, the closer we get to machine (we can't go back to monke, not anymore)
@@yummypizza3209 As a human being you have to fight your Pre-programmed base instincts that’s what separates us from the animals...That in a nutshell my friend is called evolution
@@jacekpacuszka1542 we may think we fight it, but we miserably fail, sucumbing to the emotions in us. Being human is being a failure. Accepting it is the only way to move on
I am surprised with how level headed this video is. Typically videos such as this are either heavily biased, or so superficial and vague they say nothing. It's clear this video was made with Israel's perspective in mind, but that's because the subject is the concerns of Israel. The video doesn't excuse events, but merely explains events.
It's 3 year now I visited Israel beautiful city's Tal Aviv, haifa, Jerusalem amazing people great history and I was surprised they have very warm heart for Indians. May good bless Israel and our Jewish brothers and sisters. Love from India❤
@Binnaz Husain No, the comment section is full of people predicting it'll be a shitshow, who seem to vastly outnumber the actual shitshow comments. Quite the irony...
What an amazing and neutral standing explanation, thank you Caspian, many who try to create these type of videos let bias through or are unable to understand the real reasons of why things are happening the way they are in the Middle-East, you're very well informed and seem to have a very solid grasp and understanding on the situation. Great work on the video!
It's so refreshing to hear a fresh, balanced, neutral perspective and analysis on such a divisive issue. Well done Caspian Report team! Best wishes for peace for all in the region, from Malaysia
После заключения соглашений в Осло (1993) возникла Палестинская автономия (Газа тогда была ее частью), и израильтяне начали поэтапный уход с оккупированных территорий. Это повлекло не только самостоятельность, но и разрыв части хозяйственных связей. Поэтому за первые три года частичной независимости ВВП сектора Газа упал на треть. Потом связи стали восстанавливаться, и к концу 1990-х жизнь вроде бы наладилась. Но в 2000-м началась интифада Аль-Акса (общепалестинская война арабов против евреев), и хозяйственные выгоды отошли на задний план. В 2005-м, чувствуя, что ситуация зашла в тупик, Израиль осуществляет так называемое одностороннее размежевание - эвакуирует из сектора еврейских поселенцев и выводит войска. После чего в Газе происходит политическая мутация. В 2006-м на последних свободных выборах там побеждает ХАМАС. А в 2007-м Газа под его руководством отделяется от остальной Палестинской автономии, в которой власть удержал менее радикальный, чем она, ФАТХ. Все функционеры ФАТХа, кого хамасовцы не успели убить, бежали через Израиль к родным палестинам, а Газа превратилась в де-факто отдельное государство, всепоглощающей идеологией которого стала борьба с Израилем на уничтожение. ХАМАС действовал совсем иначе. Он сразу объявил всех евреев врагами, войну против них назвал священным джихадом, а всю политическую программу свел к очень простой и понятной всем формуле - уничтожение Израиля и израильтян. Нападения на Израиль, ракетные и наземные, происходили теперь регулярно, но это уживалось с сохранением некоторых хозяйственных связей. Накануне нынешней войны Израиль бесплатно поставлял в сектор 70-80% потребляемой там электроэнергии и снабжал Газу нормальной питьевой водой - качество местной очень низкое. Из Израиля туда поступали также еда, медикаменты и топливо для местных предприятий. Во-первых, Израиль не мог перекрыть границу Газы с Египтом, и именно через нее в Газу неформальным порядком проникало довольно много всего. Поэтому ракеты там все равно производились, и в огромных количествах, а бункеры по-прежнему сооружались, нравилось это Израилю или нет. Спору нет, сначала интифада, а потом приход к власти ХАМАС резко ухудшили жизнь в Газе. По мнению Международной организации труда, к 2020-му подушевой ВВП там был на 40% ниже, чем в 2005-м. Но дело даже не в таких подсчетах, которые применительно к Газе достаточно умозрительны. Движение Газы к сегодняшней катастрофе было довольно последовательным. Другим системообразующим фактором стала деятельность UNRWA, Агентства ООН для помощи палестинским беженцам. Его финансируют в основном страны Запада, а многочисленных работников (это тысячи учителей, врачей и других служащих) оно набирает на месте. Именно в активе UNRWA очевидные успехи образования и медицины в Газе. Но попутно оно избавило ХАМАС от многочисленных невоенных забот, по существу сделавшись его гражданским подразделением. Никакого контроля со стороны западных спонсоров над ним нет. Обучение в школах подчинено идеологии ХАМАС и осуществляется в атмосфере исступленных идеологических накачек. Третий важнейший фактор - демографический взрыв. Население Газы за последние 70 лет выросло в восемь раз и достигло 2,1 млн. Сейчас рождаемость идет на убыль, но новый народ уже возник. Совместима ли нынешняя его численность с крошечной территорией (360 кв. км) - вопрос к специалистам, которые, по-моему, не знают ответа. Четвертый фактор - внешнее финансирование военной машины ХАМАС. В первую очередь, иранское. Но средства, поступающие из Катара и других стран, не прямо, так косвенно, идут на те же цели. Поэтому у режима ХАМАС есть редкое преимущество. Он не нуждается в домашней экономике, которая бы его содержала. Его гражданские потребности оплачивает ООН (а до недавнего времени также Израиль), а военные - боевые товарищи извне. Из этого вытекает пятый фактор - любая хозяйственная деятельность в секторе Газа, не завязанная на агрессию, в глазах режима выглядит чем-то вроде необязательного приложения. Больше половины рабочей силы - безработные, получающие от ООН и других спонсоров убогое, но достаточное для пропитания пособие. А те, кто где-то занят (их 250-300 тыс.), либо служат в частях ХАМАС и других боевых организаций (только их суммарно около 50 тыс.), либо трудятся в военном строительстве и кустарной военной промышленности, либо обеспечивают хамасовскую машину необходимыми ей услугами. Тех, кто вне этой системы, просто меньше. Кто-то из них бежит из Газы (примерно по 10 тыс. в год), кто-то пытается выбраться в Израиль, кто-то барахтается в остатках местной экономики. Важно, что режим без них всех легко может обойтись. Три предварительных вывода 1. У режима ХАМАС нет не только идейных, но и материальных мотивов для какого-либо мирного перерождения. Он вполне гармоничен, опирается на семидесятилетнюю местную традицию и может быть либо уничтожен, либо сохранен таким, как есть. Перевоспитать его, комбинируя давление и уступки, невозможно. 2. Сектор Газа как целое и его жители порознь не имеют никакого опыта мирного существования за собственный счет. Имеющиеся у большинства из них навыки нацелены на отправление идеологических и боевых практик, а не на труд обычного типа. Предоставить их самим себе в надежде, что они как-то справятся, нереалистично
Would be an interesting one, but if you russian speaking person, your could read a lot about it, and i think its a little too early to make a video about it, they deal will be completed at the end of december, lets wait and see how it works out.
@@DonHrvato If you compare the picture before 27th of September and now, Russia is not a victor in any way. After losing much credibility during the conflict, the peace deal granted Russia image of being in power. But it is only an image. Russia has lost main rope with which it had control over Azerbaijan. Nagorno Karabagh and 20% of the territories were limiting Azerbaijan to act more open in regards of foreign policies. 2000 Russian peacekeepers will not have same effect, especially that they will be monitored by Turkish military. Russia has lost in Armenia. Even if current political turmoil will bring down Pashynian government and pro-Russian government is put in, it is only a matter of time that Armenians will realize and start blaming Russia. Russia has lost it's global image of reliable partner and the countries that previously considered Russia as guarantee of their safety will think about it twice now. True victor here is only Azerbaijan and Turkey. Which not only liberated Nagorno Karabagh, but also got access path over Armenian mainland.
Russia showed other countries ( US, France ) that without its decision it is impossible to make smth. Russia will be the key of future of this conflict, but if you need an answer, it is an Azerbaijani victory. 8 City has been liberated ( I can be wrong ) , Include Hadrut town where Armenians were majority. In the rest cities Azeris and Armenians will live under control of Azerbaijan, but Russian peacekeepers will be there for 5 years. ( In corridors and some stations ) Armenians can go from Armenia to not liberated territories, after peace keeping mission completed, Azeri refuges will come back to territories like Khankendi/Stepanakert ( which isn't liberated, but any other ideas like Artsakh didn't accepted and it stays as a part of Azerbaijan. And Azerbaijan gained a road from Azerbaijan to Nakhchivan.
thank you for this video. as an Israeli' it's seems pretty often that people don't realy understand what's going on here and this video helps clarifying the reality
@@atesemireltutar6661 I mean they would be right of he made the video cause it wouldn't be neutral. Also they are right Artsach should be Armenian land as it's population is Armenian and it was historical Armenian
@@giorgos.efth43 But as you know borders are not and can not be drawn just by looking at demographics. There lives Armenians yes but does it mean that Armenia can annex it and exile Turks from there?
@@zakariaalami1491 Your right & that’s what he said In the video. If we look at the middleast from a historical stand point , the past 100-200 years have been the weakest points in Islamic middleast history. Before then the middleast was ran by very powerful empires ranging fro the ottomans, to the caliphates, to the Persian dynasty’s. The middleast I believe is going through a transition point & that is why the past century has been so cruel on the middleast.
Thank you for putting this together. I and the rest of the world are praying for you guys to come to a amicable solution to tensions in your region. That will last forever. Lots of love, peace, joy, happiness. Everything for your people!
Philosophical Inquired: Are there really any rules and norms when it comes survival? Great video, the one problem I have is that the territory Israel conquered from 67 isn't ipso facto internationally illegal. There is some contention regarding who the aggressor was, for example closing a trading route (ships going and coming from Eilat) has in some cases been viewed as an aggressively hostile action which would justify a country to respond with military force and there for allow it to capture lands as the defender. If this extends to Israel then the lands gained in 67 were under defensive pretenses and there for internationally legal. I'm not saying this is the case, I am saying that its not obvious that it isn't.
@@colombiansRul3s I mean everything is much more complicated then it seems, but here is another question for you. If today Palestinians fully abolished their military infrastructure would Israel tomorrow genocide and exile them? If Israel did the same thing would Palestinians genocide and exile them? I'm not saying that there aren't good people on either side nor am I say there arnt bad. But on the scale of survival I'd argue that Israel is in a MUCH risker situation then Palestinians. Here is additional proof, if Israel wanted to they could erase the west bank and gaza tomorrow and yet they don't. And vise versa, surrounding arab countries and Palestinians have repeatedly attempted to wipe Israel off the map. So it comes down to how you define survival, I define it as a matter of life or death, I'm not entirely sure how you define it, let me know.
@@idansim1 Your reframing of this entire situation into a particular definition of "survival" shows how much mental gymnastics people need in order to support Israel.
@@LordJagd I suggest you look into it some more and do your own research. There is nothing I can say to you that will convince you that this is the situation so instead of arguing in a RU-vid comment section please just go read up on the Palestinian National Covenant (Written by the gov. of west bank) which talks about destroying Israel. Go look at the preaching's of Hizbala and Hamas. Go look at what Iran thinks of Israel and what they have done in the region. I hope that helps point you in some directions.
I always disliked Israel’s foreign policy of occupying certain regions, but now I at least have some understanding towards why. That still doesn’t mean I support it I just understand a little bit. I think if everyone could at least see the other’s perspective the world would be a tad bit more peaceful.
Israel also is able to protect itself by making smart preemptive decisions because it has developed the most organised and effective intelligence agency in the world.
Not to mention bipartisan support in American political ecosystem. Most of these "preemptive decision", "organized and effective intelligence" can happen when there's a symbiotic and back and forth industrial connection with Israel and US. IDF veterans aren't simply working in start-ups tel aviv or Haifa. Many of them goes to NYC and Chicago as an extension of their workplace. Israel has access to resources in US in ways even US military doesn't.
@@morielfilm By “this thing” you mean colonization of Palestine ? How do you think you took the 1948 borders anyway ? Or the west bank post 1967 ? Zionism is a fucking wester plague on West Asia
@@borowikszatanski4950 lol because russia isn't bigger than the rest of the world 🤣 in terms of population thier not doing much better than the rest of Europe ☠☠☠
@@samhere9390 by ur logic rusia is the most powerful country on the world, then why won't they conquer all the others one by one? Do you read what u write?
Size doesn't matter, plus if all the countries fully participated I'm sure the results will be much different. For example, Iraq had very minimal participating within the war, plus many of these countries faced instability due to the recent accomplishment of independence.
A very balanced and honest report - as all of your video's we watched. But especially on this so much polarized topic related to the Israëli-Arab conflict, a great professional achievement. All the best. Çox sağ ol!
as an Israeli i have to say to all the triggered palestinians and arabs out there, the palestinan people have the right to self determination like the jews and all other peoples. but claiming that all other peoples have the right to self determine in their homeland but israel doesnt is antisemeitic. you have the full right to criticize my governments actions like any government but saying we dont have a right to self determine as i said is antisemetic.
Israel is the only Country in the Middle East where people have a high level of political and cultural freedom. Try being an atheist, single independent female, or openly gay in Iran, KSA or Syria. Israel is a vibrant culture and technological powerhouse. All it’s neighbors are either Islamist hotbeds, oil kleptocracies, or failed states. I stand with Israel. 🇵🇱🇮🇱
@@blazinchalice well, Israel brought all of the Ethiopian Jews to Israel and they're all black. Lot of work is done getting them integrated. Many "brown" Israelis were originally refugees from Arab states (they became refugees at the same time many Palestinians became refugees) and they are in all government and cultural positions. There are always rivalries between ethnicities but overall most people there are doing well
@@drorharari Thank you for mentioning the Beta Israel, who are discriminated against and despised by right-wing Israelis. Last year an unarmed Ethiopian Jew, Solomon Tekah, was shot dead by an off-duty cop. Rascism against Beta Israel is rampant in Israel.
@@azmainmd.shahriar4024 He's referencing the Israeli drones given to Azerbaïjan in the Karabakh conflict. Implying that Shirvan only decided to make this video once Israel helped them.
@@BoqPrecision offical narrative of who? He literally just presents the geo politics of Israel, just as he does the other countries. No narrative just strategy.
@@dannyarcher438 wrong...this is just what you'd expect from someone not wanting a strike on his channel or even his channel terminated. Nothing geo political was avant garde or insightful, might as well be straight from Wikipedia or the US state department, just read in a nice exotic accent. This channel is meant for impressionable 18-24 year olds who think they have a clue anyway... not for real geopolitical analysis
It was Elijah, prophet of YHVH that anointed Hazael, King of Syria (1 Kings 19). And was not Hiram, King of Tyre, friend with Solomon (1 Kings 5)? But the Shiites have captured the lands and wage war against Israel from it. This too shall pass.
@@DevinRSanto Does anyone actually believe that it does matter what someone wrote down god might have said? The reason Israel hold those heights is because it's advantageous and noone is able to wrangle it from her.
@@pittnyc1 Ah yes, the classic logic I hate the specific Bad part of people in a country Some ignorant people : My god, you just commited an Anti-Semitism
Israel - a true friend of India. Always helped us in wars against Pakistan, sometimes against America's wishes, and never condemned India's nuclear program. Long live India and Israel, the only democracies from the Himalayas to the Mediterranean. 🇮🇳 🇮🇱
@@bernardcraine True but I expect more from his work. If I wanted to hear bias reporting I would watch CNN or France 24. But, yes this conversation between Churchill and De Gaulle reminds of what you just said. Clementine Churchill: "General, you must not hate your friends more than you hate your enemies " De Gaulle (in English): "France has no friends, only interests." (De Gaulle did not speak specifically of France, but of all nation-states, including Britain.
Your Report is great but you have some mistakes. Israel Doesn't Control gaza since 2005, Israel left gaza and gave it to Palestinians, thats when they elected Hamas as their government. Palestinians in west bank are governed by The PLO since 1993 Oslo accords Arabs who live in all other territories (i.e Israeli prior to 1967) Are Israeli citizens
It's all very sad, actually. The Americans and Europeans don't really care about the well-being of Isrealis or Palestinians. They only care about maintaining a stronghold over Middle East oil/gas and global trade chokepoints.
