Link to shocking video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SbeP-4k70Ag.html. I have call guards liars in the comments in this video including Redso who followed me when I had drink taken and set me up. For years I have been exposing corruption in the Guards. Redos says he followed me when I had drink taken because was concerned about me hahha. See: Gerry Molloy System part 16, Link: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Jrj7KXNTWs0.html
Take 1). Special Criminal Court: THERE MUST BE A FULL AND HONEST DISCLOSURE BY DPP AND GARDAI TO ENSURE A FAIR TRIAL. As a matter of fact the Court stopped the Butterly trial after 55 days because vital evidence was not disclosed to the Defense by DPP and Gardai in effect the Court will stop any trial if full disclosure is not made. My concern is the Courts can order a retrial but who investigates the DPP or Gardai for not disclosing vital evidence prior to the Trial in the first place and if this procedure is common practice by DPP/Gardai who is to say there will not be another breach in the rules of fair procedures in the next trial!!! The Butterly vital evidence which lead to the retrial was discovered because the DPP disclosed it in another case by error!!! The Prosecution will allege that a man was lured to a house in Limerick City assaulted and falsely imprisoned and that a Nail Gun was use during the incident. That the main prosecution witness was present in the house and observed certain people whom he identified and whom he alleged took part in the incident. The Court was recently informed by the DPP that this main witness has been considered for the Witness Programme sense October 2016 but no decision has been made to date. The three men have strenuously denied the charges. As a matter of fact it is Garda Headquarter's Senior Gardai that decide who is entered into the Witness Programme and the Defense expressed their concern that no decision has been reached by Gardai even though the original Trial was to start on the 20th of February 2017 and still no decision to date. This means that two Trial Hearing Dates have been set, 20th February and 13th March 2017 and no decision has been made concerning the main witness. The Defense expressed their concern about the delay in reaching a decision and not being told about this intended decision prior to the first Hearing Date, 20th, and now at this late stage. The trial is intended to proceed concerning the three men who lived in Limerick at the date of alleged incident. THE TRIAL IS EXPECTED TO DISCLOSE EXPLOSIVE DETAILS AND IT IS EXPECTED TO DISCLOSE THE MANNER IN WHICH THE GARDAI CONDUCT THEIR INVESTIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE PROCEDURES.
Take 2). This trial will show Gardai allowed their alleged main witness to continue his alleged drug running and bringing either Heroin or Coke into Limerick and the Gardai never charged this person who has admitting his drug running. Worse again if this self confessed drug transporter was telling the truth to Gardai the Gardai allowed the drugs to be sold even though the person told the Gardai what house the drugs were in. Even at this stage the Gardai have not decided to enter him under the Witness Programme for his intended evidence. But one thing for sure he is not covered by any Witness Programme or immunity for the consignments of drugs he allegedly brought into Limerick because the Gardai played a hand in these alleged activities and it is a crime for him and Gardai to allow drugs to be brought to Limerick and sold and no one charged. This witness is not covered by this criminal alleged activities. This alleged criminal act drugs allegedly happened prior to these men being arrested or charged in effect the Gardai are trying to grant themselves immunity or this person because this vital evidence has only recently come to light and was not disclosed prior to the set Hearing Date the 20th of February. Most people in Limerick know this person's name as the book of evidence was served and his name constantly mentioned by the DPP in Court. So it is not a case that his life is in danger as he is walking around Limerick sense the book was served it is a case of how the Gardia protect their part in the drugs running and allowing the drugs to be sold on the streets of Limerick as alleged by their main witness. If the Gardai were concerned they would have made a decision immediately concerning the Witness Programme but to date they still have not made a decision. This suggests one thing, they are not concerned about his safety they are only concerned with getting a Guilty Verdict and as a matter of fact they are acting extremely recklessly concerning this person who appears to be extremely vulnerable, depends on substances, self serving, mentally unstable and regrettably suicidal.
Take 7). On Wednesday Dan Quilligan gave sworn evidence in accordance with his statement. He could not identify anyone. His evidence concerning entering the house was accepted by all concerned. He was viciously attacked, assaulted, one of his feet nailed to the ground with a nail gun and his other foot received similar injuries. His injuries where shocking. The people responsible left the house and he some how manage to escape. He feared for his live at the time and his life is ruined due to this crime. He referred to two people wearing WHITE SUITS during the crime. There was a short break and barristers started moving around and people knew something was happening. The DPP asked for the matter to be adjourned until today. Today Ger Mackin and Pat Hayes pleaded guilty to the 5 year section 3 charge and the life sentence charge section 15 was withdrawn by the DPP. Both received three years imprisonment. Mark Heffernan was present during the sentence and heard the Judge comment had the two been found guilty on the section 15 charge which carries life they would have received a more serious sentence. Mark Heffernan is still pleading not guilty not withstanding the Judge's comments concerning a life sentence and the DPP has not withdrawn the section 15 charge against Mark Heffernan. It is very noticeable that all the time Mark Heffernan is sitting away from Gar Mackin and Pat Hayes and that he does not communicate his co accuseds all are in Custody. Tom Lillis is due to give evidence next week and is the main prosecution witness against Mark Heffernan . Tom Lillis is a self confessed drugs transporter and has recently been entered into the Witness Protection Programme. However, Dan Quilligan was recalled and Mark Heffernan's counsel put it to him that Pat Hayes alleged while detained that Dan Quilligan was involved in criminality on the day and that he was in the house before this date and he knew Pat Hayes prior to this. Dan Quilligan denied any criminality on the day but did admit for the first time that he had been in the house prion to the incident and he did know Pat Hays. Just to clarify why I am doing this video I will prove Gardai with held vital evidence from the DPP and that Gardai are abusing peoples' rights and concealing vital evidence and did so in this case etc. Furthermore, there is now mounting pressure being put on Mark Heffernan to plead guilty due to the fact that the Judge referred to a life sentence in his comments. Many people have said so to me. I am also receiving rude and snide looks from some Limerick Gardai who are in Court in large numbers.
15). Defense asks Judges to recluse themselves. Justice Hunt immediately raises his voice and stated "No" with out asking his colleagues or asking for the reasons. Defense ask to be allowed make the application. Justice Hunt simply sits back and looks around the place to suggest the application is going to be refused anyway. Application made and dealt with by Justice Hunt without hearing from his colleagues and at one stage he stated he knows what his colleagues are thinking. Case adjourned for ruling and ten minute Judgement of all Judges read by Justice Hunt refusing the application. Defense alleged Judges prejudiced, interrupting cross examination and not treating a perjured person in a serious manner, namely Tom Lillis. Justice Hunt stated anyone committing perjury is a serious matter and this effect all that person's evidence. D/G Pat Whelan and D/G Niamh Brosonan swore Tom Lillis had not confessed to a crime and if he had he would have been immediately arrested which means he would have had access to a Solicitor and interviewed on camera. Both agreed he told them he had cleaned up blood using towels and bleach and got rid of suits concerning the assault on Dan Quilligan. Both Gardai again both stated he was not confessing to any crime. Both stated he presented himself at the Station and he alleged he was in fear after receiving text messages to watch his back. Both stated he had drink on board and they could small the drink off him but he was not drunk and every word in his statement was said by him. Both agreed the camera was not turned on while he was making his statement but only turned on when it was being read over to him. Both stated he was first brought to a room for 25 minutes and he done all the talking and no notes taking by Gardai. Both Gardai left the station for about an hour to get the alleged two suits and returned and took his statement which took about 35 minutes to make. So this man was not drunk and not confessing to any crime and allegedly made a detailed and comprehensive statement 5 pages, is a 247 alcoholic, mentally unstable, suicidal, he was taking off the bride the night before and immediately went drinking on his release, and can't remember what happens yesterday, now the Gardai and DPP are now calling him a liar and that he was not showing pictures of Mark Heffernan as he alleged, and now he has admitted to perjury and no one is giving him proper legal advice. Shocking no words can describe the abuse of this man by State authorities. It is illegal to drive a car with a point or two as the person is not capable to drive but it is now legal to have "drink on board" "smelling of drink" and be an alcoholic when making a statement about an event 6 months prior to making such a statement. In my view both D/G Gardai Whelan and Brosnan lied under oath and have abused their positions and no Garda should ever take a statement in such circumstances. But all Senior Gardai set there praising these Gardai for taking such statement in these circumstances and the DPP put forward this man's statement further praising the activities of the Gardai. A horrible picture is being painted concerning this case and no Jury Trial would ever put up with such taking of a statement and abusing this man Tom Lillis's Constitutional Rights this man's names was being shouted all over the place by the Gardai and DPP and the book of evidence was issued in October 2016 all the time he was not in the Witness Programme and only entered weeks ago. Senior Gardai from Headquarter had been deciding sense October 2016 whether to enter Tom into the Programme all the time he had to walk the Streets, sleep under bridges etc and even D/G Pat Whelan in his private Garda letter to Senior Gardai stated; Tom Lillis is a danger to himself!!!Shocking information to describe Tom and no one acted only after the Trial Started. All Gardai concerned and everyone from DPP does not care about Tom and what happens to him. He will be allowed drink himself to death after this trial or commit suicide but one thing for sure the Gardai etc will not stand by him after this Trial. Pictures allegations. Gardai alleged he was not shown any pictures of Mark Heffernan. Two suits produced one White and one Blue. Accepted no DNA or Blood on the suits.Powerful tests/results as Tom Lillis alleged the suits were used during the crime and he cleaned up blood all over the place and it took him at lest half an hour to clean up the blood. Tom Lillis is a 247 alcoholic, unstable, unwell, suicidal and can't remember what happened yesterday but for some reason he can walk into the Station with "drink on board" and remember details that happened allegedly 6 months before and make a detailed and comprehensive statement on his own. This is what the prosecution is asking the Judges to accept. Also, Defense stated they would be later alleging the Witness Protection Programme is stained over this case. This indicates they are concerned that such a person as Tom Lillis with his conditions etc is being abused by the DPP/Gardai and State to get a conviction. I am concerned about Tom Lillis and his welfare after this case as I am sure these people will not support him after the trial as has been indicated to him. Unfortunately he now has to be charged with perjury as no one is above the law including a State Witness.
16). I have contacted Fr. Mc Ferry and Tom Lilis's Solicitor as I believe this man is suicidal and not receiving proper legal advice and will be disowned by the State after this trial now that his evidence is finished. Copies of my email to Fr. Mc Ferry have been forward to various people including the Gardai Commissioner and newspapers. Such news papers have not reported all about Tom Lillis and vital parts of this case. It is now going to be alleged by Defense that the Witness Protection Programme is stained by the whole process concerning Tom Lillis. These are my views on listening to the evidence and on reading the documents concerning this case. Also which was surprising to everyone in the Court who were shocked on hearing and seeing the rude activities of the DPP's Senior Counsel Tara Burns. Mark Heffernnan's Junior Mr. Pendergast Counsel approached the DPP's prosecuting counsell and she arrogantly and rudely raised her voice and stated: get a way I don't want to talk to you. The Junior Counsel had to put down his head in shame and walk away. Obviously the DPP's Senior Counsel Tara Burns is up set about something and clearly not happy about the way the case is going. There was no excuse for her behaviour which everyone in Court heard.
Take 19). Breaking news: after 3 minutes Not Guilty on False Imprisonment. Not reported in papers totally wrong and an injustice. Other charge section 3 ruling on Friday as the Judges are to rule if Tom Lillis's evidence is being allowed and the Judges stated if the Judges reject his evidence the DPP can make submissions on Monday about the rest of the case or evidence. This clearly indicates that Judges may totally reject Tom Lillis's evidence and is letting the DPP know its thoughts. If the Judges totally reject his evidence this means a State Witness Committed Perjury, admitted it and is totally unreliable as a witness!!! It appears when it comes to People in Housing Estates the Reporters will not report in a fair manner which is an insult to the People of Limerick and Ireland. Shocking what has not been reported to date. The Life sentence charge is gone and other charge carries max 5 years. This is an injustice a man has been cleared of a charge that carries Life and the papers will deliberately not report this. SHOCKING AND AN ABUSE OF POWERS AND MEDAI ARE ABUSING THE PEOPLE OF IRELAND BY NOT REPORTING IN A FAIR MANNER. Also, Chief Superintendent Shehan, Limerick Division was in attendance and he was fully briefed on the finding of two suits one white and one blue and that this information was deliberately left out the book of evidence and never put to any person arrested or charged. As a matter of Fact today Judge Eagan asked Tara Burns if Tom Lillis was ever shown the two suits after they were found by Gardai and she replied no. In effect no one had ever shown the blue suit which was left out of the book of evidence etc. So why hide all about the blue suit? Simple everyone stated two men in white suits and even Tom Lillis for days stated two white suits but suddenly on the last day referred to one maybe blue!!! This hiding of the blue suit totally weakens Tom Lillis statement about two white suits and other peoples statements and sworn evidence. If you look at "Gerry Molloy on this take 19 this is the same blue . There is a massive difference than two white suits and one suit being a destictive blue. . And no DNA or Blood on the suits
Take 22). Mark Heffernan was himself entered into the Witness Protection Programme concerning the DPP V Collins and others. He an none of his Family have ever been involved in crime. He was on the Late Late Show, involved in Charity Events, has a Fleet of Cars, Vans and at one time had 20 to 30 people working for him. It emerged all his employers are covered to drive his vehicles and did drive his vehicles. He was asked if Ger Mackin worked for him at any stage and he stated he did not but Ger Mackin's girl often did office work for him in his office. He knew Ger Mackin and Pat Hayes and met them from time to time and on the day in question he met Ger Mackin. He strongly denied that he was in the house and wearing a white suit as alleged by Tom Lillis and that he had nothing to do with this crime. He constantly stated to Gardai ye have one of my cars in the area but not me I was not in the car at the time of the crime or connected with this crime. It now appears because Tom Lillis'e evidence is rejected the DPP/Gardai are now changing and saying your car in the area and Mark being with Ger Mackin during the morning and later is enough to convict. It was clear to everyone in Court that any person could have borrowed his car and brought it back. Everyone else charged with this crime were in contact with each other by phone but Mark Heffernan was not in contact with such people by phone. So in effect the DPP/Gardai are asking the Judges to convict on the movements of his car and his connection with Ger Mackin. There was at least ten people in the house on the date in question. Some were arrested for withholding information and others not arrested even thought they admitted they were present in the Kitchen during the assault!!! Surely an eye witness to an assault is withholding information if he simply says I don't want to make a statement and the Gardai just leave it at that. Now who is breaking the law?
14). Tom Lillis admits he committed perjury and says sorry to the Judges and says he was under pressure. He now accepts he did go to Henry Street and say he did go to Dublin and brought back what he believed to be a large consignment of drugs. This was only when he knew the Gardai were being called to say he did give the information. Simple as that I am sorry Judges I am under pressure. Perjury is Perjury no matter what or for what reasons. He alleged he was shown pictures of Mark while detained and Inspector Brynes swore he was not and Tom Lillis must be mistaking. Then he alleged he was drunk when he made his statement about Mark and the Gardai could smell the drink of him. Now the Gardai are being called and I am sure they will say he was pure sober. This is an alcoholic and drinks 247 FACT. He constantly dozens of times stated two while suits. Then for some strange reason at the end to day he stated one maybe Blue. This is because he knows now one of the suits is Blue. Then he stated what is in his statement about Mark coming down the stairs is wrong and he should not have said this. This statement, the stairs allegation was in his statement and he changed his story. He now says he seen Mark coming into the sitting room where he was sitting down drinking and smoking. Then for the first time remarkably he alleged the two people in white suit had hoods pulled up over their heads. He constantly swore he was sitting with Ger Hayes and this was for sure. Then he was told this is not true and can't be. He got cross and stated it was true. Then he was shown a video CCTV of him collecting Ger after 2pm as Ger was in hospital all along!!! He nearly died and stated that is me collecting Ger and if you had not shown me that video I would not have known I collected Ger or left the house!!! He constantly stated he can't remember what happened yesterday and only for the video he would still be saying he did not leave the house and Ger was in the sitting room sitting next to him. This man is completely unstable and unreliable. However at this stage the Judges has to rule if he is credible. If for some strange reason they accept he is credible the Trial continues as if a Jury is present and it will the Judges have to decide if his evidence is reliable to convict. He stated he was drunk on the day and taking medication, only one of his stories, and he is drunk 247 and can't remember what happens yesterday. He stated he dreads prison and don't want to go back there and would say anything to not go back. He is an extremely confused man but for some reason the DPP and Gardai are relying on him and continue to say he is credible and reliable. And the DPP officer is totally ignoring the fact that her witness has admitted perjury!!!
Take 3). The Victim in this case Daniel Quilligan who suffered serious injuries and a terrifying experience has been remanded in custody until the outcome of the trial. The DPP and Gardai alleged he may not attend Court to give evidence and has been avoiding Gardai concerning the Trial. His Wife was in Court when in his absence the Court put him into Custody. She was extremely up set and confused as to why her Husband who is the Victim has now been put into Custody. He was not giving an opportunity to represent himself or have legal representation when the application was made to remand him into Custody and the Order was made in his absence. It will emerge that Daniel Quilligan's Friend John Cammell who was present during the attack and witnessed the attack was contacted by Gardai and he refused to make a statement and the Gardai just left it at that. This to me is extremely difficult to understand as it is an offence to with hold information Section 9 (1) of the Offenses Against the State Act and the fact that the Gardai arrested other people under this Act concerning the attack. So it appears the Gardai failed in their duty to carry out an adequate investigation and in accordance with the Braddish V DPP Supreme Court Ruling, the Gardai have a duty to retain all relevant evidence and to seek out all relevant evidence.
Take 6). This Trial could not commence on the 13th as disclosure has not been finalized. The Court adjourned the matter until Wednesday 15th with a few to starting the trial and the Court is hoping both the Defense and DPP can finalize the said disclosure. The DPP also stated that at this stage it appears the main prosecution witness has been entered into the Witness Progremme. This witness Tom Lillis is the same person who allegedly entered Henry Street, Gardai Station and informed Gardai that he recently brought a large consignment of drugs to Limerick from Dublin and stated where the drugs were. However, he was not formally interviewed, arrested or charged with this so call drug running and the Gardai never sought to seized the drugs. I also noticed that Judge Hunt, who sits in the middle of the Judges, is an extremely intelligent Judge, who is firm, fair and even entering he stated the "Plane must leave the runway" "all the horses has to be in the stable" and there must be a full "Delmontie" concerning the disclosure. I have yet to establish the names of the other two Judges who appears to be fair and firm as well.
Take 20). Yesterday the Judges ruled out Tom Lillis's evidence concerning his alleged identification of Mark Heffernan due to the fact that he had drink and medication taken and hours before tried to commit suicide. The Judges had indicated on Wednesday that they may make this decision. Back until Monday to hear submissions from the DPP concerning the other evidence. It is clear that the DPP and Gardai would never have initiated this Trail without Tom Lillis as they constantly stated in open Court that Tom Lillis is their main witness and went so far to recently put him into the Witness Programme. What concerns me is that the DPP is still fighting the case knowing Tom Lillis committed perjury and the DPP did not with draw his evidence once he committed perjury and constantly told lies and stated he can't even remember what happens yesterday . This begs the obvious question, how did he allegedly enter the Garda station over 6 months later and make a comprehensive and detailed statement to Gardai when he was in fear, had drink on board and smelling of drink and furthermore he thought he was going to be charged with serious drugs offences and he admitted crimes "cleaning up blood" and getting rid of the alleged suits. He has never been granted immunity for these his crimes. So why did the DPP and Gardai stand by this man knowing that he was a compulsive liar and is a serious alcoholic drinking 247 who is mentally unstable????????????
25). What I observed and sensed about the Special Criminal Court Judges is that the Judges "side" with the DPP and Gardai and that the Judges are positioned or organized to intimidate the Defense and People in Court. Take Justice Hunt, who sits in the middle and is in constant control and specks or addresses the Defense and DPP 98% of the time. He dominates the Court and makes decisions or comments without consulting with the other Judges and he shouts at the Defense but not at the DPP or makes rude comments or remarks to the Defense but not to the DPP. What was shocking is the Fact that Tom Lillis admitted he committed perjury and the Judges simple said nothing and in their final ruling still said nothing about Tom Lillis. It was obvious to everyone in Court if a defense witness lied and admitted it Justice Hunt would have screamed at the defense witness and advised that he be charged with perjury. So the Fact of the matter is a Prosecution Witness can lie and admit it and the Judges say nothing about it. If this is their attitude then this backs up the view that Gardai can lie and nothing will be done about it. Justice Hunt's attitude is arrogant in a large scale and he is of the opinion that he knows what the other Judges are thinking and that he can dominate the proceedings. Justice Hunt was fuming that the Defense Senior Counsel Mr. Monroe was destroying Tom Lillis in cross examination and deliberately tried to stop the Defense from destroying or catching out Tom Lillis. The whole purpose of this cross examination was to prove Tom Lillis was lying but the Judges were not happy that the Defense were succeeding. So the Special Criminal Court has to be Scrapped or new procedures put in place to stop the middle Judge running the proceedings. Justice must be seen to be done and in the Special Criminal Court this is not the case. People can clearly see and sense the biased nature of the Judges and the proceedings and the impression is that the Judge in the middle runs the proceedings and the other Judges are only there to make up the numbers. This should not be the impression of any Court people.
Take 5). When Gerard Mackin and Mark Heffernan were arrested on the 24th day of May 2016 concerning the alleged offenses dated the 14th day of September 1015. Chief Superintendent Sheehan was briefed by Now Inspector Brynes and up dated concerning the investigation. On the 19th day of April 2016 D/G Pat Whelan discovered vital evidence after the main prosecution witness allegedly walked into Henry Street, Garda Station to supply more information on the 19th day of April 2016. As stated in Take 4 this vital evidence was never disclosed in the book of evidence. D/G Niamh Brosnan took down the main witness's statement that day, 19/4/16. The main prosecution witness allegedly walks into the Gardai Station 7 months later to inform the Gardai where vital evidence was and alleged he put this vital evidence there on the 14th day of September 2015. He also alleged on specking to Gardai on the 19th he was getting text messages on his phone in the last day which put him under pressure and he gave D/G Niamh Brosnan his phone number which is recorded in his statement. He then stated he "fucked" the phone away. Garda Brosnan and other Gardai never asked where did you get rid of the alleged phone or never checked out where the phone was. As stated Gardai have a duty to seek out all relevant evidence.
13). Tom Lillis re confirmed for sure he was shown Mark Heffernan's picture off camera by Gardai and that he was told what to say by Gardai. He never seen Mark prior to the date in question AS HE PREVIOUSLY ALLEGED, was intoxicated on the day, has a defective brain, compulsive liar, constantly lied in his final statement, and committed perjury. Shocking and sad witness who is totally addicted to alcohol and substances and can't remember things or events. This person drinks 247 and is constantly confused. YET THE DPP AND GARDAI STILL PUT THIS MAN THROUGH HELL THEY ALL KNOW HE IS LYING AND STILL WON'T STOP THE TRIAL. SHOCKING TO SEE A MAN CONFUSED, LYING, ETC AND THAT GARDAI BUILT THIS MAN INTO A MAIN WITNESS!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY CAN SERIOUSLY ABUSE THIS MAN AND THAT THESE PEOPLE ATTEMPTED TO BRAIN WALSH HIM. THIS MAN IS CAPABLE OF COMMITTING SUICIDE AND ATTEMPTED TO DO SO THE NIGHT BEFORE THE CRIME AND WAS TAKING OF THE BRIDE!!! HE IMMEDIATELY WENT DRINKING THE NEXT MORNING AND DRANK EXCESSIVELY AND TOOK MEDICATION. CONSTANTLY LYING AND CONFUSED IN THE WITNESS BOX AND EVERYONE KNOWS HE IS A MISFORTUNE. BUT PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY THOUGHT ALL THREE WOULD PLEAD GUILTY AND ALL THEIR DEALINGS WITH THIS MAN WOULD NEVER COME OUT. AT LEAST AS HE SAID TODAY HE NOW HAS A PLACE TO SLEEP INSTEAD OF BEING HOMELESS AND SLEEPING UNDER BRIDGES AND ELSE WHERE. I AM A 100% SURE THE WITNESS PROTECTION ACCOMMODATION WILL SOON END AND HE WILL BE ABOUNDED BY THE DPP/GARDAI AND STATE. I SEEN THIS MAN ON CCTV TO DAY BEING QUESTIONED AND SHACKING VIOLENTLY VOMITING AND MAKING THE VOMIT GO BACK DOWN AND THE GARDAI CONTINUED WITH INTERVIEWS OF THIS MAN AND BY THE TIME THEY WERE FINISHED WITH HIM HE JUST SAID WHAT THEY TOLD HIM!!! IT WAS LIKE GARDAI SAYING AN ELEPHANT WAS THERE DID YOU SEE THE ELEPHANT TOM? YES I DID SEE AN ELEPHANT!!!!!!!!!!!!! GARDAI Tell HIM what they want him to say AND THEN ASK HIM. TYPICAL GARDA ABUSE. SHOCKING. NEWS PAPERS ARE NOT REPORTING WHAT HE IS SAYING.
Take 23). Can't for the life of me understand why this case is still running.Monday the DPP made final submissions again! The Judges will give their verdict on Friday at 11.am. Who is going to investigate the fact that Limerick Gardai acted unlawfully concerning this whole case. They withheld the finding of a blue and white suit , no DNA, Blood on the suits all Gardai statements and details deliberately withheld from Book of Evidence and that fact that Tom Lillis was a drug transporter and informer working for Gardai all along. Tom Lillis committed perjury in front of Inspector Burns, D/G James Hourihane, D/G A O Driscoll and others including prosecution officer Tara Burns all who knew he kept up the lies until he was caught out. Tara Burns S.C. had a duty to immediately inform the Court that her main prosecution was lying and committing perjury. All she did was let Tom Lillis continue with the lies and only for the Fact that defense Counsel days later got Tom Lillis to admit he had committed perjury but the fact of the matter is that once he initially committed perjury the Prosecution Counsel should not have continued to support her alleged main witness once she knew he was continuing with the lies/perjury. She supported him right up to the end of the Trial which is extremely shocking and obviously she was taking instructions from DPP Clarie Loftus.
Take 4). The book of evidence was served on all three men on the 24th day of October 2016 in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act, 1967, Section 4 B (1) (a). It contains the list of prosecution witnesses and statements of their intended evidence 56 in total. The Gardai draft up the book of evidence and the DPP considers its contents and signs the book of evidence to sanction the trial of the three men. A number of Gardai including, D.Garda Pat Whelan, D/G Niamh Brosnan D/Sergeant Denis Tracey, Garda Gerard Fitzgerald,Inspector Byrens and Garda Nick Jones are listed to give evidence and have supplied statements concerning their intended evidence. All relevant evidence must be disclosed in the book of evidence. This Golden Rule and Procedure is Cardinal in the Interest of Justice. The above mentioned Gardai were in possession of vital evidence which was not included in the book of evidence. Senior Gardai and or legal advisers instructed that vital their evidence was not to be included in the book of evidence or in any Gardai Statements contained in the book of evidence. This evidence seriously under minds the main prosecution witness's versions of events as contained in his statement made to D/G Gardai Niamh Brosnan on the 19th day of April 2016 the book was served on the 24th of October 2016 and vital evidence was not included in the book which under minds the main prosecution witness. It is an offence to attempt to pervert the course of justice and who ever directed the with holding of vital evidence from the book of evidence has committed such offense in my opinion. This vital evidence was finally disclosed by Helena Kiely for the DPP by letter dated the 20th day of February 2017 which was the date of the prearranged Hearing Date. This evidence should have been disclosed in the book of evidence as this evidence was in Gardai possession sense the 19th day of April 2016.
Take 21). Every person is entitled to a fair trial and this include receiving all relevant evidence. It is common practice or policy for Gardai to withhold relevant evidence. Who will investigate Gardai for attempting pervert the course of justice? Senior Gardai in Limerick all knew about the finding of a "blue" suit and never disclosed this in the book of evidence. I am confident even at this stage the Limerick Gardai have not disclosed all relevant evidence in respect of this case!!! I will be making my own inquiries after this trial as I believe material was deliberately not disclosed so watch this space or comment which I will back up soon. This is a classic case of the DPP/Gardai having a main witness and his evidence has been destroyed by the Defense and everyone knows there would have been no case only for Tom Lillis. Rather then admit defeat or do the right thing the DPP/Gardai are putting still trying to put an innocent man to prison serious activities. This case is going to come back and haunt the DPP/Gardai as Mark Heffernan's Family will not put up with this any longer.
This video and takes are based on documents in my possession. I covered this story based on the material in my possession and I strongly believe that no person should be "set up" by Gardai or DPP or other people. I have been asked to cover more cases and I will do so if I believe the Gardai are abusing people. Just handed alleged gardai statements about a case. I will be doing a video soon about this case and following this young man's case. PS, this case refers to the DPP v Shane Larkin.
17). To days Joke. It is illegal to drive a car with a point or two but now legal according to Limerick Gardai to make a statement with "drink on board smelling of drink be an alcoholic" when making a statement. Breaking news: Tom Lillis to sue Garda Commissioner, D/G Whelen and D/G Brosnan for breaching his Constitutional Rights by not allowing him access to a Solicitor, taking a statement when he was drunk and mentally unstable, dictating the statement and abusing him concerning the DPP v Heffernan case and putting his life in danger.
Take 8). If this attack was so savage, ruthless, animalistic, brutal and it was as a matter of fact, and the victim had to give his evidence and relive the whole experience and nothing changed in the so called evidence for the DPP and Gardai, why did the DPP and Gardai withdraw the section 15 offense and where delighted to do so. The DPP has a duty to the people of Ireland and accused to prefer charges that its believes it can prove. Absolutely nothing changed to weaken the DPP's allegations and alleged evidence. Within minutes of Dan Quilligan's evidence the deal was done. So why,why,why did the DPP and Gardai act in such a manner??? They knew the maximum sentence was 5 years and policy to reduce sentence for the guilty plead and criminal or no criminal record etc so they all knew it was going to be around the 3 year mark sentence for such a brutal crime which is like what Our Lord when through. This man was set upon battered around the face, body and literally nailed to the ground and had to force himself from the position of being nailed to the ground to escape all on his own in excruciating pain. Why,why,why the decision??? The whole Country is in shock with the decision of the DPP and Gardai these where people were over the moon and it was like as it Paddy's Day came early for them when the two pleaded guilty. However, they are extremely concerned that Mr. Heffernan did not plead and end the trial. His Counsel excused Dan Quilligan so he does not have to be called again. Everyone accepted Mr. Quilligan's evidence. So why is the DPP and Gardai not pleased the trial did not end and Mr. Heffernan is shouting his innocence? Have the DPP and Gardai something hide? Answer: yes, yes, yes, they all with held vital evidence, mislead the defense, Court, people of Ireland and they are calling a self confessed drugs transporter to allegedly put Mr. Heffernan coming down the stair in a WHITE SUIT with another man in a WHITE SUIT to attack Mr. Quilligan. Tom Lillis's alleged he brought a large consignment of drugs on instruction of Pat Hayes to Limerick and stated which house the drugs are in. All high ranking Gardai were notified. This man constantly enters the Gardai stations for years and allegedly informs on people to safe himself. Did the Gardai check out his allegations about the Red Cow pick up point and retain the CCTV to back up his allegations? Why was he not charged formally interviewed? Why was Pat Hayes not arrested? Why did the Gardai not use Tom Hayes as a State Witness then which was in November 2016. Why was he not asked specifically where are the drugs in the house? Why is the Gardai allowing drugs to be sold on the Street when it is alleged drugs came into Limerick and are in such a house? Is it policy to allow this to happen? If it is policy it is a criminal offence to allow such things to happen and shocking that Gardai are allegedly sanctioning people to bring in drugs and allowing the drugs to be sold!!! Maybe this is why the "deal was done" to end the trial and maybe Tom Lillis is lying through his teeth when he walked into the station seven months later and stated he through the alleged WHITE SUITS over a high wall in Kennedy Part. The Garai immediately when and retained TWO SUITS. NUMEROUS PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE INCLUDING MR QUILLIGAN WHOM THE DPP ACCEPTED, STATED TWO WHITE SUITS were worn by two people during the crime ASSAULT AND IMPRISONMENT. BREAKING NEW:...THE GARDAI FOUND TWO SUITS ONE WHITE AND ONE BLUE. ALL THIS EVIDENCE WAS WITH HELD FROM THE DEFENSE AND NOT INCLUDED IN THE BOOK OF EVIDENCE WHICH WAS SERVED ON THE 24TH OF OCTOBER 2016 AND ONLY SERVED ON THE HEARING DATE 20TH OF FEBRUARY 2017. GARDAI HAD THIS INFORMATION ALL ALONG AND WITH HELD IT. THERE IS A BIG MASSIVE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WITNESSES INCLUDING TOM LILLIS STATING TWO WHITE SHITS WHERE USED AND A BLUE SUIT BEING FOUND.
10). I have never seen a case where the DPP signed and issued the book of evidence and it has now emerged that vital evidence was deliberately with held by Senior Gardai from Limerick. And the DPP continued with the prosecution after receiving the with held vital evidence. Then more vital evidence emerged which showed Tom Lillis was an alleged Drugs Transporter whom the Gardai never arrested or charged. The the DPP and Gardai withdrew the serious charge and two accused get 3 years sentences. The third accused is being put under pressure to plead also and may do so soon. Who is going to investigate the DPP and Gardai for with holding vital evidence and allowing drugs to be brought and sold in Limerick. I will investigate and expose the Gardai for their lies and drugs activities. No Garda should ever allow a person to bring drugs into Limerick.
Take 9). (I had to hide comments so that people can follow my Takes in sequence) See video "Gardai allowing drugs into Limerick" Why did the DPP and Gardai accept a guilty plea and withdraw the serious charge? Everyone including Tom Lillis stated the men wore white suits during the attack. Seven months later Tom Lillis directed Gardai to two suits one white and one blue. Numerous Gardai make statements about this new and alleged vital information. However, all this evidence was not included in the book of evidence. The DPP and Gardai want this trial to end with guilty pleas and this will stop Tom Lillis from giving evidence and stop questions about Gardai with holding this vital information and concerning their main witness supplying information about a drug consignment and the Gardai letting him leave the Station and not formally interviewing him or charge him. And worse the Gardai not getting or attempting to get the drugs which were sold on the Streets. I will be putting the letter wrote by a Garda to all Senior Gardai stating what Tom Lillis confessed to and the details about the drugs consignment. There is a massive difference between two white suits and two suits one white and one blue. Dan Quilligan stated there was two white suits.
11). This Trial is due to end today and if so I can do a full and detailed video concerning the concealing of the evidence of the "Blue Suit". Chief Superintendent Shehan, Superintendent Smart, D/I E. O Neil, D/G Pat Whelan, D/G Niamh Brosnan, D/S D. Tracey, Gardai N Jones, and Gardai G Fitzgerald all knew about the finding of a "blue" suit and for some reason their evidence was not entered into the book of evidence. As a matter of fact the above Crime Scene Garda G Fitzgerald never even had a statement in the book of evidence while the others had but nothing about finding a "Blue" suit. How can a Crime Scene Examiner's evidence not be included in the book of evidence if it is relevant!!! There was a deliberate decision made by Gardai not to disclose this vital evidence in the book of evidence. So this is happening in other cases and has happened before Gardai with hold vital evidence hoping there is guilty pleas at an early stage and accordingly nothing comes out about the real evidence. Shocking and I am sure people will want to know if it is happening on a regular bases and some one has to explain about the hiding of the "Blue Suit" from the Book of Evidence.
Take 18). This Trial is due to end on the 29th day of March 2017. At this stage the DPP and Gardai still have to account why vital evidence was left out of the Book of Evidence, namely two suits one white and one blue found this is not a matter for the Court or Judges but my concern is who is going to investigate the DPP or Gardai for deliberately with holding this vital information when the book was served. There must be many more case out there where vital evidence was not supplied in the books of evidence when it was known to Gardai. I believe Mark Heffernan is innocent and that Tom Lillis was briefed by Gardai off camera and that he made it all up to please the Gardai who had serious charges in the back ground for Tom Lillis and Tom Lillis knew this or believed he was going to be charged with serious offences. This man is totally unreliable and mentally unwell and will say and do anything to stay out of prison. I AM INFORMED THAT IF MARK IS CONVICTED HIS FAMILY WILL START THE BIGGEST CAMPAIGN IN IRELAND. Obviously they will have my support.
Take 24). The Verdict: On th 7th day of April 2017 Mark Heffernan found Not Guilty by Three Judges. Not one word from Judges's about Tom Lillis and Gardai lying and about the activities of Gardai allowing Tom Lillis to bring drugs into Limerick and not charge or arrest him. As a matter of fact the Judges appeared to suggest Mark Heffernnan should change his company. Typical Judges's comments not referring to the wrong doings of the Gardai and Tom Lillis or DPP. A man was nearly convicted on a selected Gardai alleged main witness who worked for the Gardai for years and was a drugs transporter sanctioned by Gardai. Mark Heffernan was served with a false and misleading Book of Evidence and it appears Chief Superintendent Shehan and Gardai are getting let off the hook for this. They are in for a big surprise as I won't let the matter rest.
12). BREAKING NEWS- Tom Lillis swore Gardai showed him pictures of Mark Heffernan. This was not in the book of evidence again concealing evidence. Tom Lillis also denied making the allegations about the drug consignment into Limerick obviously he does not know about the Garda Document sent by D/G Downey and witnessed by D/G Brick see my new video "Gardai allowing drugs into Limerick" . DPP and Gardai even this morning put more pressure for a guilty plea. This was again rejected by Mark Heffernan. Tom Lillis is being called again for cross examination again tomorrow. It appears the Gardai are being put on trial for their illegal activities and concealing evidence and their own witness is exposing them. As stated this man's life has been ruined by Gardai who I will prove got him to say it was Mark Heffernan. At one stage in the book of evidence which I will be introducing next video, he says I don't know Mark Junior. The Garda tell him who Mark is and describe him and he replies "I would have to see a picture I don't know him" shocking. By the time Gardai were finished with him he knew Mark and knew about two white suits!!! Clearly on reading his interviews Gardai are forcing all the details down his throat and he eventually goes along with the details when making his alleged statement. He even admitted today he did not make his statement only signed it after Gardai put in the details for him!!! Gardai have been doing this for years simple as that.
