Тёмный

GNX or GTN to equip your aircraft build for IFR? 

Midwest Panel Builders
Подписаться 5 тыс.
Просмотров 109 тыс.
50% 1

www.midwestpanels.com
shop.midwestpanels.com This video gives a comprehensive look at the question we get a lot. Should I equip my new build with a GTN 650 which has a navigation radio built in or go with a GNX 375 WAAS receiver as a sole source of navigation. We explain how it's possible to equip your plane for IFR with only a WAAAS GPS and what some of the arguments are against it and what we tell customers. Both units are incredibly capable and as mentioned in the video, we are not trying to change anybody minds we just want to help answer questions builders have with known facts.

Опубликовано:

 

12 апр 2020

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 216   
@kevinbutler9786
@kevinbutler9786 Год назад
I learned how to fly at sling pilot academy, now fly as a professional and have only flown glass panels and waas. In 4+ years of flying and at 1300+ hrs, I have never had any issues with waas.
@Aerospace_Education
@Aerospace_Education 3 года назад
It's more money, but I'm old school and they will be ripping the VOR's and ILS's from my cold dead fingertips :) You all do really beautiful work.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 3 года назад
Maybe sooner than you think. Thank you for the compliment!
@georgebanker2669
@georgebanker2669 3 года назад
Yep, they will.
@andik2329
@andik2329 2 года назад
Great video. I have a 650 in my panel and would choose the 375 if it would have been available at that time. There will be more GPS approaches in the future, especially at smaller airports. ILS will not go away at bigger airports. VORs are almost obsolete. After owning my RV-10 for 6 years and 400 hrs I only had to fly 2 real IFR approaches to the minimum. I think a lot of people get carried away with all those screens. It also doesn't matter if you're owning the newest equipment. What matters is that you can operate it properly under IFR and a full pattern.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 2 года назад
ILS may not go away soon but it will go eventually, as they are working on a system called GBAS, Ground Based Augmentation System that will allow one tower to cover all the runways at an airport as unlike ILS which only covers one landing direction into a runway and it will allow CATIII type approaches. Huge money savings over ILS with the same accuracy and minimums.
@shawncrump7924
@shawncrump7924 Год назад
What a great video! I’d like to point out that 125 only applies to large aircraft, 20 seats or more and/or 6000 lb. payload. Still a great idea to have that backup option though. Even in the smallest of aircraft.
@ericktijerino
@ericktijerino 4 года назад
Lots of great information, thank you and keep up the good work!
@haroldlocay3946
@haroldlocay3946 4 года назад
Very informative video. Thanks so much for posting it ! Keep them coming.
@schmidbc
@schmidbc 3 года назад
This was a fantastic video. Would love to see more like it.
@45shooterTX
@45shooterTX 3 года назад
Thank you for putting together this presentation. It opened my eyes to some options that I have not considered
@johnandersen3185
@johnandersen3185 3 года назад
Really well done video, professional and thorough and has been a big help in helping me decide what navigation unit to go with.
@bryanwade814
@bryanwade814 3 года назад
Great video as I shop around and try and decide on my panel upgrades!
@backcountyrpilot
@backcountyrpilot 3 месяца назад
This vid is great, but it is 3 years old. I’m 99% sure that about 2 years ago the FAA issued a bulletin stating that you can take your IFR check-ride with a GPS-only panel, like the Garmin 175, 375, 625, or even the 400W.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 3 месяца назад
Thanks for watching, another viewer mentioned the same thing as you have in this comment so I set out to find the answer and will be posting a follow up video to this. What we found is that the bulletin you are referring to did allow LPV to be counted as a precision approach which was one of the hang ups in the discussion but when I called my local FISDO to discuss the topic, they had a another item they pointed out that would still keep their opinion on the side of not allowing it for a check ride, we will show this in the update video.
@patrickshine4329
@patrickshine4329 4 года назад
Very nice video, thanks for having all the links to the relevant FAR/AIMs too
@trellkennett
@trellkennett 3 года назад
You have really good presentation skills!
@shawnazimi7500
@shawnazimi7500 3 года назад
Very good video, precise, well referenced, down to the point, fast paced, Steve knows GPS and WASS very well.
@CatarineausArmory
@CatarineausArmory 3 года назад
Awesome presentation sir.
@bassface84
@bassface84 2 года назад
Wow. That was a very thorough explanation. Well Done.
@Captnoatp
@Captnoatp 3 года назад
An absolutely great and informative video. Thanks from across the Atlantic
@gordonfeliciano4315
@gordonfeliciano4315 3 года назад
Very informative and I love how you explained the pricing points and reasons why pricing can vary with functionality, etc. I think you just saved a lot of pilots a lot of money.
@judgeearl795
@judgeearl795 5 месяцев назад
Excellent presentation. Thank you, Steve.
@CLEAREDDIRECT
@CLEAREDDIRECT 3 года назад
Fantastic info and presentation, thank you.
@haydenm.3912
@haydenm.3912 Год назад
This is by far the best video I have found on this topic. Thank you! Great work.
@GlasairS2-RG
@GlasairS2-RG 3 года назад
Very informative. I went with the GTN 650 for the very reasons you brought up
@robertfidler957
@robertfidler957 3 года назад
Much needed video explaining the differences in these models
@itsathaithing
@itsathaithing Год назад
Might I add that you are awesome at doing these videos. Garmin and the other companies would be wise to have you review all their products.
@pusherpilot
@pusherpilot 3 года назад
THANKS for the explanation.
@itsathaithing
@itsathaithing Год назад
I really like this video. I have no idea what all the different models cover and this clears up a bunch of that. Thanks
@IanHoyt
@IanHoyt 8 месяцев назад
Exactly the video I was looking for. Thanks!!
@SeanFChannel
@SeanFChannel 3 года назад
Outstanding video! Thank you! 🙏🏻
@iFly4BBQ
@iFly4BBQ 3 года назад
Excellent overview!
@chandrashekharthakkar169
@chandrashekharthakkar169 Год назад
Very nice detailed explanation. Thanks
@savagecub
@savagecub 2 года назад
OUTSTANDING video SteveO ! You really did your research.
@MagicBiscuitShow
@MagicBiscuitShow 2 года назад
Good stuff. Helps clear up some 'important' things when considering which way to go. Thanks for the post. Cheers, Chuck (NE Florida) : +)
@jeffswartwood7316
@jeffswartwood7316 3 года назад
Excellent video
@3dogman311
@3dogman311 3 года назад
Wow - a wealth of helpful information as I attempt to figure out what my IFR panel needs will be for my RV14A. Many thanks..!
@unclefreddy2009
@unclefreddy2009 3 года назад
I have a while to wait for a panel for mine but this really made me think of what my needs truly are especially that 375 inclusion of a transponder. Excellent video
@tedc6694
@tedc6694 3 года назад
Great video. Though I've watched it before, in prep for which gps nav to buy for my BE35, I now need new comm radio too
@flyyourdream9716
@flyyourdream9716 3 года назад
Excellent video and information.
@korbike1
@korbike1 4 года назад
Good video, well done!
@frankrizzo3729
@frankrizzo3729 11 месяцев назад
Great video, awesome information. I'm a student pilot getting ready to build a Zenith Super Duty and this video shows me some options
@muhammadsteinberg
@muhammadsteinberg 4 года назад
My head is about to explode! Young man did an excellent job explaining Garmin's offerings and knowledge on the WAAS/GPS relationship. My present stack was modern when they transitioned from soup cans and string. Hell I still have an ADF on board. Mucho dinero to replace 😢. Refinance the house and get a 650xi...lol
@kurtisarnold2788
@kurtisarnold2788 3 года назад
Excellent detailed rational information. Thank you
@columbusheights7000
@columbusheights7000 3 года назад
Great details simply explained. Thanks
@user-ii1xn4tt4s
@user-ii1xn4tt4s 4 года назад
GOOD JOB! Yes, 375 is my choise.
@ibgarrett
@ibgarrett 4 года назад
Thanks for doing this. I was whining over on FB about the lack of space for a 750 over the 650 (I’m sure I was trying the patience of whomever was responding to me). The demo of what the G3X can do with the 650 pretty much answered all of the questions as to why I would want to stop complaining.
@purplemonkeydishwasher9360
@purplemonkeydishwasher9360 2 года назад
You are an excellent presenter of knowledge, sir. I appreciate your video and teaching presentations.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 2 года назад
Thanks for watching!
@seanmurphy9632
@seanmurphy9632 Месяц назад
Working on my instrument rating, flying my plane with a 375. This cleared up so much. Thanks!
@andrewrichmond2129
@andrewrichmond2129 3 года назад
Incredible level of detail and professional approach, even reviewing FAA regs on screen. Thank you!
@JoesRCCorner
@JoesRCCorner 2 года назад
Thanks for this presentation. I chose a G175 which will allow me to perform RNAV/LPV approaches. My plan for the plane is to be a VFR Plane with IFR capability. This will allow me to either get on the ground if weather comes in, or get out of somewhere to get to VFR conditions.
@titanhank1
@titanhank1 3 года назад
Fantastic explanation!
@JabariHunt
@JabariHunt 6 месяцев назад
Great video, thank you!
@benjaminnevins5211
@benjaminnevins5211 4 года назад
Great video! I think my decision will be the 375. Having the transponder built in is a great feature. I honestly thought about getting a separate NAV radio, but I don't think it will get used enough to justify the cost. The small screen is a little annoying, but it can be loaded onto the G3X.
@singlecom
@singlecom Год назад
Another great video. Thanks again.
@dougkulick6205
@dougkulick6205 3 года назад
outstanding insight for keeping decisions real thanks
@delta69er
@delta69er 2 года назад
Great video. GPS does not use triangulation, it uses trilateration.
@jasons757
@jasons757 3 года назад
Excellent sir! I just went GPS only on my Aerostar. Pulled a bunch of '75 Collins out. and I went the GNC355a plus two KY196's and the new 3 com 345 Audio Panel. Additionally I have a stand alone GDL 50 and Aerra 760...... My mistake was using a 330esd instead of the 345 transponder. I may add a 375 thus giving me redundant transponders and the traffic and weather on all devices.
@rfresh1011
@rfresh1011 2 года назад
Great presentation...!!!
@dalvynegron1938
@dalvynegron1938 Год назад
Thanks for the info
@RayWoods
@RayWoods 3 года назад
Very informative. Thankyou
@robertgentry9436
@robertgentry9436 3 года назад
Good Info! I already have a good KT-76C digital transponder with GDL82 ADS B. Additionally, a GNS430w and a KX155 with glideslope. So... just add a GPS 175 and a newer generation iPad with Garmin Pilot for the nice big display and Bluetooth connectivity, creating a great setup for under 5k! The nice thing about iPad display is with the right mount, it can be right at your fingertips and have an even bigger and in some ways more versatile display than a GTN 750. Basically, the 175 and KX155 give you everything for a #1 GPS/Nav/Com, and the 430w becomes the #2 backup. Cool thing is that you can Bluetooth your flight plans from the iPad with either Garmin Pilot or Foreflight apps to the 175 and it can then cross fill them to the 430w. I'm also considering some of the GI 275 stuff that also connects with Bluetooth when upgrading round instruments or getting rid of a vacuum system. Lots of info for relatively small bucks (in avionics terms) and can keep the round gauges for backups and retain the retro look in my classic.
@dkeyyablo11
@dkeyyablo11 7 месяцев назад
One great video, expertly done with poignant and relevant information given .thank you
@John.Halsted
@John.Halsted 7 месяцев назад
Great video!
@DanCoastie
@DanCoastie 2 года назад
I think I made the right decision…dual g5 with a 375…great video!
@Susieandchris
@Susieandchris 4 года назад
Very helpful Thankyou
@jawadsyahab
@jawadsyahab 3 года назад
Thank you for your information, we want to replace the KLN 90B in a bell 430 and i think GNX 375 is the only one GPS (+ ads-b) will fit with small space at pedestal.
@stlflyguy
@stlflyguy 4 года назад
Awesome video!
@rigilchrist
@rigilchrist 2 года назад
Excellent presentation. I'm planning on a Sling TSi. I wish you guys were here in the UK to build the panel! (subscribed)
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 2 года назад
Hi Bob, We have built several panels and have several more to build for Slings in the UK.
@landinggearup
@landinggearup 3 года назад
14CFR125 applies to no homebuilt. What it does apply to would require a second navigation source. A GPS with WAAS is ONE source. To encourage IFR operations with one navigation source is ill advised particularly when it is your com source as well. One box quits (and they do quit from time to time) and you wont be shooting any approach ASR or otherwise. And yes the ACS require more than a GPS approach for the rating. Good overview of the garmin offerings though.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 3 года назад
landinggearup not only have I instructed in aircraft with one NAV Com but many fly with one. If I lost my GPS it wouldn’t really be that big of a deal, yes you can shoot an ASR approach without a GPS, same as a no gyro approach.
@sunnydayrcpilot
@sunnydayrcpilot 3 года назад
Midwest Panel Builders....landing gear up is correct. Part 125 has NOTHING to do with small planes. Basically, that is for planes with more than 20 pax. Like they said the rest of the video is good though.
@kamikazeren
@kamikazeren 3 года назад
I don't think single source is an appreciable risk as there are much greater dangers to IFR flying, especially in a single engine recip. There is a degree of redundancy if a G3X is installed as that will have a sufficient nav capability to mostly fix the nav problem, albeit the PIC will have to make a certain declaration to legally use that backup source. Also, an IFR flight will almost always be operating in a radar environment so the controller can provide navigation and terrain separation. Money is probably better spent on a good, reliable powerplant. JMHO.
@richardperry21
@richardperry21 3 года назад
nice job Sir,,,
@tomlawrence713
@tomlawrence713 3 года назад
GPS175 can be used for an instrument check ride. To execute a non precision approach, you turn WAAS to shoot a LNAV non precision approach.
@haroldlocay3946
@haroldlocay3946 2 года назад
You mean turn WAAS off to shoot LNAV ? And the second non precision approach use LPV to greater than 300 ft min ? What about needed two nav aids ?
@dsikka
@dsikka 2 года назад
Another great video!
@sactu1
@sactu1 3 года назад
Excellent! Thanks!
@paulintexas
@paulintexas 2 года назад
Great video and explanation!! I've been trying to decide whether to go GTN or GNX375 + GTR255 and this confirmed what I suspected. Costs is a few hundred more than the GTN650xi for the GNX375 + GNC 255, but you get a transponder. Add in one more com radio and you have redundant GPS + Nav and redundant com including separate chassis so no single point of failure for everything.
@Maverick_1b
@Maverick_1b 2 года назад
My plan exactly, GNX375 + GNC255 + GNC225, separate HSI for the Navcom.
@AnthonyPuca
@AnthonyPuca 7 месяцев назад
Just stumbled across this video. This is fantastic! Being 3 years old, I wonder how much is out of date now? At '23 AirVenture, we were talking to the Garmin rep about Garmin's 355, 375, 650, and 750. I have had 3 CFIIs and 2 pilot friends, 1 of which is ATP, helping me understand which is right for me with differing answers across the board. Building an RV-10 and about halfway right now, waiting on QB Cabin and starting my IFR training hoping to better understand this. I would be flying VFR 99% of the time, with occasional light IFR to get through clouds and out of Denver. Heavy IFR here is ice and that accumulates quickly on the Van's thick wings. Overall, I want to be /G and able to do approaches to numerous airports, many of which don't have ILS anyways. Your GPS is the redundancy to WAAS makes me think I don't need the Garmin G5 either?
@Wpilot673
@Wpilot673 3 года назад
great information!
@w4twa
@w4twa 2 года назад
Very informative vid, thanks for taking the trouble.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 2 года назад
Any time, Paul. Thanks for watching!
@JacobC-tp8jx
@JacobC-tp8jx 3 года назад
Great Video!
@billcuster
@billcuster 3 года назад
Nice job! Confirms my thoughts on having only a WAAS GPS for light IFR in my experimental. I really appreciate the objectivity. I'd like to hear a discussion on the 375 VS a 175 with an EchoUAT out, and a 327 and GDL 50 to feed the G3-x,
@1stinsonguy
@1stinsonguy 3 года назад
Huh?
@fly4fun
@fly4fun 2 года назад
What a fantastic and clear explanation of the options. I have a 375 in a Husky and it almost seems like I could add two 275s and a magnetometer to be certified IFR capable. Do I read that right?
@robertgary3561
@robertgary3561 3 года назад
I went with the GTX-375 with GNC-255a. The 255 was a better value than a 650 plus a transponder. Although I'm surprised that the 375 doesn't push frequencies to the 255.
@f14flyer11
@f14flyer11 Год назад
that was a great video
@bobwells3184
@bobwells3184 3 месяца назад
Great video...watched the whole thing and realized you are out of my airport!!! D95
@user-ii1xn4tt4s
@user-ii1xn4tt4s 3 года назад
👍good job!
@profiveoh
@profiveoh 3 года назад
I like all those “hunerds” being saved. I have an existing 430w and probably going to add the 375 for a transponder and backup nav.
@robertgary3561
@robertgary3561 3 года назад
The 375 naviator is far better. You can create random holds, it has lateral and vertical guidance to VFR runways, and more. Its a next generation.
@ulephone1918
@ulephone1918 3 года назад
Awesome presentation with excellent information. Question Do you build panels fro certified AIRCRAFT?
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 3 года назад
We do when we team up with our friends at Lapeer Aviation.
@JimDorn
@JimDorn 3 года назад
Steve and Adam, I recently discovered your channel and I've thoroughly enjoyed videos and the information. I am getting ready to build an aircraft (model not decided yet) and this video triggered a question which I've not been able to find an answer. I'm hoping you guys can help. I've noticed that most people using the G3X system will pair a GTN device with a GTR200 or GTR20 as their second comm. If I went with a GNC 255 for both the second radio and Nav, I know the G3X can control both the radio and nav portions. However, is there a way for the G3X to display VOR/ILS information from both Navs (like a cross radial identifying a fix on an ILS approach)?? Or would a secondary display like a G5 or GI-106 be required?? I know I'm thinking old school by wanting a second Nav radio but I can't shake the question and capability. Thanks for your thoughts.
@1krr
@1krr 3 года назад
This is a great video but I do have one question. I have an older non-gps IFR stack with DME and a KX155 with glide slope and another KX155 without glideslope. I'm thinking of getting either a gtn650 or the gnc355. I'm wondering if I should get the gnc355 and install a g3x to get more real estate or if I should get the gtn650 with G5s?
@rn2811
@rn2811 2 года назад
I’ve been flying an arrow a lot that my club owns and on a IFR flight yesterday my alternator went without warning then within two minutes everything went dark including the 375. Because of the 375 having the transponder in it I couldn’t even squawk 7600. Luckily the wx was pretty much VFR had a alternate in mind but I decided to flicker the master switch one more time and the lights back on and used that opportunity to lower the gear and radioed atc to inform them of my situation. These units are a great when everything is working but one must be prepared to utilize those pilotage and dead reckoning skills.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 2 года назад
If everything went dark, your transponder probably would have too. Backup batteries would help that also
@rn2811
@rn2811 2 года назад
@@MidwestPanels Very true, and do you see ga aircraft getting these backup batteries? Thanks for responding quickly.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 2 года назад
@@rn2811 yes, more and more we are seeing it. TCW has certified units available.
@rn2811
@rn2811 2 года назад
@@MidwestPanels Thanks 👍
@tylersatterfield7309
@tylersatterfield7309 3 года назад
great video/ I enjoyed your take and presentation. I did however find that when you were talking about the gnx375 at the 15:18, you had showed and commented on the gtr 20 paired with it when this is not possible. My understanding is its only compatible with a g3x. I can not find any documentation or menus in the gnx375 to support this.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 3 года назад
Correct, the GTR 20 is only compatible with the G3X. We build Experiental panels so G3X is what we work with. If you were putting this in certified without G3X then you would have to use rack mounted radios.
@messupfreq550
@messupfreq550 2 года назад
Also two big thumbs up... I really appreciated the clarification on the regs regarding 'contination / redundancy' that helped me a great deal in understanding what is perceived vs true loss of functionality. ILS can also break or get damaged, so takes a lot of steam out of arguments regarding duplicate capability. Also, todays equipment is inherently more reliable than older gear with many aging sensitive components. Taken to the extreme i suppose some gear heads out there would have the panel so loaded the tail would need ballast...lol.
@joep384
@joep384 4 года назад
great video.. I'm planning on installing a GNC 355 along with a G5 HSI to satisfy IFR flying. Many pilots, avionics shops and FAA DE's etc are unsure of the requirements for IFR flying and IFR check rides only using a GPS WASS navigator. Can an instrument student take the IFR check ride with only a GNC 355? 3 different approaches required, For example, the same plate can be used to do an LNAV, LNAVVNAV or LPV approach in many cases. Three different approaches. Just in case, my backup plan is to install a Navcom unit tied into the G5 HSI along with a previously installed GNC 355... Just heard your last comments on IFR Checkrides. I will still install a separate Navcom if needed to satisfy IFR check rides plus gain additional redundancy with a second comm radio and second non gps nav source.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 3 года назад
The ACS does state that you need to perform approaches by way of ground based navigation equipment so technically you can't do a check ride with only a GPS. Plus an LPV is not classified a precision approach even though it is flown the same as an ILS. The best thing to do is check with your local DPE to see their thoughts. As for IFR flying, as mentioned in the video, as long as it is WAAS its totally legal.
@joebaginski5863
@joebaginski5863 3 года назад
@@MidwestPanels First of all, CONGRATS on a superbly informative video. It is rare to see anyone dig into the FARs and the AIM in explaining this complex information. The only point I'd like to submit is that the ACS does state (A-14-15) "Localizer performance with vertical guidance (LPV) minimums with a decision altitude (DA) greater than 300 feet height above terrain (HAT) may be used as a nonprecision approach; however, due to the precision of its glidepath and localizer-like lateral navigation characteristics, an LPV minimums can be used to demonstrate precision approach proficiency (AOA VI Task B) if the DA is equal to or less than 300 feet HAT." Personally, I'd prefer to have the ILS capability. Thanks for a great job
@LarsLarsen77
@LarsLarsen77 3 года назад
Wow, I'm old. When I first started looking into getting my pilot's license GPS wasn't allowed for IFR at all.
@erickoconnor9443
@erickoconnor9443 4 месяца назад
Great video but you want to be careful saying that you can use the G3X to manipulate any navigators as this renders your IFR navigation illegal because the only way to do this is to revert to the internal GPS (G3X) which is not IFR certified. You can however use a peripheral such as an IPad to input, change or add anything on your flight plan. This can be done without ever switching from your Navigator GPS. I have been asking Garmin Aviation since 2020 to please add the functionality of the second G3X to use as an MFD to add or modify flight plans. Nearly 4 years later, this is still not a functionality available on the 3X with any Navigator.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 4 месяца назад
Thanks for you input, honestly for the 2 minutes I would switch over to the internal GPS I’m not concerned about it. There are no alarm bells ringing to ATC and to be quite honest the G3X is WAAS although not certified, so in the event you lost you Navigator you could fly everything on the G3X as a backup if you had to. Having said that I would rather use my iPad as you mention and transfer to panel as I find it easier anyway and that’s what I teach my IFR students to do.
@jpoppinmoneyunit7098
@jpoppinmoneyunit7098 4 года назад
Great explanation, thanks! Does the GNX 375 need a separate CDI to be IFR certified? Doesn’t it have vertical and horizontal bugs right on the screen for a gps approach?
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 4 года назад
jpoppinmoneyunit We are glad you enjoyed the video. You do not need anything more than the G3X screen. The G3X has an HSI and displays the course as well as the glide slope if the approach uses vertical guidance. In the event that the G3X failed we can use the G5.
@Stratocruizer51
@Stratocruizer51 2 года назад
@@MidwestPanels But if you don't have a glass PFD, then wouldn't you have to have a nav indicator such as GI 106B to display "on course" guidance with the GNX 375 display indicating location on the course as well as localizer display? I have seen this combination advertised as a basic certified IFR setup. I was surprised to note that the GPS 175 (and I assume GNX 375) is compatible with many older nav indicators from other manufacturers.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 2 года назад
@@Stratocruizer51 yes you would need an indicator like the GI 275, G5 or GI 106.
@pilotvtail
@pilotvtail 5 месяцев назад
I'm in the US but plan to fly to Canada and also the Caribbean. Is GPS-WAAS with a GNX acceptable or will I need a GTN with the VHF nav capability? Thanks, and GREAT videos!
@ryancz9997
@ryancz9997 Год назад
One point that is missing is that VNAV is only available on the GTN 650 (and 750). While this relies on a capable autopilot, it is worth mentioning as part of the discussion.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels Год назад
All though you are correct that the GTN does VNAV and the GNX doesn't, GNX does V-Calc so you could calculate your descent if a crossing restriction was given, since most of us piston poppers do not usually fly SIDs and STARs, it is not as much of an issue.
@matiaswilson4768
@matiaswilson4768 Год назад
If I may ask, in regards to taking the IFR check ride. Will a G3X, GTX375, GTR20 and a GNC 255 Nav/Com meet the requirements of being able to fly an ILS. I think so but wanted to get your thoughts. We are looking at matching the panel of the Piper 100i on our Piper Cherokee. Figured Piper did enough research in coming up with the most economical IFR panel on that trainer. We would also install the GFC 500 and one G5. Thank you
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels Год назад
Yes, the GNC 255 would fulfill the requirement for ILS.
@erichtrombley9195
@erichtrombley9195 3 года назад
Good information on the various WAAS GPS navigators. Regarding the legalities of installing only one WAAS GPS navigator for IFR you reference Part 125.203, however, this regulation is not applicable to GA aircraft. Part 125.203 is specific to AIRPLANES HAVING A SEATING CAPACITY OF 20 OR MORE PASSENGERS OR A MAXIMUM PAYLOAD CAPACITY OF 6,000 POUNDS OR MORE. Part 91.205 which you cite earlier uis the applicable code governing instrument and equipment requirements for powered civil aircraft with standard category U.S. airworthiness certificates. Two-way radio communication and navigation equipment suitable for the route to be flown is all that is required. Navigation equipment, however, is addressed under the applicable Technical Standard Order (TSO). A WAAS navigator certified to TSO C-145\146 does not require alternate equipment. Therefore, only one WAAS navigator is required for IRF.
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 3 года назад
Understood, we are simply showing all regulations as they apply to GPS navigation, as it goes in aviation if it doesn't say you can't then you can. Also a TSO is not a regulation its a design spec. An STC is what specifically calls out what is required for certain installations per aircraft, such as a G3X in a certified aircraft has an STC that spells out what is required for that aircraft not a TSO, the equipment it has meets TSO for its required operation. All of this though is mainly for the experimental market and what is required for IFR, which does not fall under certified regulations to begin with.
@TarmacBlast
@TarmacBlast 4 года назад
Excellent video. Lots of great information. Wouldn’t a GNX 375 + GNC255(instead of a GTR20) be a better option since it allows you have a Nav/Com? I think it would be more equivalent to the GTN650 + GTX 45R. 1 GPS, 1 Nav, 1 Com, 1 ADS-B In/out Xpdr. Or am I missing something?
@patrickshine4329
@patrickshine4329 4 года назад
I think you're right - functionally, you'd have equivalent capability, but at the cost of panel space. Also, the GNC255 is quite deep (11.23"), so it eats up space behind the panel too. It was designed more for legacy installations, so it has interfaces for HSI, autopilot, etc., that you probably wouldn't need, while on the other hand, the GTR 20 has a built-in 2-place intercom that you might actually want (and save on having to buy a comm panel, too).
@ralphrogers7647
@ralphrogers7647 4 года назад
Very, very, well done.... oh, and thanks for not starting with "Hi guys". R
@ChrisJones-qq3fc
@ChrisJones-qq3fc 4 года назад
@@patrickshine4329 I believe the GNC255A also has a built-in 2-place intercom, so I guess if you don't mind the depth, you also get panel space savings there. It's a bummer that the 650 doesn't have a built in intercom, seems like low-hanging fruit. Great video and information btw, thanks for putting this together.
@ashokaliserilthamarakshan5079
@ashokaliserilthamarakshan5079 2 года назад
I went with the GNX 375 + GNC 255 combo because of the 8.33 kHz spacing required in Europe. So gained same capabilities as an GTN 650 equipped system at the expense of panel space. The GNC is quite long, but was able to fit without much issues.
@stingsportflyersusa2561
@stingsportflyersusa2561 3 года назад
If I added a 650 to a ELSA Light sport aircraft would that allow the aircraft to fly IFR and pursue instrument training in the plane?
@rickseeman5679
@rickseeman5679 Год назад
You're good
@loveguitar2x
@loveguitar2x 2 года назад
You can use GPS in leu of DME. Other than that excellent video!
@MidwestPanels
@MidwestPanels 2 года назад
Yes you can use GPS in lue of DME no dispute on that.
Далее
Couple problem !! 😂😂 @jujufitcats
00:17
Просмотров 4,2 млн
НОЧЕВКА ПО ЦВЕТАМ ЧЕЛЛЕНДЖ 4 !
56:18
Haydarlar oilasida tug'ilgan kun | Dizayn jamoasi
00:59
Garmin G3X Approach and Go Around With TO/GA Button
28:46
Backups For Your Experimental Build?
7:36
Просмотров 8 тыс.
Full GARMIN panel upgrade | Piper PA-28-181 Archer
20:35
Mastering GPS Procedures
1:05:24
Просмотров 352 тыс.
Garmin VNAV/VCALC on GTN, G3X and 2-inch Navigators
14:50
Garmin G-5 vs GI 275...Which One to Buy??
7:47
Просмотров 53 тыс.
Couple problem !! 😂😂 @jujufitcats
00:17
Просмотров 4,2 млн