granada holmes being gay for 15 minutes 

pal you made me laugh so hard

Holmes looks like he's about to cry as he says it too

@@itexplodes3824 Watson too XD

The devil's Foot- where Watson pulled himself out of a drugged stupor to save holmes and drag him out of a deadly smoke-filled room

Wow... I just started reading "A Scandal in Bohemia" and he said EXACTLY that

This sounds so EruRi

Watsons' is too XD I'm dying watching this. It's hilarious. 3:59

I agree I love it so much

Eso es un verdadero amigo

Ridiculous. This is the problem with society. Any 2 men or 2 women having a close trusting relationship must be homosexuals. Such deductions is causing confusion in young people!

Son grandes amigos

quite so.

To think that you were getting a spank off Mrs Hudson, then you asked for your mouth to be washed out....she made sure it was cleaned...

Puleeze. Wtf is wrong with the modern world, that two men can’t be friends without assuming they’re buggering each other.

Take your homophobia elsewhere Dorothy. Gay people exist. Some people read Holmes and Watson as gay. Get over it. ​PS. Jeremy Brett was bisexual. @@dorothysay8327

Who called the Thought Police? People can interpret fiction any way they want.

BBC Sherlock is so strange and unnatural

Unlike BBC Sherlock…

Exactly what happened. 😂

In the same story they hold hands when they get scared by a monkey lol

This is technically true but it sounds hilarious out of context 😂 ​@@emi283

Wich episode please ? ☺️

I don't know why Branagh even wanted to play Poirot. There was never a less Branagh-like character ever written. Now Gilderoy Lockhart, on the other hand - perfect match.

@@itzakpoelzig330 My fan-casting for Lockhart has been Hugh Grant, but I thought Branagh did a great job. As for his turn as Poirot, I have to admit I adored it. Not because he's a match for Poirot. We have matches for Poirot. Long before Suchet did Murder on the Orient Express, Albert Finney knocked it out of the park in '74. So what would be the point of another actor doing exactly what they did, and probably not as well? No, I think Branagh made a clever choice in reinventing Poirot as a more dashing character. I felt like I was seeing Poirot as he sees himself, not as a ridiculous little obsessive, but as a tortured genius, profoundly haunted by the great disorders of the world he can never fix. And I wouldn't dream of depriving the world of the magnificent absurdity that was his mustache. The mustache HAD A MUSTACHE! How can you argue with that?

🙈

Perhaps? But we must remember sir conan doyle? Ultimately, we are clay in his hands....thoughts here?

@@CountBeetle RU-vid keeps auto-deleting my reply, what?? Because I used "q*eer"? Seriously? Imma try it again with censoring it but jesus that's ridiculous

@@CountBeetle Doyle famously didn't remotely care what you do with the character ;) And there are good reasons to assume Holmes may have been q*eer-coded by him intentionally - not necessarily because he was supportive of gay rights (though that's not impossible considering his liberal views for the time), but because Holmes was supposed to be an antihero and a misfit anyway. The q*eer-coding simply could have been another tool to make him appear different and flawed, like the drug abuse and the mood swings. Either way, the fact that he portrayed Holmes as completely uninterested in women alone was already highly "q*eer" for the time, in the Victorian sense of the word but in the modern one as well, and it was clearly a very conscious choice by Doyle.

He was theatrical. Mistaken for camp. Jeremy Brett was superior.

Ditto

Granada adaptation of Sherlock Holmes starring Jeremy Brett

💀💀💀💀

Never watched these before. That's because you're probably a Yankee and obviously have no grasp of the televisual arts. Take yourself away.

@@karlmeyer9473 we got fresh fish in the closet here and it wants to come out ;)

Jeremy Brett was such a stunning person… you see it in interviews of him.

Probably not. The attraction he feels for women seems to be very real, even if discreet. This is because Sherlock Holmes considers love and passion to be irrational factors that would hinder his strictly rational judgment. It wouldn't make so much sense for him to show it and try to hide feelings for a woman if he was gay, it would be much easier to just keep not showing it.

@@arthursouza7 i dont know where youre getting the idea holmes is into irene. Its explicitly denied in the books (in fact, holmes’ lack of attraction to women is mentioned several times in the stories), and even in the granada series theres no evidence holmes felt anything for her. They met twice!

Sherlock only admires Irene’s intellect and nothing more. She was the first person to outwit him and Sherlock wanted to remember that. Irene as a love interest is only portrayed that in various adaptations.

No no no

There's no romantic or sexual attraction to The Woman whatsoever. He merely admires her intellect and finds her aesthetically pleasing, such as he also seems to find that one girl in The Lion's Mane. Admiring someone's intelligence and seeing them as handsome does not exactly qualify as romantic feelings

I’ve also got two wives 1) Your 2) Mom

@@svpportive Mrs Hudson washes your mouth out....

yes mary and sherlock

Straight people why are you like this?

wot

You clicked on a Sherlock gay compilation, what did you expect

Is there some reason Holmes couldn’t be gay? Some reason he shouldn’t be? Or are you just a bigot? My money’s on curtain number three.