@Solve Everything Yea do everything like rockstar does i.e, say nothing just show one trailer and then boom we've got a new banger for you.. Really cyberpunk 2077 is bad when it comes to very small things than even witcher 3. Don't know how they managed to forget everything they did right with witcher and just downgraded their own next big ip.
Cyberpunk is shit. But let's task. Gta is a whole series. I think they edit every gta code and don't make it from scratch. That's why they are perfect. But in case of cyberpunk it's company's first open world game.
@@mranonymous481 Wow for fucking real? Wow, someone finally had a glimpse of that. Amazing. So Code being updated and reused from the first GTA VS A Brand new game being built from scratch. Whos gonna win? Let also talk about Rock Star being a big AAA Studio while CDPR is trying to be a AAA studio. Oh boy, let bash the small one and compare it to the bnig one. Oh also, let take a game that has been updated for 7 years and compare it to a game 1month old. OMG! So amazing. The best quote in Cyberpunk is "Hater gonna hate" and that's purely what all hater are doing here. Atleast, you've got half a brain to see some logic but your first phrase kinda destroyed the point.
The thing with rockstar is that they don’t announce things super early and get everyone’s expectations super high. Just like rdr2, only announced it 1-2years before release
If you know that rockstar back then is got a lot release new game every years.Remember in 2008 rockstar release gta 4 and midnight club los angeles and then 2009 gta 4 dlc and gta chinatown wars,2010 red dead redemption,2011 la noire,gta 5 trailer and max payne 3 if I not wrong.And then 2013 gta 5 release after that rockstar very rare to release new game until 2018 and it just red dead 2.So basically rockstar is disappointing on milking gta 5 because after gta 5,rockstar not release new game and not making again a lot of new franchise title just red dead 2 which is prequel and not from red dead 1 and not all brand new franchise title.GTA also same before gta 5 rockstar always release gta in short term not long time like gta 5.If you see list of rockstar games from 1997 or 1998 until 2013 ,you can see that rockstar always release a new games every year and brand new franchise title games every year.So in that period we got millions of rockstar games franchises.But now from 2013 until present rockstar games just release 2 franchise games(including online).
@@eriksantoso1741 sir you are not trying to understand one simple thing i guess That gta5 milking thing might be correct but It is just senseless to compare game of hd era with highest detailing and n numbers of different game Mechanics inside in the games like gta5 and rdr2 so obviously they take time While the games back the developers neither had the assets nor they have to it becuase people's expectations were already low regarding detailing and logics in game so obviously they took far less time to make So games like gta5 and rdr2 will take their considerable time becuase what do you thing choices in rdr2 even regarding reading a lettee or writing in diary all these animation and their mechanics took far more time than what we expect So rockstar should be given faith as when they take time they make a masterpiece
The reason Rockstar is taking so long, is that their probably adding every detail possible to GTA6, which is great, just hope it's not super laggy, that's all.
@@BrazillianBadger 8 Years actually, nearly 9. And Rockstar made Rdr2 in 7 years. And it is the most detailed open world game of all time. Plus the graphics are AMAZING.
@@BrazillianBadger Hopefully, but we have to trust Roackstar. They made masterpeices over the past decade. They are most likely working on a single player open world game right now. And I know they put alot of love and passion into their games. So it won't turn into Cyberscam. Don't worry. Just stay away from this garbage.
Yea for sure, but Cyberpunk having 7 years is slightly misleading, around 2014 they moved mostly everyone to Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk went into full development in 2015-16 after Witcher 3s release, either way the game needed another 1-2 years and needed to cut production of the ps4 and XB1 versions
@@vhsninjaccoon7705 oh yea 100% don't get me wrong, I hate what cyberpunk is lol, I'm on series x and still can't get the experience that I wanted, but again in the state it's in it needed another 2 years IMO
@@juanitopl No. It was announced 7 years ago and they started working on it in 2016 after witcher 3 dlc.CDPR was a small studio before witcher 3,they didint have money and people to work on 2 AAA games
GTA fanboy Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie, and hurt you...
GTA V is ass. CP2077 is way better with those awesome glitches. Video games supposed to be fun not realistic. Nothing beats the true to life Bugs of this materpiece CP2077
@@jkb1603 actually his right...we play games to escape reality but games graphics keep getting better so we can almost feel like real life doing anything we want so I think its draw between you guys
Am I the only one that drives randomly in GTA 5, just normally. And flipps everyone off constantly just to cause havoc in traffic? Thank you Rockstar for making that feature 😂😂😂
Because the developers don’t know how to program a proper 3rd person view. Geralt in W3 still walks and controls clunky, so they lied and said “immersion “
I think they are working on the same engine since the begining , it's the engine who handles all this stuff. even if they're not developping gta they can work on it
Try answer this question , takes about 10 year and just making pile of bug, glitch , weird things what we get??? 🤣🤣🤣 a Cyberpunk 2077??? Even a game similar like it GTA V is better in many things ... now player from Cyberpunk about 20% of them gonna quit & play GTA V back
And making sure it runs on stadia to keep Google happy after they paid you to prioritise them. Tin foil hat theory I know, but can't shake the feeling it's true.
GtaV is still to this day way ahead of its time not overly defending cyberpunk but ROCKSTAR has had years to perfect Ai world building and what not honestly I believe cyber will make a huge comeback No Mans Sky style but only time will tell if not I no t he nodding scene is gonna be insane
@@zackbatcountry3361 nothing is ahead of its time unless it is literally from the future, cyberpunk also had years to perfect their Ai, they will never fix the Ai with updates.
Sadly, that's the future I guess. Graphics make good trailers for pre orders, gameplay doesn't You just need realistic graphics and shooty things in order to sell thousands of copies
That's what 7 years gave us Imagine how much advanced GTA VI. Will be coming after 10years from gta v there will be no competition It's Rockstar afterall!
@@ochd1502 the problem with CBP2077. they announce it like "cOmINg : WhEn I'tS ReAdY" at their first announcement. R* idk will ever they do that move or not.
@@nurfrizki7793 yeah and i mean have you seen red dead redemption 2? 2 years ago and its one of the most realistic games and greatest games (at least in my opinion) of all time, Just think what gta 6 will be like
@@nurfrizki7793 better be quiet but silent killer than loud but stupid.. 👍 i like how rockstar move.. they dont make big hype so nobody will be dissapointed with the game they have made.
@@walterwhite1071 just saw cyberpunk v Vice city and Cyberpunk vs SA And vice city has done several things better than cyberpunk (like blood stained footmarks, water splash, physics)
@@SpicySpaceCat00 it would be Fine if CDPR Didn't stated that this game is a next gen with realistic graphic ( If you say is sarcarsm Sorry for not undestand that)
@Szala Kaka Red Dead Redemption’s NPC programing surpassed Cyberpunk 2077 by a million, maybe buy both games and compare them and your eyes will finally open
@Szala Kaka better plot? Not really. Fighting system nope. More detailed world? Nope either. You could argue that the fighting was better than gta v and would have been more believable. More detailed world?, and what can you do in that world more than look at it? In RDR2 you can interact with almost everything in the open world. You can fish, hunt, play poker, go to the theater etc etc etc almost anything that is possible in a western themed game. Don't start me on the plot because that's where RDR2 story shines especially if you're a fan of the first game. You see the downfall of a man who thinks he's perfect and his plans can't go wrong a tale of treachery, the slow painful death of a character which you get attached to trough gameplay and his redemption. It's not by all means original, but the story is strong enough to keep you invested because of the characters. You get to understand some things that happened in the first one.
@Szala Kaka for what it is Cyberpunk could have been better than RDR2. It's a futuristic game ffs the possibilities are semi infinites the ragdolls are ass for today's standards, the animations are repetitive, bugs obviously, the police doesn't chase you and respawns next to you which isn't that fun at all. I was expecting a game where the customization would be endless, have visible metal body parts, red eyes like terminator etc, but meh the customization isn't that interesting honestly. The collision on the cars are basic too, feels like I'm playing saints row or mafia but less good. The bugs are not really the only problem dude, and that's why most people are complaining. If a game only consists of a good story mode which is the only redeemable quality then mind as well watch the full "movie" clips here on YT.
@@Thrashaero Can't put all the blame on the gamers, CDPR mislead people and lied for years about this game. At least this will hopefully get people to stop pre-ordering and buying the lies and excuses from companies.
I think it was a combination of not having enough time, no experience and severely understimating what they were set out to do. Rockstar has been perfecting their formula for decades, CDPR was like a headless chicken. Despite this I enjoy the game, as a The Witcher 3: Future,, but that’s all it is.
They're most likely trying to milk GTA 5 online for as long as possible before the money starts drying up. Then, they'll start developing GTA 6. Remember, this isn't the Rockstar of old anymore.
@@spiidey1 GTA VI has been in development since GTA V was finished, just like V was when IV was finished, you could see the same health and body armour hud design from GTA IV in GTA V during development. You can't seriously think they start developing that late lmao
If you look back at when Rockstar previously realised games they where more frequently being every year or two. But with gta V shark cards rockstar doesn't need to make any new games because that would be alot more work then adding a few missions and cars to a six year old game.
Dude it's a thing in San Andreas and that game is from 2004 lmfao. I'm pretty sure even GTA 3 has it which came years before even that. Cyberpunk is just embarrassing.
I like how the shadows completely exposed the laziness of cyberpunk's devs, they're just like "let's not completely animate bc the player couldn't see it on first person"
I hate the fact that this is right. But I'ma be real, gta III had better AI than cyberpunk. *cough* actually no, cyberpunks ai can't even be considered that. It's only program is to shoot and move which is somewhat decent, or to cower in fear if it's a civilian. No pathfinding, barely ai. It's sad that games from the very very early 2000s could do AI better than cyberpunk. It pisses me off. I could live with that if it just had a better crime system, and AI driving
