2:25 That silver sensor plate looks like the front of a JEEP. Have you noticed that Casio changed the back plate screws to phillip head only on this watch. Casio always used the phillip head and slotted screw type for decades , it was one of the easiest ways to tell fake Casio watches from real was by the screws on the back. Fakes always use phillip head only. I was surprised by this change when I bought this watch.
Por esse motivo dentre outros prefiro as versões anteriores do Mudman G9300 e GW9400 a falsificação chegou a um nível par muito superior difícil de ser decifrada ate por peritos no assunto mudman G9300 e o Rangerman GW9400 são meus favoritos. Ainda não achei nada que os substituam. 😎👌
Original colours look so superior imo. I think this colours cheapen the look Also, I don't get the hate for the screen. Yes it's darker than a positive display, but that's why you choose the negative display in the first place. I've never had an issue reading mine on wrist. The angles are perfect imo.
I own more than 20 g shocks from the basics to the mudmasters and this one is by far one of the best for legibility. Rangeman and mudman are the best in my opinion when it comes to legibility. (Only the postive displays) negatives mudman sucks one of the worst inhave ever seen in my life from digital watvhes above 200 dollars
@@delver1857 people just love to complain. It is like nickelback. Their is literally nothing wrong with the display. I have used it in low light and in the scorching sun. Always a easy read
@@delver1857 trouble reading? I said myself that the negative display is trash. I have them both and display wise. Negative is a 4/10 positive is a 8/10
