Habeas Corpus: The Great Writ 

I had an inmate released by writ of habeas corpus

This is why I love RU-vid - I can see content like this.

Leo Frank was represented by a team of eight B'Nai Brith (a fraternal organization for a specific religious group) lawyers, quite literally the best money could buy... and still he was convicted on the testimony of a lone black man represented by one lawyer who was paid 40 dollars... in 1913. Leo Frank hired the Pinkerton agency, known bagmen for wealthy interests at the time who literally hired criminals as "agents" and several of whom's agents were convicted of crimes, to aid in solving the case, or was it to aid in covering it up? Leo Frank's case was appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court in 1915, by a team of top notch lawyers and FAILED to convince a jury or a judge at any of the several steps in this process. There's very little chance Leo Frank wasn't guilty. He had literally every advantage except probably that of being innocent. The historical revisionism by a certain religious group and their smear organization, the ADL, is a sick joke. Leo Frank was known throughout the community to be a predator of young girls and as a man of privilege, born into wealth, the American version of a princeling, a graduate of an upper crust University (Cornell), he was used to getting away with whatever he wanted and he was used to seeing the people in his social circle interacting as peers and even superiors to the very officials and police he would deal with in this incident. Is it possible such a man from such charged social circles would believe the resources he was capable of mustering could overcome any accusations, especially with such a convenient patsy as James Conley, by all descriptions a gullible drunkard black man who would likely be one of the first suspects? On the other hand, James Conley, the man historical revisionists of a certain religious group attempt to pin the murder on, was a black man working a factory with white managers and owners, the idea that he would think he could rape and murder an underage white girl and leave her body in the very factory he worked with some poorly scrawled notes and get away with it is patently absurd. Any black man in 1913 in this environment would know the closest black man would be the first suspect in such a murder. The idea that he would have the master plan of pinning it on his boss, a wealthy connected white man, and that he would succeed in that is so stupefyingly preposterous for the time period it's absolutely unbelievable. In all likelihood it went down more or less as Conley confessed. Conley was an accomplice to Frank, a gullible lookout, patsy, and drudge worker to dump the body, paid a pittance and manipulated by the sophisticated and intellectual Leo Frank. Frank was a child predator and a murderer and probably Mary Phagan wasn't his first.

There are no article 3 judges today

Instructional; I would have really enjoyed IT had you spoke a bit on "Constructive Custody, and what it's specifically applied to. And specifically when it ends, in particular circumstance it can be applied as part of WRITING ones on WRIT based on the principle of Restraints placed on One being restrained. Is one in a particular circumstance requiring, to know 1) If one was convicted of a violation of PC1473.6 per information. 2) During sentencing, The Judge redused the felony to a measdemenor

Very good point regarding gitmo at 22:00!

A constitution right. 🙏🙏🙏🇺🇲

Try getting one issued in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia (Pa.)

Needs to be released on a writ Habeas Corpus.

I have filed a Habeas Corpus and it was denied the judge called it frivolous and gibberish, they tried me in court and was so damaged. They separated my 3 children after 4 months of fighting my way out of the false felony charges with the grace of the Divine I won my case no probable cause. But they won't return my son back to me my motion was denied! Can someone please help me! My children are the one who are suffering!

Shakespearean I commend you

I would like to know we had a writ of habeas corpus in the grounds that defendand was detained without probable cause

Should be able to walk out of court after H.C. Court as long as as no victim. No victim no crime correct? I do know there’s a lot more to this than I mention here.

Iam not a person iam a live living human being and not a citizen ether whats a citizen and a person its not defind as a living human.