Тёмный

Hardy Weinberg Principle for the USMLE Step 1 

Physeo - USMLE Library
Подписаться 93 тыс.
Просмотров 50 тыс.
50% 1

A clear, cohesive explanation of the Hardy Weinberg Principle for the USMLE Step 1.
This video covers the Hardy-Weinberg principle and covers important associated ideas such as genotype frequencies, allele frequencies, and X-linked recessive disease calculations. Enjoy!
Come watch the rest of our biochemistry library at physeo.com/
Keep calm and watch Physeo #kcwp

Опубликовано:

 

20 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 43   
@polk304
@polk304 5 лет назад
You are the first person to make sense of this and a bunch of other things in medicine. i hope soon enough you will be popular. God bless
@physeo-USMLE
@physeo-USMLE 5 лет назад
🙌 thanks for the kind words! We're glad you're liking it!
@mathew555s
@mathew555s 3 года назад
This was absolutely amazing. Incredible. I was half asleep while watching this and still learned the concept. Absolutely amazing. Just amazing. thank you.
@drayeshaali9800
@drayeshaali9800 4 года назад
You explained better than kaplan trust me !!!
@pierce1234567891
@pierce1234567891 6 месяцев назад
VERY CLINICALLY RELEVANT EVERY DOCTOR ALWAYS TALKS ABOUT THAT THIS IS ALL THEY DO ALL THE TIME EVERYDAY
@mazifatemi2488
@mazifatemi2488 3 года назад
Thank you so much! I have never been good with genetics and would always get questions like this wrong. Yesterday on my NBME I got TWO questions right because of THIS video
@enmanueldejesussirisreynos9788
Just amazing, perfect explanation, all make sense. I am even teaching using this video as base. Thanks a lot
@minenhlengcobo2761
@minenhlengcobo2761 2 года назад
Thank You. Thank You. Thank You. This explanation was so simple.
@mariyaasghar7539
@mariyaasghar7539 4 года назад
To the point , well explained ! Don't have words .. great job :)
@physeo-USMLE
@physeo-USMLE 4 года назад
🙌
@vanshajchandra307
@vanshajchandra307 3 года назад
Finally p=1 made sense to me..thank you so much
@drmohammad6429
@drmohammad6429 Месяц назад
best explanation ive ever came across so far
@An-oj6ss
@An-oj6ss 4 года назад
The best!! Thankyou so much!!
@adlesal24
@adlesal24 3 года назад
SUPERB YOU ARE ASTONISHING WHAT A GREAT SIMPE EASY EXPLANATION BETTER THAN MANY OTHER WEBSITES YOU REALLY GAVE ME GREAT IMPRESSION ABOUT YOUR WEBSITE
@danachavoshian1025
@danachavoshian1025 3 года назад
Thank you so much for this video!
@kingshitonhisthrone
@kingshitonhisthrone Год назад
Duuuuuude.. you are a legend. i wish i’ve found this earlier
@danagreenberg945
@danagreenberg945 3 года назад
was super simple and good thank yo u so much
@enriqueparedes1104
@enriqueparedes1104 3 года назад
my friend , please could you explain me how did you get 1/150 for husband? thanks in advance
@hayriyetufan6310
@hayriyetufan6310 3 года назад
In second question why did we eliminate that the possibility of father is ressesive homozygous? Do we have information that the father is healthy? Thank you very much :)
@luisrosoccer
@luisrosoccer 4 года назад
thank you :)
@sriharshakandlakunta8954
@sriharshakandlakunta8954 4 года назад
Finally a guy wid quality on this shit
@reuvenmeirherrera9580
@reuvenmeirherrera9580 Год назад
Thank you for this video!: at 7:51 why is probabiltymom is a carrier 2/3? We said pro. that mom is a carrier is EITHER 1/3 OR 2/3.. right? so why did you choose 2/3 and not 1/3? Thank you!
@bann9437
@bann9437 6 месяцев назад
I think cuz it’s the higher probability
@manlikanamkaew2220
@manlikanamkaew2220 2 года назад
Thank you so muchhh~👍💕
@josh6149
@josh6149 4 года назад
How did you get .006587 from 2 x 0.9967 x (1/300)?
@fatimaserrato6929
@fatimaserrato6929 2 года назад
yea, that's what i was trying to figure out. I kept getting .006645
@ozziedog18
@ozziedog18 2 года назад
@@fatimaserrato6929 He used .988 instead of .997, so I guess he made a mistake
@Dr.SaifAlzubaidi
@Dr.SaifAlzubaidi 2 года назад
Thanks a lot. I just don't get why you multiplied 1/4 by 1/150 and 2/3... If they're asking for the probability that their child would be affected, and assuming the parents are carriers, isn't the answer 1/4 from the Punnett square?
@gichinc4373
@gichinc4373 Год назад
Because total probability in AR diseases is the probability of both carrier parents passing down the mutant allele (1/2 X 1/2 = 1/4) X probability of mother being carrier X probability of father being carrier . If the question says both parents are carriers , then each parent has a probability of “1” . That would be 1/4 X 1X 1= 1/4 (Like you said) However this question requires us to calculate the probability of each parent being a carrier . Thus: 1/4 X 1/150 X 2/3 1/4 = the probability of each parent passing down the mutant allele (1/2 X1/2) 1/150 = probability of father being a carrier 2/3 = probability of mother being a carrier If the question said mother was a carrier , then It would be : 1/4 X 1/150 X 1 1/4 = the probability of each parent passing down the mutant allele (1/2 X1/2) 1/150 = probability of father being a carrier 1 = mother is a carrier Thus as long as the question doesn’t mention either parent being a carrier (then probability would be 1 ) , then it requires us to calculate the probability .
@preethi7751
@preethi7751 2 года назад
Wow! Amazing.
@tariqalwafaei6304
@tariqalwafaei6304 9 месяцев назад
Thanks a lot
@julianagarcia218
@julianagarcia218 Год назад
amazing!!!!!!!
@drnykterstein_
@drnykterstein_ 3 года назад
I dont get why in the x linked condition, you took q as 1/10,000. Shouldnt it be q^2 as 1/10,000?
@drnykterstein_
@drnykterstein_ 3 года назад
Ohh i got it! Thanks!
@mellowdoctor9029
@mellowdoctor9029 3 года назад
Just magic
@SlaughterALABAMA
@SlaughterALABAMA 3 года назад
Can you explain why in the second question the husband is 1/150, when in the first question he was 1/300?
@nanasardarova1495
@nanasardarova1495 3 года назад
In first question husband was carrier 2pq = 2(0.9967×1/300),he took 0.9967=approximately as 1 so 2(1×1/300) = 1/150
@sashak6798
@sashak6798 3 года назад
:') thank you
@mdilias3640
@mdilias3640 3 года назад
Thank you very much. please, cover more genetic topics for USMLE!
@doctorposting
@doctorposting 6 месяцев назад
wait what? theres no calculator on step???
@Jboy806
@Jboy806 5 месяцев назад
Since they are both from the same population, why is the probability of the wife being a carrier not 1/150?
@mellowdoctor9029
@mellowdoctor9029 3 года назад
Magic
@drgunjanchaudhary5689
@drgunjanchaudhary5689 2 года назад
Formula of becoming queen -->> princess 👸🏻 😊🙏❤️💋
Далее
Hardy-Weinberg practice problems
12:38
Просмотров 184 тыс.
Imprinting and Uniparental Disomy for the USMLE Step 1
11:15
ОДИН ДЕНЬ ИЗ ДЕТСТВА❤️ #shorts
00:59
The Hardy-Weinberg Principle:  Watch your Ps and Qs
12:16
USMLE STEP 1: GENETICS (THE BASICS) w/ Questions
18:14
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
14:57
Просмотров 543 тыс.
HMP Shunt for the USMLE Step 1
8:13
Просмотров 13 тыс.
Genetics Terms
13:30
Просмотров 89 тыс.
Example Hardy-Weinberg Problems
13:35
Просмотров 55 тыс.
USMLE Step 1 Linkage Disequilibrium
7:01
Просмотров 116 тыс.
USMLE Step 1: Metabolic and Genetic Syndromes
1:29:20
Просмотров 33 тыс.