Have the Flagship Monsters Overstayed their Welcome? | Monster Hunter 

I like Zinogre and Barioth ~ their design is so metal.. but i love their Counters Stygian Zn & frost fang. I think me despite only playing World + Ice _ Rise. I'm bored with same og narga altho i'd love to see its variants.. Stygian Zn really felt on par with Savage Deviljho coz they're hard hitting and fast. they gave best satisfaction of killing compared to regualr top teir non elder drags

Looks like 4th gen got a lot of love for the expansion

@@dygouken Indeed. Love to see it!

Should you mention apex forms from 4u? Not many monsters got those and they do change the moveset of the monsters a few of the mascots here got them one of really high note being zinogre.. i swear there's some favortism going on.

Wow, I never knew this, that's really cool!

Thats how you get the Chiefs weapon in the back of the house right?

The thing is Diablos have become 'too famous' that if they try to removed Diablos, some fans will complain. Yet the 2 way too similar, both have a more brute-style fighting method, both have not only the same skeleton, but also identical design, both even inhabits the same sandy or desert habitat and have the same cactus-based diet, so there's a risk of 'redundancy'. Unless if they wanna make them both have a complete different traits aside from the amount of horns

Diablos is way more iconic than Monoblos so i doubt that will happen unless capcom changes the fight somehow to be more unique.

Hm. This makes me want a monoblos deviant

That's a good way to look at it. Personally I just never get tired of the flagships, they're all so good!

I feel the same way. However, having too huge of a roster appearing in every single game will make that roster eventually go stale. Rathian and Rathalos are fine to have in every single game, they have always told me that "yes, this is indeed MH". Swapping the other monsters out for new ones should happen soon though. When meeting the same 10 monsters in every single game, they will go stale from lack of variation.

While this is a great lesson indeed, I'd argue that it's not exactly applicable in this situation. In fighting games, the characters are controlled by the player. Removing a playable character from a fighting game is the equivalent of removing a weapon in Monster Hunter. Yes, the game is still playable, but if you main only one specific character, this will heavily impact the player. And depending on the player and your options, you might not be able to properly enjoy the game anymore. Compared to that, having a monster or removing one is more comparable to removing a track in mario kart. Baby Park is peak Mario Kart track design, but I can still absolutely enjoy any mario kart games that don't have baby park in it.

​@@blastimbre Well, personally I do feel it to be very similiar. In Monster Hunter specifically, fighting different Monsters changes how you approach the combat. You can go more aggressive, or might need to be more methodically and patient, depending on the monsters moveset. This is also very similiar to how different tracks in racing games work. Baby Park is very simple in it's track design (cant get any more simple than that), but very chaotic when it comes to item usage. In this map, your driving performance isn't as important as your awareness of your surrounding and item usage (no matter how much of a lead you have as the first place, you still have to deal with other people using stars, bullets and the like). On the other hand, Cloudtop Cruise will require much more of your driving skills to dodge the traps and exploit the various shortcuts and benefits the map has to offer. The monsters in Monster Hunter Games have a similiar effect to the player. A Rakna-Kadaki serves mostly as a punching bag (at least to me), so I can go all out with performing great combos and maximizing my damage output, but then comes an Apex Zinogre (electro doggo on crack) and I'm forced to adapt more of a hit-and-run playstyle. Wether or not you do agree with that comparison though won't change my initial point I tried to make: Removing playable characters in a Fighting game is definitely not the same (gameplay wise at least) to removing Monsters in a Monster Hunter game. But if you do have a better comparison/example regarding the monsters (and Mario Kart tracks), feel freel to share it with me :D Edit: I would like to mention that, for me at least, having a track I do love in a new Mario Kart track is similiar to fighting an older Monster in a newer Monster Hunter game. Yes, there are different nuances, but the idea is mostly the same.

The issue with this comparison is that's a fighting game. Theyte characters not monsters. Monsters dont have a personality or a character

I always thought MHGU hammered to death the idea that there are an arbitrary amount of monsters slots. But then again this is coming from someone who only played 3 MH games to any significant capacity so far: MHFU, MHGU and MHWI.

In mhwi it was cool because you can experience them with a fresh look and fight, but in rise experiencing it again just got old real quick.

@@JoelHernandez-tz3vk Well it probably also has to do with carry-over, since older games could get away with porting monsters from previous games over with only some touch-ups, it wouldn't be as developer intensive to keep bringing back old monsters while still making new ones. it is more of an issue when making a bigger generational leap like with World where the jump in visual fidelity and changes to the game engine that would require a lot more work to bring back older monsters.

Personally I really liked Vaal Hazak, honestly preferred it over Chameleos.

I like both but I love chame more but I definitely get your point, wished they had swapped chame with Kush in World, so that it actually makes sense for them to be in the ancient forest design wise and so that we don’t have several elders just hogging the recess

I would love that as well, lagiacrus has definitely gotten the short end of the stick

My one qualm with Lagiacrus returning is he will be gimped. Lagi is my favorite momster in the entire series by a healthy amount and I simply don't think he's recovered from the loss of water combat. Even the new moves he got don't make up for his lost water moveset. I'd legit prefer to wait for underwater hunting to return before we bring back Lagi daddy.

I don’t think he’s in a bad spot, Royal Ludroth has recovered very well after Rise despite being a mainly aquatic monster too, and Lagiacrus has the advantage of being able to borrow attacks from a subspecies whose whole concept is adapting to land combat

@@bluevern904 I must respectfully disagree, I actually find the modern Royal Ludroth to be quite bland far as his fight goes. Likewise for ivory Lagiacrus. But I suppose that's merely a matter of preference.

Zinogre is literally just a land lagiacurus

I like it when they show up themtically you know? Where it makes SENSE for them to be where they are.

I'd more say Rathalos is Monster Hunter's Pikachu, but Zinogre is their Lucario, their Charizard, and their Incineroar all in one. Enough Zinogre already, please. You have other electric monsters.

I would say Rath is MH’s pikachu. Not too overly popular, but definitely kept in every game/gen. I heard someone call Zinogre is more of a charizard since he’s popular but I don’t think people are tired of the love it gets yet

@@topazshot88 oh hey we had the same comment basically

BRING BACK NIBELSNARF

I really hope we get Steve, it's one of the monsters I want to return the most!

Whos Steve?

@@TufanK93 Apologies, Steve is a nickname given to Seregios. I honestly don't know why, but it is

@@BakeNation_MH oh i didnt know that 😅😂

@@BakeNation_MH it was cause at a panel or convention Steve was debuted the crowd ask for the monsters name. But capcom didn't have a name for it yet. So they jokingly said his name was Steve and it just stuck.

I have never foguht a King Shakalaka yet, so that would be pretty interesting, plus, I would love to see Shakalaka back

@@BakeNation_MH They would fit well in Sunbreak because they are goblins!

Why not both? Lol zinogre doesn't take much effort to put in another game. More is better idk 🤷‍♂️

tri did good but I do think it shaved the board a little 'too' much, if I recall there were only 18 big monsters with no variants, and with a bunch of weapons being cut (Gunlance, Dual Blades, Hunting Horn, Bow and longsword only being available 'after' you've beaten Lagi) it made the game feel kind of barebones, the aditions made in portable and Ultimate both combated this though.

@@taloscal Actually in Tri GL, DB, HH, and Bow were flat out cut completely! The only extra weapon types you unlocked through progressing the story was the Switch Axe (which got its debut in Tri), and the LongSword. The rest of the weapons didn't come back till I believe Portable 3rd in Japan and 3U in the west

@@maddeeps5520 yeah that's what I meant, sorry I worded it wierdly XD you unlock the longsword and switch axe while the others were cut out.

Yeah, Iceborne's roster was almost like MHGen 2.0 with all the returning fan favorites that were added.

World had some absolute standouts for sure, but it wouldn't be fair to ignore compared to other mid game monsters, anjanath is kinda boring tbh. He's a fire breathing t Rex, very aggressive, and that's more or less all. Beyond that he feels almost like a diet glavenus, complete with throat exploding and tail swings, though his use feathers not a sword.

I haven’t made up my mind in Iceborne is the pinnacle, but I can say that the inclusion of nargacuga and zinogre were disappointing to the extreme. I wanted new monsters, or old ones that I haven’t fought in a long time so their fights are fresh. I won’t get that with those flagships.

My one issue with iceborne is the alatreon fight. I feel like relying on gimmicks like escaton judgement takes away from the overall enjoyment. It forces you to use the same copy-paste safijiva build or kulve build in order to actually win. If they had made him more like his GenU counterpart, then iceborne would be without flaw in my opinion.

I don’t have a problem with meta gear but I just feel like it wasn’t necessary to force people to fashion armor builds for it. I have always been a more casual player, playing fashion hunter for the most part and worrying about builds later. It allowed me to play how It gave me freedom and any mistakes made were my fault so I adjusted as necessary. I feel like escaton judgement was interesting but the way it was implemented was kind of poor.

This is fair, I do love seeing me some new monsters!

I agree 100% on both of these!

Good ol steve

I highly doubt Rathalos won't appear in every game that will be like a Pokemon game without pikachu

@@thecorruptedgamer7032 i agree

Steve will be back in a few weeks though! :)

Nice example, Lagombi certainly does show up a ton in these games, for better or worse, and it's interesting considering it doesn't seem too important, per se.

@@BakeNation_MH I feel like Lagombi is a good beginner monster that adds variety to the type of monsters available.

What about Diablos? Hes been in MH1, MH2, MH3, MH4, MHGen, MHWorld, MHRise, MH Stories and MH Stories 2. Hes been in every single game exept in Base MH4 but he was in 4 Ultimate still.

@@draw2death421 Diablos wasn't actually in vanilla Gen, only added in GU, but yeah he's super common , though missing 4 and gen actually makes his record equal to lagombi so far. He's kind of treated as a pseudo flagship, even promoted to a full one with bloodbath so I figure that's why he comes back a lot.

I love chubby bunny 🐰

And the original trio diablos rathalos and rathian should keep appearing

@@dripdimetrodon4391 it was a quadrio everyone forgets about poogie.

@@dripdimetrodon4391 I'm so sick of diablos tbh. They could totally give monoblos or any other monster like gammoth the "raging brachy or amatsu treatment" where they totally got a complete makeover in their fight and spectacle. Just my opinion tho

Indeed. As much as I love both of them, it's hard to defend them when they've both been in so many of the Monster Hunters.

I feel like they only come back for weapon balancing purposes, we historically havent had many blast weapons and when it comes to thunder the only good weapons are Lagis and Zinogres and it seems like the dev team dont like Lagi all that much, either that or they dont want to use Lagi cause they cant really implement Abyssal.

I feel you For Fanged Wyverns, I feel they're lizards like the Great Jagras I saw that first before Zinogre, and I never knew they were made in the 3rd generation So I'm happy MHW IB has plenty of Fanged Wyverns, however I wish Odogaron returned in rise instead of Tobi Because he's abused by 3 monsters Odo would pick a fight with almost any monster, imagine if Odo had a similar fight with Magno like Luna and Garan, but Magno wins because of Hellfire

Zinogre was technically the only Fanged Wyvern (excluding Stygian), in terms of skeleton re-use, there are also the Magalas.

@Plain Water the only 2 brutes with their variants in mh4u I was sad there were only 2 of them Fortunately a few years later I had a dream Uragaan was in it His intro was him eating rocks inside a shed and as soon as he saw your character in the game, he got angry and roared ready for a fight

I would love to see some more snake wyverns, all we have is Najarala and Tidal Najarala. At least in rise we got a new temnoceron with Rakna Kadaki

I would love to see snake wyverns make their return in sunbreak. They could do some cool stuff with them coiling around you requiring wirebugs to escape from.

@@gamecavalier3230 Snake wyverns are a class of wyverns possessing a snake-like body structure. As far as I know, najarala and tidal najarala are the only snake wyverns right now.

@@gamecavalier3230 I didn't know about them either them until playing GU recently. It's a cool skeleton that I'd love to see return for a new monster.

@@gamecavalier3230 I'm close to hitting G-rank myself. You've got plenty of good stuff to look forward to.

When I saw Radobaan for the first time, the only thing I could think about was how sad I was there was an uragaan clone. While obviously not the same exact fight, the similar properties are there

This really doesnt make sense cause even if they were gone new monsters would take their place and they wouldnt nexessarily have to be similar, like bazelgeuse becoming the new deviljho or athal ka becoming the new final boss. The fact that you want both and not just one of the other just ends up giving less resources to the new monsters since they also need to bring back every fan favourite one

@@pandinus1377 that's pretty dumb why would a flagship monster replace atlal ka? You really think having Nargacuga prevents that?

@@PraiseChika its an example not literal, im saying that if a monster gets cut for a game its replacement is usually something original or different and not straight up the same thing

@@pandinus1377 well something like Bazel and Jho have comparable roles as invaders but fight you in very different ways, Monsters that would replace/block each other from appearing would be more like the Khezu/Gigginox or the recently revealed Almudron Subspecies/Agnaktor (assuming Agnaktor doesn't appear, which is the assumption due to the recent subspecies reveal)

I feel the exact same way

Nooo not tigrex. You can't take him from me. You don't know him how I do. Tigrex is not up for debate. Good day sir

Those monsters are honestly too iconic and unique to not be included. Tigrex has a cool design and while Nargacuga is more tame, the way he moves and the sounds they make are unique enough. Same for Zinogre. If anything, they kinda show how tame some new monster designs are in MHW when compared to new comers

Eh, Zinoger’s bowgun weapons have been op/ very good in a lot of the recent games. Stygian and Zinoger in world were the top of spread hbg till safi and Fatty and Zin was the second best but the most versatile pierce hbg in GU and in rise it is the best slicing gun. But yeah rath keeps getting the best armour of the lot to my dislike

@@Ritsu362 tame? Like have you seen Rakna? Or shara. Honestly Tigrex is plain, he is a simple fight and that is often the charge of him. Narga is more agile and takes attacks in a different route and while Zin is zin you can’t tell me that monsters like Odo don’t have fun fights and really carry the mantle of fanged beast well

@@victory8928 anjanath: deviljho lite with a little fire Banbaros: deviljho except he’s fat and is actually a moose? Tobi kadachi was pretty cool except they reused him. orange tobi and red tobi and black tobi lol Jyuratadous- what if lavasioth/plesioth used mud instead? 😳 also the ice version whose name I forget. Legiana also looks kinda lame even if they have some cool ice attacks. Royal ludroth- I mean great jagras Also, Nergigante is a cool fight but he’s not as interesting as Velkhana or the other Elders Val Hazak was cool tho. Shara ishvalda is absolutely one of my favorite monsters. So crazy looking, I love it when they break the mold and look really weird, kinda like Nakarkos or Ibushi from rise. Namielle also looks cool with the way they fights. Honestly, the elder dragons were all mostly cool. It seems like half were kinda meh which isn’t usually the case when compared to newcomers in most other MH games Also, I say Odogaron has a subdued design but he’s pretty cool to fight the first time. Definitely one of my favorite fights when I first started

I really love Rare Species, and they might be my favorite alternate form of monsters. I really wish Capcom would bring them back because they are absolutely amazing fights.

I share the same sentiment. I also started in tri and grinded out the endgame of mh4u, you needed elder dragon gems for literally everything and I got tired of them fast. Apex system made them even less bearable in mh4u, then in mhgen there were so many monsters to the point where I didn't have to farm them. Then came MHW and Kushala and teostra were back. again. I'm still playing Iceborne right now, but the amount of kushala and teostra hunted are almost the bare minimum I needed for armor. I'll do everything I can to not have to fight kushala again. Then the duo (because the most fun fight got taken out of games) appeared in mhrise. again. I'm getting real tired of them. Not only are they prominent, but they almost can't be ignored because elder dragons are such a big part of the endgame.

We need to bring back Dire Miralis and Gogmazios

Low and behold, if that Sunbreak road map is any sign it seems Capcom got the memo on rare species.

@@Andyjoe522 Woohoo Lucent!

Just watch , same things gonna happen with seregios

@@Paradox1012 Yeah, atleast the seregios weapons have awesome designs

Nargas weapons have almost always been top tier, or almost top tier since his first appearence in portable 2nd g/freedom unite. Having purple sharpness, decent slots, and high crit were well worth the tradeoff for a lil less in raw attack. Plus having purple sharpness and high crit could easily make up the difference in power. Also they eliminated the "need" for handicraft, often a very difficult skill to get. Steve weapons are similar, but have a bit more raw, less crit rate, and have a sharpening mechanic from dodging.

@@patrickleblanc613 So I'm not crazy for wanting a change in what's on top for once xD

@@ThijsTrials i wanna see them bring back some of the better diablos weapons. Cera cymmetry, diablos chaos broker to name a couple. But yeah, a change in the "meta" would be nice. Problem is, narga and steve weapons have a setup that makes them extremely reliable. With good positive crit rate and slots, the weapons are already good, but purple sharpness is the icing on the cake, especially since its one of the most coveted things to have on a weapon because of its modifiers. They would either need to either nerf the weapons, create even more reliable weapons with even more broken stats, or alternatively they could either adjust the current monsters defenses against raw damage or bring in new ones more resistant to it. Make them more susceptable to element damage. That could change things abit if done right. Now there are skills that can and will help other weapons combat and even excel narga and steve weapons in power and usefulness, problem is those weapons often need certain skills allocated to start getting the same result or better, such as having purple sharpness, good crit rate, meanwhile nargas and steve have all of that basic goodness built in, so they can focus on other skills to boost damage output instead. Such as crit boost and tenderizer. A constant uptime of 140% crit damage increase every hit instead of 125% is broken

Rathalos is literally the flagship of mh as a series... why take it out?!

@@literallysafijiva alright, then leave the Rathas alone But still take the other flagships out

@@liothetitanhunter7959 Fuck yeah let's re-introduce a bunch of monsters that require their own dedicated arena that don't overlap with other monsters, rely on features that don't exist in the game anymore or are literally vespoid but big

@@FlorkGnubbler yeah, Lavasioth got 3 mainline appearances in monster hunter So why not bring him back? Or at least the other 2 Piscine wyverns Even the Aka and Uka duo And last the Molten Tigrex, only 1 appearance

Fated 5????? Who's the 5th???

I found that theme and immediately thought it would sound amazing in the background, I love it

Alternatively they go the GU route and include almost everything, that's my personal vote, have more diversity in what you can fight and where in one game. Frontier also had that, just a huge assortment of greatly varied monsters

@@Lockz1111 well yeah my issue is that they show up in almost every game and it kind of takes away from the wow factor for me

As long as the monsters ai keeps getting better and their design keeps evolving, i dont mind seeing repeats. Just having them there does not take away from the creativity of new monsters. Nor should it. The more monsters the better. The only thing i dont care about is the low to lower-mid tier monsters. They can disappear for all i care. I have no love for the alpha versions of generic fodder-drome or drome similar species especially.

If there is one thing I want to see, it's to have Molten Tigrex reborn

@@BakeNation_MH Oh my god i would love that

Heh, yeah. They've already killed his streak of being in every MH in gen 4, but now we could use another break from him. Also, I added a link to our Discord in the description if you want to join it. It's nothing much at the moment as we haven't spent much time working on it yet, but we definitely intend to in the future!

Mhwib has the same number of monsters as 4u (70). And rise has about half it's monsters out due to sunbreak not being released yet. It also has 41 btw in it's base game which is fairly large already. Idk what you mean by smaller roster. Nothings gonna be like genU. That was made specifically to have massive representation.

@@ritten7452 World had the smallest base roster since Tri and base rise has the smallest roster since portable 3rd. It's true that Iceborne added enough content over time that it came into line with recent non-generations performances but that was achieved over time considering 8 of those were added after the initial dlc. I don't necessarily think that it can be expected that Sunbreak will see as significant an increase, particularly without many of those monsters being added afterwards. Sunbreak is set to release almost half a year faster than Iceborne did, after all.

@@jahredharrison4069 world’s roster being smaller is very understandable due to the game being built from scratch and all the monsters being remodeled from scratch to have high poly count models to fit the home consoles and PC platforms higher graphical capabilities. Im sure moving forward the games will have larger rosters, as we can already see from Rise having 45 monsters in the base game.

@@AysarAburrub I understand and agree with that, but it is still a major factor in people getting tired of flagship monsters.

@@jahredharrison4069 Reguardelss of how long it took to get those monsters, my point was that the games have the same amount of monsters. The rosters arent smaller they just took time to add more.

I feel like Lagi touches the ground just as much if not less than Mizutsune and Royal Ludroth so I don't think that's the problem. I'm thinking the issue is more likely something to do with his long neck behaving in strange ways or interfering with terrain or something

I know right, it's crazy!!!

There are a lot of gen 4 monsters that haven't come back, and I am hopeful that some of them will either in Sunbreak or MH6

for me, dunno why but I really wish to see the Najarala again. That, or another "big snake" monster, which feels like its missing somewhat. And overall, more neopterons/temnocerans. Big creepy crawlies are great as an alternative to more lizards, dinos and dragons.

I would totally be fine with having Mizu in every game

If you are referring to the soundtrack from the outro, it is called "Flame of Peace". The specific segment you hear in the video starts at about the 2:15 mark. Here is a link to the soundtrack: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HKfh_OgZ1ag.html

@@BakeNation_MH thanks

I've been of the mind that when the Magalas do return, it should be as the stars of a title update. It would be an event that would take place after the game's main story, so no need to worry about overshadowing the new flagship and final boss elder dragon. You could throw in frenzied versions of a handful of monsters as build-up to fighting them.

What monsters in particular do you want to see return?

I have lots of nostalgia for 3rd gen Monsters with Tri being my first entry. So this includes Lagiacrus, Quoropeco, Gigginox and Agnaktor. Gore Magala, as much as i'd like to bring him back, they'd need to make a big deal of it. This includes the frenzy, which was woven so nicely into the narrative of MH4U I feel just bringing him back would do him huge injustice. But I'm hugely surprised that Seltas and his Queen haven't made a return, especially now we can have more complex monster interactions. I always loved how these two worked together and was MH4U's funnest fights. And I think this has been said by many others before, but we have Glavenus... Mitzizune, Astalos on the horizon... Please complete the fated 4 with Gammoth and Glavenus in sunbreak... Thanks for asking :)

@@JustJohn43 My first game was technically tri, but I didn't truly start playing until 3U, so I completely agree with you on having 3rd gen nostalgia and missing some of those forgotten monsters. I also share the same sentiment with you about Gore Magala, if he were to come back, the frenzy virus would need to play an important role otherwise it would seem forced

That is Lucent Nargacuga's armor from Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate.

Brachy is a tricky one because he did introduce the "blast" mechanic, but it was slimeblgiht in 3U and it was changed to blast in gen 4. So, in one sense he pioneered it, but in another sense, blast belongs to multiple monsters. Plus, I would be really surprised if they brought back Gore in Sunbreak as well. Given they have already brought Seregios back, plus Mizutsune (in Rise) and now Astalos too, it would be very surprising. But hey, I could definitely be wrong xD

I completely agree, the Monster Roster is not as a big deal for me as is the gameplay

You know it! Can't wait to fight him :D

This is a good way to look at it. The returning monsters d act as a sort of benchmark for the hunts, and they could also be useful in determining favorites through comparison and contrast

I'd much rather see new invaders tbh. Bazelgeuse is more interesting to me than goku and pickle. I'd be okay with zinogre if they did more variants but only having one which they dont put in every game and is extreamly late game sucks. I didnt even know he was in World cuz I never got far in iceborne. I just wish to see Gore Magala and maybe Great Jaggi back

Honestly same. Frost plans to revisit the topic after Sunbreak's update cycle is over, so we'll see how it goes then

There is also Rakna-Kadaki, I would say that monster is above low tier

@@BakeNation_MH You're right Rakna should be mid/mid high tier. It's another fight i don't like so i tend to forget about it

For sure! That's bound to happen as well. The flagships are just made to be these incredible and memorable monsters, especially compared to some of the other regular monsters in the game.

You, and every other hunter splattered between it's horns

I am most excited for Lucent Narga out of the three. It was one of my favorites back in 3U, so finally having it back is extremely exciting.

It is the Jumbo Village theme from MH2 Here is a link to a video of the theme if you want to hear the whole thing: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KcikS-WDuiY.html

So are every U and G games, they are an expansion of the previous entry.

Why don't you say the same thing for all the other games on the list?

This is something I thought would be really cool as well, just a clean slate and a completely fresh experience

Look what Mh tri did every Monster except the Raths & Diablos were New It had the smalest roster ever in a Mh game but it didnt matter

@@AstonMartinGT5 Very fair point. I think some people put too much emphasis on the sheer number of monsters in the roster as a measure for how good the game is going to be, and that's just not a good way to judge the game. I would much prefer quality over quantity in terms of the monsters I am fighting.

@@BakeNation_MH definitely just bringing 2 or 3 back is enough let the rest be new there will always be new games where they come back or come back in the G rank expansion

It was about darn time he returned :D