Have We Found Life on Venus? 

oh for god's sakes..no it isn't ! she makes blunder after blunder..eg..2:23 phosphine found in extremely high levels...like hell it was....

​@@psycronizer I do not have the qualifications or knowledge to have seen that type of error or others you have seen. I am not disagreeing but my comment was a reaction to the video. I saw so many superficial articles about this news but this video is the only one that talks about how scientists could not model a non-biological origin for the gas, and other topics.

Wast the PBS Spacetime video

@@baileytaylor1160 p)

Fascinating

Everyone knows Venus has the worst meth problem

That would explain why they didn't see any life after landing there. The Venusians were like "Hide, it's the cops!".

Thick clouds are perfect place for aliens to hide meth lab

Snazzypop Maybe you should do some Meth. That’ll make it even better

Noooo. More Math and less Meth

You go

ISRO Is in the process if building such a probe called "Shukrayaan", as Shukra is the Indian Mythological name of Venus.

Breh, why would we come to venus when we our self will become just like it. Just wait for a century and the solar system will have 2 venus by then.

How about we clean up our oceans first, then go....

@@MissTrinidad NASA’s total budget is less than $20 billion, we can do both. I'm sick and tired of hearing this argument, WE CAN DO BOTH. We shovel $750 billion into the pockets of tobacco companies every single year but we get mad at the people that are trying to keep our entire existence, species, origin, and everything from A. remaining a mystery and B. getting annihilated and reduced to space debris by an unseen disaster. But no, let's not do the stuff with the potential to revolutionize our breakthrough rate and save us from being a one-planet species because the drop in the bucket required should go to more immediate problems here on Earth. Why not ask for a 30th of the US military budget instead of some of the most important science ever done? Obviously, we need to save our planet, but we can do both, they are not mutually exclusive. If you want more to be done for it it's not the money required that's holding you up, it's the people profiting from the destruction of our planet. Also, there a million more urgent threats than our ocean pollution when it comes to problems here on earth. Our oceans rising are certainly worse, and either way, it's not the money that's the problem, it's the people dumping garbage into our ocean because it's cheap. Do you even know what you're arguing for?

9:30 Global Warming, it was Global Warming.

Plot Twist: Trump's first term was on venus.

@@Toxicity1987 Weeeeeell, that's probably what completely sterilized Venus, yes... But it also saw a global resurfacing event between 300 and 600 million years ago... Think of a volcanic eruption, except everywhere at once: A planet-wide flood basalt eruption. For context, this happened _after_ the evolution of metazoans (aka animals) on earth. Venus may have had complex life up until that point... Which could indeed have been waging chemical wars fueled by copious amounts of methamphetamine. Just sayin'

@@thenerdlobby6599 He's like the anti-Superman! Escaped his planet as a decrepit old man, in order to guide humanity into destruction. Or Ben Schwarz! How many -towns- planets are we going to let him ruin before he's finally put in prison?

Real Short answer: yes.... long answer: life of Venus found us first. Then Egypt was born.

Nerd click bait

Ty for saving me 15 minutes of my life

Has there been any update on said chemical?

@@jaysmith4314 latest I heard (end of 2022) is that some people don't think the chemical (phosphine) is there at all, while recent studies from one of the teams that do says it's unlikely to be life because none of the other changes in chemical composition that you'd expect are present.

@HousingDinosaur pretty good

It also sounds like what the oil companies want earth to be lol

it’s actually a tamer version of future earth. water going up into the atmosphere and not coming back down is a big contributor to global warming, and earth has more water than venus ever did

Ngl those video clips they show of Venus looks like something you'd see in a documentary about volcanoes or deforestation

That sound both true an sad

Most probably. As she said, they were probably similar in the beginning, but as the sun got bigger and hotter Venus became uninhabitable. This will probably be Earth's fate one day, as the sun has not, and will not, stop growing. It happened to Venus first as it's closer to the sun, and it's only a matter of time until Earth is too close too. Billions of years though, so I wouldn't worry. Who knows where humans will be by then, if we're still around we'll probably be off traveling the universe. We've only existed at all a few million years, so it's an unimaginably long time away.

I mean, how do you differentiate between human contaminants and real ET life.

@@mohammadzuhairkhan8661 watch the video lol no earthly life can survive the highly acidic conditions of Venus

@@linecraftman3907 No Earth life that we currently know of, that is.

@@Guru_1092 I read that even if we did bring microbes ourselves there's no way they could have produced so much phosphene in that period of time. Seems like it's really either some new unknown chemistry on rocky planets or life. Either way it should make for a great scientific advancement.

Debunked by thunderf00t. His video is very compelling and calls the venus life hypothesis nonsense. Pretty much zero water, insignificant phosphene, impossibly acidic conditions, no hydrogen, not going to happen, a dreamers folly.

I would have loved to be raised on these films

Yeah kinda dissapointing

@Alpha Centauri No, we just gave them a ride on ours, obviously.

This I did not know. Along with the new discovery of the amino acid Glycine this is forming a strong case for life as we just don't know it. We need another ship. Thank you and please keep commenting useful information.

Two years later, and has there been any update on the subject?

i think that i have no idea what you are saying.

I trust you because you sound smart

You are correct

Yup it's phosgene but even phosphine is poisonous

@@jm56585 Incredible logic.

Hi

@@shawneeg214 Hello

Roberto Perez wanna go bowling?

@@shawneeg214 ye

5head

True, I forgot about that.

They address your point at 4:36

@@reinhardtscheepers6317 No, they don't, they further the misconception. The original paper actually has a calculated maximum production from lightning and solar wind. At 5:03 this video asserts a simple misinterpretation of the abstract form the paper, claiming that none would be produced by these processes on Venus. I trust that they did not stop with the abstract in their reading of the paper, but likely just forgot the small details as they went through numerous other sources which skipped that detail. Hence "disappointed". We are talking about the second reference in their list of references by the way.

Are you sister of that Real Engineering guy ?

Yea

Good point, these are a lot similar. Might be a chain channel of Real Engineering

The channels are affiliated with each other (they sometimes mention each other’s videos) I don’t know if they’re related

no

I suspect that there is a pretty face behind that voice.

There will be if Elon gets his way

A big underground lake has been found. Check out Scishow.

Yes David bowie

TAKE A LOOK AT THE LAWMAN BEATING UP THE WRONG GUY

Shut it bowie

1000 times higher than in earth's atmosphere is "just" a few ppb?

@@CuulX That's an apples to oranges comparison. Comparing it to the equivalent biological footprints of life, this is miniscule.

@@lankatr no

Check out @bullaki for a detailed explanation on the Venus phosphine discovery.

Check out @bullaki for a detailed explanation on the recent Venus phosphine discovery.

Asi tak :D

Check out @bullaki for a detailed explanation

Been moved and NASA watched as it was moved a little closer to the earth. Noticed how big and bright it is nowadays in the evening sky? It's being terraformed as I type . There are two NASAs ,outer NASA don't have a clue what the inner NASA does. Our Benevolent space brothers are preparing that planet for inhabitants. Those who follow ANSWERS OF AN ALIEN FROM ANDOMEDA were informed of this for quite a while now.

Humanity definitely didn't. Life might have, but we might never know for sure.

@@toboterxp8155 It is possible you kno

Well, firstly, besides perhaps the moon, we don't even know conclusively that there is no life on other planets. If we were to seed life, then we may very well destroy any microbial life that might exist. In time, we probably will seed life on, say, mars. But as a blanket strategy, it's just plain reckless.

“If any life existed there they would be melted by the rain!!!”