Definitely a symptom of the patriarchal society, right? I mean women are so oppressed. The men always get the advantage in these hearings and the benefit of the doubt, obviously.😂
@Rebecca-hc5ju it really doesn't matter. He agreed to her being main conservator. After that point they where just working out the details of how it was going to go..the main conservator wanted supervised visits. At that point no one contested her. The father agreed.as secondary he can only suggest things.. all those questions and figuring out how that was going to go was just to figure out the fair amount of money owed..
I'd sue her for mental anguish and for the backpay. He shouldn't have to pay that since he had no say in their lives during that time. And he also wasn't seeing them. I know that child support and visitation don't have an effect on each other but at the same time we have no idea what is happening with the kids and whether she's a good parent. She's being charged with fraud and running from the law about it. I hope they use this to arrest her and then she won't be getting anything because he's going to have to take the kids if she goes to jail. You can't tell me that a person with fraud charges is a good person. She's literally using her skills as a fraudster to defraud this guy. And the courts are helping her do it. Saying he has to have supervised visitation because of a "feeling" is not proof that he's going to do anything.
I wouldn't let anybody with warrants near my child either. The father is trying to protect his kids. The court is trying to protect the mother and the state's financial interest. Disgusting.
@@k.stacey7389 I don't disagree, but dad is an oil field worker. I am very pro father's rights as I believe we have none here in the US, but do you know what that job entails? The LONG hours, the dead tired when you get off? He has a large foundation he needs to build. I hope the best for him
This guy needs a lawyer! I don't know why he's agreeing with all this crazy stuff! If she's got a warrant these kids obviously can't go to jail with her!
She should be in jail for every day she denied their children access to their father. And yes, should lose custody. WHy can't we change laws that the law STARTS at joint custody? DIsgusting
Sure she demands back child support while withholding the children from their father and is on probation for a robbery charge! Father's get screwed over all the time.
Sounds like it’s a different county that the warrant resides. So why would this court take her in when it’s not their warrant and courts are not law enforcement
civil court first of all. secondly... isnt texas the best state for fathers rights right now? if he asked for half custody and their was no evidence backing up a legitimate reason as to why not... he would have gotten it.
Usually, they don't. Not when they appear at hearings like this. If they were at some sort of criminal hearing they would send somebody to get her, but not during a civil case hearing.
It’s pathetic that the father needs permission from the mother to watch his own kids under supervision. Who was supervising her when she had her first kid?
@@thesun-N-moon8885I love how the state will take the kids and put them in a foster home in other situations but when a father has been kept from seeing the kids they want to slowly introduce them… if he’s a good man they will be fine.
@@jwhippet8313 I thought it was bribery not robbery. She had probation and apparently didn’t show up and now has the warrant… Not saying what she has done is okay, but just saying what I thought I heard
Thanks. I was trying to figure out why she was worried about that. The govt idiots didn't pick up on it and should have. Shameless incompetence on the part of the judge and the other woman.
Women should automatically forfeit back child support if they refuse to allow fathers in the kids lives….and every missed visit should result in money being taken away from CS…
@@sinjamaree exactly I wish they could just put the money straight to rent/food/clothing without the money touching. I knew some women who never spent the money on the child and would use others to help pay for things for their kids.
@@sinjamareeI can’t count how many times I have seen a mom with child support, food stamps, nice fresh nails, makeup etc… and the kids trailing behind looking like a mess. My kids always look better than I do! Not saying this is her… but clearly she doesn’t care about the children’s needs when she keeps them from the father. A great mother should be fighting for her children to have a relationship with their father if he’s a good man.
So let me get this straight. He hasn’t seen his kid and she admits to keeping the kids from him. And he still pays back child support. Where are the consequences for her actions?
Because you still have to pay even if you don’t see your kids. They still need support. You are suppose to go to court for visitation if you are not allowed to see your kids. That is for any person who is not the custodial parent.
@@Shawn-rq4py Dads also keep kids away from moms. There aren’t consequences for them either. Bad parents come in both genders. But guess who gets the last laugh? The parent who is stable and the kids learn they can rely on. 😂 (That’s me having the last laugh with my son every day.)
What the heck?!?!? She's in a court hearing, admits she has a warrant for a violent crime, and everyone is like - well, that's not interesting, do you feel he needs supervision when visiting his child?
@@jwhippet8313 I figured. I don't get it, since they quite clearly clarified it immediately, but since it seems so many heard what you did, I can't quite fault you for it.
Every video I watch of this judge is gross. She's so slanted to the mother it's wild. She has a felony warrant and he needs to be supervised with the kids? Good grief
This judge really doesn't deserve to be on the bench she should be disbarred!!! You're sitting there and you're not FORCING this WOMAN, to give HER ADDRESS, so the POLICE CAN PICK HER UP, ON A FELONY WARRANT!!! And you're talking about giving the FATHER, SUPERVISED VISITATION?!?!? INSTEAD OF FULL CUSTODY, this is DISGUSTING, AND ABSOLUTELY WRONG! I'm SICK of watching FATHERS SUFFERING THIS WAY, and giving the MOTHER'S ALL THE RIGHTS. Especially when you have one, as UNFIT as SHE is, and a FELONY WARRANT on top of that!!! And NO, I'm NOT a MAN. I'm a WOMAN saying THIS!!!
What a freaking JOKE. Why. Is this father’s being kept from his children yet has to pay this horrible mother. These ‘ judges’ are an embarrassment to family law
Wait.... the father can't pick up the kids because they don't know him but the uncle can go get them and they don't know him either? I hope the judge is wise and fair enough to see that the mother's request is absolutely absurd!
The father needs to hire legal counsel. The mother will continue to keep the babies from visiting the father until he petitions the courts to modify custody arrangements.
It's crazy watching the state always gang up on the dad, and you never see them ask the mom to do supervised visits just because, they act like a man can't take care of his children without proving himself. It's sad!
@@oliviatreemy son is going through a divorce right now. His wife and he agreed to 50/50 custody and the state is trying to change it. He is already paying the child support he and she agreed to and the state is trying to change that too. They agreed and the state is saying no so the divorce keeps dragging on.
@@grammar4341 First, the state can't do that...unless some entity like the GAL disagrees with the settlement the parents both agree on. Another possibility is that one of both of the parents have not enacted their safety plan or completed services required of them. It doesn't sound like you are fully aware of your son's case or what the courts are requiring of him, or his ex.
Dad always gets shafted. I had it happen to me. I had a daughter and her mother tried to hide/keep her from me. I took her to court so I had legal rights (even tho I should have already had them). after I won my court case, I showed up to visit my daughter and the apartment was empty. she had fled to Arizona from Washington state (where we lived). so here I was paying child support to Washington for my daughter, and I was ALSO paying child support to Arizona for the same child at the same time. I had to fight child support to even get them to understand I have only 1 child yet 2 separate states were taking child support from me. needless to say after having lived through hell trying to be in my daughter's life, I avoided having more children because I didn't want to be hurt again.
Denial of visitation puts her legally in control. He definitely needs to stop being so nice to her. He needs to decide that he’s the best person for the kids. Once he decides that, she’s gonna have some trouble.
@@alisonfraser8231 - that has nothing to do with what I just said. Most states consider children community property until there’s an order in place regarding parenting time. Meaning, neither parent has majority control and care. The law will not step in and force one parent to give the child (ren) back. There’s no order to enforce either way. I don’t believe that every parent is the appropriate person to care for and manage their child. Some parents just can’t get it together. Doesn’t make them wrong, but it does make them the wrong parent for the job. Too many times women have been given the power and they have abused it. Unfortunately, I think that’s the case here. I also think that mandatory DNA testing should be done for every single baby born. No more paternity fraud. Women who have done that should face felony charges and jail/prison sentences. They should also lose custody of their child. How can you raise a child to be who they are if you don’t even know who helped create them? It’s time to do the right thing for the right reasons. The truth is the only way to make a difference.
Not sure if you have been around the oil field, it isn't a place for kids, if he wants custody, sounds like he needs to get himself a good woman and a house big enough for them and his 3 kids, a lawyer, and then come back.
I agree but the kids are not familiar with him. So needs to play ball to familiarity than get a lawyer to show he is best. A plus is that he already have a child leaving with him
They do that to see how reasonable the parents are being. If what they ask for is reasonable, then it will be ordered if the other parent agrees. If it's unreasonable for the situation, the judge will set their own ruling.
And the judge and OAG essentially doesn't care about the felony warrant. Imagine if he had a felony warrant. The breaks would be on and the judge and OAG would be in full investigation mode. A woman with a felony warrant... Nothing to see here. Let's get that Title IV D reimbursement money.
I'd never allow it. Been married for 33 years and we both loved our kids more than we were ever furious, disappointed, or irritated by one another. Divorce was never an option. We weren't going to separate the family WE chose to create because we couldn't get along, communicate, and raise our children together.
I don’t think he should pay back child support for her refusing the kids which causes psychological abuse. I feel like the court is discriminating against him.
She draws the man in, marries, gets immediately pregnant, births the child, divorces, repeat. She's a strong woman and don't need no man. Oh, except to send her money. Nice tattoo. Looks like that's how she spent the $600 he sent her.
Well, she’s got a warrant out for her arrest on a felony charge. She’s already on probation for another crime. The tables will turn soon & he’ll file for primary custody in no time ;) Btw, exchange children at a police/sheriff’s office. Parents agree now, til they don’t.
Who is this person (oag) making all these decisions? she's infuriating, if i was the father i would be angry with this process it seems all based on what the mother says she doesnt seem concerned about his position at all.
Why would be need supervised visitation? He’s taken care of his children and there are no issues. She wants to control the situation and that’s sad for a dad that wants to be in his kids lives.
I understand the supervised visitation to start, not because of anything he did but since she kept the kids away from him for over a year they don't know him and need to get used to being around him again before they just get left with him for a full weekend. And since she had no valid reason (aside from "the issues") to keep them away, she should provide valid reasons for it or forfeit Back Support for that time period. Children are not weapons or money tickets. But like most of the rest of the comments, I cannot believe the judge never addressed the fact that she has a felony warrant!
If he had a warrant they would be in full investigation mode. They would know what it's all about and the sheriff's office called and he would have been arrested.
She kept him from his kids completely and now comes to court with I just want him to see them and be happy, the I’m sweet as pie’ act is covering something she is planning, mark my words, he needs a lawyer now!
The way this employee of the court is talking to the father is ridiculous. So this mother has alienated him in their children's lives and they're questioning the dad about it? Treat the mother a bit more accordingly as a woman who's withholding visitation from a biological father for zero given reason. She gave no reason. She wants supervised visits for the dad when clearly he should have custody. Also, she has a warrant for her arrest? Wouldn't the judge have an obligation to have her arrested? She took his kids from him and that's enough for someone to lose custody.
What's up with this Judge.... she runs away because the police are after her ... hes in a stable home setting ... she just putting problems in the way .. and the judge still backs her ... WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN
This judge is a complete idiot, she has warrants but the judge is going after him. Amazing! Mom withheld the children from him, this is alienating the parent and I thought that was a major no-no. This county is in serious trouble if this judge is an example of the judicial system in that county.
You court system need to get yourself together not all about the money and your pockets. I am a female and I need to know why he should be giving money to a woman who didnt let the father see his kids. You have caused the women mother to become babysitters and employers to the men fathers. Because of this yall may as well give the kids back to the fathers. Employment redudant and over.
It’s not in lieu of visitation. It provides continuity for the kids. It’s usually on weekdays where working/school/dinners/bedtimes make actual visitation infeasible.
@@sinjamaree You can't be serious about defending this crap. You are as ridiculous as this woman... Let's allow YOU to solely *see* your kid (if you have any), parents, loved ones - even a pet ONLY on Facebook Live for “continuity” of relationship, please….🙄
I don’t get it. So the ONLY issue with visitation is that dad is somewhat of a stranger at this point. So the solution is for his brother, also a semi-stranger to the kids, picks them up?? The logic does not compute.
I'm sorry. She admitted in open court that she has been withholding the children from their father, and that she has no concerns of danger to the kids. NO, she shouldn't get back child support. She decided she was a single parent, and that she had sole rights to the kids, and that she had full authority over whether the father could see them or not...if that's the case, she should be solely responsible for the expenses of having the children. I'm sick of trash mothers who want to be single parents and have all the control, and still think they should get all the money.
Womem hping from d to d but dad needs assisted visitation. Whats bull is this 😂. What a waste of time. Just dip dude make an other family. Explain it to them when they 18 😂
Parents who separate and care more about their child, than their animosity toward each other, never end up in court fighting over custody and child support. They make it work because they understand the children are the bigger picture. Without a doubt all of these custody & child support hearings are filled with bitterness, a sense of ownership of the children and often times more than a hint of jealousy.
That’s not how it works. Whatever is going on with the Mother has nothing to do with the children and THEIR needs. Child support does not stop until 18 or through college.
Neglect and Parental Alienation are both forms of child abuse. If one parent is committing PA it doesn't justify further abusing the child by financially neglecting it.
The rub is Title IV D reimbursement. The state collects .666 for every dollar collected per month. That means there will be a backdoor alimony payment to women and it will be paid regardless because the OAG must have its revenue stream.
Wow! Can’t even finish watching this. The mother has a felony warrant. Kept the kids from the dad . Mom also moved far away and they want dad to drive for supervised visit. This judge is awful needs to be fired, she broke the law by not checking on the warrant and having the police arrest her. But the judge wants him to drive 8 hrs for a supervised visit , back child support. Mom says she want this all to be over and she is the one that started it by taking off with the child. But the judge rewards her. The dad needs to get a lawyer because as usual the man gets screwed.😢😢😢😢
Got a feeling he’s not going to make all those supervised visits if he’s 8hr away, now paying $700 in payments plus back child support. Basically hobbles him. Sad.
This is a prime example of how family courts are biased against the fathers and will always side with the mother. She has a felony warrant but yet he has to have supervised visits if he has the fugitive mother permission. This judge should be ashamed and this guy needs an attorney asap. Disgusting he is being punished for being alienated from his kids by this disgusting woman.
I hate this judge, she is beyond bias against men. This is unbelievable, please men wake up and stand up for yourself. Please change the laws. No citizen of a country should be living like a second class citizen, this is just egregious and a real misandrist.🤦 Please remove this judge🙏
The fact that a woman can decide to keep a child away from the other tells me everything that I need to know about the u.s court system thank goodness I had a child in Panama were support is split 50/50 on child support and custody
It really perplexes me why mom would withhold children from dad for over a year then get to court and be so amicable about access. I really don't think he should be be paying back support when she willfully withheld access to the children. I'd get it if he just didn't bother to seek access but that dosent seem to be the case here. I really hate to see any parent think they have the right to deny access to children just bc they don't like who they chose to procreate with. I really hope things move on smoothly for these 2.
His brother will be the ‘go between’ for drop off/pick up his niece/nephew but she can’t meet half way because of an oil leak? What is the point of the Judge being there?
@amandaharris5055 Of course, you're not going to agree with it you're a woman. You realize the most dangerous place for children are with single mothers ? Statistics prove that but the courts always wants to give mothers custody.
@@beatencheeks2no its not, just because someone doesn't want or can't see their kid doesn't mean the kid stops needing things. There's a reason they are separate issues in court. For example if they werent separate, a non custodial parent who doesn't want to pay support, could easily harass the ex or involve the child in their nonsense specifically to get their visits taken so they can avoid support which isn't fair to the child. And on the flip side of that, if the non custodial parent falls on hard times or whatever and doesn't or can't pay support, then the custodial parent could refuse visits which isn't fair to the child. Reasons like that are why they must continue to be separate issues.
Equal treatment under the law, dude needs to get a lawyer. The states have to treat men better, and stop being women centric. Allowing any parent to get away with the stuff is horrible, Hold them accountable!! People use frickin BIRTH CONTROL!!! Come on….Bribery, geez
Why does that guy pop up in a bubble in the beginning and say you kept this child away from the mother for 2 years, when the mother in this case did that(1and half years in this case)not the father? And that isn't even from this case. A bit misleading. Unless you were trying to show that it is a crime when the father does it but not when the mother does it? I mean a little text bubble would've been nice for context to explain that it had nothing to do with this case at all and was just a juxtaposition of how the law is unequally applied between mothers and fathers.
