Justice Gurupal Singh Ahluwalia is thorough, honest, precise no nonsense personality that looks for truth in a case so that justice is delivered. God bless him.
माननीय जज साहब श्री अहलूवालिया जी की कोर्ट प्रोसीडिंग्स को देखने और सुनने के बाद मेरे जैसे साधारण वयक्ति को देश के जटिल न्याय प्रणाली को समझने में काफी हद्द तक समझ आती है! धन्यवाद जज साहब..🙏
I think high court has wrongly interpreted the SC judgement which says Financial Distress and not Bankrupt … bankrupt is declared by a decree of court… SC has said while interpreting sec 142A court may consider financially distress condition which is broad in meaning and bankrupt is a very narrow interpretation… council should have highlighted this fact…
Honourable Judge this is the litigants wish that advocates should be accountable for every case. After taking huge fees litigants suffer for justice year after year for decades.Ultimatily litigants with out getting justice they die.
माननीय न्यायाधीश महोदय को शत शत नमन करते हुए सम्मानित को हार्दिक बधाई एवं शुभकामनाएं मिले दीर्घायु हों और कितने अच्छे तरीके से एडवोकेट को समझाया फिर भी ग़लत आधार पर निर्भर हो कर निर्णय नहीं किया है ऐसे लोगों के कारण ही न्यायाधीश महोदय सम्मानित हैं जय भारत वंदेमातरम सहित यथोचित सम्मान सहित अभिवादन आशीर्वाद मिले
Sir jan bujhkar lawyers ko kahi kahi debate k liye rokte h matlab unko pata h ki imse tym waste nahi karna chahiye or jaha debate karna chahiye wo karte hai isse lawyers ko sikhna chahiye ye videos to inko law ki oadai k tym batane chahiye
Kewal court me apne muwakil ke samne against hai baad me to fir dono milkar agla date par tanne ki niti banayenge kyoki 2017se2024 tak wahi dekh rahe hai
Apna profession ko agar imandari se nibhaye to nischhit janta ka ashirwad milega or court me case ka no. Bhi Kum hoga lekin wadi pratiwadi se milkar case ladenge to apna profession ko kya samman karenge
Excellent stand by Court.Every Appeal court lawyer takes this stand against trial court lawyers.These Appeal court lawyer's doesn't know what is in Cr.P.C. and C.P.C...
Judge shouldn't side with lawyers.veryone know about the Malpractice by lawyers in court.you shouldn't turn blind on these malpractices and blame clients for everything.its duty of lawyers to give legal advise to clients to not to enter false statements.
Is it possible that instead of uttering the words milord or lordship so often, the lawyers start their argument with the sentence 'all I say hereinafter will be with respect to you milord.' just as the witness takes the oath before the cross examination bagins.
He's not a fool guy.... Other persons r ready to manipulate the facts and matter.... Judges always keep going on track by following the rules and laws.... That's why it takes a time to understand and take the judgement accurately....
@@infocolletion Don't support inefficient judiciary and judges only are to be blamed for this. Judges blame lawyers but why they give adjournments why they don't impose heavy cost on lawyers for delaying. The way this judge behaves suits supreme court collegium and such types of judges mostly are selected by supreme court and he will surely be elivated to supreme court.
@@sahibsinghbajwa3256 why no comments? Judges are not above law. They have not passed IAS NEET JEE CA OR CS level of exams. They are appointed by unconstitutional process of collegium.
Judge over dramatic and quite unnecessarily prolonged the hearing. There is nothing alleging incompetency of trial lawyer if the evidence directs itself. In this case the Judge could have simply pointed out to this lawyer that SC Judgement he was relying on was post trial court finding and cannot therefore impinge the conduct of trial lawyer. But nevertheless, the SC ruling in Rakesh Shrivastava could still be used to make out a case for dismissal/modificatio on the grounds of sudden and unforseeable economic collapse of the litigant.
