There's no question that Grand Seiko is a display of high level craftsmanship. I have one in my collection but always seem to turn to my rolex watches for my everyday wearers . Just the way it is . I've been wearing Rolex since 1968 and have never been let down, and being an outdoor guy , they're about as robust a peice as you can get . I always am afraid I'm going to scratch up my Grand Seiko so it's regulated to a "going out watch" . Just my experience.
I'm an Australian guy watching a British guy talk about a Japanese watch on a channel that is owned by a Swiss company that was founded by a South African guy.
How do you put all of that thought into the different countries and then don't even talk about the fact that this is all happening on a platform (RU-vid) that is owned by an American company (Google), which bought it from the three original founders, who were each born in three different countries...Taiwan, Germany, and the USA?
One week after purchasing my Snowflake, I went to a jeweller (different from whom I bought the watch, who do not sell GS) for a strap change. The vendor was indifferent when I tried different straps, but after I picked one and waited for the strap change, the clocksmith himself came to me from his back office praising how good my watch is and how rare it is to see one. I knew already that I've made the right decision but that confirmed it.
When the King Nerd comes out of nowhere to drink with you, you know you nerded correctly & properly. You were technically correct, which is the very best kind of correct. ;)
@@Megalosmalakas1977 I guess it doesn't have to be that way. What this comment implies is, for someone able to spot a GS, they're most likely to be watch enthusiast. While Rolex, I can bet there's not a single soul who didn't know/heard about Rolex. So, people who can spot Rolex really varies, from watch enthusiast and not.
@@AIRFORCEFREAK1 😱 say it isn't so! I have three brands on my grail watch list... Omega (likely an Aqua terra) Blancpain Lemans big day/date flyback chronometer, Or....a Grand Seiko Spring drive. Guess its gonna have to be a GS spring-drive. Gotta support the cause! And to the production team @ watchfinder & Co, thanks for another delightful installment. It's always special when you wax poetic about our shared addiction. And if I had to say why I personally love the art of mechanical watch making so much.... they give me...hope. The Apollo moon landing will always be the pinnacle of what the human mind is capable of. But so too is a time piece that you can wear on your wrist, and so long as you never stop wearing it....it will never stop telling the time. Natch! ...gives me hope. Keep up the good works. Be well peace. clb
Not true, ever heard of the Japanese term "takumi"? Japanese has this obsession chasing perfection in their craftsmanship, that's why you see sushi or ramen restaurants that serve only 6-7 people, or artisans with handmade goods with very low production volume in pursuit of perfection. They sacrifice monetary profits and take pride in perfecting their craftsmanship.
Can we STOP talking about GS?! I don't want the price to go up more. Leave GS to us watch nerds and talk about the other brands like Rolex and AP instead.
I saved up for 13 months and lost 30kg, and I'm rewarding myself with a Snowflake. Should have it within the next 4 weeks. I cannot wait to put it on my wrist for the first time. My first luxury watch and I know I'll never sell it
I'm a Rolex owner and I agree with pretty much every word of this. I love Rolex but I am acutely aware of how vast and rewarding the world beyond Rolex is. Own and enjoy a Rolex, but don't kid yourself that it's the pinnacle of watchmaking.
Seiko and GS is a tacky brand today, they are nothing like how they were in the past. It will only get worse, except for the most expensive models the rest of the lineup will be shit like this.
"Is that Rolex real?" "They probably also have one and chances are, it will be better." Probably the biggest reasons why I'm extremely skeptical about buying a Rolex. I'd rather answer "What's a Grand Seiko?" than "is your Rolex real?"
Brilliant thought. I have no doubt that the movement in a Rolex is excellent but that’s not why people buy them. It’s the 911 of the watch world. The excellence of the brand. Poseurs buy them to impress.
@@zamiryusof8239 Rolex is the only company in the world which actually wants the fake industry to exist and thrive. The fakers are doing a very special kind of marketing and advertising for Rolex at no cost at all! :D It's a symbiotic paradox, if such a phrase makes any sense... Certainly nothing to do with watchmaking as such. And also the reason why I will NEVER buy a Rolex. However, we have to admit that this is one of the key factors behind yet another paradox - the fact that every year Rolex keeps increasing the number of watches they produce while at the same time getting more and more expensive (sic!?). Consumer madness at its best. Or worst. The jury is still out... :) Cheers!
@User 2389 Go ahead, tell me what makes a Rolex superior to a GS. Design? That’s subjective. Finish? No comparison, GS is clearly superior. Movements? Whatever you think of the Spring Drive, it is innovative and the Hi-Beat movement is superior to any Rolex movement. ....and please don’t tell me about resale value and staus. I couldn’t give a shit.
I first saw Grand Seiko last year in an upscale department store in Seoul. I thought it was a Rolex then noticed the GS logo. It was a stunningly beautiful piece of craftsmanship. In comparison Rolex is a utilitarian hammer. When I got into work on Monday I showed my fellow watch nut friend the photos and asked if he’d heard of Grand Seiko. As excitedly as you explained in the video he was also like a school boy telling me all about the brand and the backstory. Grand Seiko is the watch for the true watch connoisseur. Not some wannabe with no idea what he’s wearing on his wrist or why he’s wearing it.
I bet if you send it back to Grand Seiko with that exact complaint they would polish it for you with no questions asked. :) Moreover, I bet they would start doing it on every new watch they produce as standard practice! :)
Receiving compliments on your watch sure do is a great day maker, when i someone says to me "nice watch" i want to tell them all about the history and the engineering nedded to achieve it, but i jus hold back and say "thank you". Sometimes is pretty hard to hide my power level.
LOVE the last line. I am more likely to have a conversation about watches with someone who is wearing a Grand Seiko than a Rolex. My boss wears a Rolex Submariner. I started chatting him up about the recent (at the time) record breaking sale of the Paul Newman Rolex Daytona that I read about. He had never heard of the daytona, or the knew anything about the headline.
You really need to look into GS more. There are so many better looking models than the Snowflake. People tend to say that Snowflake is the one because that's the only model they know about.
@@jeanraspail2979 I felt the exact same way! Last time I were in Japan, I visited the seiko flagship store in ginza just to get the Snowflake, because I like everyone else had it like my holy grail. But when I had it on my wrist, my reaction was "is this it..?" It's not a bad watch, I was just expecting so much more, and I had hyped it up way to much in my head. Plus, the light weight threw me off too much. It felt cheap because of the weight. So I got another GS instead.
@@RustyNotesTV yes, my main gripe is the Titanium, I don't understand why GS use this material so excessively... I find the SBGY003 interesting too, maybe I get the chance to try it on sometime
In the last 6 months, watch channels have been jumping on the GS bandwagon. I don't like it. I'm saving to buy one. All this hype is gonna make them more expensive.
I know! I’ve been looking at them for a couple of years now. Don’t have the money but am waiting for the day. But that may get further and further away...
Unfortunately, the most comment I’ve got so far is, „you spend all that much for a sEiKo?“ Very few people of the general mass have an interest on the mechanics and details, or dare I say modern day horology. Most are only interested/cared for the brand cachet. Same cliches I’ve always received for my JLCs, Moser and GP. Be it from ignorance, but the general mass likes to utter the usual, „if it’s not a Rolex, you’ve chosen poorly“.
I get what you mean. but.. the history of the watch and the company is so meaningful to some... I really enjoy reading up and listening to horological content! I don't understand most of it but it's fascinating!
It's hilarious. I compared my GS with my coworker's Rolex. He agreed that mine looked sharper and more stunning, but he would never choose a GS over a Rolex. He said the same about my JLC. People are way too enamored with the Rolex name.
@@kingsleycy3450 some of us just don't care about Rolexes. The only one I wish I'd bought was a Newman Daytona back in the early 90s, and really only because I'd have flogged it for a fortune. I just can't get excited about them.
Exactly. And before you purchase it, you had better be certain the hands on the quartz models line up on every tick mark. They don't on mine, and I've seen several GMTs that also have that problem. While my much less expensive Casio lines up perfectly. Be careful and don't buy sight unseen.
Agreed, I think its because their information that typically lives on the caseback on most their watches. It still needs to be there so they crowd the exhibition back lol
I'm ready to be chuffed Edit: okay i said this before the video started but at 9:08 sounds like he is saying chuffed. *I SEE YOU'RE A MAN OF CULTURE AS WELL*
It will never appreciate in value, because the "Seiko" on the dial devalues it on some level regardless of what fanboys want to say. No one is going to start paying far over retail for Grand Seikos outside of some diehard fanboys. There's a reason Toyota didn't call Lexus "Grand Toyota".
@@Shintsu2 there aren't many luxury watches that appreciate in value anyway. Even luxury brands like Omega, Zenith, JLC and Blancpain depreciate. And all he people who pay less than retail prices as well
For me, no problems with this one. As far as sheer excellence in watchmaking, the Swiss can still outdo Seiko, but IMHO only when they really stretch themselves, as for example with the Brequet Classique Chronometier (sic?) or AP's Altiplano Ultimate Concept (featured in one of your other fascinating videos). The later is not just impossibly thin at 2mm, but one of the most interesting dials I've ever seen. But those are both insanely expensive...10-30x the $$ of a Grand Seiko. Wearing a $20K Rolex would just remind me what a dumb ass I was for spending so much on a very ordinary watch.
Oh boy, that's one of the best episodes EVER! 😂 The narration is on such a tormenting personal level it hurts. But in a good way. There are so much lines in it that would be worth quoting that it wouldn't fit in a single comment. Keep it coming, Watchfinder!
The problem with Grand Seiko is it's NAME. Not that there is anything wrong with Seiko watches, but carrying the brand that sells $80 watches doesn't help sell $8000 watches. Lexus would not have done as well had they stubbornly decide to brand themselves as "GRAND TOYOTA"; same logic. They would have gone so much further carrying a distinctly Japanese name that has nothing to do with Seiko.
I would love to see an analysis of average bounce time by watch owners by brand. I can’t help but wonder how many folks who paid Lange 1815 or Saxonia money for a steel Rolex took all those deserved pot shots and still watched until the end. Thank you for really driving the point home with the exact amount of subtlety necessary to do so. Also, hello triggered Rolex owners. It’ll be ok, probably.
My current daily wear is a Tudor GMT and I’m watching the whole thing. I’ve never like the aesthetic of GS but am curious about the accuracy and durability
I'm going to get a lot of hate with this comment. First of all, I admire the finishing and quality of GS, when you look at them on the loupe it looks perfect. I actually went to an invite only GS event just before lockdown. Again I was blown away with the quality and finishing. BUT, their design just doesn't do it for me (I'm sorry). I spoke to a few people in the event, none of them (besides the guest hosts and staff) were wearing GS . Everyone in the event has no doubt about GS unique position, but none of us wants to buy it. In fact I noticed more people wearing Tudors and Vintage Rolex instead (in these types of events people tend to pay respect to the brand by wearing the brand if they own it) . For me, the design has to appeal to me as well as the function, minus being able to read the time the function itself are usually like for like (time and date unless you going with complications), so the design element usually be the focus. For me having "Seiko" on the dial simply feels cheap, it reminds me of their cheap quartz and adding a grand there doesn't really do it for me. Also most of their design is rather office like and a bit "boring". Is like wearing perfectly made rounded toe shoes, but the shoes itself doesn't match with your Tom Ford suit! Watch collecting as we all know can be a bit snobby, I personally find a cheaper Jurghan more appealing than GS. Buying something which might please other people because you wanna convey to others you are a watch nerd but giving up on what you truly prefer in design i truly cannot do.
I'm with you.. tried to like GS, but found their designs just a bit clunky in real life.. I also absolutely hate the feel of Titanium... don't understand why they use it so excessively..
As the saying goes...you can’t please all of the people all of the time.....The submariner is a design classic but I find it too utilitarian and clumsy looking....preferring instead something between that and a dress watch for everyday use. So long as they have a well engineered and well finished product they’ve got good foundations.
@@richardclowes7428 I get what you mean and I totally agree with using a Sub as an example. But my take on it is, would you wear a GS to a pool or the beach VS a sub or perhaps an Explorer 1? Where the Explorer 1 may resemble a slightly closer general aesthetic with GS, GS definitely has a better finished product.
I am proud to say my first ever high end watch was a GS. I don't care about brand recognition - I care about horology, quality, craftsmanship. Several watches later and my GS is still probably the overall favourite in my collection.
@@thetruthhurts7500 hahaha. Good one. I've actually got a Rolex. An Explorer. Beautiful watch - I absolutely love it. It's somewhere in the middle of my collection: not as good as my GS Spring Drive Snowflake, my JLC Reverso Duoface, or my Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Aventurine (though I know comparing a time only to a chronograph isn't a fair comparison). The Rolex is, however, better (in my opinion) than my IWC Portugieser Automatic, my GS Hi-beat, and my Omega Globemaster I feel sad for you that you think horology peaks with Rolex. You poor thing.
The finishing of the dials in Grand Seiko are phenomenal. But it definitely has its flaws. Case thickness and bracelet are areas I think definitely need improvement, I truly hope in the future they have the opportunity for a tapered bracelet model and are able to tone down the case dimensions just a tad.
This dial is incredible. Wow! And accurate, yet subtly stated jabs at the Crown. One of your best narratives yet IMO. Lastly, the commitment by Grand Seiko to finishing and iterative refinement is commendable.
Man these videos keep getting more and more entertaining. And I'd rather get a Grand Seiko over a Rolex in a heartbeat anyways because I think the Japanese watch industry is far more consumer friendly than the Swiss. Casio, Citizen, Seiko: all highly respected brands because they make watches that work and work well. I'm in love with my Seiko 5 and my G-Shocks, all combined cost less than $400 new.
The only thing they need to fix is the clasp. On my GS the clasp is not the most secure closure and worst of all no micro adjustability on the fly or any adjustability. ALL watches above 3000 dollars should have micro adjustment on the fly. I love my GS, but don't wear as often as I would like simply because it's not always comfortable. Rolex bracelets are for me the most comfortable bracelets and even the basic easylink is great.
John Flink nope but I’ve never really had compliments on any of my watches Patek/AP/Rolex/GP.. I think the last was my Tudor when it first came out (Brown bronze) and once with my GP
As a proud owner of this "Kiku", I can safely say that this watch looks much better on the blue leather strap it comes with. The steel bracelet kinda dilutes the impact of this truly outstanding dial
I lost count at how many times I paused and rewound the video, just to admire the beauty of this watch. That's a testament to Grand Seiko's craftsmanship, and a sincere compliment to your photography.
GS is not better than Rolex. Analogous to apples & oranges…both fruit but decisively different in taste, texture & esthetic. Let’s not conflate the two. Owning numerous Rolex tool watches I appreciate GS however their sports watches are cumbersome and tall due to their Spring Drive. A remarkable movement but too thick. Lume should be plentiful but is sparse. When GS makes a sports timepiece that around 39-41mm an relatively thin with an abundance of lume I’ll purchase my first
"Heritage is here to stay. It's a bit of a buzzword these days that can mean anything from inventing the watch itself to purchasing a long-dead brand and making rubbish watches under the name." Hmmmmmmmm
For the rest of the world "perfection" is something special that should be charged extra. If you ever been to Japan, you know that for Japanese "perfection" is just a standard. They don't understand how you can do a lousy job, even if you're not paid enough to do it. My problem with GS is that I'd love to own a spring drive. The movement, WR, power reserve, everything is great. Yet I can't find the design that I'd instantly fall in love. Every watch has something that would bug me for life. Usually it's the other way around, I love the design, but specs just aren't there. And I'm not the kind of guy that buys a watch with the plan of selling it later in mind. Also I think GS needs to add more precious metals to their production.
Agreed, I feel they need to be less conservative with their designs. Swiss watches often seem to have a more flair to their designs somehow. That said, I’d rather spend my money on a GS any day,
Agree entirely with your comments.. very conservative designs yet so impeccably finished for the price, that it leaves the mind in a conundrum of what to think next..
@@AmericanBusinessman422 It's because it's a myth, maybe with a hint of truth. Weebs somehow think watchmakers in Japan spend endless amounts of time working on their watches then sell them for $3000 and make a profit somehow.
GS are great watches. Few aspects which I feel can take them to the next level. 1. The fonts for logo. Letter and number are aesthetically not the best 2. The logo and letter print on the back glass is bad and should not be there. 3. The GS bezel in most cases to me feels very ordinary design well
It's true I've never had a good talk about a Rolex with anybody, but once and a while an omega owner can hold a chat. I've only ever seen one other Tudor in real life, and that guy I work with. I've gushed over the GS Snowflake to so many people and nobody really gets why I want it so bad.
Call me crazy, but I not interested in Rolex at all. Everyone I know(personally) that has a Rolex bought it for no other reason than it's a Rolex. When I see someone with a Grand Seiko, Zenith El Primero, etc., I see a watch enthusiast who is leaving their dream.
Same with people who buy a Ferrari or Lamborghini. They may love the car and really appreciate it, but it's just as likely they're just like, "alright, I'm rich. What do rich people buy? A Ferrari or a Lamborghini." By contrast, someone who buys, say, a Lotus has to be a car enthusiast.
@@bryancheron6902 The Ferrari comparison is VERY fair. If you watch car videos, you'll see a lot of commonalities in how Ferrari and Rolex operate and their culture. THEY chose the customers that can pursue their products. They both focus on their branding more than innovation.(but still great quality) Both were born out of humble beginnings; Ferrari manufactured tractors and Rolex made tool watches.
@@seanthomxx2694 It's Lamborghini that manufactured tractors, actually. I'm a huge fan of the brand (I've read several books on the company's history andI even went to the Lamborghini museum in Italy once), and I haaaaaaaaaaate the douchey image associated with it.
@@bryancheron6902 right, I got their their history mixed up. But Lamborghini doesn't have the pretense that Ferrari has. Hell, they sent cease and desist to Deadmau5 because of his wrap.
@@seanthomxx2694 I just googled this, and even though I had no idea who Deadmau5 is (I'm guessing some kind of entertainer), it seems it was Ferrari who sent a cease and desist letter to him, not Lamborghini. No?
This is by far the best video on this channel. It is incredible how accurately you have captured the true essence of a watch enthusiast's admiration and love for watches which doesn't necessarily defy any rational or logic for reasoning
I felt like he was talking directly to me. I have so few people I can talk watches to. I lurk in these channels comments and just enjoy realizing there are so many like me out there. And no, it is not the cost of the watches. But I do not want to preach to the choir.
I got a GS SBGJ203 a couple months ago, sold it last month, for two reasons, first, the whole watch got highly polished, so shinning so beautiful, however, it easy to get scratch, you need to wear it extremely carefully to avoid scratch, you can’t like a Rolex, polish yourself by using a polish cloth as GS use special polish method, sending to Japan for polish takes over 6months. My wife got many bags and those bags got many mental parts, too easy to scratch the watch in my case. Secondly, the bracelet is exact the same as my friend’s $500 Seiko presage watch except the buckle, I have no idea why Seiko use cheap bracelet for a $5000 watch, it’s definitely not feel good for me, GS is extremely well made, good for watch but no good for wear. just my opinion.
i have not handled a seiko bracelet, but GS bracelets by no means feel cheap to me. It's one of the most comfortable and solid bracelets ive seen. The extremely delicate polish on the bevelled bracelet edge is top notch. Touch the lazor sharp edge of a Rolex bracelet and you ll know what i mean. As for the micro-adjustment. The half links work perfectly for me, but if anyone see that as a must, one can always go for a sporty model before GS make changes on their dressy models if they will.
Totally agree with your sentiments. Up until for some time I still couldn't get my head around the fact that Grand Seiko could be placed a notch or two higher than Rolex. But that thought is slowly waning as I read more and more not just of the history of GS but the effort it is putting into its creation is astounding, beyond belief. As I delve deeper and deeper into the above mentioned literature and taking closer look at GS time and again I'm slowly trying to realise what the hype is all about. And believe me it makes sense. I recently saw the current Seamaster and other variations of it, only to be disappointed by the fact that none of it actually held me spellbound. Compared to a GS you can easily tell the lack of finisse. I spent less than 10 mins on each of the variants trying to see what is there that could see the Seamaster on my wrist but nothing really ticked. Glad I saved myself 10g.
I love this quote: "An older Rolex still has that tool to do a job charm, a new one is neither one thing or another" . I had a great deal of respect for Rolex when they sold their watches as a good quality, robust tool to tell the time. In the last twenty five years they have lost their way.
I own many watches over $100,000 Rolex and Patek’s included. But I must confess .. one of the finest watches I own is a $9100 GS “White Birch” .. the attention to detail is almost Lange level at a fraction of the price.
I wore a Seiko Presage Mockingbird and used the attention it brought me to talk about the horology trials. It’s light-catching dial even managed to draw some interest, only for ppl to find even more details like dual-finished hour/minute hands, and contrasting gold secondhand. If I ever own a G.S, I’m just gna hand it to them next time. It’s mirror finishing and intricate dials speak it’s own story...
Controversy alert! I would love to own a mechanical watch with a movement that I could look at for hours, but I haven’t taken the plunge yet. Why? When I open my watch drawer I am confronted with a plethora of quartz items dating from the ‘80s, all ticking (Seiko VH & VK aside) merrily away within a couple of seconds of each other. I’m not wealthy by any means, but even if I had the cash to splash, I am wary of the stress that would manifest itself when, upon the aforementioned opening, confronted with a watch that requires setting - and even winding! I know that I have a small psychological problem, but I am, otherwise, harmless. Seconds matter to me. The order and contentment that I feel when all second hands and digits are in accord cannot be understated. Thank you for letting me get this off my chest - I feel better already!😻
Grand Seiko is unlike anything on the market. And even Seiko, I like my Seiko 5 more than my Submariner. Yes, it’s weird to some, but there’s nothing like Japanese quality. I see Grand Seiko as the Lexus of watches.
Imagine that. I have owned nothing but Lexus vehicles since 1991and Rolex since 1972. I collect Rolexes. I love them both. However even Lexus can’t hold a candle to the longevity and build quality of a Rolex. I have had many Lexuses and have many rolexes. Both are admirable and worth every penny.
b..b...but it doesn't have as good as a resale value as Rolex. Most people who want a rolex want it either for the easy social status or for speculation purposes. Case closed. The fact that people are always trying to compare both feels like a (desperate) attempt to justify GS, when it should really be living its own thing. I'm, for one, really bored with every thing in horology being compare to fucking Rolex. Want to help horology : JUST STOP MENTIONING ROLEX all the time.
Start at $8k, when it gain popularity among celebrities it would jump to $14k but the dealers would not sell it for less than $18k plus one would have to suffer the "waiting list"
Lmao, all it takes is a green bezel and a green sunburst dial to pump the resale price to >2x retail. If they spent this much time crafting a dial for one of their sports models, you can bet it'll instantly sell for even more than that
It's quite funny that Rolex fans are considered ignorant snobs, but the GS fanboys who say you're only a real watch enthousiast if you love GS, are just as bad... I don't have a preference for a certain brand, but I do like several models of Rolex, Omega, JLC,... and I really like the GS Snowflake. Might actually get me one if only they would get rid of that silly power reserve indicator and put a better clasp on it.
Are they even comparable? Of course Rolex is better than a Seiko lmao. The 9s85 movement is still using regulated balance, and Spron610 is only magnetic resistant to 180gauss, Rolex started to use free sprung balance wheel and Parachrom material is immune to magnetic field making it a much more reliable watch. Rolex also does way better bracelet.
That's a heat blued hand and not painted. But, the blemish could be from a particle that fell on the hand during the heat blueing process. Happens to the best in the business even with those who boast about "Geneva Seal" and "Hand finishing".
@@yetidh9 A speck of dust is a lot less worse than a messy paint job when you know it was done without any regard or care. Having 1 or 3 particles of dust that fall on the dial while assembling happens to even the best in the business. But say finding a scratched hand or indices where that's a very big no-no. I've seen JLCs and even a few Geneva Seal Vacherons have scratched hands that is very apparent to the naked eye. One of the reasons why I dropped the VC Overseas from my grail list. I mean if Grand Seiko can do a better job for a fraction of the price, then why would I pay 3 or 4 times the price for a VC which is supposed to be way upscale when it comes to quality control?
@@inkhaurt5812 I agree with that. You should get what you pay for. I do think people judge Rolex harshly. For the most part they are mass produced watches priced under £10k (RRP). I very much doubt the GMT hand on a Rolex is hand painted. You can't accuse a machine of not being careful :-)
Im an Indian guy replying to the comment of a British guy commenting on Trinidadian guy responding to a German guy on a comment of an Australian guy watching a British guy talking about a Japanese watch on a channel owned by a Swiss company that was founded by a South African guy.... keep it going guys...
I love both my Rolexes and all four of my Grand Seikos....and I'm always looking for yet another GS, but no more from Rolex. At least living here in Tokyo I never have to explain GS ;)
Addressing the "Is your rolex real?" You can probably tell without asking the owner, just look at his ride, is it a high end luxury car? His home, is it a mansion? If yes there is absolutely no reason for this owner to have a fake. If the owner drives an old corolla though or lives in a tight rented apartment you can probably guess its not a real piece.
The fact is that while GS may be better than Rolex (arguable), outside of super watch nerds almost no one knows about GS. GS needs better marketing to compete.
