I own D850. The histogram looks different in my camera DSLR screen and different in the ACR, while editing; Usually throws it to the left dark site. The shadows are deep, the colours are darker. Is it incompatibility of the equipment, high mgpxls camera or..? What shall I do to avoid this?It is ruining my pics. Thx
Tony, you make histograms so chill. You're just a chill dude editing some chill photos with some chill histograms. If there was a chill histogram you'd be all the way to the right. Keep up the chill work, man.
I tried searching for a video on your channel a few weeks ago and couldn't find anything like this but now it's here! Really makes more sense now - I'll have to put it to use now, appreciate all the good content you guys put out! :)
How often you can find a pro teaching photography features like this on youtube? Different screen calibrations is never a problem after Tony's explanation of histogram.
Guys, thank you very much! Your videos are just treasure for a newbie like me. The more I watch the more I understand I was a monkey with camera, and now finally I evolve :)
Much good information. Where the RGB histogram has advantages over the luminance histogram is where there is a disproportionate amount of one colour. Imagine taking a close-up shot of an orange flower, surrounded by dark green leaves (don't sound like a very exciting shot, but plenty of people take images like that). If you expose to the right using the luminance histogram you may well find that the petals look rather flat and lack contour. Look at the RGB histogram and you will probably see that the red channel is blown and the exposure needs to be reduced to avoid this. Small point but can save your bacon in some circumstances. Otherwise, nicely put.
Histograms are a dark art, but you have just enlightened me. Thank you Chelsea's assistant for exposing me to this tutorial. It's as clear as black and white now. :p
These videos are amazing! So informative and really well thought-out. I love your content and the books you are selling are at such a great price point. It really shows that you're trying to make photography accessible to everyone.
Excellent explanation Tony! Love your content, though I am curious about why you would want to expose to the right- I always thought it was best practice to expose to the left in order to be able to recover highs later in post.
Would have been good to mention perhaps more clearly that a picture with just snow and sky and a white bird should have everything on the right side of the histogram. So no black point or anything even close to it. So one should not force a black point and a white point if the image has all dark/black or bright/white. If you take a picture in a mist, then everything is more or less gray, and there is no black point or white point and the picture should be washed out.
Very useful. Regardless of how much I think I know about a particular element of photography, I was learn something new about it from your videos :) Although, I was waiting for the part where you talked about live histograms shown on the camera screen and how to react to what they're showing.
Unfortunately the histogram can be misleading in very specific situations because it averages out the three primary colours. I got pictures where the histogram was perfect but one colour was blown out completely. Sadly most cameras don't show "RGB" histogram in live view so you need to take the picture first and then check the levels of the primary colours. If one colour is blown out, you can underexpose a bit and retake the picture.
Hmmm.... frankly this is the reason I've never submitted a picture to TCLive - I just love dark and moody shots that are not technically perfect, in many cases with a lot of complete black (and there's no point in raising the shadows because there's nothing important to see in there, it'd just ruin the mood). My favorite shots lean heavily to the left, and sometimes when I see similar pictures being submitted I wish you'd just look at them first, not at the histogram. I agree that it's good to know what it's for and how it would technically be perfect, but then you can still decide to do something completely different.
i know hitting the left and right clips blacks and whites respectively but what happens if the histogram hits the top anywhere in the plane? i've been searching for the answer but haven't been able to find it anywhere
What if I see different histograms on my camera and computer? The histogram on the camera looks fine, but when I look in PS something is always off. The midgones often go way above the top line, when they were somewhere in the middle on my camera. The most noticable culprit is blue - it tends to go to the underexposed side and that changes a lot the image, giving a bluish tint and darkening it. I'm awfully confused. Is something wrong with my camera?
There are professionals who don't know how to explain the technicalities of photography but you are not one of them. I can't thank you enough for excellent and informative tutorials. I wish you did underwater photography so I could learn more about that area.
Man, can anyone help me? What is the best camera body(Nikon/Sony/Canon) for $1000(and why)? I am a enthousiast stills shooter, and ReallY LOVE shooting. I shoot all kinds of stuff, but mostly like astrophotography, landscape and portrait. (But that focussing on the sony a6300, WHOOH) I also can go for the Canon 80D and the Sony a6300, because there is like 30% off here in Belgium. I am really in a struggle( I watched like over 60 hours of all reviews and I am just dead, I cant choose, love mirrorless sony but seems little useability) THANKS for your help!
Tony, I have your book SDP. and watch many of you videos, but all your adjustments are made in either Lightroom or Photoshop. I have neither. But I do have Adobe "Elements 12". Can you do some videos using that?
He says that color histogram is not very useful. I think it's very useful, because the luminosity histogram is just an overage of the colors and does not tell if some color component is overexposed. It's quite common that especially sunlit faces get overexposed in the red color, sky in blue, and vegetation in green. Overexposed areas are flat and post-processing is impossible. Another issue is with the recommendation that you should shoot bright, because there's less noise in the upper part. This is true in the sense that while CCD or CMOS cells themselves are mostly linear, the signal-to-noise ratio is better in the bright end. In JPEG images, you also have less noise in the bright end, because they are flattened out in the logarithmic scale. However, logarithmic flattening and packing into 8 bits also loses much of the linear information, which is why it's better to either shoot raw or underexpose. Further, shooting in raw does not always save from the problem, because the CCD and CMOS cells have an internal _antiblooming_ feature, which makes images nonlinear in the brighter end and hence you lose information.
Hi, Tony. Love your videos and tutorials. I'm looking for a little more hands on training with DSLR photography and Lightroom editing. I'm in Columbia, SC. Do you have any recommendations? Thank you for any guidance you can offer.
This was helpful, but it seems like it is a guideline and not a rule for all shots. For instance, I was not able to have it "shoot to the right" on some hummingbird pictures I recently took. If I did, the white on his neck was completely blown out (even though it wasn't touching the far right) - making the picture look really bad in my opinion. If I shifted the histogram more to the left, so that there was a bigger gap between the edge of the histogram and the far right side (which you said would be underexposed) - the neck was no longer overexposed, which got all the detail back on the neck. The rest of the bird mostly looked sharp and detailed as well. Although on some of the black feathers on the edge of the wing did loose some detail. So a worse looking histogram, made the better looking picture in this case.
I've been to Peru probably 6 times but is been over 12 years since being to Machu Picchu :( Need to go back I can't even find my original (6MP) images!
So it’s like an eq for audio but for an image instead? Low end is on the left, high end is on the right, and you can adjust each “pitch” to add more “black” or “white”. An image needs dynamics, just like an audio track.
Camera LCD screens offer a terrible rendition of the actual image. They are mostly useful for histograms and text displays. This is especially true when shooting RAW.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I do believe both are extremes and the best bet is to find a perfect balance where the picture is neither over or under exposed.
Thanks for this video but you didn't explained what is the histogram and specifically how this can be read. It feels I need to understand completely from scratch.
I use the histogram all the time if I'm shooting in bright conditions, or else take a test image and dial in any required compensation after checking it. Whichever method I use, the histogram is at the heart of it.....
Thanks and I was aware of the histogram but didn't use it much. And yes I have been fooled by looking at the screen on my camera so let's ad this tip to my bag of tricks. On a separate note our big screen TV has RU-vid built in great.... but I do not see a like button or way to add coments so I jump back to the phone... any suggestions.
since raw i stopped caring much. even my Highlightswarning is wrong and i easily get it all back in raw. i heard phaseone bases its warnings upon the raw. why cant all manufacturers do that? useful to just stay within syncspeed for example.
I am from Dubai. I want your Stunning Digital Photography ECOPY. is it available?. And How I will get your 14 hour video. Is it possible to download? How I can Buy it?
Ethan Blankenship its normal that any digital does that better, still....many Nikons have Sony Sensors....my dated Sony a65 takes 1-2 stops over easily. depends though. but the Highlight Warning is wrong. technically, at least at low ISO, to the right is always better as long you dont truly blow out. oh and try Film;)5-8 stops overexposed. not a Problem :D
i've never had a problem bring back shadows with Nikon but if i "correctly expose" there tends to be so much detail lost in the highlights because they're blown completely out. however when i shoot Canon I will shoot to the right because Canons shadows are SOOOO grainy compared to Nikon. plus its part of my style to shoot to the left. i usually don't tell anyone what they have to do and not to do, its up to their creative interpretation and how their cameras preforms. I also shoot with a Minolta X700 and a film Nikon 6000 too! love em both
tony says it because you introduce noise when you do that and hes kinda a noise phobic. I dont care, since usually no one ever look at your pictures at 100% zoom level just yourself. I shoot Nikon as well and do that all the time, since I better introduce noise, then to blow out the Highlights. (well at least when I dont shoot for instagram, since all hipsters there blow out Highlights like your camera has zero dynamic range lol) The faded look I dig myself. So Tony is more of a conservative guy, wich is fine, but shouldn't take as "you have to do it so it so" since its still an art, not a technical course at university. I also edit sometimes raw files from Canon, and holy moly you cant shoot to the left, not just is the noise unbearable but the bending and weird Artefakts let me wonder why someone still shoots with it, when its so bad lol. Oh year right the color since.. blabla..
I really wish that you'd show an image of a bride in a white dress beside the groom wearing a black tux in the bright sun with fill flash, or in the shade and the histogram, and dealing with the potential white blowouts.
I shoot in RAW, my *camera* histogram gives me a graphical representation of the *JPEG* and not the RAW information. What sort of witchcraft is that, I want my RAW histogram. :D
Tony & Chelsea, really enjoy all your videos there so helpful and interesting! Was just wondering how can I send in a couple of photos for you to review on one of them videos you do photos of 2016? Iv got about 3 photos that I would really love you to have a look at 2 that iv taken on my 1100D and 1 on my new 7D both using the same 50mm F1.8 and edited in Lightroom.. Keep giving us these videos all the best for 2017 from Giles in UK London
Hi Tony and Chelsea, Great channel and by far one of the best among the photographers! Keep up the good work! Said that, do you know if the Nikon D610 has a histogram in live view? I can't really find info about that on the net...
Thanks Tony 😊 ... this is the single most important post you've done (to me). I actually picked up skill that I never bothered with and it is awesome. I tried what you discussed and played with some images that I thought were throw aways, and fixed them; some with stunning results 🤔. Big props 👏 Alvin
Hi Tony, Hope you receive this message well, I would like to ask you about the computer that you use in your presentations, please correct if I'm wrong but, looks like that you do not use a Mac and I would like to know the computer specifications, because when you are using Photoshop and Lightroom the transition and image changes occurs very smoothly and in a very nice performance, because I'm planning to buy a new computer to use in my pós-production if you can give me these information, would help a lot. Thanks
Hi, Tony . First congratulations for all your hard work is very helpfull. ofcourse I am your follower in all plataform. I am very new on this world of photography. My question: Using a Canon mirrorles M50 in manual mode when I read the histogram some time is overxpose or under. I use the shutter speed or aperture until I see the histogram in my camera display right. Even when is fine on the display I can see on the exposure bar maybe one stop over or under. I took the picture and looks great. My question is when the histogram is fixed it doesnt matter the exposure display bar in my camera. Sorry maybe is a silly question, but you are the master
Hey, thanks for the good content. Do you happen to have a video about organizing old photos? I inherited a massive dataset of old family photos (digital and scans of old developed photographs) with duplicates and different formats and file sizes. I have a hard time to sort them since I don't know where to start. I really would appreciate if you could recommend some software or make a vid about this. Thx.
Hi! Your videos are awesome. Thanks so much! In Lightroom when I look at the histogram....if the triangle on the right is white, that means something is blown out. Sometimes when I bring down the highlights a bit, the white triangle disappears and I've gotten rid of the blown out area (?), but then the triangle turns to a color...like red, blue or yellow. What does this mean and is it a good or bad thing?