I have Spanish Roots from Granada and I am a Muslim Alhamdoulillah. ☝🏼💙 It has given clear effect what History has produced. 😉 I thank my Spanish Brothers for maintaining the Alhambra well. Thank you for passing on this beautiful history Brother Adnan Rashid,JazakAllah Khair.
Tarib ibn Ziad is from my Amazightribe in the near of El Hoceima like Abdelkrim El Khattabi. I'm very proud of my anecstors and the islam. Alhamdulilah
I am also a descendant of Granada, i am a citizen of Granada too and Muslim since my family from that time escaped to Morocco. But came back half a century ago.
Br Adnan is a Sheikh in Islamic History. Because of him my interest in Islamic History developed and Alhamdulillah I am reading his recommended books too. May Allah reward you for all of your efforts and further increase your beneficial knowledge!
In 2015, the government of Spain passed a law allowing dual citizenship to Jewish descendants who apply, to "compensate for shameful events in the country's past." Thus, Jews who could prove that they are the descendants of those Jews expelled from Spain because of the Alhambra Decree would "become Spaniards without leaving home or giving up their present nationality." The Spanish law expired in 2019 and new applications for Spanish citizenship on the basis of Jewish family heritage are no longer allowed. However, the descendants of the Jews exiled from the Iberian Peninsula may still apply for Portuguese citizenship.
Yes, I'm Portuguese, and this law is still valid. I've met several Jews that were "just passing by" Portugal to get their European visa... its ridiculous
I have today MashaAllah, that this wa an absolute gem of a production! Wallah so informative and beautiful Allah ya batik feekum! ❤️ (PS. If you’re reading this Musa bin Adnan Rashid then PLZ CHERISH YOUR FATHER.. You are VERY LUCKY)
@@marioformosa4259 @Mario Formosa native americans and canadians dont want u christians Liberation of land of native americans and canadians and austrailians should happen and will happen
I was looking earlier today the two football teams in the south of spain Cordoba & Granada have nicknames (the caliphs & The Nasrids) Granada still use the colours red & white, which are emblematic of the nasrid dynasties coat of arms. I do wonder if there could be a resurrection of Islam in spain, wouldn’t that be beautiful ❤
@@sevilla7fulvous êtes au courant que Al Andalus n'existe pas, il à disparu en 1236 après JC. Et vous êtes Andalus comme moi japonais 😂 Vous avez un mauvais réveil 🤣🤣
In some cases Christian dhimmis suffered martyrdom for their beliefs. Sometimes they revolted against Muslim hegemony. Sometimes they formed alliances with rebel muladis or helped the Christians of the Reconquista (provoking expulsions, such as those under Almoravids and Almohads). Indeed, there was a long history of muladi insurrection in Islamic Spain. Although the inferior social status of the muladis was probably the main cause of their discontent, some of the unrest among the muladi population probably stemmed from the fact that at least some conversions to Islam would have been insincere. When the only options were exile, forced submission, or conversion, some Christians surely pretended to convert but continued to practice Christianity in secret as crypto-Catholics. As we will see shortly, in the ninth century the rebel Umar Ibn Hafsun was supported by both muladis and Christian dhimmis in his decades-long resistance to Umayyad rule, and he seems to have died as a Christian. And in a bloody episode in the mid-ninth century, the “martyrs of Córdoba” included muladis who publicly renounced Islam or confessed that they had been crypto-Catholics all along. Even sincere conversion did not ensure equality for muladis. Arabs were at the top of the social scale, with Berbers in the middle, followed by freed white Muslim slaves who had become mawali; the muladis, further divided into first-generation converts and the rest, occupied a lower echelon, above only that of dhimmis and slaves. Naturally, muladis were not happy with their condition as third- or fourth-class Muslims. Not surprisingly, the muladis-“mixed ones”-earned another Arabic label: al-adhall, or “vile rabble.”87
Dhimis got killed bcz of judicial procedures. If you want to call martyrdom'' then it is upto you. Almohads killed many muslims also. So wrong analogy. Ruling class enjoyed high status along with their links. And for your infos, they way Catholics vanished Muslims within just 50 years does not go with anyhow with Muslim ruled Spain. In Granada there were 66% Muslims, rests were catholics and Jews. This was around 1492 CE. And for Martyrs of cordoba incident, most of the "stories" perhaps over exaggerated and even be myth also! I have checked all the citations. All of the are from late 19th and 20th centuries without the mentioning of primary material sources! drama! What Muslims faced during 15th and 16th centuries can be traced through memoirs of victims (like books found in excavation, Memoirs, Church writings, verdicts of Kings and Other contemporary sources) Forget about Muslims, Look at Spain at Spanish colonies. They also did the same! Chronic crusadic behaviours. So
A letter sent by an anonymous Granadan to Ottoman sultan Bayezid II is typical of how Muslims in Spain sought to rile foreign Muslim powers to their aid in the name of Islam: “Alas for the exchanging of Muhammad’s religion for that of the Christian dogs, the worst of creatures!… Alas for those minarets in which the bells [of the Christians] have been hung in place of the Muslim declaration of the shahada!” The towns “have become strongholds for the worshipers of the Cross, and in them the latter are [horror of horrors] safe against the occurring raids [jihads]” (Allen 2010, 367).
Yes, they had a right. Native Iberians who willingly converted to Islam when forced to convert to Christianity will say so. Have you forgotten the mass slaughter you did? It is a pity that Sultan Bayezid II was a weak ruler relative to his father Mehmet II under whose reign the Iberian Kingdoms would have been ground to dust had they dared such an action.
@@AbdulRehman-tl1vi Lol the savages were horiffied that the christians were now safe from their Jihad raids that they would often do which enslaved and killed thousands of christians. The natives defended themselves.
@@AbdulRehman-tl1vi Muslims did mass slaughter the moment they set foot in Hispania. Savages Musa ibn Nusayr's first reconnaissance missions to Hispania returned with reports of "great splendor and beauty" which increased Muslim desires to invade Hispania. During one of the multiple raids in 710, the Muslims “made several inroads into the mainland, which produced a rich spoil and several captives, who were so handsome that Musa and his companions had never seen the like of them.”[15] During another early raid, a Berber chieftain “set fire to their houses and fields, and burnt also a church very much venerated amongst them. He then put to the sword such of its inhabitants as he met, and, making a few prisoners, returned safe to Africa.”[17]
@@AbdulRehman-tl1vi The native Christians under muslim occupation called their christian brothers in the north of Iberia to save them from the muslims who were deporting tens of thousanda of Christians out of their ancestral lands to North Africa. "The Almoravids deported many Christians en masse to North Africa to punish them or prevent their collaboration with Christian warriors of the Reconquest. As for the Almohads, they concluded that only forced conversion could take care of the multicultural problem that these suspect Christian communities posed. Some Christian churches survived in Huesca until Christian forces retook the city in 1096. Until the eleventh century a few churches and monasteries remained in the rural villages of Islamic Spain. All these details indicate a Christian culture that indeed was declining under Islamic hegemony but that nonetheless refused to die."83
what's wrong with Spain or any european country changing their religion? Who said that a region must stay christian all the time? Christianity didn't even exist in Spain before Saint Paul. Spain was originally Monotheistic (like Prophet Adam and Noah peace be upon them), then Pagan Polytheistic, then Christian, then Muslim and Christians living side by side, then ENFORCED Christo-Pagan Catholicism, and then Light Christianity fused with Secularism, and now Liberal Secular Atheisto-Christian. I won't be surprised if Spain become full fledged Atheist in 2200AD without muslims.
i cried for the history of spain of muslims and also the number of views to this video ... unbelievable ... Dr. Adnan's history video ... and only 5k views ?????? whats going on?
What a sad ending to a great history of Muslims flourishing in Spain from mighty dynasty’s to a hopeless emir surrendering Subanallah… one day we will be back in full might and strength InshaAllah 💪
@@marioformosa4259 native americans and canadians dont want u christians Liberation of land of native americans and canadians and austrailians should happen and will happen
HA elle est belle la religion de paix musulmane ses enfants sont prêt a refaire 711 ,😅ont vous attend depuis 1492 cette fois vous aurez même pas le temps de pleuré bande D'arrièré 🖕
@@marioformosa4259Islamic Rule was one of the Foundation's for Renaissance. Europe was in the dark ages. It was only because of Muslims that you people got to know your own books. Wherever you people went, destroyed people and the Land. The best example in today's age is the invasion of Middle Eastern countries by Western powers. Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan are some examples. Inshallah Reconquista is coming soon.
Although the Christian dhimmi population had almost disappeared from Islamic Spain by the completion of the Reconquest, Christians did not go down without a fight. The eleventh-century chronicler Ibn Hayyan writes that the ancient city of Elvira (a garbling of the Hispano-Roman name Illiberis), part of the area occupied by today’s Granada, was once peopled largely by Christian dhimmis and muladis and was hostile to Islam.82 Under the Almoravids, some dhimmi leaders in Elvira collaborated with the Christian warriors of the Reconquest, and as a result Muslim mobs sacked the neighborhood’s church, obeying the fatwas of the ulama. Records from as late as the eleventh century show Christian towns that Muslim authorities in the taifa kingdom of Granada considered potentially subversive. The Almoravids deported many Christians en masse to North Africa to punish them or prevent their collaboration with Christian warriors of the Reconquest. As for the Almohads, they concluded that only forced conversion could take care of the multicultural problem that these suspect Christian communities posed. Some Christian churches survived in Huesca until Christian forces retook the city in 1096. Until the eleventh century a few churches and monasteries remained in the rural villages of Islamic Spain. All these details indicate a Christian culture that indeed was declining under Islamic hegemony but that nonetheless refused to die.83
They were not indigenous They conquered the area, with a mix of Arabs, Berbers, and Moors The indigenous people were the native Iberians, the Romans, and Visigoths who were primarily Christian Islam was introduced via conquest, not through missionaries or other peaceful means
Well, in 1482 the last Muslim bastion of Granada fell in the Reconquista; Fortunately, Spain was completely liberated from Muslim conquerors again! This meant that Spain, like almost all European states, was able to develop free of ecclesiastical and religious obstacles (the Catholic Church tried to slow it down for years, but at some point this ghost was over too!) Spain was able to develop with democracy, humanism, enlightenment, education , secularism, freedom of the press and developing equality between men and women; all attributes that are still missing in Islamic states today:!
One extra bit of info. The Catholics from the north were not the original Spanjards who came to take back their occupied land. The "originals" were living peacefully among the muslims all along. And the way Muslims took Spain was not the same as how the Catholics took Spain.
Although the Christian dhimmi population had almost disappeared from Islamic Spain by the completion of the Reconquest, Christians did not go down without a fight. The eleventh-century chronicler Ibn Hayyan writes that the ancient city of Elvira (a garbling of the Hispano-Roman name Illiberis), part of the area occupied by today’s Granada, was once peopled largely by Christian dhimmis and muladis and was hostile to Islam.82 Under the Almoravids, some dhimmi leaders in Elvira collaborated with the Christian warriors of the Reconquest, and as a result Muslim mobs sacked the neighborhood’s church, obeying the fatwas of the ulama. Records from as late as the eleventh century show Christian towns that Muslim authorities in the taifa kingdom of Granada considered potentially subversive. The Almoravids deported many Christians en masse to North Africa to punish them or prevent their collaboration with Christian warriors of the Reconquest. As for the Almohads, they concluded that only forced conversion could take care of the multicultural problem that these suspect Christian communities posed. Some Christian churches survived in Huesca until Christian forces retook the city in 1096. Until the eleventh century a few churches and monasteries remained in the rural villages of Islamic Spain. All these details indicate a Christian culture that indeed was declining under Islamic hegemony but that nonetheless refused to die.83
In some cases Christian dhimmis suffered martyrdom for their beliefs. Sometimes they revolted against Muslim hegemony. Sometimes they formed alliances with rebel muladis or helped the Christians of the Reconquista (provoking expulsions, such as those under Almoravids and Almohads). Indeed, there was a long history of muladi insurrection in Islamic Spain. Although the inferior social status of the muladis was probably the main cause of their discontent, some of the unrest among the muladi population probably stemmed from the fact that at least some conversions to Islam would have been insincere. When the only options were exile, forced submission, or conversion, some Christians surely pretended to convert but continued to practice Christianity in secret as crypto-Catholics. As we will see shortly, in the ninth century the rebel Umar Ibn Hafsun was supported by both muladis and Christian dhimmis in his decades-long resistance to Umayyad rule, and he seems to have died as a Christian. And in a bloody episode in the mid-ninth century, the “martyrs of Córdoba” included muladis who publicly renounced Islam or confessed that they had been crypto-Catholics all along. Even sincere conversion did not ensure equality for muladis. Arabs were at the top of the social scale, with Berbers in the middle, followed by freed white Muslim slaves who had become mawali; the muladis, further divided into first-generation converts and the rest, occupied a lower echelon, above only that of dhimmis and slaves. Naturally, muladis were not happy with their condition as third- or fourth-class Muslims. Not surprisingly, the muladis-“mixed ones”-earned another Arabic label: al-adhall, or “vile rabble.”87
El Reino de Asturias es previo al Emirato de Córdoba. Tanto los españoles cristianos como los españoles musulmanes eran españoles, no hay aquí "población original".
It is a fact that in every century muslims advanced. But the feeling of power and arrogance they built, led to their downfall and continuous downfall. May Allah protect Muslims and give them the power back that they had!
Sheikh Adnan, you seem to be joining debates in Hyden park with senseless, ignorant so-called Christians there. You being a knowledgeable scholar should not waste your time and energy with ignorants who don't even know how a decedent debate is supposed to be. You can instead call big Christians scholars for the debate.
