History of Poland : Every Year 

Hi from Romania, bastard!

Hello Mr. betrayer, highest analphabetism ratio in Europe! :)

Bence Fülöp Hi

Bence Fülöp hello :3

Ria, ria Hungaria. :D

Helo From Poland :)

xDuel Rasciauskas Hello from Hungary :P

Kukacka Anna Cool I love ur country ^-^

xDuel Rasciauskas Cool. I can barely hear it nowadays. Every time I watch some Poland related videos to gain some positivity cause the Polish-Hungarian love..All I see is some Polish hating on us, Greece people hating on us, Romanian..Romanians hating on us (not like we dont hate back to them I have to admire that) and everyone just hates this (awesome) country cause our prime minister is a load of asshole.

Kukacka Anna but lithuanians loves u and Austrians :)

And Hungary be always our brothers. Chwała Wielkiej Polsce i Węgrom!

Transylwania is Hungary :)

Yea i love hungary !slovaka and Czech from Poland!..

Turkey and poland 🇹🇷♥️🇵🇱

@@alituranulu2307 and turkey! ;-)

Greetings from Poland, from our best friend! :)

: Hungaryball : Is slovakia ur friend too Btw im slovakian And in can speak magyarul

Poles like Czechs and Slovaks.

: Hungaryball : you mean from our brothers?Polak Węgier dwa bratanki!

X6 64 what you mean?

Thank you my friend! Greetings from Poland!

@@GreatPolishWingedHussarsgreetings from Qatar!

@@itsmax45 Thanks! Greetings from Poland too!

Thanks i am from poland

Greetings my brother

You are a single Hungarian. Get a girlfriend and get a life

lengyel magyar ket jo barat!!!

First queen of Poland was from Hungary her name was Jadwiga also known as Hedwig . My best friend is Hungarian too :)

Poland hungary brothers

Simon Gray Thanks.

Simon Gray lol. yes. otherwise who cares about poland nowadays. poland ideas in eu4 is insane

kl yb Poland is great! Economy growing so fast after being a communist nation of Russia. In less than a decade half a trillion dollars made? Ha!

Alex Z still, Russia controlled them, they had to ration, none of modern technology (only black and white screen tv/cinema and Atari my parents had in 1980). They also had to learn Russian language in school.

"Communist nation of Russia"? NEVER. Under Soviet occupation - betrayed by its allies after WW II.

Thank you! But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the vdeo is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

​@@GreatPolishWingedHussars YOOO CHILL

@@notsyth Ridiculous! 9 months after I wrote the comment to write such nonsense!

Thanks! But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the vdeo is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars You did not mention Kazimierz Odkupiciel, who, after the rule of Mieszko II, actually saved the entire country, the very nickname "Odkupiciel" may be associated with saving. So she was one of the most important people in Polish history

@@Anni33212 I didn't mention him because I was reporting on later periods of Polish history. Because Kazimierz I lived in the 11th century. Furthermore, I don't know Kazimierz I under the name Odkupiciel (Occupier) but under the name Kazimierz I Odnowiciel (Restorer). The terms "Odkupiciel" and "Odnowiciel" are similar in Polish. That's probably why you were wrong. But I nevertheless thank you for the reference to Kazimierz I, because the Polish king Kazimierz I was great and every memory of him is good! That's why you still get a thumbs up from me! compatriots usually get a thumbs up from me anyway because we Poles should stick together. Powodzenia!

Hey, thanks there. Right now however I'm working at a different series.

But the ,,rozbicie dzielnicowe" was other than here

You say great balhae empire is just a small nation.......

Rowan Mapping but there are quite many mistakes

Indian brahmins are Poles, haplogroup a1r1

Carlos Silva because he is Indian?

You dont like turkey right?

Thanks

Bruh after a year, I am here and my comment is dumb af xd

I'm from Curitiba but I support Germany, i'm brazillian and german nationalist.

Thanks! But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the vdeo is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

@@joaovillan nazi?

@@igorjast7633 NOOOO

​@@joaovillan nazista

dziękujemy Bracia

Kosovo is Serbia!

Dziękuję i nawzajem from Poland!

Poland is NOT SLAVIC!

@@fikret6322 hhahahah then what is? Mongol-Altaic?

Kabarety pod wyrwigroszem

Barbara Woźniak ?

Thanks you for history of my contury !

Józef Piłsudski are not president. He is Poland marshal.

Khey Pard znasz polski?

YulianXD i to jedyny film obcojęzyczny tego typu co uwzględnił księstwo warszawskie :D

ale nie wspomniał o rozbiciu dzielnicowym :)

#polskikompleksniższości

@@Hubcio255 Trochę ciężko byłoby to uwzględnić

No pewnie

Lol

Same with Romania

Looooooool

I jerman

Entschuldigung polen. Und France wer sosnt Deutschland?

Norby studió™ thank you😘(I m from Poland(🇵🇱❤🇭🇺)

Norby studió hello my Hungary brother. Polish realy like Hungary :)

not all people in poland are cool the majority are in love only and exclusively in their nation

Polak Węgier dwa bratanki

Anschluss Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland Deutschland

@@glowfoxxx not funny, didn't laught

@@glowfoxxx cringe

@@dorukgoktug8230 cringe

@@glowfoxxx No Gdańsk?

Thank you! Polak Węgier dwa bratanki i do szabli i do szklanki

@@maciejk2665 plus 1byczqu

Thank you friend!

Prussia: Unites Germany Poland:Becomes independence Germany: Is attacking Poland again

Poland and Russia: Eventually annex prussia Prussia: Player left the game

Poland: *creates prussia* Prussia: some crimes can never be forgiven

But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the vdeo is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

And for you! :v

that ain't truth, the truth is that after 1683 there was respect between those two countries, even earlier in wars between Turks and Poles there was respect for each other. When Prussia Russia and Austria took polish territory only Turks said that they disagree with it. The next thing is that Turks were natural ally against russia, the only problem is that Poland and Turkey never used it, maybe unfortunately.

likewise, long live for Turkey

Don’t think we are good friends with Turkey but definitely we do have a lots of respect for each other

i from poland

You don't have to stand up this isn't North Korea, it's youtube ffs

It's called respect. We stand, becouse we're proud to be Polish. In N.Korea, they stand, becouse they'll die, if not.

Tycini1 did i say that poles are retards? As you have already found out im polish but wtf like no matter how proud you are you will never stand up while watching a damn video. ITS ONLY A FUCKING VIDEO

Spoiler: It was a joke. I didn't stand.

if you did stand up thatd be fucking weird as fuck

Thanks R1a1 Y-DNA brother

Arian (Iran=Arian?) DNA.

tak

yes! God belss Poland xD

PodobnO slavianie pochodzą z IRANU:)

Hi braders you from Turkey? do Turks call Poles Lechistan? Regards, the great Turkish family

@@Wieslaw_wiking yes but in ottoman time Now we say polanja

@@ekremuspapazolous5812 Ottoman its german

@@Wieslaw_wiking ottoman is german?

@@ekremuspapazolous5812 Jewish hahhah

Hugs from Poland to our Hungarian brothers. You guys and Croats are the best in the world. :)

♥

Im from Poland and I very like hungarian president

Thank you!

Everyone’s from hungry in the comments!

Thanks but this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement to the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the vdeo is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars kto inny zrobi esej na 2000 słów o polskiej historii jak nie gościu o "polishhusaria"

great respect from Poland for the Turks for recognizing the existence of Poland during its occupation and opposition to its partition

@@owoc8260 By the way, Prussia was a completely backward state compared to the very advanced Poland. . Incidentally, Poland was a great power and an empire for centuries that Prussia never was! But what was special about the Polish empire was that according to the Polish Imperial Constitution of 1505 "Nihil novi" the Polish empire also became a de facto republic and the Polish empire actually called itself Rzeczpospolita which translated means republic. By the way the polish Imperial Constitution Nihil Novi from 1505 was the first democratic constitution ever. "Nihil novi", in this political sense, is interpreted as "Nothing about us without us"! This Constitution stipulated that the parliament (Sejm) must approve all new laws and that the king is only the head of the state with limited power elected for life (elective kingship). His real field was foreign policy. Poland had become an aristocratic republic and nobles' democracy with this Imperial Constitution Nihil Novi. This system provided equal rights for all nobles; the high nobility, who mostly had huge estates, were legally on a par with the simple, petty nobility according this constitution. !" Not the king, but the parliament elected by the nobility had the power for the most part of domestic politics! The nobility made up up to 10-15% of the population in the Polish Rzeczpospolita unlike in ruled despotically with the exception of England rest of Europe with 1%! The Lithuanian nobility, who were already largely Polonized, had the same rights as the Polish nobility through this constitution. In fact, the Polish nobility had won great privileges from the king long before that, so that despotism of an autocrat ruler in Poland was gone long before the constitution of 1505. However, this constitution was the product of previous reforms, because even before this constitution, the Polish nobility had enormous rights compared to the European nobility of other countries. In the Privilege of Jedlno of 1430, the Polish king gave the nobility a say in tax legislation and the legal certainty of being punished solely on the basis of due process and judgment (making Poland the first country to have civil rights enshrined in law). This limited democracy of the 1505 constitution was then reformed in 1791 with a new democratic constitution. Called the The Constitution of May 3rd! In terms of content, the constitution was based on the ideas of the Enlightenment, the declaration of human and civil rights and the reform discourses that had been taking place in Poland itself since the 16th century. The the democratically elected parliament (Sejm) was declared to embody the "omnipotence of the nation". The citizens got the same rights as the nobility. The government was subordinated to the parliament. The king should be elected as head of state. That is why the Polish constitution is considered the second democratic constitution in the world after the American constitution. Although that's actually not true, because the Polish constitution of 1505 was the first democratic constitution. Prussia like all of Germany against it would never be able to establish a democracy in their country. No matter whether in Prussia or in another German small state. Alos as a united state, they were incapable to democracy. History has proven that. They were only capable of democracy when the dictatorship was violently overthrown by foreign powers and there was a denazification and re-education campaign. In fact, they had to be beaten to democracy. Unfortunately, the Russians or Poland or France did not take the opportunity to finally defeat and destroy Prussia when they had the opportunity. BecauseIt it would have been better for Europe if Russia had finally crushed Prussia when they had the chance to do that. Prussia's only remarkable achievement was to force the other German small states into a union. Prussia was able to do this because Prussia was the strongest German small states of the various small German states. This union together with the German small states outside this union was strong enough to defeat the French in 1871. The result of this victory was the establishment of a united Germany. The consequences of of this unification to the German state were catastrophic for Europe because the consequence of this state establishment were 2 world wars and the possibility for this nation to commit various genocides. The founding of this state in 1871 was a terrible catastrophe for Europe, and without Prussia, the founding of this state in 1871 would not have happened. It is a historical fact that these two world wars would not have happened with a total of 70 million deaths for Europe if the German small states had not succeeded in founding the united German state. This nation would not have mutated into a Nazi nation either! If Prussia had not existed and thus also no unified Germany, then there would not have been also almost 50 years of communist oppression in half of Europe. The communist victory in the fallen Russian Empire was the result of the First World War caused by Germany and Austria so the communist rule over the areas of the fallen Russian Empire would never have existed without Germany like the later successes of the communists after the 2nd World War through the communists could occupy half of Europe and force the nations there to embrace communism. So NO world wars, NO genocides, NO immeasurable destruction and NO strong communism. This multiple NO would be the result of the destruction or considerable weakening of Prussia. Because Prussia made this German state possible in the first place. That was actually the only relevant achievement by Prussia! Unfortunately, when the Poles had the opportunity to do so, they did not destroy Prussia! Too bad for Europe! Others also had the opportunity to destroy Prussia or to weaken it decisively. So the French, the Poles and the Russians. unfortunately didn't use the opportunity to destroy Prussia either.

@@owoc8260 Well, the Ottomans were afraid they might be the next to be partitioned. That's why they protested when Poland was partitioned. In reality, Poland didn't really matter to them at all! If it were the other way around, the Poles wouldn't care about a partition of the Ottoman territories either, unless Poland itself was in danger of being partitioned. Then Poland would also protest against a partition of whoever. By the way, if RU-vid didn't inform you, I've also posted other short comments.

Love from Poland brother

I invite Hungarian brothers to Poland

Thanks but this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement to the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the vdeo is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

Greetings to you! From Poland! 🇵🇱❤🇭🇺

Yeah you are brothers in 1444 there was a police Hungarian union as well as a bunch of Polish kings in hungry

Greetings from Poland brother!

Is it that both Hungary and Poland were squashed between two or more Great Powers for centuries, sometimes taking land from those Powers but often losing land to those same Powers? That is, sometimes existing but for the grace of other nations, and sometimes expanding because of the courage of armies?

@@james6401 This claim is not correct. Becuase Poland was not squashed between two Great Powers for centuries. This condition only existed for a relatively short period of 47 years from 1871 to 1918. Namely when the German small states finally succeeded in founding a united German state in 1871 after 1000 years of wars against each other. Only then there were two great powers occupying Poland. Before 1871 there was only one great power that was Poland's enemy, that was Russia. Because neither Prussia nor Austria were great powers. Even in a weakened state at the end of the 18th century, Poland could have repelled both Austrian and Prussian attacks. Even when Poland was completely weakened at the end of the 18th century Poland still had enough economic potential to mobilize armies. So the Poles at the end of the 18th century were quite capable of mobilizing relatively large armies for defense. Neither Austria nor Prussia would have been able to defeat and to destroy Poland alone. Poland still had military potential, as was particularly evident in Kościuszko Uprising in which Poland fought against the Russian Empire, Austria and Prussia. Before the Kościuszko Uprising in 1794 there was the Polish-Russian War of 1792, which also makes it clear that Poland was defeated by Russia and not by the Austrians and Prussians as well. In this war Poland also won battles like the Battle of Zielńce. How weak Prussia was shows that Prussia really only sent an army of 1000 men against the Polish rebels. ONLY 1000 MEN! This small ridiculous Prussian army was then defeated by a far superior in number Polish army in the Battle of Bromberg in 1794. The Prussian commander-in-chief was killed in this battle too. The ridiculous Prussians also tried to besiege the Polish capital Warsaw with only 25,000 soldiers. The Poles had mobilized over 49,000 men and expelled the Prussian troops. Thanks to the mobility of the forces, of General Dąbrowski Polish troops have even advanced into Prussian Pomerania. Also in the Battle of Rajgród the Poles defeated the Prussians when they tried to fight against Poland without the support of the Russian Empire. So Prussia was unable to fight Poland alone and could only hold onto the small Polish territories with the support of the Russian Empire. For example, in the Battle of Szczekociny June 1794, the Prussians needed the help of the Russian Empire to defeat Poland. The Russian Empire fought alone against the Polish troops in most battles of this war. The Poles also proved their military potential against the Russians when the Poles defeated the Russian Empire in the Battle of the Polish Kościuszko Uprising like the Battle of Racławice or the two successful Polish Uprisings of Warsaw and Wilno. There were also other victories against the Russians. So the Polish armies also achieved some victories in some battles, but then in the end the numerical superiority led to the victory of the Russian Empire. The dwarf Prussia would have been able to defeat Poland on its own because in fact the Russian Empire won most battles against Poland without Prussian participation. The difference was that the Russian Empire did not need Prussian support, but Prussia could not defeat Poland alone. The same applies to Austria. In fact, the Austrians did not take part in this war at all and only benefited from the victory of the Russians. The small two part of Poland that Austria and Prussia received of Poland were actually a gift from the Russians. The Russian Empire annexed most of Poland. At this time the Russian Empire annexed the Crimea and wanted to take more areas from the Ottomans. The Russian Empire wanted to prevent a conflict with Prussia and Austria at the same time of the war with the Ottomans. So the Russian Empire left relatively small areas of Poland to Prussia and Austria. Because together Prussia and Austria could have caused trouble for the Russians when the Russians were at war with the Ottomans. If the Russian Empire hadn't the conflict with the Ottomans at that time, the Russian Empire would have annexed all of Poland. So Poland was not squashed between two Great Powers for centuries but Poland was dominated by the Russian Empire in the 18th century and then destroyed at the end of the 18th century.

Greetings, from Serbia brother Armenian, forever back and in future, God bless Armenia and we never forgot what ottomans did to your nation!

@@markodj2344 finally someone said ottomans instead of turks

@-Hyper It's wrong. Over 1 billion people died in genocide. Please be correct man

@-Hyper ironi

Armenia got carved up just like Poland. Turkey and Russia split Armenia, and Germany and Russia split Poland.

Thanks for the praise! But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the vdeo is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

Mogłeś poprostu przewinąć na sam koniec filmiku...

XDDDDD

Mogłeś po prostu włączyć TVP.

Do I have too? D=

we've got very big casus belli by the way :) Smoleńsk isn't Russian. Like Moscow - 2 years of occupation.

We were once up to Moscow sooo...

During 16th centurie to 18th

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

I just realised Poland and Peru shared the same religion, that's fucked

Thanks! That's very nice of you! But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the video is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

Thank you my friend. I like the Romanians! Romanians are reliable allies. Unfortunately, we Poles have had very bad experiences with our treacherous allies in 1939! What few people know is the fact that Romania was an ally of Poland in 1939 who was ready to fight alongside Poland as a reliable ally. Romania immediately agreed to support Poland and was ready to fight. But the Polish government has rejected the Romanians' offer of support. Poland felt that the support of Romanian troops would be unnecessary. Because Poland was completely certain of victory. It was a fact that Poland, with the French and British, were completely superior to the Germans in 1939. Little did the Poles suspect that these cowardly allies would betray Poland and not attack. Nobody in Poland could imagine such madness. Such a lousy betrayal.

Tonhar λ xD

*****​ O co Ci chodzi? Po pierwsze Duda ma poczucie humoru a ja tutaj nikogo nie obraziłem, tak? A po drugie on JEST a nie BYŁ prezydentem. Taki Polak, że nie wiesz kto jest głową państwa?

***** Zresztą tak ułożyłeś swoją wypowiedź, że nie wiem o co Ci dokładnie chodzi.

K, tak myślałem, że znowu wyjdę na debila, bo nie odróżniam intencji komentarza. wybacz xD

Wow, pierwszy raz widzę ludzi na yt, którzy potrafią się przyznać do winy bez wyzywania Matek... Szacun ;D

Евгений Ф life is boring without enemies, dont u think? XD

Fuck you :)

Евгений Ф Почему враги?

@@algirdisnowgorodskas1740, потому что много поляков ненавидят Россию.

Dmitriy Zhukov С хорошими людьми ты познакомился, слава богу. Я тут родился и живу с рождения и немного с кем таким познакомился. Большая часть поляков это к сожалению обычные русофобы. Говорит это поляк.

your history is so nice!

Russian Mapper thanks you😘

@@anatolictengrist bırak şunları ezik köpekleri. Zaten polonya Avrupanın en yobaz şehri.

me poland

Love Greece from Poland your country is beatiful

What the hell happened there

@@pancytryna9378 The Swedes invaded and many nobles took their side while the king and his allies fought back. The period is known as The Deluge and there is an excellent novel with that name about this period by Henryk Sienkiewicz

@@rodrigocampos1225 Ahhh, that's what happened Yes I know about it I am Polish... I was just supries how it was portrayed on the map

@Pudzian Yes

Not funny...

@@Dominik-rf4ei You Are Poland?

5:38 Poland join the chat

@@Dominik-rf4ei 😂😂😂

@@orang9178 yes and what?

Winston Churchill: Poland is the Jackal of Europe!!!

me poldancd

Poland was never great. Its not even a country. Fuck Kosher

Poland is already great greeting from random guy from random country💘

@@grexplay9384 wtf? when they did it? XD

Super Waldek i tak był najlepszym władcą Polski po Narutowiczu

Pan Borysek nie podchodził pod , mieszka, bolesława chrobrego, kazimierza wielkiego, kazimierza odnowiciela,jagiełe, jadwige, zygmunta starego, batorego.

Super Waldek oczywiście że podchodził ,jako jedyny miał też jaja po nim żaden Polak już nie miał

Może podchodził do paru ale do kazimierza wielkiego ani batorego nie podchodził może i był dobry ale nie był najlepszy

Super Waldek najlepszy w XXw.

Also, the man who led horses with wings (Winged Hussars).

Actually he was one of biggest fools in polish-kings' history. He made one of many mile stones which later lead to polish destruction

@@iorwenvaremreis2195 he did try to implement changes, but whenever he called Sejm to make them, some corrupt member of nobility would say Liberum Veto. Besides, if Sobieski wouldn't help the Austrian Empire Ottomans would conquer Vienna and potentionally the rest of Austrian Lands which would've make Commonwealth more vulnerable.

@@minutemen_in_t-605 yet Sobieski had no problems of giving rights and proclaiming catholicism(which was not dominant in PLC in that period) as priviliged religion which made made most of educated szlachta(that was mostly kalwinist) obsolete and useless

@@iorwenvaremreis2195 Catholicism was always dominant in PLC. He made it states official religion but unlike in other European countries people who believed in something else were treated equally as Catholics.

Also Prussia, and Saxony

Yea

Ok. But which country is more important? In the Rzeczpospolita of Both Nations, Poland was the kingdom and head of the union. But Hungary was also a kingdom. We prefer Hungary to rule the whole of the Balkans, and Poland and Lithuania to rule in eastern Europe. Better to be friends.

Good point.

It would be a cool country,if they were connected. Otherwise thats a genius idea.

@@derpypaws1250 egypt had syria in one point so maybe its not bad

says cowboy garfield

HistoManiak Nr1 But still its important :)

Mieszko is first historical duke of Poland

Mieszko I wos prince of Poland

I'm Polish

Znaczy, na którego istnienie mamy dowody :) Przed nim był jeszcze jego ojciec, dziadek no i piast kołodziej

Well can't argue about that

They never even fought back. How can u surrender when ur already playing dead?

@@oakharbornigata2602 Poland fought back for example We created Underground State who fought with Nazi Germany or 1944-Warsaw Uprising ;)

@@oakharbornigata2602 seriously? Thanks

@@oakharbornigata2602 stupid dickhead

Thanks! That's very nice of you! But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the video is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

Thanks! That's very nice of you!

Omg. Poland did not occupy Russia. Only one city. This is the same as saying that Napoleon occupied Russia by occupying Moscow. Why are Polish nationalists so stupid?

Dmitry Volkov- Huh? During the Polish-Muscovite war we had literally taken Moscow, it was well more than just 1 city we held.

+MWiatrak, You did not "take" Moscow. You entered there with the permission of the boyars. There was no siege of Moscow by the Poles. And at that time (Time of Troubles) there was no centralized power. Moscow boyars with the Poles failed to put on the throne the Polish tsar. So it was just one city. Poles who think they captured Russia after gaining power in one city are ignorant idiots.

Eh, we still took it nonetheless and there was a huge decisive battle called the Battle of Klushino before hand.

+MWiatrak, No, you're not. Boyars let the Poles in, because they were afraid of False Dmitry. They preferred to crown the Polish Orthodox tsar, rather than an impostor. In any case, the city was taken into siege by russians after half a year, and in a year and a half, the Poles, who did not manage to escape, were executed. What was happening in the city is better not even to mention. Hunger, cannibalism, etc. I see no reason to be proud of. Although, I'm not a Pole. The Poles decided to assert themselves by telling everyone in succession that they took Moscow and captured Russia by that. It's funny.

+Bangaram killevybody spierdalaj

Ty kotleciaku

Avocadov JEBŁEM XDDD

^^

Stronk?

Julia Ale przez większość czasu nie był xD

Tak choć o ile pamiętam to Mieszko I go jedynie zhołdował a niekoniecznie miał na nim pełną władzę

Idąc tym tokiem rozumowania to Czechy też były polskie xD

Thanks! That's very nice of you! But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the video is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.

@Demy Troy Fuck bastarland wherever-you-are-from the shithole fakeland

remember mongolian invasion of europe

Thanks for the praise! But this is not a good video because there are many mistakes! So this video is completely nonsensical and historically wrong because the enlargement of Poland after the agreement on the Union of Krewo to include the Lithuanian territories is not shown, which in the history of Poland meant that Poland became an empire. Poland was an empire for centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The Polish term "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" used in the vdeo is also wrong for the same reason, namely because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Because translated this Polish term means Rzeczpospolita of both nations! Anything but both nations. The Poles were completely dominant in this state and the Liatuans were almost completely assimilated. Only the Polish nation was relevant! And only the Polish! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. Unfortunately the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation is also used in the video. To call this state Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish Term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire so the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. I used the term above too. Moreover, neither the rule of the Polish king over Sweden nor the rule of the Poles over Russia is shown. The expansion of the Polish king's power southwards with the rulership of Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, parts of Croatia, Romania and Moldova is not shown either. The video is very bad because of these many errors.