History of Sumer Mesopotamia ( 3,000 years of Sumerian history )explained in less than 4 minutes 

🤺☦🇷🇺They were the same race as Akkadians. Sumerians were the Cushitic family of Nimrod, therefore they were black, and that's why they called themselves that. It's because Nimrod was isolate, and was the only black person who went to the lands of Semites. They are today, the Dravidian race, Melanesians and Oceanic races

🇮🇶❤

🤺☦🇷🇺Sumerians were the Cushitic family of Nimrod, therefore they were black, and that's why they called themselves that. It's because Nimrod was isolate, and was the only black person who went to the lands of Semites. They are today, the Dravidian race, Melanesians and Oceanic races

That would be awesome if it did :)

Instrumental terompet lagu barat

:D I am glad it does

It fills me with herpes. But I don't think I'm using it correctly.

Awesome thank you, glad you found my channel :)

I love that you love this channel :)❤

Just be careful with history. Don’t be a novice who just believes what they are being told. History is about points of views and perspectives. It’s not in a straight line. It’s not solved. It’s not compete. In this country, the history the masses are taught has a Eurocentric Perspective. But keep in mind that Europeans were not a major player anywhere near when Africa and Arabs were prospering culturally. So Europeans can only assume what certain things mean based off of their own interpretations. Interpretations than can and have been wrong in certain cases. If you want to learn about a peoples history you have to go to those people to find out. A European commenting or creating narratives about African, Aboriginal, Asian, Native American or Arab should be taken with a grain of salt and vice versa. An African should not, and can not be, the authority on European history. Just like a European can not be the authority on African history. It’s too much room for misinterpretation and bias. That reinforces stereotypes and misinformation.

Hi "T.L."; check out my 'Club': "Ancient Readers UnLimited" group on MEETUP.com. We meet on DISCORD.com. Check us out. :~ ) I am a Greater Mesopotamia/Ancient Mesoamerican--Olmec 'nut', ha.

Glad I could help

Thanks man! Glad you found it now

@@EpimetheusHistory Hey can you answer a question for me ? Why did Neolithic farmers over populate Europe to the point Western Hunter Gathers could no longer compete with them and mixed or perished ?

Thanks Massimo! Yes I did :) ...I typically draw them while listening to the radio or watching a tv show, it is pretty relaxing

huh

No. Akkadian is an East Semitic languages while those other languages are West Semitic. They all descend from proto-Semitic which most likely was spoken 2 thousand years before Sargon's time, somewhere in the Levant or Arabian peninsula before spreading to Mesopotamia and north Africa, leading to local forms of proto-Semitic, such as Akkadian, Ugaritic, Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic.

🤺☦🇷🇺Sumerians were the Cushitic family of Nimrod, therefore they were black, and that's why they called themselves that. It's because Nimrod was isolate, and was the only black person who went to the lands of Semites. They are today, the Dravidian race, Melanesians and Oceanic races

@@EasternOrthodox101 The Melanesians/Australian Aboriginals arrived in their area more than 50,000 years ago. Meanwhile ancient Sumer was 5,000 years ago. Get basic history right.

@@JohnDoe10350 wrong - the planet is only about 6000 years. that timing is wrong

@@EasternOrthodox101 According to what? The Bible?

It varries a lot from video to video but this video for example I used the books Cradle of civilization, great ages of man, peoples of the stone age vol 2, Empires of the Ancient Near East and ancient.eu as my main sources for this one. I have a lot of books on middle east and a tonne of the Ofsprey military history books. On subjects I don't have books on I use the internet more. Ancient.eu is a good site much better than wikipedia :)

Ill check it out, isn't it amazing we can look so far back and have a general idea of how the earliest civilizations came to be and how much our species has evolved and advanced

Oh yeah...back at university I took wayyy to many history courses too, took a really good one on ancient Assyria (my major was finance) But I have been reading history books since I was a kid

For me im just a tradesman, but my love of history began with military history mainly ww2, its my day off today in my room here i have a collection of ww2 and ww1 memorabilia worth over 20k from all combatant nations (mainly the agressors germany, Italy and Japan) but its branched out to all periods and times, so im looking forward to seeing ur future videos which has a military history theme

Wait you have some allready ill watch em all 2day, checked out your whole list

Pareidolia Face they are descendents of Greek who are descendents of Hitties & Hummarians North Mesotopamia and indo-Eurasia people

Watch this ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yffm0ReCM0Y.html

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yffm0ReCM0Y.html

Every living human in the west has DNA from Mesopotamia and most likely all those other places too.

"hi youtube im a rapebaby"

Patrick Lee You'd be surprised to know that Cuneiform is likely the direct mother script of the Latin Alphabet itself so it's impressive to see how the script evolved and is now used to write languages all over the world.

RexPETA1789 sure it is the Slavic people (Grrmany) derives from Greek Greeks derive from the Hitties and Humarians who had an ido-Eurasian language those people settled in Northern Sumerian which ancestors were from Mesotopamia that is the Orgin of the white mans language if you will.

Sumer was a language isolate, ot has no relations to any indo-European language, it's much closer to semetic than it's to indo-European.

Patrick Lee Cuneiforms variaty of hyeroglyps like Chinas and Mayas, siplest form of writting .Only Phinikians writting where each letter means tone make modern alphabets in all country in the world.

Patrick Lee In cuniforms an symbol, means Syllable or whole word.Norhing common with etruskians and others alphabets .

Ahem the Amorite empire, Hammurabi, perhaps the Hyksos, perhaps the Minoens...

The Kingdom of Israel

...and hopefully there will be more :)

Epimetheus full thanks for your hard work

My Iraqi brother

the greatest region on earth

I agree. We need to stop the governments of Saudi, Turkey and Iran from intervening.

David but Nimrod was no cupbearer , he was a mighty hunter

Dr. Douglas Petrovich makes a great case for Nimrod being Sargon of Akkad. RU-vid his name and Nimrod. I believe he is in the midst of writing a book about this. Notice in Genesis 10:7 Cush's sons are named, then in 10:8 it mentions that he fathered (yalad) Nimrod. So, Nimrod wasn't a son of Cush in the same sense as Raamah, Sheba and Dedan were. Moses likely threw Nimrod's name in there because Nimrod would be a well known name of history, and many might like to know his derivation, but either Moses didn't know the particular genealogical connections or didn't wish to digress further. But Nimrod was definitely a few generations removed from Cush.

Bakunin que the shitstorm in the comments for those ones from people who ignore the golden ages the region went through after those conquests

Controversy will happen...

No one gives a fuck

The coastline has silted up and moved further out to sea since ancient times

@@EpimetheusHistory so they think it was from time to time and not in one moment?

Yes, I wonder if the title author got confused with how many years ago Mesopotamia happened, and how much of it's history was explained til.

6000 years of history before Rome emerged

Very interesting question...I would think it very likely that there was some mixture of the Indus valley civilization was Sumer. They where the two most populated places on earth and more evidence seems to be coming to light that they traded with each other on a pretty regular basis. I would think it possible that some IVC people moved to Sumer and some Sumerian that moved to the IVC That could be wrong, but I think it makes sense and is probably just a question of how rare of an event that was.

Sumerians spoke an agglutinative language before assimilation by Semitic people. This alone decreases possibility of dravidian connection.