Тёмный

History Two-Party Democratic Republican System Explained United States Democrats Republicans Origin 

Illustrate to Educate
Подписаться 110 тыс.
Просмотров 47 тыс.
50% 1

Have you ever wondered how the United States has two major political parties, Democratic and Republican? In this short video, we look at the major events that led to their formation as they are today.
The Roots - Founding Fathers - 00:22
The Division - Democratic-Republican Party - 1:10
Slavery - Political Issue - 1:59
Civil War - Abolishing Slavery - 2:42
Evolution of Republican Party - 3:29
Roosevelt - The New Deal - 4:05
Modern Democratic and Republican Parties - 4:39
Sources:
www.britannica...
www.britannica...
dk.usembassy.g....
en.wikipedia.o....
#democrats #republicans #politics

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 138   
@maximilianogarciachirinos3663
@maximilianogarciachirinos3663 2 года назад
Excellent video. I am pro small business, limited government regulation and the protection of the individual rights.
@crystalmartins8214
@crystalmartins8214 Год назад
i think that meshes more with libertarianism
@jaycaw9081
@jaycaw9081 Месяц назад
A true libertarian​@@crystalmartins8214
@myaslife5351
@myaslife5351 Год назад
Im in a online 8 week course for college currently and all he does is make me read. This was such a big help!!!
@melonnieali4113
@melonnieali4113 Год назад
This is exactly the type of platform and content I needed. Thanks so much.
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Год назад
Glad to hear it! 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
@johnnyhensler
@johnnyhensler 2 года назад
I doubt I'll remember all the Information. But thank you for sharing it. 🇺🇸
@Nanofuture87
@Nanofuture87 2 года назад
Keep in mind that the Democratic-Republicans weren't often called that at the time. They were usually just called Republicans. We call them Democratic-Republicans or Jeffersonian Republicans today mostly to help avoid confusion with the modern Republican party.
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 2 года назад
Thank you for that clarification! I was not aware of that fact. :)
@jrod3868
@jrod3868 Год назад
He obvioisly put the ‘democratic’ part of it so he can create a positive spin to the current Democratic party. What about the mentioning the Democrat ties to the kkk and also where the Jim crow (or Jim-Eagle as potato head said it) came from?
@thehillbillygamer2183
@thehillbillygamer2183 Год назад
@@IllustratetoEducate I noticed you didn't mention how the Democrats supported segregation Jim Crow and the Klu Klux Klan in the 20th century in the 1960s and how a Democratic governor tried to stop the integration of schools even then is Republican party that supported civil rights Republican party that got the women the right to vote and black people the Democratic party that are the racist evil people still a flat today they just pulled the wool over the eyes a black people in minority people
@johnweber4577
@johnweber4577 Год назад
The term was often used for the “Democratic-Republican Societies” that were radical political organizations inspired by the Jacobin Club which supported the Jeffersonians, though they were called a lot of things by different people, as well as later on for Andrew Jackson’s faction of the party as opposed to Henry Clay’s “National Republicans” and John Randolph of Roanoke’s “Old Republicans” prior to its breaking apart.
@andrewchicos4431
@andrewchicos4431 Месяц назад
@@Nanofuture87 nice try, but still a load.
@koochieman99
@koochieman99 4 месяца назад
Exactly what I was looking for, RU-vid made me dig for a unbiased video. Subscribed
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 4 месяца назад
Welcome aboard!
@cindywujcik8834
@cindywujcik8834 2 месяца назад
@@IllustratetoEducate should be in every school system. They are the future and probably don’t know what the truth and terminology are. Are we in terrible times?
@maryairhart13
@maryairhart13 Год назад
Very interesting. Thank you. Yes useful
@Cbrizzy44
@Cbrizzy44 Год назад
What about black people and abolitionist that actually created the republican party
@dapeace316
@dapeace316 2 месяца назад
Great video and illustration, brought more insight. The only area I was concerned about and so I did some little research on is that the Democrats weren’t in office from Truman to the 1980’s, unless I misunderstood you. In any case, after Truman we had Dwight D. Eisenhower who was Republican from 1953-1961, Richard Nixon and Gerald R Ford from 1969-1977 (Both Republican’s, after JFK and LBJ (Democrats) THEN we had Ronald Reagan. So, no there was a rotation after Pres. Truman
@davidjones7544
@davidjones7544 Год назад
Great presentation!
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Год назад
Thanks for watching! 👍🏼
@TheLibertyChat
@TheLibertyChat Год назад
Your amazing keep it up
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Год назад
Thank you! Will do!
@RobertWWD
@RobertWWD 2 месяца назад
We were never Democratic. We were and still are just Republicans we are the party of Lincoln. My Irish Republican Ancestor was a Civil War hero.
@erik222
@erik222 5 месяцев назад
the fact that i knew that the confederates were the old democrats that were pro slavery makes me feel good, i was telling a black liberal sister that the democrats are the pro slavery party and she kept arguing that it was the republicans and their racist confederate flags, i told her no that originally the old democrats that lost the civil war were the ones who rocked the confederate flag and that the democratic that she supports and follows are the plantation and she is living in their plantation 😂 she was so upset, i told her she was brainwashed due to propaganda and indoctrination in democratic schools 😂
@victorconway444
@victorconway444 3 месяца назад
Remind me, which party is trying to protect confederate statues? Which party is trying to remove any mention of slavery in history classes? Which party do rural, white, dixie-waving southerners overwhelmingly vote for? Is it the Democrats? Didn't think so. It's you who needs to read more history. In case you forgot, it was a Democratic president that desegregated the military. It was a democrat that signed off on the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1968, prohibiting discrimination in the public and private sectors. And with a democrat-dominated congress as well. Times change.
@ynotawoody
@ynotawoody Год назад
The following is the script for a video I published Sep 23, 2014, titled: "Suffering Suffrage (What they don't want you to see)" House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy and President Barack Obama, are vacationing on a private island somewhere in Bora Bora, when a bottle washes up on the shore. When they uncork the bottle, a genie appears and offers three wishes. One to each of them. The genie not being well versed on the "Rules of Etiquette" insists that Kevin have the first wish. After a moment of indecision, Kevin demands that all the members of both the House and Senate be made republican. The genie snaps his fingers, and Kevin suddenly finds himself standing on the floor of the House surrounded by nothing but fellow republicans. Nancy, in an act of self-preservation, insists that she is entitled to the inverse of Kevin’s wish. The genie snaps his fingers, and as with Kevin, Nancy finds herself on the House floor; every seat occupied by a like-minded Democrat. Barack immediately realizes the profound effects both Kevin and Nancy’s wishes would have on both the republican and democratic parties, should either wish be permitted; and vowed to have no part of it! Barack prayed that his, the third and final wish, be to rescind and deny both Nancy and Kevin’s wishes respectively. For the third and final time the genie snaps his fingers and reinstates the status quo. The genie is stupefied by Barack’s choice of wishes and asks him: Could it be that you are willing to endure gridlock, partisan name-calling and finger pointing rather than exploit an unfair advantage? Overwhelmed by what had almost happened, Barack hastily answered. ADVANTAGE? HECK NO! Without the other neither of us would have anyone to blame for the deplorable condition of the nation. The American people might wake up, stop arguing with one-another and see us both for the fear mongering parasites’ that we have become. I see no advantage in that! ---- Just think about it...
@TrixTheClown
@TrixTheClown 20 дней назад
There's definitely more..like how the ideals of the southern democrats shifted when LBJ signed the civil rights act..
@MrPookiexL3oi
@MrPookiexL3oi 3 месяца назад
So what I just learned was both of these party flip flop back and forth in favor of what the people (citizens) want depending on what the major issues of that time was. So that way nobody else can form a party to go against the two. Might as well call them the Managerial Party because that is what they basically are.
@stopthis9309
@stopthis9309 Год назад
So to all you "We must save our Democracy" people. In what year did America become a Democracy? Hmm? Don't know? Allow me to enlighten you, We are Not a Democracy we are a "Constitutional Republic" as in the rule of Law not a Mob rules democracy. Now find the word Democracy in this our Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, "I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
@Anarcho-Stupidity
@Anarcho-Stupidity Год назад
Election is democracy
@JoeBiden69696
@JoeBiden69696 Год назад
​@Account name: None a constitutional Republic elects its leaders in a democratic fashion. A democracy is only popular vote. It is mob rule. No minority rights. No checks and balances. No right to fight against the majority. America is not a democracy.
@JayVTheGreat
@JayVTheGreat 10 месяцев назад
@@Anarcho-Stupiditythere’s more that goes into a *democracy than an election.. we’re not a pure democracy. We’re not for a reason .. democrats already act like tyrants.. they’re trying to take full control..
@joechristiansen6016
@joechristiansen6016 7 месяцев назад
There are democratic elements to our elections, but it is not a pure democracy. Thank goodness. Our founding father’s biggest fear was a pure democracy for fear of majority or mob rule over the minority. The electoral college system is a system of checks and balances against a simple majority rule for federal offices. Lower level elections tend to have more elements of a pure democracy. Our nation most definitely is a constitutional republic, not a democracy.
@victorconway444
@victorconway444 3 месяца назад
I don't think it's accurate to say the New Deal is what caused the party switch in the South. The Democrats were untouchable in state and federal elections in the "Solid South" throughout all of FDR's terms. And the New Deal coalition was the height of Democratic power throughout the country since the Jacksonian era. A lot of poor white southerners, conservative as they were, were also hit hard by the great depression and were generally as supportive of FDR's reforms (which provided a lot of aid to struggling farmers) as urban workers were. And even the Republicans, like Alf Landon, were mostly pro-New Deal as well at that time. Because they knew as well as FDR (who didn't start out so left-leaning either) that an anti-union, austere, pro-business platform was unwinnable with most of the American people. They still couldn't compete with FDR, but it goes to show that the need for some significant degree of reform and intervention was practically a consensus at that time across party lines, and even their respective conservative/liberal factions. It was much more the 1960s during Johnson and the civil rights act/great society reforms that pushed the southern conservative wing away from the democrats and toward the republicans. First they just formed their own "State rights democrat" party in support of segregation, but then Nixon's southern strategy capitalized on this rupture in the democrats to get a foot hold in the south for the republican party. And then the increasingly influential evangelical religious right forged an alliance with the republicans and really won over the "bible belt" south (and rural white americans generally) during Reagan, while pushing away any remainder of the Republican liberal wing to the Democrats.
@tylermanter1548
@tylermanter1548 Год назад
IM Republican .
@justcurious3119
@justcurious3119 2 месяца назад
Hmm
@Ian-rg3jq
@Ian-rg3jq 11 месяцев назад
Also I've looked it up. Their were like two democrats that turned republican. There was no shift.
@8shoyle
@8shoyle 2 месяца назад
Conservativism is fluid... It moves from party to party. Thus, the reason you'll hear a republican say... I'M a CONSERVATIVE first.
@terarosen7909
@terarosen7909 Год назад
If you believe there was a party switch then please explain why many of us republicans have been republican from the beginning and our ancestors fought on the side of the north to free slaves. It doesn’t sound like a switch to me. Also our government has been changing our history books for quite some time and this is one of the lessons they’ve been teaching people. Why the change?
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Год назад
Sorry I'm not really sure I'm following what you're referencing as a switch. If you can provide and example, maybe I can clarify.
@macagnoned
@macagnoned Год назад
@@IllustratetoEducate Many people like to push the idea that party ideologies swapped after the civil war, I personally disagree if you look at the Stalwart Republicans and President Grant. Also Btw I like the video’s, pretty good with few mistakes. (Mistakes as in social progressivism terminology and other small things). Otherwise wonderful channel
@Thomas-ju2jn
@Thomas-ju2jn Год назад
I am Black, Republican, and Conservative unabashed Christian like Reverand Martin Luther King. My father and I were in DC the weekend of the March on Washington, and saw the marchers but could not march because we had put blisters on our feet exploring Washington and Arlington National Cemetary to pay our respects as many did at the grave of Northern Democrat John Kennedy. Here, dad made the then popular point that America had gone into two world wars and took little more property than grounds to bury our dead and post the second war, bases to forward deploy if we had to come back. I was 8 years old and Arlington National seemed so big I was worried about the sun going down and running into the Klan who might be coming into town for the next day, dad explained a little about the hallowed ground, people who did not have to be in a fight they did not want and doing the tough but right thing, and he mentioned nearly 25% of those killed by the Klan were white who 'had problems' with the Klan and their gang-like influence and power. We weren't supposed to be there the next day because it could be dangerous but we were where we could see the crowd for a while and I was surprised all the people who were there and white, later estimates were that at least 20% of participants were white. Didn't have to be their fight, didn't have to risk all they did, but God put that option in all of us, I believe that was what Dad wanted me to see and figure out as less Christian attitudes increasingly took over the movement.
@terarosen7909
@terarosen7909 Год назад
@@Thomas-ju2jn interesting story. I hear milk was against blacks being democrat. Is that true?
@alexkay6676
@alexkay6676 Год назад
@@IllustratetoEducate It is being taught that the parties switched at some point. That the modern-day Republicans are actually descended from the Civil War Democrats. This is incredibly false. The only switch was that Republicans became pro-small government while the Democrats became pro-big government and three Democrats became Republican. That is all that switched between the two parties.
@goldenvulture6818
@goldenvulture6818 2 года назад
2:50-2:52 That flag isn't the national flag of the short-lived Confederate States of America
@AntiFurry927
@AntiFurry927 Год назад
It’s the one we all know tho
@goldenvulture6818
@goldenvulture6818 Год назад
@@AntiFurry927 Not everyone knows it. You don't have to be an expert on the American Civil War to know about both flags & understand the differences between them.
@joesalyers
@joesalyers Год назад
The modern Republican platform comes from Dwight D. Eisenhower and Reagan’s political views came from failed presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. Prior to Goldwater the Republican Party was more Libertarian in its views. Just my take but a good video, cheers.
@alexanderhamilton2219
@alexanderhamilton2219 Год назад
The GOP was less libertarian before Goldwater, not more libertarian. The GOP was more paleoconservative/classical-conservative before Eisenhower, Goldwater, and Reagan.
@johnweber4577
@johnweber4577 Год назад
Goldwater was actually very libertarian, coming out by the end as pro-choice as well as supportive of homosexuals, and even expressed worries about the party being taken over by uncompromising religious zealots.
@Lee-zw9rn
@Lee-zw9rn Год назад
😊
@b1O15
@b1O15 9 дней назад
Brain hurty
@nicholasthibert197
@nicholasthibert197 Год назад
You missed some main points and told some half truths.
@EddieReactss
@EddieReactss 3 дня назад
Vote Trump
@matthewnelson325
@matthewnelson325 Год назад
The Most Lame 😒 two party system in modern history ! : (
@AntiFurry927
@AntiFurry927 Год назад
Grammar police, don’t use a comma because it means you are calling the emoji lame instead of the 2 party system
@phillyguy2157
@phillyguy2157 Год назад
I was waiting for the mention of Republican Presidential canidate Barry Goldwater who is said to be the founder of modern Conservative politics of the Republican party. He also was against the Civil Rights Bill of 1964. It was Goldwater who inspired Ronald Reagan.
@alexkay6676
@alexkay6676 Год назад
He was for every Civil Rights Bill except that one because he felt it was a redundant bill and he thought certain parts of the bill were unconstitional.
@phillyguy2157
@phillyguy2157 Год назад
@@alexkay6676 Barry Goldwater was a hypocrite! The 1964 Civil Rights Bill scared him because he finally saw that a Civil Rights Bill would be passed! Oh yeah the Civil Rights Bill of 64 was Unconstitutional for him because the Federal Government of the United States which supposed to stand for freedom would tell those RACIST White bigot filthy southern Jim Crow Segregationist who had WHITE ONLY signs up in their stores, lunch counters etc " Sorry your White Racist fantasy time is up!!!!" ( Sorry for the run-on sentence). Barry Goldwater felt that it was Unconstitutional for the Federal Government to tell his White bigot cousins in the South what to do upon their private property!! Sorry Barry and you lost the 64 election in a landslide!! Finally racist ass America and it's Racist constitution that you wiggle in your seat as you speak of it had finally released the final chains off of Black people! Barry Goldwater tricked the NAACP and shocked everyone! But I think Racist America was not ready for him anyway! You know why??? Because he was a Jew!! I don't think there have never been a Jewish president. And by the way this is the same constitution that struck up the 3/5th clause upon the Slave population. Wow man!! You talk of the Constitution as if it's the Bible..😂😂😂😂
@JoeBiden69696
@JoeBiden69696 Год назад
John f Kennedy inspired ronald reagan. What the fuck are you talking about? I'm a registered Democrat and a history teacher. You're sorely and utterly mistaken or you're purposefully misleading people.
@SIAN_1
@SIAN_1 2 месяца назад
Southern Democrats did not switch to Republicans from Roosevelt. The South voted for FDR in every single election. However, South definitely was not as hardcore democrat as before. Also, Republicans were able to win the South before the Roosevelt (Hoover won Florida, North Carolina and more), so I don't think that's true.
@ulikemykungfu3995
@ulikemykungfu3995 Месяц назад
The south voted hard democrat until about the 90s is when it actually flipped.
@elspoocho4637
@elspoocho4637 Месяц назад
Is it too simple to say the two parties completely switched sides within 70 years?
@TTKChrisking
@TTKChrisking 2 года назад
I voted for a specific party in 2008 and 2012. And politically speaking it was my biggest regret. I wish we had the 2 party system explained to me like this in HS. They gaslit us into thinking " free this free" that was morally virtuous. And then I started working and paying taxes and lifted the veil. Suffice to say I left that party and will never look back. Hopefully one day we can all attend a baseball game again without wanting to molotov each other's homes.
@tmwk__
@tmwk__ 2 года назад
Guess what? You’re not alone! It’s called growing up. I know exactly where you’re coming from.
@butbunsin9044
@butbunsin9044 Год назад
More parties mean you will get dictator. Thailand, cambodia, myanmar as example. Multiple or plenty of parties which always control by dictator. Small party didn't have enough vote to call a day.😂🎉
@alidi4144
@alidi4144 Год назад
Starts with a D
@warrenkbelljr2129
@warrenkbelljr2129 Год назад
I completely agree because in today's society the policies in the in country and continent's constantly being changed in order to fit one sertian group in order to make them happy and it's being done. On both political parties they're constantly twisting things around for their own political gain so if we all take a time to think about it both political parties are filled with lies claiming that they're going to fight for the rights of the citizens of this country and continent .
@RyanRapid
@RyanRapid 8 месяцев назад
@@alidi4144emocrat
@Cjohnson87
@Cjohnson87 Год назад
Their both corrupt
@TheBattleRabbit860
@TheBattleRabbit860 2 года назад
We need a multi-party system with more than two parties. Everyone's political views are far more nuanced now than they were in the past. There are many more issues, and if you look you can see definite 'groups' within each party we have today. We even have names for each group, but only one party. Other countries have three, four, or even more, political parties. Our two-party system has created political gridlock in the House and the Senate, a deep national divide, and devolved into finger-pointing and political name-calling.
@GunNr-
@GunNr- Год назад
Better yet, just get rid of the party system. Have people vote based on the candidate's specific views, not their political associations.
@tanikajames513
@tanikajames513 Год назад
@@GunNr- Great comment because both parties have certain values that could be amazing for us why make us choose which party and not the goals intended for us by the people running. Also summarizing the goals into those categories makes it a bit easier but what if we needs 1 or 2 values from the opposing party
@josephstarkey8183
@josephstarkey8183 Год назад
I see your point, but having too many parties just keeps anything from being done. What we need isn't to get rid of the 2 parties, but for more moderates to go out and vote for members of their party who are likewise moderate. This will allow for the two parties to actually be able to compromise and make progress.
@butbunsin9044
@butbunsin9044 Год назад
More parties mean you will get dictator. Thailand, cambodia, myanmar as example. Multiple or plenty of parties which always control by dictator. Small party didn't have enough vote to call a day.
@TheBattleRabbit860
@TheBattleRabbit860 Год назад
@@butbunsin9044 That is very true that having too many parties had a drastically negative outcome in some nations, I don't believe that would happen in the United States. With the separation of powers such as it is, I don't see how it would be possible for there to be a total dictator. The biggest problem with trying to implement a multi-party system from a two-party system would be getting voters to break away from their current party line. This could be more likely moving forward with progressively younger generations growing disillusioned with the current main parties. Doesn't mean it is likely to happen anytime soon, and what, exactly, the political landscape would look like I don't quite know; I know, however, that with the current divides within the Democrat party with far leftists (like the Justice Democrats and the "Squad") and the split between older and younger Republicans, it _is_ possible for at a three-party system, if not a four-party system. This is, of course, ignoring the so far stalled Liberaltarian and Green parties. The former of which is so fractured within its own ranks as to be useless, given the wide spread of beliefs and stances taken inside of the party, and the latter of the two garnering essentially 0 media attention. Of course, this is all just my own speculation and I admittedly need to research this topic further in order to be able to fully outline how I believe something like this could work, but on the face of it I would say that internal disagreements would, if ignored and unattended to, could lead to a split in one or both of the parties.
@Lance0714
@Lance0714 Год назад
Two sides of the same coin
@Dhruveavishcombo
@Dhruveavishcombo 10 месяцев назад
Yeah! Video is definitely useful❤..... Appreciation from INDIA👍
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 10 месяцев назад
Thank you so much for the comment! 🧡💚💛
@vondoromal7016
@vondoromal7016 2 года назад
I love it!!! Hy Dan, do you know Tom from Nerds for Humanity??
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 2 года назад
Thank you! No I don’t know Tom 😞
@vondoromal7016
@vondoromal7016 2 года назад
@@IllustratetoEducate I am a member on his channel. I am hoping you guys can collaborate and do something. Data is his stich. Thank you for what you do...
@sanuthomas5334
@sanuthomas5334 9 часов назад
Thank you
@andrewchicos4431
@andrewchicos4431 11 месяцев назад
Im a former History teacher. Wow there's a lot of missing information and disinformation in this video. For instance only one Democrat switched parties, Strom Thrumond. The Democrat Republican Party became the Democrat Party. Federalists and Whigs ended up being the Republican Party. I could go on and on. Thank God there are only about 700 likes.
@Dhruveavishcombo
@Dhruveavishcombo 10 месяцев назад
Oh thanks.... ❤👍btw I'm from India.
@zitkanaduza.89
@zitkanaduza.89 Месяц назад
I think if he included every single thing that has happened, we would be here for days or weeks watching it.
@sanuthomas5334
@sanuthomas5334 9 часов назад
You
@magnus9165
@magnus9165 5 месяцев назад
Both parties are owned and operated by the same plutocratic donors. We are stuck unless we can get these tapeworm leeches off the jugular vein of this nation.
@deanvasquez8591
@deanvasquez8591 Год назад
This is false. Not the true start. 😂
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Год назад
🤔 what’s the “true start”?
@JoeBiden69696
@JoeBiden69696 Год назад
​@@IllustratetoEducate don't worry about this comment. You did a fine video. Thank you
@Imhannahschrader
@Imhannahschrader 9 месяцев назад
Also, some time in history there was a switch in political parties. Republicans used to be much more liberal than conservative, and Democrats used to be much more conservative than liberal. If slavery was an issue today, the Democrats would essentially most likely support abolition, and Republicans oppose abolition because of their conservatism and unwillingness to change with times. But I am loving your videos! Just found your channel tonight!
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 9 месяцев назад
Nice! That makes me super happy! Thanks for checking out the channel 😊
@RyanRapid
@RyanRapid 8 месяцев назад
No both parties would go against it there wasnt a party switch
@nataliagarcia1543
@nataliagarcia1543 7 месяцев назад
No both parties would support abolition of slavery because it's inhumane for humans to be held as slaves.
@charlesledbetter907
@charlesledbetter907 7 месяцев назад
Wrong ​@@RyanRapid
@RyanRapid
@RyanRapid 7 месяцев назад
@@charlesledbetter907 well when was it then
Далее
11 ming dollarlik uzum
00:43
Просмотров 279 тыс.
TEAM SPIRIT: НОВЫЙ СОСТАВ. SEASON 24-25
01:31
What if the United States DID get a national divorce?
12:53
The Trouble with the Electoral College
6:31
Просмотров 7 млн
Noam Chomsky - Why Does the U.S. Support Israel?
7:41
Van Buren - Founder of the Democrats Documentary
1:15:30
Просмотров 130 тыс.
How the Republican Party went from Lincoln to Trump
7:21