HMS Queen Elizabeth PASSEX salute with JS Ise and USS America 

There's more than 3 in that club, the world is uniting against the ccp's belligerence.

@@chilesauce7248 》》There's more than 3 in that club, the world is uniting against the ccp's belligerence. LOL the brits don't even have enough money to buy a whole squadran of fighters. They have to borrow some from the americans. As for the dutch. LOL sorry I laughed. What is that dingy for?

@H L Funny it’s not happened yet. Maybe it’s because the response would reduce the PLA to fighting with bows and arrows.

@@MetaView7 Even half a squadron of F-35s will make short work of the PLAs cheap Su-33 rip offs.

@@davidcockayne3381 LOL That must be a comforting thought. Just in case you have not been briefed, all F35 pilots have been instructed to stay away from chinese fighter jets.

🐩🤠🐕

Russian and Chinese weebs : 👁️💧👄💧👁️

@H L Actually, the follow on class will be F-35 capable. The way around it? Wordsmithing of course. That's what made the Kuznetsov an aircraft cruiser (or something like that) and the Invincible class a "through deck cruiser". The Japanese are simply reinforcing the deck and making it F-35 capable "in case" there's no runway and a plane needs one.

@H L Yep, my mistake, The Ise won't be converted-- however, the follow on class will be converted. No ski jump, according to Janes, but all the other upgrades to support F-35 operations like a US America class amphib.

Not the Hyuga class, which JS Ise’s ship class, but the larger Izumo class, Izumo and Kaga since they were designed to carry the F-35B… Izumo has just completed its phase one modification (heat resistant deck)… Phase two will be redesigning the foredeck…. The USMC F-35B’s will be doing trials with Kaga in October…

@H L Japan will engage in "proactive contributions to international peace." I am sure you see the point.

lol tell that to the afghans.

Reminds me of Master & Lapdog: Three cheers for Lucky Jack!

@@MetaView7 wtf you on about?

@@danglingdave1787 Just ignore him mate, he's a child.

Well don't be

80 years ago they needed a carrier. They went back in 1945 with the British Pacific Fleet did not seem to have problem then! They had Carriers see here: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Pacific_Fleet

Most ship names are.

Except USS The Sullivan’s..after The Sullivan family from Saving Private Ryan Sullivan..

Nothing wrong with the name, but I’d have thought they’d save it for one of their super carriers, or even had it as the name of their next super carrier class, ie instead of Ford class, AMERICA class…..

@@6mojo Well, no, actually. The Sullivan Brothers asked to serve together on board a ship, There were five of them serving on the cruiser USS Juneau that sank in the battles around Guadalcanal. The first namesake ship, a Fletcher class (DD537) is a museum ship in Buffalo, NY. Saving Private Ryan is loosely based on the story of the Niland brothers from Tonawanda, NY, a suburb of Buffalo. Three were thought to be dead and the 4th brought home. However, one was a POW of the Japanese.

they might as well call it USS Forrestal

Ah an SKK of culture has appeared

don't forget the Hiryu

The word is 'hurrah'. In Thai it would be 'chayo!'

They save the fanfare for the public when they return to their home port after deployment, what we see here is just tradition being exercised. 🍻

Dont worry the UK is building 13 type 26 frigates and 5 type 31e general purpose frigates and the type 83 destroyer is in the drawing board

@@kelanakelana7998 Just 9 Type 26s I'm afraid

@@anon4214 wait it got reduced!?

@@kelanakelana7998 Actually 8 26s, the 13 got split between 26s and 31s years ago. 32s are planned to follow though to increase number again.

6 is a pretty good number, type 45s are specialists and aren't a very good general purpose ship so extra number would be better being type 26s.

Well, it’s hard to convince a sober guy to go Kamikaze.

I don't know about Japanese having pubs or bars but they do have a practice serving curry on Fridays. As far as I can remember, this practice first originated from the Imperial Navy.

@@4thzone697 wow, that’s an original joke

it's politics, politicians in Japan will not give them money, if they say that they are building an battleship or an aircraft carrier, it's an to offensive name or capability. But a Destroyer, that they are willing to accept since it can be used as a defensive measure. Hus IJN ISE is an Helicopter destroyer... It's in the name of the Japanese self defense force. a military to only defend with, never to attack. thus they are not allowed to build something that sound like an offensive capability (in name only) But it have changed now, since Japan have changed it's military from a Self defense force (in name), that can only defend Japanese territorium, to now is know as Japanese military, and thus are allowed to do more than just defend.

ok cause China and Russia could do better with their rusty shit

@@erlend6338 calm down you pathetic mug I was being sincere

Life is so hollow

*beginning

Are you talking about the good manoeuvre by the USS America ??

If they ordered

lol chine can’t complete just the usa alone can beat chine

@@Ukfairgrounds you can’t “complete” a sentence then you think your smart enough to invent new countries “chine” ? You just can’t “compete” fair vlogs uk ?? If your from the uk then I’m from China or chine 🙄

@@fauxfox2974 your making no sense it’s just a fact the Royal Navy has better ships and training well chine just has Ridiculous Numbers to make up for it usa can beat chine alone so with all of Nato chine has no chance fort that was just common knowledge ??? When are you talking about if I’m from uk your from chine please elaborate

Hoorah!

Hoorah!

What would be the benefit of nuclear propulsion? It wouldn't create a better warship

@Brett Mitchell Yes I have seen them.. I wondered what he'd have to say this time.

There is no reason why Britain couldn't have built nuclear carriers, but it was decided not to as most countries do not allow foreign nuclear vessels into their ports and this was seen as limiting the scope of the carriers and they all need to have stocks replenished,repairs made etc.

@@laurenshayton2399 "most countries do not allow foreign nuclear vessels " 99 percent of nations allow nuclear carriers. Nuclear carriers have 2 times the duration of mission times as it is the support ship. Australia allows them. "tourism Minister, Mark McGowan today welcomed more than 5,000 senior officers and crew aboard USS NIMITZ (CVN-68) to Western Australia." Italy? They allow them... "For years a dozen Italian seaports have been decrying the risks they run as bases for nuclear powered or nuclear armed U.S. warships (submarines, aircraft carriers): Augusta, Brindisi, Cagliari, Castellammare di Stabia, Gaeta, La Maddalena, La Spezia, Livorno, Napoli, Taranto, Trieste, Venezia." Germany? The UK? France? "Nimitz conducted her second abnormally dangerous navigational detail of the deployment as she transited the English Channel (with its high volume of shipping) en route from Wilhelmshaven, West Germany, to Brest, France." Japan? "Ronald Reagan made five deployments to the Pacific and Middle East between 2006 and 2011 while based at Naval Air Station North Island. In October 2015, Ronald Reagan replaced USS George Washington as the flagship of Carrier Strike Group Five, the only forward-based carrier strike group home-ported at Yokosuka, Japan, as part of the United States Seventh Fleet" South Korea? "U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Michael D. White, the commander of Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 11 and Rear Adm. William McQuilkin, the commander of U.S. Naval Forces Korea, pose with local dignitaries aboard the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) in Busan, " India? "The carrier departed North Island for its thirteenth deployment on 2 April 2007 to the Arabian Sea, relieving USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in support of OIF. It anchored off Chennai, India on 2 July 2007 as part of efforts to expand bilateral defense cooperation between India and the United States." 25-29 May 1991: Nimitz anchored at Dubai 11-12 Mar 1993: Nimitz sailed through the Strait of Malacca 18 Jun 1993: Nimitz sailed outbound through the Strait of Hormuz into the Arabian Sea 13-14 Feb 1998: Nimitz anchored off Port Suez, Egypt, and passed through the Suez Canal 21-23 Apr 1985: Nimitz anchored in Augusta Bay, Sicily, to turn over to Dwight D. Eisenhower. 31 Dec 1988-6 Jan 1989: Nimitz anchored at Singapore , affording her crew their first port of call after 71 punishing days at sea.

>>Hope to see you beat China to the punch and keep putting pressure on China. As a retaliation, china is sending an extra container ship to your shore.

Who said it wasn't leaking?

U r an ill informed pratt.

well, i heard they unloaded 100+ covid victims at guam.

Its been sailing for a few months and it hasnt leaked...the one that leaked was the HMS Prince of wales and not QE. QE Never had a leak and the one the POW had was not because of the hulls.

@@MetaView7 who would have thought it, forces personnel can also catch Covid..

Yeah let’s destroy the planet🙄🙄🙄

@@Jabber-ig3iw just every naval base and deep port airfields if china attacks japan taiwain Philippines

NATO is still a present threat to the world.

Right after HMS Boaty McBoatface, of course ;-)

Why that has to be the most stupid thing I've seen anyone comment.

@@WR-yc8ts u gay go to israel

Why would you want that?

@@snoke5567 armagedon

@@keratonkanoman2844 😂😂 wtf your something else

You should know the fact that you are living with the far more past country on earth, China.

You'll probably find that is a tradition hundreds of years old, most things are when it comes to 'military courtesy' as such.

@@spartancam-rs5ru Even worse! We’ve been saluting allies or such by doing that for Centuries?! Smh

Yeah, depends on whether you're prepared to fight to preserve the freedom to post what you've posted, or you'd prefer to toe the party line and be ordered to hold your tongue or else.

@@gordonsmith8899 you really use that as an Excuse? Look at those wars since WW II, nothing came out of it except senseless killing and destruction. And by ' toeing the Party line you mean China and North Korea???? Ridiculous, those Warmongers wouldn't have the balls to take them on because they are nuclear powers. They only fight the weaklings , cowards they are. And what did come out of that in Afghanistan? No perseverance at all, lost the will to fight long time ago. And look at those soldiers who come home psychology damaged beyond healing. How small minded you are!

Bit of a moot point really unless the Taliban suddenly discover a navy left down the back of the sofa.

@@saundyuk Not much fking use then is it.

@@krackerman3628 A bit like you.

we could of bet the Taliban if we had really wanted to its called a nuke.

@@danglingdave1787 Yeah murdering thousands of people and leaving the Taliban unaffected - sure that would have worked.. pure genius

@Blob B Read a book then 🙄 Not my fault your not being productive and saying nothing productive 🤷‍♂️ Ps you haven’t proved me wrong 😉 Because you can’t lol