Maxx c trickstar is a misplay but an understandable one considering how niche the deck is. Maxx c with a face up apropriate on the field is inexcusable
I did that once when my brain was on autopilot and I happened to draw into Nibiru like 3 draws later and that happened to end their turn. I would not recommend relying on that kind of luck against Trickstar lmao
@mattyorshin I belive in the tcg they are still limited/semi even to this day(minor edit they seem to be off the list in the tcg but In the ocg light stage and reincarnation are still limited/semi
That takes me back. My first ever constructed deck was Appropriate Exodia way back in the day. It was really funny when I had a mirror match and our appropriates created an infinite loop until my opponent drew Exodia first.
Alright imma be honest... I forgot Regulus had a negate lmao But I least I gave my opponent the chance to win, but they just took it like a champ It was a ranked duel so it wasn't rigged :^)
Probably they thought blaster was an equip instead of a normal spell and only reacted when they got killed. Either that or the loop made them tune the game out from how long it had been going on for
I watched this on stream and there was some debate about whether there was something stopping them from using the negate but it's even funnier to know that they simply didn't use it. I bet they turned their toggle off and went afk
Trickstar Aggro might be my favorite Duel Links deck. They can burn, Direct Attack, and pull burst damage out of nowhere. I also love how hard they can punish Maxx "C" in Master Duel but have yet to finalize a build there.
The best part about Appropriate Exodia (or Exodia, Appropriate! ?) is that you can still lose the game, even if your opponent resolves Maxx C: If you have an odd number of cards left in deck and the final piece is the very last one, Appropriate will try to draw two but can't. If I recall correctly, you do check for alternative win conditions mid-chain but only _after each resolved chain link,_ so you should lose by deckout before the game realises the alternative win condition in your hand.
Opponent in the 1st duel was just completely unaware, didn't know, lacked the pertinent information, had the wool pulled over their eyes, left wanting in regards to knowing, & whatever else could be said about how played they were
I do know. I saw it coming months ago. The way you get new cards was horrendously bad. The game was a money pit. One thought I would put 70 dollars down. Only got 2 UR 4 Sr. Duel links or master due would have given way better cards.
@LukeVonKarma: I was expecting this to happen to be more funny, he would have one card left in his deck, and the last card is the last peace of exodia, and he special summoned a monster, to make the opponent draw one card, and then he draw 2 for approriated, but end-up only drawing one, he out deck himself and the exact same time he out deck with appropriated making the game end in a draw, this is because appriopriated is a continous effect, and not an effect that start a chain, so even if unable to completely draw the 2 card because of it being continous effect, it is considered done resolving even thought it was incomplete, unlike in Master duel using sharde of greed to draw 2 card when you have two left and your opponent chain a card that cause you to lose one card in your deck, since pot of greed start a chain it only stop resolving when you draw 2 card, and since you only have one card to draw, so it is never done resolving so that is why you out deck lose before the win of exodia happen since the win condition can only happen in between chain number and after chain link 1 resolve.
Yoh saving yourself from a deckout without anycards in you deck feild or hand i have to admit is actually impressive shout to your butts opponent for actually reading cards
This shows that Maxx C is not the problem card and is perfectly balanced. Instead we should ban every fun card ever and implement full power Kash into master duel
