Тёмный

Hong Kong's New Security Law: Assessing Article 23 

Center for Strategic & International Studies
Подписаться 306 тыс.
Просмотров 4,4 тыс.
50% 1

Last month, Hong Kong’s chief executive John Lee announced plans to pass the city’s own security law, a requirement of Article 23 of its constitution that has on previous occasions been blocked by public resistance. The law will impose penalties for a broad range of offenses deemed to contravene national security, including treason, sedition, espionage, and insurrection, and complement broader security legislation Beijing imposed on the city in 2020.
Please join the Freeman Chair for a roundtable discussion of Article 23, implications for Hong Kong’s business environment and civil society, and how Washington and partners might respond.
Freeman Chair Jude Blanchette will be joined by Hanscom Smith, Freeman Chair Senior Associate and former Consul General in Hong Hong and Macau, Thomas Kellogg, Adjunct Professor of Law and Executive Director at the Georgetown Center for Asian Law, and Yaqiu Wang, Research Director for China at Freedom House.
This event is made possible through general support to CSIS.
---------------------------------------------
A nonpartisan institution, CSIS is the top national security think tank in the world.
Visit www.csis.org to find more of our work as we bring bipartisan solutions to the world's greatest challenges.
Want to see more videos and virtual events? Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: cs.is/2dCfTve
Follow CSIS on:
• Twitter: csis
• Facebook: CSIS.org
• Instagram: csis

Опубликовано:

 

16 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 15   
@kirkhoo7456
@kirkhoo7456 4 месяца назад
Pleased to see CSIS and these “Asian law” scholars and observers unhappy with the proposed legislation.
@fatdoi003
@fatdoi003 4 месяца назад
as if your own country don't have national security law..... then why charge and convict those Jan6 people?
@wongcy713
@wongcy713 3 месяца назад
We don't know how HK will use article 23. But the world had seen how US had used its national security laws for a wide range of issues Why don't CSIS the unofficial mouthpiece of CIA enlighten us on how is article 23 vs US security laws.
@benombati6501
@benombati6501 4 месяца назад
CIA propaganda at it again😂😂🤡🗑️💩
@user-zn5nx4uj3p
@user-zn5nx4uj3p 3 месяца назад
CIA moved its operation Taiwan now. Thank god HK will not become the next Ukraine, but Taiwan is at risk
@LuisRios-pw4ig
@LuisRios-pw4ig 4 месяца назад
More tools to assert total control of the city is clearly one of the objectives; but, what is wrong with that? It is a Chinese city, is it not?
@asdf83917
@asdf83917 4 месяца назад
Based on Sino-British joint agreement , HK is using one country two systems. Hong Kong should be have their own law that different from China. If the "control " is actually protect the fellow citizens and its government , it would be OK; but now the government using this to take away basic human right.
@jackytang3683
@jackytang3683 3 месяца назад
one country two systems by joint agreement,but one country is conerstone for two systems, if there are chaos or problem disputed ,China central goverment has all rights on HK by basic law and China constitution@@asdf83917
@qingzhou9983
@qingzhou9983 3 месяца назад
@@asdf83917 This is all because people in Hong Kong failed to write their own National Security Law according the Basic Law. But people in Macau did that long time ago. And everything has been fine there!
@ladylizabeth
@ladylizabeth 3 месяца назад
Wrong law at the wrong time Tom? Obviously you are as ignorant about Article 23 as you are in the National Security Laws that are legislated in other countries. I encourage a closer examination of Article 23 to appreciate its intent and structure in relation to similar laws elsewhere.
Далее
A New Cold War: Conversation with Sir Robin Niblett
1:10:50
The last of Hong Kong’s street food rebels
14:57
Просмотров 623 тыс.
The Chinese Telecom Challenge
52:19
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.