How Allah Got His Name Wrong 

How can I be your patron and donate to your cause?

Pray for God father in Jesus name for your safety and protection

Christian's in Western lands don't understand what they're doing to themselves by allowing Isl@m to flood into their country's.

Intresting, it says there are 2 million Muslims but what if they are less and too afraid to say they are not?

The fact that I questioned whether youre still alive after reading this tells all

Proud of u brother....Love from #INDIAN_HINDU 🇮🇳💪🚩

Lord apostate prophet it great to your magical face in morning. I would say very good morning

Didn't Muhammad "appropriate" the name of a minor Babylonian war deity, who was called "alla"? It would fit the aggressive nature of the false-religion's warlike proclivities...

I would like to say allah is yahweh Allah's hebrew name is yahweh so allah yahweh kills and destroys muhammad in khaibar by poisoning and sent him to hellfire so yahweh has given us warned not to misuse his name and war in it's his name otherwise u will go to hellfire forever and what kind of person is muhammad was who encourages and pray to the god of Christian's and jews yahweh give him islamic name allah and allah yahweh took his life for his misdeed and crimes so yahweh is great shalom AP

What i didn't figure out yet is Do you hate Muslims or do you love them and want to open their eyes to the truth ? If you hate them then what are you doing is understandable as bigotry and you could join a long line of bigots that are found everywhere as they spread hate and make the world a worse place, but if your goal is the opposite you should then not just talk about what is wrong but reveal the right thing ( the truth ) with an evidence ! in this way you become a religion scholar !. At least your legacy will be remembered as someone who tried to show people the truth instead of someone who spread hate and bigotry. It is so easy to demolish a thing but so hard to build one ! what is your big goal and big picture, demolishing or building ?! at the end it's your choice.

Wouldn't god want people to be religious

@@Annadog40 Yes, of course. I said that he's doing God's work.

@@vsasv The difference is that the New Testament doesn't proclaim itself as a new book for a new religion that comes to "correct" the older religions whose text was allegedly falsified (which is what the Quran claims). The New Testament comes as the continuation of the Old Testament. Plus Jesus does mention YHWH in John 8:58 if I'm not mistaken.

@@vsasv When God introduced himself to Moses, he told him that he is YHWH (יהוה). The meaning of this name is usually understood as "I am". This indicates God's eternal and self-existent nature, outside of time. Now, when Jesus says "before Abraham was born, I am!" (John 8:58), it's a clear reference to the name of God and especially to it's meaning. The name of God is not directly quoted but it is evoked implicitly. You have to remember that it was traditionally forbidden to pronounce the name of God (YHWH) and that the New Testament writers were primarily focused on conveying the teachings of Jesus, his life, death, and resurrection, and the implications for the new Christian community. As a result, the direct use of the name YHWH was not a central aspect of their message. There are, however, instances in the New Testament where the authors directly quote Old Testament passages that contain the name YHWH. For example, in the Gospel of Matthew, there are several references to passages from the Hebrew Scriptures that include the name YHWH in the original context.

@@vsasv Of course the sentence "ego eimi" is used everywhere. "I am" is a very common thing to say. However, in this specific sentence, saying "before Abraham, I am" doesn't make any sense (grammatically). But if you put it in the context of the New Testament, which often refers to the Old Testament, it suddenly makes much more sense. Whether we agree or not on the interpretation of this verse (and we could talk about it for hours), your initial argument doesn't make much sense in my opinion. You are saying that the argument of the video could also prove that the New Testament is wrong, I don't think so. The whole point of the video is that it is really weird and contradictory that the Quran and Islamic tradition is using names that refer to YHWH (in their root) while saying that the religion of YHWH is false and that it's book was willingly falsified by its followers. Even if you consider that the New Testament doesn't mention YHWH, the argument of the video can't be used to Invalidate it because the New Testament never claims that what was said before is false.

It's a very weak argument

@@rashidabdur-rahim1012 refute it then.

@@PebsBeans Tbh idk if anyone can ever be this stupid, the word allah, had been used by the Christian and jewish arabs even before islam

​@@rashidabdur-rahim1012Go on then, disprove him

Why Muslims always say "this is fales" without ever showing how or why with a source?

Sorry, allah is monolinguistic

Which is strange, when you consider that Arabic is a mixture of Aramaic and koine Greek. Two languages that the Bible was written in long before islam.

"Quran" is 💩

@@dalelaforce1683 really? It is a mixture of aramaic and Greek? What are the source? I want to read 🙏. Its an interesting claim because both Aramaic and Hebrew use Greek words maybe it was just a language that people used around the world as a langua frenka or a common language

Basic common sense doesn't exist in islam

Just as Christianity and Judaism borrowed from Zoroastrianism.

So, I Think Islam is Cocktail.

so is every other religion

@@kouroshmarx8646 Where's your proof of your claim?

@ Christy Christo: not only they fused it together in mishmash way but also add their own lustful and barbarism to it.

1. Jesus and the Aramaic Term for God: Jesus referred to God in Aramaic as "Allah." Source: Aramaic Dictionary 2. Yahweh in Arabic and Its Meaning: Yahweh in Arabic carries significance. Arabic term: يا هو (Yahweh) which means: Oh he! or Oh him! 3. Arabic as Ancestor of Indo-European Languages: Arabic's role as the ancestor of Indo-European languages and origin of speech. Source: Classic Arabic as The Ancestor of Indo-European Languages and Origin of Speech 4. Hebrew and Aramaic as Ancient Arabic Dialects: Hebrew and Aramaic are considered ancient Arabic dialects. 5. Arabic Terminology Explained: Howa: He Elah: God Alohim: My God Lah: To whom it belongs Allah: The God (literally means "Oh he to whom everything belongs")

​​@@ABJADs And those sources date before or after Muhammad's conquest during the Caliphate raids? Also how come Allah pressures you to say Allah or Allah with his many titles yet God has o many of titles and names. All are welcomed and all contributes to him.

The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

@@mznxbcv12345 Lies, God doesn't beat his women and subject people to the jizziah. All are lies right there. The man on the video beat you to the point after thus statment is nothing more then a battle cry of a dying race. Now leave your lies and comply. Or be left on the sidelines of obscurity.

@@mznxbcv12345 St. John of Damascus has proven you faulty. And this man who made the video has brought up the sciences and origins you have lost. Don't believe me? Read about St. John of Damascus, but you can't because all sources out side the quaran are considered wrong. And you'll find a way to avoid his honest critique of islam. God dose not permit you to worship a stone he didn't send.

It's not "Yahweh" anyways. That's made up. This is what this stupid guy from the video doesn't understand. YHWH originally meant Yehowah, which means "He is". This is the name that the Israelites gave to him because he said to Moses "I am that I am", so his 'name' was "He is" ie. YHWH. That's also where names like Yehoshua (Jesus) come from. That name means "He is saves" ie. God saves.

The name "Yahweh" is just fake and made up because the later Jews didn't know what YHWH originally meant. Jews never said God's name out loud, so they literally forgot how to pronounce YHWH cos it's written without the vowels. So then they came up with "Yahweh" as a proposed meaning of the word, but that is totally meaningless as a word. So YEAHHHHH, this whole video is also meaningless. Allah just means "The God", and in the Qur'an he lists 99 of his names there. YHWH isn't mentioned like that in the Qur'an because Arabic is a different language, but the equivalents are mentioned. "He is" means the one who always "is", ie. The eternal one who never dies or fades away or becomes weak or sleepy or whatever. There's no change in him, he just "is". That's what it means. So in arabic, you got names like the eternal one or the ever-living or whatever else. Same thing.

But even those 99 names are not specific names like how the idols used to have names. They're just things like "The most merciful, the most forgiving, the most powerful, the all knowing, the protector, the provider etc etc". These are names that you can also give a human, so they're not specifically godly. That's because he's not a human, so he doesn't even have any particular name in the way that humans do. I think that's what the early Israelites didn't understand about him. And that's why he never mentioned any of those names to them. He just said I'm your God and I am what I am. He "is". The word "is" = "to be" and he says that word "be" to whatever he wants to create and it becomes. So when the bible says "the word became flesh", it means God said the word "be" and Adam was created, and from him, his wife. And God said "be" and Jesus was created without a father. So every time he says "be", God does a miracle like that. And he himself is miraculous, so he "is". ... But what he is in particular are those 99 qualities.

Oh and in case you're wondering why it's Yehowah. That's because howah (or huwah) means "he" in Hebrew, same as in Arabic. And the "ye" is the third person singular verbal prefix. So for example, if you want to say the verb "saves" as in "he saves", you say Yeshua. It doesn't contain the word "he" separately, but it implies it from the 3rd person conjugation. That's the translation of the name "Joshua". Or if you want, you can also add the word for "he", so then Joshua becomes Yehoshua or even Yehowahshua. Same thing. And that was also Jesus's original name. So where does that "wah" part come from? Well that's just part of the O vowel when you add another short A. You can see it more clearly if you think of the O as a U (as it is originally pronouced). A "W" is just a "double" U, even in English. So in other words, the U and the W is the same exact letter. Just when you have an A at the end, you don't write it as "hua", but as "huwah" instead because it naturally sounds more like that, but it's the SAME exact thing. So "he" in Hebrew = "hu/ho" (or "huwah/howah" in full). The H at the end is just for emphasis, like in Allah or like in that made up word "Yahweh". The H there has no function other than emphasis, cos you're saying God's name in a grandiose way. So if you want to say "he is", you change the pronoun "he" (howah) into a third person singular verb by adding the "ye" prefix, and so you say "Yehowah". That's it. It's not something mystical or complicated. It's just basic. So in Exodus 3, God says "I am that I am. Tell the Israelites: 'I am' has sent me to you. Tell the Israelites: 'He is', the God of your fathers, has sent me to you". That's all YHWH means. It means "He is". There's no magical/mystical "Yahweh" meaning to it. That's ridiculous and made up. So this guy from the video understand NOTHING about this. He just thinks YHWH is some strange mystical name loool!

Their allah is truly a great deceiver. That's the reason why he has 99 or even a thousand "beautiful" names. Muslims would lose their minds once allah reveal to them that his real name is S _ _ A N also known as L _ _ _ F E R. They've been lied to all their lives to kill and throw away their lives for this twisted/demonic ideology.

In fact, if you study Robert Breaker.. The names actually tell the story of what will happen from the beginning (genesis), to crucifixion. Now you tell me if this is possible, especially if everyone lives to be 600-969 years old.. under the hydrocanopy present before eden (higher barometric pressure means longer life): You tell me how easy it would be to plan all this out like they know it's coming.. Adam = "Man" (is) 930 years Seth = "appointed" 912 years Enosh = "mortal" 905 years Kenan = "sorrow" (but) 910 years Mahalael = "The Blessed God" 895 years Jared = "Shall Come Down" 962 years Enoch = "Teaching" 365 years Methuselah = "His death will bring.." 969 years Lamech = "the despairing" 777 years Noah = "comfort and rest" That's 7,625 years. No way they planned that.

are you saved?

That's why many christians are still christians. They don't read their bible

​@@isaiahclark4339 those who claim to be saved or born again are worse readers of the bible

We should all learn to be more appreciative of intelligent people. Not just those who are affluent and are lining their own pockets. Cj

@Zack Smith to what do I owe the pleasure of your visit?

La illa ilaYHWH

That's odd. If she was doing her Master's at Oxford she'd know that "Semitic" is an archaic language category based on 18 c/19 c century pseudoscience. Antisemitic means purely hatred against Jews. It was a term coined by anti-Jewish racists in late 19 c to sound more sophisticated. The original definition of "Semitic" is not relevant.

@@jiros00 She was doing physics, not philology. Oblivious to the whole history. Even the earliest categories were constructed with all kinds of racist assumptions, weren't they? I thought the idea that Arabic as a semitic language is fairly ubiquitous, even if the orientalist agenda hasn't stuck in the same way.

‘Allah’ is NOT the Islamic name for god, it is the pagan name for god! "The verses of the Qur'an make it clear that the very name Allah existed in the Jahiliyya or pre-Islamic Arabia. Certain pagan tribes believed in a god whom they called 'Allah' and whom they believed to be the creator of heaven and earth and holder of the highest rank in the hierarchy of MANY gods. It is well known that the Quraish as well as other tribes believed in Allah, whom they designated as the 'Lord of the House' (i.e., of the Ka'ba). It is therefore clear that the Qur'anic conception of Allah is NOT new." (A Guide to the Contents of the Qur'an, Faruq Sherif, (Reading, 1995), pgs. 21-22., Muslim)

Allah is name of pre-Islamic moon god and chief of pantheon. Once you analyse Quran and islam through rational lens it all makes sense. Of course Momo made chief god into an only God downgrading others into angels or djinns. It makes it much more acceptable to Quraysh pagans. Also slavery is allowed because most of Arabs owned slaves. Polygamy was again an Arab custom quite since it allows for much higher production of jihadis than monogamy. Finally since Allahu is a moon god Islamists follow a moon calendar to generate him

​@@kurremkarmerruk8718- technically semitic is called afro-asiatic nowadays and is a language family that includes arabic, aramaic, hebrew, ancient Egyptian, akkadian and Chadian, among others.

Where is the problem here?

jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. Arabic is written in an alphabetic script that consists of 28 consonants and three long vowels. For example: قرأ زيد كتابا qaraʾa zayd-un kitāb-an Zayd read a book This sentence is composed of three words: qaraʾa (he read), zayd-un (Zayd), and kitāb-an (a book). The word order is verb-subject-object, which is different from English but similar to Proto-Semitic and Akkadian. The word zayd-un has a suffix -un that indicates the nominative case, which is equivalent to "the" in English or "-u" in Akkadian. The word kitāb-an has a suffix -an that indicates the accusative case, which is equivalent to "a" in English or "-a" in Akkadian. Proto-Semitic is the reconstructed ancestor of all Semitic languages. It is not written in any script, but linguists use a system of symbols to represent its sounds. For example: ʔanāku bēlīya ʔašū I am his lord This sentence is composed of three words: ʔanāku (I), bēlīya (my lord), and ʔašū (he). The word order is subject-object-verb, which is different from English but similar to Arabic and Akkadian. The word bēlīya has a suffix 'ya' that indicates possession, which is equivalent to "my" in English or "-ī" in Arabic. The word ʔašū has a prefix ʔa- that indicates the third person singular masculine pronoun, which is equivalent to "he" in English or "huwa" in Arabic. I'll compare Arabic with Proto-Semitic and show how Arabic preserves features that are lost or changed in other Semitic languages. Let's start with a simple sentence: ## The house is big Arabic: البيتُ كبيرٌ al-bayt-u kabīr-un Proto-Semitic: *ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u Hebrew: הבית גדול ha-bayit gadol Akkadian: bītum rabûm Amharic: ቤቱ ገደሉ betu gedelu As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-). But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include: - The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian. - The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. - The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian. - The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber. Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen. Arabic: كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Proto-Semitic: *kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Hebrew: המכתב נכתב בעט ha-michtav niktav ba-et Akkadian: šipram šapāru bēlum Egyptian: sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t Berber: tturra-t tibratin s uccen Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum). Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

@@mznxbcv12345”… true name after it had been long forgotten?” True name of what? Which part are you talking about?

The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

Use short words. They’ll get it in the end. LOL

Problematic for all religions, actually.

@@happilysecular2323 for atheists even more

@@SaintOtter How does that come?

@@mysterion7586 well because an atheist as in a naturalist has no basis for knowing that his faculties relate anything true. An animal is only programmed for food and reproduction. Not for Phylosophy. That's just the start. Heard of the mathematical challenge to Darwinism? Evolution is mathematical impossible. Heard of the big bang? In short: who (or if you prefer what) caused it? Ever thought of morals? Are you convinced it is absolutely wrong to do certain things? Out goes atheism because they only have "relative morals". I would not want to live in a world with atheists. It is hell.

They have been publicly replying to my comments trying to convert me. It's like these people have so much time to find us and preach to us. And I thought the JWs where annoying enough to come knock on my door

@ they still quoting Quran verses like its changes anything. On this very video. 🤦🏽‍♀️

u call him your friend that`s great what if he a muslim do u call him the same thing ,why do u believe such one he is not even muslim&u quote by what he has said only because of what he saith pleasing u, western media are commoned on that islam that islam is the fastest growing religion in the world as per western media says had a very large groundswell in whole world on the contrary of that christianity goes in decline &churches converted to mosques especially in the west u really take place behind the illusion,in 2000 we never found even a single place in states to pray therein unlike now there are 200 mosques builds in states yearly nevertheless the relentless vicious war which wages against islam in whole world,all the best

The religion of peace is indeed where it's God sermons the followers to kill all others to owe their allegiance to such God. How powerless is this God that He needs His followers to do what He Himself cannot do.

force of dark is watching

How many in India live in abject poverty NOW? What about the infanticide going on in India?

Hinduism is horrible the caste system is dumb

​@@jackjill3205Narrated `Aisha: that the Prophet (ﷺ) married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that `Aisha remained with the Prophet (ﷺ) for nine years (i.e. till his death).

​@@jackjill3205stop. Islam is misery.

They cry like little girls about everything anyway

@Jack Michaelson Bro Zach smit is a Sunni muslims from Pakistan. Anyway's what matter is this, arguing with him won't hurt him, but you. These muslims have madrassas and so much that for them, time does not matter. However pissing you off and converting people to Islam is thier goal. So bascially, Ignore him.

@Zack Smith how? What kind of fool say *misinformation* and don't explain anything?

@@sebassanchezc-1379 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawah

@@wlan246 wtf is that? What is about the subject? Inbreeding is a serious problem in Muslim world SMH 🤔

Here is puzzle for you ....How did Abraham call God???? Yahweh? NOPE.Abraham never heard of name Yahweh but refer to God as God Almighty which is what Allah means. Muhammad comes from Abraham thru Ishmael not Moses so there is no reason to call God Yahweh even that Bible mentions Allah and Yahweh in same sentence in Old Testament which of course these false preachers Apostate and David Wood have no clue about.

@@keksione7235 Almighty? No, he calls him El. Elohim, El-Shaddai, etc.

Statement if a person name is Joe and people call him Joseph. Is that the same person?.

@@Draezeth You forget Jehovah. etc LOL

@@sophiawilson8696 YHWH is Jehovah. Same name, just a western form.

Oh shit! Makes sense.

More accurately it was Allah Who supposedly is the greatest deceiver ( wich is really of course Mohamed,s álter ego).

He stated that Allah was the greatest of decievers, not himself.

Whats the name of the hadith ? I need to use this during debates

Mary Gomes 😂😂😂😂

I so want to see this in a picture but I wouldn’t want you to doxx yourself 😂.

Hahahaha 👍

there is a sinister reason for writing god instead of Allah, they are trying to tell other non Muslims that "see! we worship the same as your god so we are buddies!"

In Arabic Allah is not name it is contraction of Al Elah which means The God and is used with Arabic Muslims and Christians alike. In semitic languages Elah (Arabic), Eloh (Hebrew) and Alah (Aramaic, language of Jesus) all mean god so AL-Elah in Arabic means The God (AL means The). God doesn’t have name and why should he? After all he is who he is.

@@anismatar Allah doesn't mean Elah those are 2 different words, arab Christians probably used the word Allah for fear of Muslim persecution and the name stuck over time otherwise Christian god's name is YHWH as in the old testament.

James Double : Thank for the information. I knew part of it but I thought that it was confined to the Arabian peninsula.

Ok

Correct, it's all myth. See videos by dr Robert price or Richard carrier about Christianity. Could be that no historical Jesus existed at all. Again some dying and rising star being worshipped.

its So Sad as u looks old Enough to know better GOD IS ALLAH . BIBLE ? DEU 6 4 In biblical Aramaic they referred to “God” as " אלהא (aláhâ/Elaha) or Elah (אלה) ”, in Hebrew “אֱלוֹהַּ \ אֱלֹהַּ elóah”( Elohim: elóah's grammatically plural form.), and Arabic is cognate “الله Allah”. Hebrew speaking Jew says Allah is God ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NqHdVhVGwK8.html&pbjreload=10 IF U REJECT ARABIC TRY HEBREW...JEWS NAMES OF GOD = ELOHIM/ADONAI/ ALLAH ALLAH = U may find it in Arabic bible GEN 1 1 31 u will find the word ALLAH mention 31 time + in Hebrew language the word ALLAH IS GOD... God/Allah/Elohim,/Eli, Alaha..NEVER YAHWEH NOW I EXPECT YOU TO DENY UR OWN BIBLE...RIGHT ? YAHWEH = BA AL = SATAN = THE REAL FATHER OF XTIANS .... because that was man-made by Hebrews rabbis from the Tetragrammatons’ (YHWH/YHVH). It can be pronounced Yahweh or Jehovah. The significance of God’s name is repeated emphasized throughout the scriptures. When dissected in the Hebrew, the true definition of Jehovah (Yah-Hovah) is revealed. “Yah” (@) means “god”. “Hovah” (@) Translates to “eagerly coveting, falling, desire, ruin, calamity, iniquity, mischief, naughtiness, noisome, perverse, very wickedness.” Jehovah is Synonymous with Baal: “Baal (@) from ba’al with pron. Suff.; my master; Baali, a symbolical name for Jehovah - Baali.” The Jewish encyclopedia (“Adonai and Ba’al”) reveals: “The name Ba’al, apparently an equivalent for YHWH.” UR FATHER BLOODY GOD ...who break up to 3 separate figures- persons - statues... 1 THE SADIST CRIMINAL FATHER ...who sent the dumb son to die 4 others sins,....and shouted b4 death = MY GOD why U FORSAKEN ME ..LET ME DOWN , DECEIVED ME ,BETRAYED ME ...ABONDEN ME .......

@@sayedf11 Do you really believe that Jesus was actually seeking for an answer at that time? Seriously? He was fulfilling the prophecies, God's plan. He was human. He felt. Everything a human feels at the time of dying. From pain to confusion to despair. And don't you dare picking the Lords name in your mouth speaking unholy words. Quran is a copy pasted version of the old and new testament. If you guys had absolutely no respect for Jesus or considered him a joke you wouldn't include him in YOUR "holy" book. You religion revolves around one object. The moon. The same object witches use and satanists for their rituals. And you bet there is only one name Satan and his dogs are afraid of..😏

What do you understand by this video. Are you blindly supporting content without knowing its meaning? AP knows about his blind supporters. Now tell me what makes this video great to you. Lets talk.

Plan it Designs lol

Hello...am looking all over for David's latest boom boom....its disappeared!

@@planitdesigns6192 Just tell us in what AP is wrong here?

@@RM-fs8ub watch it on bitchute, it's still available there

Allah couldn’t read.

You mean Muhammad 😂

Mysterion They’re one and the same.

hahahaha nice jokeee e

@@chykcha Yes, but Allah is considered to be metaphysical (although he obviously doesnt exist), Muhammad is just a 7th century guy.

How is he "winning souls" if he doesn't believe that Christ is God?

@@brendabrenda6782 if someone gives you more biblical truth even if they don't believe it themselves it still will point you the right direction

@@mraims82 you sir are an idiot.

@@habibie are you familiar with the “Chinese Room”? There is no necessary insight into the motivations or even sentience of an unseen actor carrying out a task correctly. It’s merely a condition that happens to be occurring.

@@syedsaad4160 ויאמר עוד אלהים אל משה ... יהוה זה שמי לעלמ וזה זכרי לדר דר. This was the answer to Moses’ question. The question was “they will say to me What is his name? And what shall I say to them?” It could have been so simple. “Tell them it’s Allah.” But that never happened. Why would such a specific and central point become a throw-away question? יהוה ... this is my name forever and my memorial (viz., that by which I am to be remembered) from generation to generation. That seems pretty emphatic. Not exactly “Call me Zeus, call me Tim-whatever”. If any part of the Tanakh were preserved at all, you would have to reasonably expect “Here’s my name-remember it forever so you can call me by it” would be preserved. If none of the Tanakh is preserved then it’s not coherent enough for the Quranic references to it to be logical. So if you aren’t kicking the legs out from under the Quran-are you certain that God remembers his own name in the context of the Quran? Because he does not appear to do so.

u are one wrong path

Islam is a prison for soul and body

@@secretartist567 you follow a pedophile

@@secretartist567no,he is not.

The FBI will flag you for extremism, fascism and racism now. Being their Communist, Jihadist Selves

Agreed, but this is the proverbial Big One really. Even so, certain Muslim apologists at least must be Olympic-level mental gymnasts by now

@Jack Michaelson pretty sure he didn't actually

@Jack Michaelson the guy visited me as well. Asked him the reason for his visit because it would be foolish to waste a chance of a good debate

@@erikdevries2215 This chubby pig is again bullshitting as usual. He doesn't know what he's talking about. This ugly looking ass doesn't know that the name of "Allah" is pronounced so in Arabic while in other languages the pronunciation differs according to the language. But yet since Hebrew language is somehow closer to Arabic, the Arabic name of Allah is mentioned in Hebrew texts in old bible versions as Allohem. Not to mention the name of Allah is known in English as God, does that mean a problem? In Hindu scriptures Allah is known as Ram or Shiva, does that mean a problem? So every Messenger of God to every nation called Allah according to the language understandable in meaning to that particular nation. Imagine the last and final Prophet Muhammed called Allah as God, what his Arab nation would have understood who never knew English? So as I said this chubby ass doesn't know what he's talking about. That's why he has no balls to debate a knowledgeable Muslim and all what he does is to fool donkeys like him. That's why he refused to debate Muhammed Hijab and was badly refuted in the video "Annihilatory refutation of appostate rizwan, and here is the link: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-O_9VHixMOFs.html. Watch this video guys to see the lies of this chubby pig and his ignorance which proves how stupid he is. For correct information about Islam follow my account on Instagram @scientificmuslim.

@Zack Smith This chubby pig is again bullshitting as usual. He doesn't know what he's talking about. This ugly looking ass doesn't know that the name of "Allah" is pronounced so in Arabic while in other languages the pronunciation differs according to the language. But yet since Hebrew language is somehow closer to Arabic, the Arabic name of Allah is mentioned in Hebrew texts in old bible versions as Allohem. Not to mention the name of Allah is known in English as God, does that mean a problem? In Hindu scriptures Allah is known as Ram or Shiva, does that mean a problem? So every Messenger of God to every nation called Allah according to the language understandable in meaning to that particular nation. Imagine the last and final Prophet Muhammed called Allah as God, what his Arab nation would have understood who never knew English? So as I said this chubby ass doesn't know what he's talking about. That's why he has no balls to debate a knowledgeable Muslim and all what he does is to fool donkeys like him. That's why he refused to debate Muhammed Hijab and was badly refuted in the video "Annihilatory refutation of appostate rizwan, and here is the link: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-O_9VHixMOFs.html. Watch this video guys to see the lies of this chubby pig and his ignorance which proves how stupid he is. For correct information about Islam follow my account on Instagram @scientificmuslim.

bible ' earth is flat circle does not move ' Quran ' earth spherical. moves in orbit'.....seems to me thats the opposite of plagiarism

The arabic language did exist before islam

@@FKAAYA The artificial Quranic admixture of languages that you ignorantly call "Arabic language" did not exist before the Quran.

@@humansdosuck it didnt exist in writing but it was spoken by your shorsighted logic the english language isn't it's own language but rather just a mixture of Latin/Hebrew and other ancient languages

@@humansdosuck the quran wouldnt exist without the arabic language

Wendell Osborne - Most illiterates are.

The author of the quran is not confused. Satan is the author of the quran. The quran is to confuse others. These are the people who will appear before the white throne judgement who do not accept jesus they shall appear before the white throne judgement and cry out allah lord I did this for you in killed Jews and martyred myself etc etc. YHWH will say to them depart from me I never knew you.

conghelach Satan doesn’t exist. You’re just as dangerous as the Muslims.

Wendell Osborne Not uniformed, manipulative. Just like the authors of the buy-bull. Religion is just a way of keeping the dumb masses under control.

@Zack Smith don't you get tired of doing this?

The Gospels and Torah actually say quite the opposite in regards to both the Quran and Muhammad

@@Joe-pc3hs Remember when the angels proclaimed, “O Mary! Allah gives you good news of a Word from Him, his name will be the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary; honoured in this world and the Hereafter, and he will be one of those nearest to Allah. [Qur’an 3:45] Indeed, We have sent revelation to you [O Muhammad!] as We sent revelation to Noah and the prophets after him. We also sent revelation to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and his descendants, as well as Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon. And to David We gave the Psalms. [Qur’an 4:163] Indeed, those who say, “Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary,” have fallen into disbelief. Say, O Muhammad, “Who has the power to prevent Allah if He chose to destroy the Messiah, son of Mary, his mother, and everyone in the world all together?” To Allah alone belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and everything in between. He creates whatever He wills. And Allah is Most Capable of everything. [Qur’an 5:17] O People of the Book! Do not go to extremes regarding your faith; say nothing about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger of Allah and the fulfilment of His Word through Mary and a spirit created by a command from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers and do not say, “Trinity.” Stop!-for your own good. Allah is only One God. Glory be to Him! He is far above having a son! To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And Allah is sufficient as a Trustee of Affairs. [Qur’an 4:171] Then in the footsteps of the prophets, We sent Jesus, son of Mary, confirming the Torah revealed before him. And We gave him the Gospel containing guidance and light and confirming what was revealed in the Torah-a guide and a lesson to the God-fearing. [Qur’an 5:46] The Messiah, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger. ˹Many˺ messengers had ˹come and˺ gone before him. His mother was a woman of truth. They both ate food. See how We make the signs clear to them, yet see how they are deluded from the truth! [Qur’an 5:75] …and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this crucifixion are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever-only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him. [Qur’an 4:157]

@@glennbarrow8325 Youre quoting whats being disputed without even addressing the point.

@@glennbarrow8325 Is their a particular reason why you still avoid answeing the point and continue on with red herrings? Youre really just proving "Apostate Prophet" point.

Stop taqqiya. Islam means submission. Leave islam

@Zack Smith Abdul lol

Zack Smith you’ve just confirmed the reason I referred to your kind as ABDUL by posting a link to an article made by your kind without any facts on it’s content. What a Xerox you are! Wake up and start thinking for yourself. Don’t be a moron in your entire life.

What dyou mean? Converted to Islam or left Islam?

@@THYB737 wkwkwk, no one converted to islam. they are revert. but yeah that kinda make sense.

He means they converted to atheism, metaphorically

weak DNA, weak neurons alas, it happens :D

Out of curiosity, are they atheists now?

Allah: That's why we should kill the apostate @#%#@*

YHWH is jewish name under BIBBLE TIME..It was NOT GOD but ONE OF ELOHIM......The word "GOD", it was invented in GREEK TIM,E , many year after BIBBLE TIME

SANDRO MARTINI I think the point of the video, if I’ve understood it correctly, is that God had revealed his name to the Jews and Christians as YHWH long before Islam came along. There’s plenty of evidence for that. But not only does the Quran not seem to know this (?), but it claims God is now calling himself Allah. Makes sense if you’re taking about a different God, after all there have been lots of Gods with lots of different names throughout human history. But if it’s supposed to be the same god appearing to Mohammed as the last in a line of prophets going back to the time of Jews and Christians, then why would he now claim to have a different name? Maybe I’m just misunderstanding something.

@@richl6343 you have a good will to understand :). but it's confusion. The concept of GOD (Ζεύς [Zeus] is Διός [Diòs]) was invented in ancient Greece in 400 A..C. The Bible was written 2,000 years before, of the (Greek) invention of the concept of GOD. where was the concept of ELHOIM, and not GOD, because the word (GOD) did not exist yet. The Bible has been copied, from the THALMUD (Jewish), and the concept of GOD has been added, which is different from the original concept of ELHOIM. The concept of GOD (Ζεύς [Zeus] is Διός [Diòs]) provides for it to be UNIQUE. In the concept of ELHOIM, instead, there are many, and one of these ELHOIM was called YHWH, but there were also other ELHOIM, and that certainly had different names as they were different (individuals, in flesh and blood, as described by the prophet Mose) What you wrote previously should be written like this: "I think the point of the video, if I understood it correctly, is that ELHOIM YHWH, had revealed his name to the Jews and Christians as ELHOIM YHWH, long before Islam came along."

@@sandromartini1525 you say "The Bible has been copied, from the THALMUD" but the THALMUD is the study of the bible of jewish tradition :) ELHOIM - it means god as an obstruction. ALOHECHA - means YOUR god. "אנכי יהוה אלהיך" -> Anochi YEOVA ALOHECHA: -> I am "Yhova" your God. GOOGLE THIS: אנכי יהוה אלהיך אשר הוצאתיך מארץ מצרים מבית עבדים לא יהיה לך אלהים אחרים על פני lets ask consciousness: does the truth is what: "is"? - or a desire of believe?

Where do you get your information?

​@@2ahmad_From the blood of the martyrs.

Did bro not even read a single thing about the history of Muslims overall? Is ISIS the basis of th whole Muslim population for you? Did you know how much does debates against no Muslims for centuries? In major Caliphates, to make the Non Muslims understand Islam? The various countries over the world that has Muslim majority like the Southeast and Middle East nations? Do you not even try to open a history book of the Muslims? You claim us not accepting debates, when you dont even know they exists? How much people converts to Islam after DEBATES?

Allahu Akbar Edit: since many ppl are confused I'm not Muslim I just finished the sentence

dimitriszah 999 Al ilah was the moon god and Akbar was the sun god. The two were unified to make Allahu Akbar and had three daughters, Al Lat, Al Manat and Al Uzza.

Aloha Snack bar

@@feralcyborggaming1531 Salami Latecum

Hihihihihi!

@seriousdudeserious Not only congregations "permit" honest criticism, but the Bible itself has been viciously attacked and criticized for millennia, but withstood ALL of it! Goes to show, that Truth will ALWAYS be TRUTH!!! If you apply the same criticism to the koran it soon looses credibility!

@MooHamMAD Atankvadi yeah sure, thats probably why we are commanded to love other as ourselves and always put other peoples needs above ourselves. people like you will only realize how crucially different Jesus is from Muhammad once someone slits their throat in the name of Allah.

@@xxxmmm3812 You wanna see Islam in action go to Pakistan and Saudia and question Islam and argue. You will see the result and will know how peaceful Islam is. They are just selling here sweet candies and bitter juice will come later which can be seen in Europe.

Rumor has it, the longer an Islamic apologist watches this video, the more difficult it becomes for them to defend this strange god called Allah. Make sure to enjoy every moment of it, to like it, and to share it. :)

This is evidence of names that are not translated and that the names in the Qur’an are correct AMAZING NEWS: Prophet Muhammad's Name Found in the Bible - Jewish Rabbis on ISLAM ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vTfaKs22RAs.html

Apparently he has 99 names.

@@Remake5182 funny, islam and his mathematical "miracles"

@MooHamMAD Atankvadi no dalla hu gobar which means pimp is shit...that was used for pre islamic pimps because prostitution is not correct acc to islam...when mohammed heard it he was not much literate so everybody was shouting it...so he thought it is allah hu akbar...while people were thinking why was he calling a pimp great...so thats how islam began

Google User even its fucking name

Excuse me sir, arab christians and arab jewish called god allah too. Even arabic bible called so translate god as allah too. Did you ever met arab christian coptic ?

Hahahahahaha!

So correct!!! JESUS CHRIST IS THE WAY! (JOHN 14:6)

@Pichkalu Pappita So enlighten us.. what is the truth.. what is right, einstein?? ..

Boom boom time.

@Pichkalu Pappita "Just live your life" .. another clueless libtard that doesn't believe in Absolutes.. How was the Pride March?

And millions of Christians are joining Islam

Well you know lah😂

Biasa bro lagi nyebarin yg katanya *kebenaran* 😂

They are hurling curses

Most cannot comprehend the video and just throwing shade at apostate Hahaha

@@BardiXOfficial hey, don't insult shit

This is evidence of names that are not translated and that the names in the Qur’an are correct AMAZING NEWS: Prophet Muhammad's Name Found in the Bible - Jewish Rabbis on ISLAM ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vTfaKs22RAs.html

Jesus not only spoke Aramaic but he also spoke Greek and Hebrew. the Greek word for god is Theos and the Hebrew word for god is Elohim. And since Jesus was Jewish and read the Torah in synagogue he would’ve called God YHWH

Elohim means the same thing as allah.

@@muhammedrashid7473 The same remark you made in another thread! So I'll repeat my own response from it: I don't think that "Elohim" is equivalent to "Allah": "Elohim" is an Hebraic plural, meaning "Gods"; and "Allah", I understand to mean (for I do not yet read Arabic) simply "God", a singular noun. Why a plurality for the singular God of Abraham, Issac, and Jacob? A knowledgeable Jew likely will tell you that a "plural of majesty" is used (consider that most monarchs, not only in the West but throughout the world, generally promulgated commands as "We, the King", etc.). A knowledgeable Christian, that the plurality recognizes the three persons within the Godhead: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; three persons, but one being, much as you are yourself several persons -- son, perhaps also father, friend, brother, husband -- yet just one being, even though you relate to people differently in each of your personae. All very different to the being whom Mohammedans conceive as "Allah", the best of deceivers (not a desireable attribute! and one which Christians, Jews, and most people of any or no faith would more likely give to Satan, "the father of lies").

Fundamentally exposed

@@muhammedrashid7473 That's very UNwise of you to mention that. Eloh(im) in Hebrew indicates plurality, which you people reject!!!

@@Rowarst. The quran refers to allah in the metaphorical plural . Please look it up .

Can you defend your argument?

Zack Smith I’ve been reading your responses to various comments on here and it seems that your microscopic Muslim brain cannot formulate a better argument than “no, It isn’t. U dum!”

سلمى الغالية 🌹🌹🌹

@Markus TanbeckGreat article.. Now can you bring an academic perspective?

@Zack Smith I know. Thanks. I was addressing to the one who posted the main comment.

that's why muslims are afraid of education, logic and science... it makes islam crumble pretty damn fast

When you was young?? That’s pretty impressive!

@@hekimaasilia6207 Thank you. I was just the product of my environment really. I grew up around this type of information and conversations. I was aware of a lot and could read quite well so it was natural for me to think and research these types of things.

@@syedsaad4160 ancient Greeks had many gods not just Zeus, Zeus is not a word for lord or god it’s a fucking name. Here are some Greek gods for example, Hera, Poseidon, Hades and Persephone. The Quran clearly states that Allah is gods NAME not what he is (according to Islam)

@@syedsaad4160 that's not true though. Those are not translations, Zeus means sky father, Buddha was a person whose name meant enlightened and all other names/titles mean something different

Liar

@@hatunboy4531 who your pedophile prophet or the fake moon god Allah?? Which one is the liar?

@Zack Smith so lover of a 54 year old fully developed man putting his thing in a 9 year old child?? You think that is right?? Really??

@Zack Smith why are you always sniffing round videos like this anyways if you simply don't agree with them?? Mind boggling 🤔🧐

@@lolomimi4410 one verse from Quran destroys you

They will not use these yah names any longer, but as Muslims are ignorant lots will still use these yah names driving the rest of the Muslims bonkers. Yahwe is good, my god is yahwe....😂😂😂😂🤣

Oh they coming for his head!!! He's just stood on their toe, 👀👀

@@lolomimi4410 this vid will hurt a good number of them more than let us say a good kick in the balls with a steel boot

@@erikdevries2215 it has started!!! Look at the comment section 🤣😂🤭

@@lolomimi4410 what has started? And where in the comment section should I look?

May Allāh (AWJ/عَزَّ وَجَلَّ) bless you and guide you to Islām (Dīn; the truth).

That is what god actually warns people about when they do shit like..you know..make a religion and..build it on war and killings

That is why you are not God... yet...

@@Pa-1 I've been going to anger management therapy.

@@jaewok5G - that's a good start...!!!

Too bad there are a lot of oil in that dessert 😁😁😁

Jewish Saikh.

Patti Gatzke Allah is fake

you are not a rabbi. second: jews reject Jesus. According to them, he is boiling in piss in hell. Jesus was a crazy rabbi and his mother was a whore according to jewish scriptures. merry xmas!

@J.W.D. Salvation76 Fuck your Jesus

Merry Christmas to all 💞

Hohoho.. islamophobic spread..

@@SyamAxylum93 Hohoho when one tells the truth, muslim calls islamophobic.... when a 60 yo man marries a 6 yo girl, muslim calls holy wedding.... when an innocent black dog is dead to being stoned by muslim, you call that animal is syaitan , dont be a donkey because God gives you brain to use... not just to follow a doctrine blindly. In islam, music is haram, dancing is haram, asking questiong about quran verses is haram, eating pig is haram but taqiyah is not haram, stoning and killing someone is not haram

Salamkhan114969 Syam only the sheeple believe the word islamaphobia exists. This stupid word was created by the UN to silence critics. I’m not a coward or a moron. Islam is mob mentality. No one knows what they truly believe in. It takes someone like AP to tell the truth. May Yahweh bless him x

@@SyamAxylum93 Fearing something dangerous as islam is totally ok.

hes an atheist lmfao😭

@@perfectlittlerat Not for long.

@@is17a985 wdym?

@@perfectlittlerat helping people to get out of the biggest satanic cult that is Islam, is of course God's work, even though he's not religious now.

@@chlq35 What about people who analyze other religions like Christianity and help people leave that religion, are they doing god's work as well?

I recommend you watch this: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dUyllD36MbM.html If you tell some truths and withhold others this constitutes as a lie. Would God bless one who tells lies?

Fool. You think that's deep knowledge. Better have sense

You are funny man. You clearly are an idiot that just believes what anyone tells you. I am actually surprised how this channel is by an ex-muslim when half the shit he says is false and the other half is misquoting or him failing to understand. I will copy and paste a comment i made here, and maybe you might begin to understand how wrong this video is.

This video is pretty stupid as it is pretty misleading. The problem is your lies are being believed by other idiots like you. So lets explain Allah means The God. Its not a name or anything, it just signifies that we are talking about the one god. The only god. Arab christians, jews and muslims all use the Allah when they mention their god. Second the name yaweh. Nobody is exactly sure of the origin of this name. Some say it translates to creator, or " he who makes things exist" something like that. If that was the case then its simply that yaweh exists for muslims as its one of the 99 names of allah. The name yaweh might mean literally mean "He is" or some say Lord. If that was a case then it still is not a contradiction. As Lord translates to basically god اله or رب. And god can be known as these things in arabic. Yaweh when literally translated to arabic is يهوه. It is pretty close to اله and it might be the origin it. There are no contradictions as each prophet preached to the people about the god, the one, the creator. Most of the names in the video are from prophets sent to the people of israel, so it makes sense that the prophets would use the language the people living there use. As each prophet reveals the message to the people in their native tongue. And if the israelites prophets had the word meaning god as part of their name its ok. As prophet muhammad's father was named Abdullah, before muhammad preached to the people the message of the quran. So how was a specific name for the god of muslims widely used before the birth of the man that preached that god's name. People that believe this guy's crap are probably uneducated fools that can't read or search for themselves.

no he doesnt

Thee name of the evil cult masquerading as a religion is Islam ...common sis, they can't get you. :-)

I hope you think that way about all religions. It wouldn't be wise to talk down Islam while still having stone age abrahamic beliefs!! Just saying...

Kelvin Raj Some? You're a bit optimistic, bud.

muslims won’t accept agree with u not because i fanatic on the contrary of that iam logical follow critical thinking but u take what u have heard for granted in quran god said to all mankind functioning your brains but u don`t

lufayoub hopes i read quran without any negative mindset but to be honest there is nothing miracle in quran and only repetition of Jews, Christians , degrade non muslims and fight for allah... 1 more thing that allah will put the disbelievers in hell.. wow allah also got ego problem like human beings..

lufayoub hopes kill the disbelievers and called it Holy War and u will be rewarded in heaven..

@@KelvinRaj1109 ,there is no such verse said so ,on the contrary there is verse in quran said who killed an innocent like killing all humans, o mankind i do create u male&female make u peoples &tribes to know each others,great truth of god this verse only make sure that islam is the truth first god has addressing all humans coz he is the god of all mankind secondly the aim of our creating is knowing each coz by that we will know we are all on the same footing of humanity

it is not the task of the church to enlighten you about islam, but rather its job is to preach the gospel to you!

@@herbstzeitlose1616 I'm taking about the meaning of those biblical names. I honestly did not know their meaning.

@@herbstzeitlose1616 It is the Church's moral obligation to warn about the religion that kills and persecutes Christians and that will lead souls to hell.

@@brendabrenda6782 not primary. But it is primarily the task of people to inform themselves about it and then to show moral courage.

YHWH uses even atheists to bring Glory to Him and to YESHUA the Son of Man !

Facts schmacts! You can prove anything with facts!👍

If they HAVE minds . . . .

please become muslim its the only way to God Allah

@Zack Smith Is your name Zakariya or Zakir by chance?

@Zack Smith Your reference explains why Christians can and in many cases do use Allah, but it does not show why Muslims refuse to use YHWH when some of their prophets have YHWH as part of their name.

Trumpian?

Zack Smith I read your article. Though, what is your point? Are you agreeing or disagreeing with AP?

@@yidiandianpang zackir Smith naik has low iq and lives in his own sweet world. He doesn't even get what the video is all about and thinks he has made some great points by posting a link which he himself has not read 😂

You know that basic understanding of the Arabic languages would break his videos. Would you like me to get educated about Christianity from a person who's personality is being ex-Christian

@@2ahmad_ tell me please what it means to a Christian?

Dear Ahmed biblical meaning of being a Christian is being Christ like

There is no etymology linking YHWH to Allahu. Allahu comes from Elohe. Get busted Sandman

Very well put mate

Real funny

and al-Lah is his pimp!

Muhammad moyherfufket

@@neerajprakash4271 moyerfofket, lol

V good point most people would miss this .

Good wine must age a bit.

Titus kriswanto by the way I’m Christian .your bang on the money most atheists don’t know much about religion.i

So? Some people became atheist because they're learning about religion in the first place

Fred LOL it’s been proven that atheists understand religion better than religious people, which is why we know it’s a bunch of crap.

Tbh idk if anyone can ever be this stupid, the word allah, had been used by the Christian and jewish arabs even before islam

This is evidence of names that are not translated and that the names in the Qur’an are correct AMAZING NEWS: Prophet Muhammad's Name Found in the Bible - Jewish Rabbis on ISLAM ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vTfaKs22RAs.html