How does the EU pass LAWS? 

EU citicen are called to vote for parliament

Why? The EU works fine, it's not a government! In fact it's the greatest political feat ever achieved in history. Not Caesar, Alexander the Great, Napoleon or Hitler with their armies could achieve the what the EU has achieved, a forum for debate and common law making. Europe is already united, it does not have to be a federation, it already has achieved everything a federation does for its constituent states and is becoming more relevant each day. The united states of europe already exist in all but name, that you don't recognize it is because it's the first of its kind, truly an unparalleled achievement in history.

Same number of senators for Luxembourg and Cyprus vs France and Germany? Are you dumb?

But at that stage, the Member States would lose all control on the EU system. And Member States are the main component where citizens reflect too - still

​@@Ketzakalthe european council would still decide the general course of the EU, and they're of course going to prioritise their nations interests

I'm trying to get a handle on what your suggesting and whether it would enhance or diminish a single member state's ability to muck things up. Just picking a country at absolute random here, for the sake of example, would what you're suggesting make lil' ol' Hungary more of a menace to the European Union than it already is? Having one or two member states that can throw a spanner in the works made sense when there were six members, but for 27...

No they are made by the WEF

its because they are the REAL illuminati (bad joke!)

Because the commission are actually experts in their fields. The parlament elects the agenda and a points every commissioner. So laws can be made to actually do what's intended and then debated by the politicians of what to do or oppose instead of the reverse

​@@inteallsviktigt the nurse is the biggest expert I guess

The Commission is indirectly elected that just like the national governments. The legislature also has full control to modify the legislation and vote on it. The Commission does not get a vote.

@@falsevacuum4667 more indirection results in more twisted representation

@@angelg3986 Sure, but the Commission isn't really any more indirectly elected than the British or German governments.

You only think that because you don't know enough to really understand what the EU is. Europe is already united, not into a federation but into a confederation, and that is what it likely will remain. The EU is currently more relevant than it has ever been, the war in Ukraine has proven that. Without the EU half of europe would have been at war right now, like it has been in every conflict that arose for over 2000 years. The fact that the eu has rallied most of europe behind Ukraine, is a unprecedented feat of political engineering that has no equal in history. So the EU works as designed, to prevent major conflict between the nations of europe and find unity in diversity, through collaboration and interdependence. You just saying it's irrelevant and impotent is just you ignorance talking, The EU was conceived as a peace project, and since we have gone for over 80 years without major war in europe, we can safely conclude, the EU works!

@@lowlandtech I disagree with your optimistic view of the EU. I used to have high hopes for the EU as a peace project, but after doing more research and observing its actions, I have changed my mind. The EU is not only a peace project, but also an economic and political one, and it has many flaws and challenges that undermine its relevance and effectiveness. For example, the EU has failed to address the migration crisis, which has caused humanitarian tragedies, social tensions, and security risks. The EU has failed to uphold the rule of law in some of its member states, such as Poland and Hungary, which have eroded democracy and judicial independence. The EU has failed to counter the rise of populism and nationalism, which have threatened its cohesion and values. The EU has failed to reduce the social and economic inequalities among its member states, which have fueled discontent and resentment. The EU does not have a united defensive and foreign policy, and often its member states only pursue what is best for them and not for the EU as a whole. For example, the war in Ukraine has not proven the EU's strength, but rather its weakness and impotence. The EU has not been able to prevent Russia's aggression, nor to provide adequate support to Ukraine. The EU's sanctions have been ineffective and inconsistent, and some member states have even undermined them by pursuing their own interests with Russia, such as Germany with the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. The EU was conceived as a peace project, but it has not been able to prevent or resolve conflicts in its neighbourhood or beyond. For example, the EU has not been able to stop the wars in Syria, Libya, Yemen, or Nagorno-Karabakh, which have caused immense suffering and instability. The EU has not been able to promote democracy and human rights in Belarus, Turkey, or China, which have oppressed their own people and challenged the international order. The EU has not been able to deal with the threats of terrorism, cyberattacks, or disinformation, which have endangered its security and credibility. The EU has not been able to cope with the challenges of climate change, digitalization, or globalization, which have transformed the world and required new solutions. The EU is not as united or relevant as you think. It is facing a crisis of identity, legitimacy, and leadership. It is losing its influence and credibility in the world. It is struggling to adapt to a changing and complex environment. It is not working as designed, but rather as divided. You are not ignorant, but you are naive. The EU is not a success story, but a work in progress.

@@nemanjaognjenovic40 The primary directive of the EU is to prevent war between the major nations of Europe like there were in the last 2000 years, and that they achieved. All these other countries, are not in Europe, it's not in their mandate to prevent those. The EU is the first of its kind, they need to learn and figure things out, furthermore it only has existed in its current political form for just over two decades, give it a fawking break with those fantastical problems solving skills it is supposed to have. For European cohesion to flourish, nationalism needs to die out with all those people who remember a day that the EU did not exist. Because their mentality is the cause that lead to 43 thousand wars in over 2 millenia, in europe alone. You cannot just wave it a magic stick and make human stupidity go away. It has reduced war in Europe from two a month to just two a handful in 3 quarters of a century, that is the major accomplishment. To look at government to solve our problems is both stupid and wishful thinking. Everything else is up to us, the people of Europe. We need to work tireless to make the European project work, to do anything less is treason. Those who stand in the way of progress makes them an enemy of mankind.

@@nemanjaognjenovic40 I disagree with some things what you said. The EU is a continental union, not a country like the Confederate States of America, that's why it doesn't work. We are talking about 28 democracies that will never agree with each other, and it is all about turning these 28 democracies into one cohesive democracy. This solution will work and it will lead to federation. On the other hand, small countries like Estonia or Latvia will not be heard in this one democratic system, so the best solution will be a confederation. The EU does not have a presidential or parliamentary system, but an intergovernmental system, then how could the EU fail at anything if it rules nothing? The most important decisions in the EU are taken at the European Council by European Leaders.

@@nemanjaognjenovic40 The projects intention has allways been to prevent wars between its *members*, of the countrie the EU has according to you failed to prevent them from going to war NONE are in the EU. Just like all the other "failings" are *not* within the EU power to actually do either. Are you blaming the EU for operating *within* its mandate?

Don't you dare utter that disgusting name here

The EU is much better than the HRE. I agree with more integration, though!

Eu is the reincarnation of Roman Empire, but democratic and whith France and Germany on the top.

@@davidepalmisano5788 I meant the second one. It wasn't that great.

@@zionismisterrorism8716 the Eu and the Roman empire are very similar in size, the Holy Roman Empire was extremely smaller in size.

Surprised to see someone investing with Ms. Olivia Andrew, I am currently on my fifth reinvestment with her and my portfolio has grown tremendously. Their weekly signals are highly profitable.

You invest with Ms Olivia Andrew too? Wow that woman has been a blessing to me and my family.

she often interacts on Telegrams, using the user name below

OliviaandrewFXT

Glad to see Ms. Olivia Andrew, mentioned here my husband recommended her to me when I was in Spain during covid she is amazing

?

@@thodan467 it's just EU land fairy tales. Make the EU sound like the good ship Lollipop 🍭.

@@rebeccanoble6797 source for your well reasoned Bias?

@@thodan467 seven solid years of listening to EU sychophantic zombies and comparing it with real life.

@@thodan467 how's Qatar gate going? Do you remember when France boycotted UK beef for six years after the EU vets declared it BSE free? And the EU stood by and did *ZILCH?* Remember that? Oh yeah, the EU "looks after its citizens", except when it doesn't. This is just lying to yourselves. I'm glad we got out.