How far Prithviraj was great? I PRITHVIRAJ CHAUHAN I MOHAMMAD GHORI I INDIAN HISTORY 

Sach sun ke jhatka laga 😅😅

Bhai sachai to btaya h na profesor Dr Punia ne accepte kro

Ram puniya ko mughal bhut pasand hain bhai that's why 😂 baki history ki baat kre to iska exposed video bhi available hai RU-vid pr

@@human9h36 but ….. Rampuniya ki baten zyada authentic hoti hai

@@mr_khan_11 bhai accepted

और साथ ही महान राजा वह भी होता है जो अपने देश की सीमा को सुरक्षित रखता है...

सम्राट अशोक शिवाजी महाराज

Samrat Prithvi Raj Chauhan aur Maharana Pratap ye mahan Raja the

करेक्ट

Bhai ek dam sahi baat boli tumne

आप ने बिल्कुल ठीक कहा

सराहनीय टिप्पणी है आपकी👍🙏

🙏🏼🙏🏼👌🏻

How many kings built schools where children of all Varnas could study together and teachers from all Varnas were teaching. How many hospitals were built where people of all Varnas could be treated and the doctors of all Varnas were involved. Same with roads, wells, temples, public transportation etc.......by "these so called great rulers"?

@@thankskads6215 Very few. Whatever they did it was more to consolidate their kindom.

@@jhakkuagadhi842 please mention any of them. The story of Eklavya and Dronacharya is in front of us. When did social reformation begin in present physical India, and by whom...

Ha andekaar ka bhi

In dono ki funding kaha se hoti vo bhi puchhiye ji🙏

Punyani ji koi itihaskar nahi hai. Itihas ko galat tarike se pesh karne me mahir hai yah

किताब का नाम?

The best book is Prithvi raj raso

Akhchay ne to sb badal dala,, histry man bn jayega ab,,,

नहीं था

@@rationalhuman3557 सूरजमल ने सुझाव दिय थे, कि कैसे नॉर्थ भारत में सर्दियों में युद्ध करना है, मराठों को बोला था कि अपनी पत्नियों को युद्ध के समय में भरतपुर भेज दो, और भी बहुत कुछ. पर मराठों ने उसका अपमान किया. राजस्थान के दूसरे राजा तो पहले से अलग हो गए थे उनके उप्पर कोई सवाल नहीं करते. मराठों में बहुत over confidence हो गया था. इसीलिए हार गए. कोई jaeda दिन नहीं चली था युद्ध. युद्ध के बाद मराठों सेना का इलाज भी सूरजमल ने ही किया था, जो बच गए थे, और उनको सुरक्षित उनके घर तक पहुंचाया था.

@Sudeep Ohlayan ,,,,,,, magar history ke sources se pata lagta hai ki surajmal ki demaand thi marathao se ki delhi ki satta use mile ,,,,,,,,,maratha is baat se sehmat nahi the ,,,,,

@@rationalhuman3557 हर राजा की इच्छा होती है कि उसका राज्य बढ़े. अगर मराठा जीत जाते तो वो सही होते पर वो हार गए. बहुत बुरी हार हुई थी. इसका मतलब वो इतने तैयार नहीं थे, अगर मान लेते सूरजमल की बात क्या पता भारत का भविष्य कुछ और होता. 99% sources को counter check करना चाहिए. डॉ Ram Puniyani जी इस विषय पर कोई answer दे सकते हैं. उनको इतिहास की अच्छी जानकारी है.

@@rationalhuman3557 ओ भाई जरा पढ़ के आओ मराठाओं ने हिंदुओं पर कितना कर्जा प्रति वर्ष मांगा था अरे आधी रियासते बर्बाद हो गयी थी कर्ज की वजह से तो कोई भी हिंदू क्यों साथ देता मराठों का में राजपूत हु पर मैं महाराजा सूरजमल जाट के बारे में एक भी उपसब्द नहीं सुन सकता हिंदुओं पर अत्याचार किये थे लगान के नाम पर मराठों ने एक बार जरूर पढ़ो भाई राजस्थान और मराठों के बारे में फिर अपने आप समझ जाओगे क्यों कोई राजा मदद करने नहीं आया

💗

Ek bar bhi zikr nhi kar sakte ye unka qki alah Udal khand mai khud kai bar aya hai ki prithviraj shabd bhedi ban chalate the.. fir inhe kehna padega ki dekhiye Alha Udal khand bhi jhootha hai aur prithviraj raso bhi. bas inke al masir sahi hai jis mai toh ye chutiyapa tk likha hai ki Chishti aya hindustan, prithviraj ko shraap diya blah blah.. jiska zikr aur kahin nahi milta. Fictional inka ye poora nazariya hai history ko todh marodkar muslims ko mahaan batane ka aur hamare mahan Hindu rajaon ko neecha dikhane ka. Q koi khud ka dimag nahi lagata bas sab inke behkave mai a jate hain

Nhi dikhyenge kyuki kuta us k liye hi bhonkta hai jo usko tukda dalta hai

Alha Udal Ahir kbse hogye vo to rajput tai

जय वीर अहीर आल्हा उधल 🙏

@@jaisinghkhangarot6774 bhaiya ji ye sab batein karna ab toh chordh do Tum sab. Ahir ya rajput. Jo bhi ladhta hai.. woh ek khsatriya hai. Veer bhogya vasundhra ko bhool gaye kya

Jab kabhi sach bhaher nikl ker aata hain to Mahan log BJP ki sajis batane lag jate hain

Dear Srivastva ji, After the death of Samrat Harshavardhan , the Manuvadi forces created and supported smaller kingdoms for their vested interests. From Samrat Bimbisar to Samrat Ashok and upto Samrat Harshavardhan, Buddhism was the main religion. The brahmanical forces got a chance of spreading their religion after the death of Harshavardhan in 647 CE. They supported a bunch of newly anointed rulers who in their turn agreed to follow and promote Brahmanvadi religion. Later on, some of these rulers were christened as Rajputs. It may be noted here that from Bimbisar in 6th century BCE to Harshavardhan in 7th century CE, none of the kings was a Kshatriya or Rajput in the brahmanical sense. In 16th century, the Brahmins realised that although they eulogised and propagated the Kshatriyas as Kings in their scriptures yet in recorded history, none of the rulers was from a Kshatriya clan as defined by them. Hence , they started calling the rulers propelled by them during 700 CEto 1200 CE as Rajput or neo Kshatriya. In order to establish this they chose Prithviraj as their one of the hero and wrote an imaginary story of his valour and romance in Prithviraj Raso. The Delhi rulers of the time were ignored due to being secular and patronising Jains and Buddhist equally. The Raso author even got the Delhi rulers, the Tomaras dethroned by Prithviraj Chauhan whereas upto 1192, they were the sovereign kings. It was the Tomar king Chahad Pal Tomar who faced the Mohammed Ghauri in both the battles of Tarrain in 1191 and 1192. There is a seminal book written by Harihar Niwas Dwivedi of Gawaliar Dilli Ke Tomar, available on internet in PDF form free of cost . You wii find the answers to your queries in the said book in detail and authoritatively. Regards.

बनाफर वंश के राजपूत सेनापति थे। जो चंदेल राजपूत थे उनके यहां

बचपन में ,, आल्हा ऊदल पर लिखी गई पोथी थी जो वर्षा काल में बहुदा सुनाई देती थी ,,कानौं में मनमोहक वातावरण प्रस्तुति ,, आल्हा ऊदल बड़े,,लड़ईय्या जिनकी मार सही ना जाये ,,,,,, आश्चर्य है वो हिन्दू मानस संस्कृति सुहावना समय सब समाप्त हो गया , कोई उसपर टीका टिप्पणी करने पर भी नहीं सोचता ,, आल्हा ऊदल सम्बंधित पुस्तकों का प्रकाशन , पाठ्यक्रम सब समाप्त हो गया ,,, आल्हा ऊदल ,, पृथ्वीराज प्रसंस्करण किसी हिन्दू को ज्ञात नहीं ,,अब हिन्दूओं को केवल औरंगजेब का ही ज्ञान दिया जा रहा ,,

Rasput nahi the, ahir vansh se the

Rajput Raja ke ghar per Unki Shiksha hui thi

Prithviraj 3 was a king of a small kingdom not an emperor like chandragupta, ashoka, samudragupta, akbar..

1990 मे कश्मिरी पंडित ओंको भागाया यह भी साच या गलत फहमी है यह भी एक बार बाताई ए

Prathviraj Chauhan was never defeated except second battle of tarain, he even defeated Chandel - Banaphar's and appointed his general Pajawan as governor of Mahoba Also there is no such relation between Prathviraj and Jaichand, there is no contemporary proof of that

Abe kaha padh ke aaye ho Yar dono mosere Bhai the,jaichand kannoj ka raja or prithvi Raj Rajasthan ka.yar kaha se late ho ye jhantu facts🤣🤣🤣

Charan tribe singing near a fort in Rajasthan,told this story.after few years of war,Chand bardai got to know that samrat is in ghazni prison,he went there.n than sultan gyasuddin was killed by samrat with shabdbhedi baan.shahabuddin ghoris elder brother gyasuddin ghori was sultan.

Bhai jise tum sach man kr baithe ho tumhe kese pata ki wo hi sach hai

Aa गया andhbhgt,😜😜😜😜

@@samstollan13 हा अंधभक्त ... भाई पृथ्वी गोल होती हे ..चपटी नही 😅😅😅 कही पर लिखा हे चपटी हे तो मान नही लेते आप जैसे ....इतिहास देख लो ...और बेहतर होगा आप अपनी उपाधी हमे ना दे ... "अंधभक्त "

@@hiteshjijotiya2083 यही प्रश्न हमने आप से पूछा तो ... आप क्या कहेंगे ...

​@@saurabhparmar97 bandar. sooraj nigal Leta hai ek aadmi ka 10 sar ek aurat khet jotne se. ek admi kheer khaane se. Paisa hua ek haathi ki. chooha sawari. 😅😅😅😅 ye kis kitaab me hai ??????

Do you love your civilisation,? Do you think Ghouri was a brutal invader?

@@BeyondBorders2020 Ofcourse I love my civilization. Prithviraj Chauhan, Rana Sanga, Rana Pratap, Shivaji, Guru Govind Singh, Maharaja Ranjeet Singh and Jhansi Ki Rani were the bravest Indian warrioles. Every Indian must respect them. Howver we must be objective in our history.

@@rebasingh258 ,,, 😂😂 aren't Md Akbar Jahangir Tipu sultan Haidar ali Indian

@@jayantanag7736 I did not understand uour question.

@@jayantanag7736 Sir absolutely they were. But unfortunately in our country political parties are using them as per their religious vote bank. I fear someday they will change our history book as well. 😔

Thanks a lot❤❤🙏🙏

Sach sach hota hai...Hindu ya muslim nahi

@ Yash Shrivastav aapke pehchanne se itihas nahi badal jayega wo to wahi rahega Jo hai.

क्यों लम्पट मोहमद ने 6 की आयशा को चोदा इसपर तुम अंधनामाज़ी को बुरा क्यों लगता है

Randi Ayesha aur lampat Muhammad ke naam se chamche bhrak jate hai 😑 😅

😀😀😀😀😀

​@@rejakulahmed8858Hata atannakwaadi

Jo tumara liya sahi bola unha Allah sahi rakha jo na bola unhe 72 hura na mila ,🤣🤣🤣🤣

For Muslims Mughals were flawless,isn’t it😀😀

@@deepaksawlani5516 ghanta. Most of them were flawed when seen through lens of Islam Many of them enjoyed women and wine and never cared for their subjects

@@deepaksawlani5516 and for you your modi ji is flawless right ? 🤡

Fine conclusion.

True...he was a regional king like 2 or 3 states...he had not large area or large army

Dispassionate post- mortem par excellence.

Ya . But many thing you forget. 1 His love for his empire (or dynasty) 2he made many mistakes. But he is still a great King . Because he stood as a bulwark against Muhammad Ghori till his heroic death.3 He was a born solider and courageous and fearless warrior . He has one fo fearless warrior in Indian history .

At that time rajputs were brave it was jaichand, prithvi raj

​@@studywithrajat3270 bro ghori was not a born soldier he was defeated by woman when he invaded Gujarat

Brother. He is paid media of communists and. Tukde tukde gang

Puniyani is no Historian

Are you saying that Akshay Kumar is historian??😂😂🤣

​@@SAFFRONINFERNO Dr Ram Punyani has got science background & he was a professor in Bombay IIT. But he studied history on his own interest. Since long he delivers lectures, conducts workshop with varied groups. And he always presents history objectively. He volunteers with the organisations that are working for national integration. Dr Punyani is very learned person.

@@daliakarmakar5123 Love Da delivers speeches He only vomits his crap among his coterie If he comes outside his mulla / Jholachap network he will search for holes to hide

Tab tak hi sirf jab tak woh islam ki sacchai na bole.... Nupur sharma ne to sirf Qur'an ko quote kiya tha.... Kya hua tab?

Chandbardai ne jo prithvi raj ke bare me likha vo kalpnik tha lekin sanyogita ke bare me Jo likha vo Satya. Ye kaise ho sakta hai?

@@Rajesh_singh_manhas bolne ka ek tarika hota hai agar hum tumhari sab sacchayi batane Lage fir mirchi lagti hein reference ke sath jawab milta hai fir tum jalte ho.

@@Rajesh_singh_manhas Jinko aaz tak apna itihas nhi pta chala oh Kuran ky Bary me bolne ka haq rakhty hain kya Nupur Sharma Ko puchhlo 4 veed me se kitna giyan hai use apne Dharam ky Bary kya pta hai usko jinko Hindustan ki hindi nhi aai azztak samajh me oh Hume Arab ki Arabi sikhengy Humne kab tumhary Dharam guruon Ko gali di ya Bura kaha tumhara Dharam tumhe Mubarak ho Hara Islam hame Mubarak Dharmik Wahi hai jo apne burai Ko khatam Kary naki dusron me burai nikale or apna khabar nhi

You are right, this fellow glorifies mughals.

@@venkatdeshraj7845 TRUTH WILL ALWAYS HURT U

Brother, I think, the irony perceived by you is just due to effect of context. In a time when ordinary Hindu King like Prithviraj is projected as being great (more than they were), obviously honest historian will deny it. (Because these kings has done little for upliftment of public, fighting against social evils or had any futuristic vision). At the same time when ordinary Muslim rulers are depicted as villain (more than the were), any honest historian will correct it by refutation. Look at it conversely, if someone will demonize Hindu kings (more than they were), person like Ram puniyani will also oppose it. Or if someone will try to project Muslim rulers hero disproportionately, he will also correct it by refutation. But incidently, in present context this cannot be a case. Had he been truly against Hindu kings, then he would have denied glory of great historical figures like Ashok, Shivaji, Harsh etc.

Right

Hi

You are absolutely right.

Strength lies in unity, what unites us? Cast division magnifying by these fake seculars

Hope all citizens like you understand because every day there is no peace but war. They want to make the democratic country into dictator rule so everyday new muddas. Ppl are diverted mean while the actual plans are executed while they manipulate citizens with news. The muddas are only for communal disputes by these devils. They enjoy the luxury and citizens suffer the bloodshed. Taj Mahal is in seven wonders of the world, lucknow historical name, coins are with historical marks and so on… citizens are diverted for these reasons.