No video :(

How good is RAW video? (Canon 5D mark ii)

Подписаться 404 тыс.

Просмотров 1 млн

50% 1

In this video, I test the new RAW video recording with the Canon 5D mark ii.
Learn how to film yourself and others with our brand new course: andyax.com/cou...
Raw video recording gives you uncompressed video, which looks like it was shot with a big budget camera! To achieve this, you need to download and install the Magic Lantern hack in to your camera, and download the RAW build. You can read more about it here: www.magiclanter...
PS. Be careful when installing the hack, because it may damage your camera.
Since the RAW hack on the Canon 5D mark ii doesn't support FULL HD video capture when using the whole sensor, I shot everything in 2.35:1. To capture RAW video, you need a really fast CF/SD card. It's quite complicated to work with the RAW files in post production, but since it's RAW, it's a dream to colorcorrect the videos :)
Thomas Leypoldt is a composer, and he have made the music for several of my videos. He does actually have a RU-vid channel where he uploads his great filmatic soundtracks. I feel privileged to have a personal soundtrack. Thanks Thomas :) Check it out here: • The Andyax Soundtrack
If your want to stay tuned with our videos, you can subscribe here on RU-vid. You can also visit my Facebook page here: / andyaxproductions
My homepage is: www.axp.no
Thanks for watching :)

Опубликовано:

3 сен 2013

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 810

@Andyax 3 года назад

Learn how to film yourself and others with our brand new course: andyax.com/course/

@Thoracius 2 года назад

8 years later and the color rendition on the raw video from this 16 year old camera is still way better than most cameras available today and the level of detail is enough for most use cases.

@fish2036 2 года назад

It's 14 years old actually, but yeah I know what you're saying!

@classic1625 Год назад

yeah its absolutely crazy

@Photoshopuzr Год назад

thats why im still using mine😁

@RipRecords 10 лет назад

The flickering on your video comes from the Shutter Speed and the current that is pumping into your electricity. Adjust your shutter speed until you see the flicker stop. Usually somewhere in between 1/50th and 1/60th

@love4musicuk 10 лет назад

I use 1/50th and I always have a flicker if for example im infront of the computer and filming myself. Is this due to the electricity current?

@RipRecords 10 лет назад

Yes, I believe. I have the same problem when recording in front of my 50" LCD TV as well. Try a few stops below of above that...it's usually 1 or 2 stops away. If it flickers at 1/50th for you, it should stop at 1/60th (or at least be a lot less apparent). I know the Golden Rule of doubling the shutter speed of your Frame Rate, but sometimes you have to break this rule to get rid of a bad flicker from electrical currents.

@love4musicuk 10 лет назад

RipRecords Yeah I try to stick to the golden rule and I thought if I broke that it'd make the video look weird, but I shall try it in future, Thanks :)

@RipRecords 10 лет назад

Sure thing bud. It won't make the video look weird at all. I love sticking to the Golden Rule too, but sometimes, in cases like these...you have to break them. Bumping up the shutter speed can actually make your image a little sharper too. Bumping it up a stop or two to help resolve a flicker image won't hurt your image at all. It's more psychological than anything.

@brown55061 10 лет назад

RipRecords Would the faster shutter effect the moray at all, like the top of the building at 4:28? In RAW is was even more obvious than h.264. I saw some vids where the ISO and shutter settings could cause that issue. Just curious what you guys have found.

@MichaelManus 10 лет назад

This honestly had me saying "wow" throughout the whole video. I am in awe, the RAW video is so beautiful!

@enduraman1 9 лет назад

You are very photogenic and your smile looks amazingly good on camera. More people should learn from your videos. I can really feel the positive energy and excitement you exhibit in your video regarding the use of RAW video quality. Your enthusiasm is remarkable.

@wanderingsailor5503 10 лет назад

I believe you can not record audio when filming in raw. Do not worry though, simply use a slate when filming. Hold the slate in front of the camera before you start a take(make sure the audio is running) then simply clap the slate. Later in post find the peaking point in the audio and the clap in the video and simply line them up. You can also use a program like Plural Eyes. I hope I was able to help you some.

@theseanwardshow 10 лет назад

Wow, what a world of difference

@Andyax 11 лет назад

Thanks, and no problem :) I used Canon 50mm f1.4 when talking to the camera, and Canon 24-70mm f2.8 for the indoor shots and Canon 24-105mm f4 for all other shots.

@EdoHDpro 7 лет назад

This comparison is not really fair in my opinion, the picture profile you chosen to shoot h.264 looks desaturated, like neutral or other flat picture profile, and RAW footage looks graded in your videos, so that obviously shows such a big difference in quality. So this is you leaning towards suggesting how cool is the RAW and not letting us decide under same picture profile how much difference there is... interesting thought RAW looks a slight bit like HDR...

@MrFolaz 7 лет назад

I thought the same . but the 200x zoom in both videos comparison was useful , much detail in the raw footage .

@ihsanisk2320 7 лет назад

While I agree as far as the grading and white balance goes, the sharpness difference was really obvious. Was that in-camera or post sharpening? Didn't look that way to me.

@donepearce 7 лет назад

Have you tried grading H.264? The point is that you CAN grade the raw footage - so you do.

@Ben-rz9cf 6 лет назад

To me RAW is the next best thing to HDR because it is similar in principle. (more color / value range than the naked eye can see) But HDR is leagues better because bracketing allows for so much more light information to be captured. Even as better sensors are invented that capture practically HDR color depth in a single shot, we can then bracket that down 3x or 5x and capture 3-5x the data.

@reporterliveru 6 лет назад

Все верно говоришь!

@Dhruv1223 9 лет назад

HOLY SHIT!!!!! The amount of detail lost with the lossy formats they use is unbelievable. Even the colors aren't accurate.

@IBMua 9 лет назад

Dhruv1223 About the colors, that's called a white balance for the most part. He could've set it accordingly during the shooting, though it would've been hard to set it perfectly.

@Dhruv1223 9 лет назад

Ihor Menshykov hmmm. But the whites seemed fine more or less.

@futuresdojo 8 лет назад

+Ihor Menshykov Well put, I think that would have at least helped with a fundamental standard to make the evaluation a little more "fair" - despite the lack of proper white balancing on the h.264, the difference was pretty astounding... Btw, could you tell if he was shooting at 30 fps in some scenes then 24 on others? I couldn't be sure, but it felt like he was shooting at 2 different frame rates for some scenes; I know that his shutter speed was pretty fast when you could see the man serving them their food (when he walked across camera he was a little choppy - a result from a fast shutter speed setting). Let me know if you could the frame rate. Andyax has been awesome with sharing great knowledge from his tests and short films, but I wish he could be a little more elaborate for the standard questions most videographers will ask: 1. Shutter speed 2. Frame rate 3. Camera Body (he shared that) 4. Lens 5. Picture profile (only applicable to h.264 obviously) 6. Gear used (slider, stabilizer, tripod etc) 7. Polarizers or filters

@rogerunderhill4267 7 лет назад

Dhruv1223 he said he did a lot of work in post to get it to look like that and agree - it looks amazing!

@4eyesnb 7 лет назад

well, the amount of space saved on H264 format is also unbelievable

@DSLRguide 11 лет назад

That footage looks great! Was the in-camera sharpening turned down all the way? there were definitely some aliasing issues, but still a far clearer image. It may just be a problem that the Mkii has.

@rafsannasfar5137 3 года назад

@DheerejSingh yes

@PerspectiveFocusFilm 10 лет назад

the only issue i see with the RAW video vs. the H.264 video is the amount of aliasing that has become more prominent than before. But it's great how much sharper the image is and how clean the light is on everything!

@jolly7506 8 лет назад

Light flickering is more likely happening not because of a tweak\program, but because of the shutter speed. Normally you set shutter speed 1\25 to 1\50 if you record 25fps. Also, it might depend on light sources. Source: movie making experience with 5dmk2

@olehansen_Norway Год назад

@Jolly I did not find any reference to ""movie making experience with 5dmk2", can you please guide me where to find this?

@Andyax 6 лет назад

Here are our best filmmaking videos, in one playlist 😀🎬 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-iEFHXt94XWY.html

@Richman2736 10 лет назад

Konge!! Synes du bør vurdere å lage en skikkelig gjenomgang av hva man bør tenke på når man skal skyte RAW. Det mangler ikke på tutorials om hvordan man installerer, men heller hvordan instilinger man bør ha på kamera til post! bare en ide! Forøvrig, synes dere er flinke og håper dere blir den norske versjonen av film riot (med norsk egenart! Keep up the good work!!

@beautyspotty9444 5 лет назад

I am home because of an episode of depression. And I try to do things that are Fun for me and help me get out of this again, for example video editing. But this incredible music made me cry so hard (I cry easily at the Moment) 🥴😅😶🙈

@nowawakened1720 4 года назад

Smart 👍

@nickpavlou5023 3 года назад

Jesus loves you!

@mihailandrei1100 8 лет назад

Wow....RAW is amazing........Good job, man!!!

@sanshinron 10 лет назад

Not a real comparison. h264 footage was not color corrected at all and the white balance is off (it's blue). RAW footage on the other hand had to be color corrected and is warm, that's why colors seem more pleasant. This is pointless. I want to see a comparison between color corrected h264 and color corrected RAW. I'm sure RAW will win, but the difference won't be nearly as big.

@flywithmeFSX 10 лет назад

I think you might be right on this... Actually I can't imagine how there could be even colour and sharpness differences that obvious. Would be really nice to see a non colour graded side by side comparison.

@flywithmeFSX 10 лет назад

Actually I have to correct myself. I tried shooting RAW on my 600D (only capable of processing sth about 900p) and it really looks that much different than the compressed h264 video. It indeed is more blue and green, overall much colder than the default video, which means you would have to really colour correct the footage in order to receive comparable picture.

@DigThat32 9 лет назад

***** I've only shot stills in RAW & those files are big. How much footage do you think you can get on a 64gb card?

@DigThat32 9 лет назад

Got it, thanks Kyle

@RomanHoltwick1 6 лет назад

exactly!

@misterpaulggftw9103 Месяц назад

In the shot in 1:21 , I attribute the non-raw H.264 giving that indie film look of the 2010s while the RAW is giving that Netflix indie look. Though, I love the non-Raw version because it is really nostalgic and there's a charm in it. The RAW video is really good to. More so, my liking is only pulled through sentimental feelings.

@navefluxos 8 лет назад

Eu me pergunto se isso pode danificar o meu equipamento. Eu não tenho muita experiência com this'm do Brasil não entendo o que ele diz no vídeo. Alguém já usou? Eu quero comprar um Canon 6D vai trabalhar nele?

@zuffenhaussen 8 лет назад

+Willian Silva Oficial Eu não tenho muita informação sobre como lanterna mágica funciona 6D. Eu tenho um 7D e eu um grande trabalho para vídeos de nível avançado e profissional. Eu tenho quase dois anos para tê-lo instalado no meu computador não tenha dado qualquer problema, na verdade, eu nunca conheci ninguém que tenha danificado seu equipamento. o aviso é dado, porque é um desenvolvimento de software não é Canon, por isso, se houver algum dano não vai cobrir a sua garantia. Se você me perguntar, eu acho que você deve esgotar a curva de aprendizado com tudo o que de fábrica traz a câmera e, em seguida, estender suas habilidades para tudo o que oferece ML. lembranças. Special thanks to Google Translator. :)

@FesliyanStudios 10 лет назад

I see major sharpness improvements, but not much in dynamic range in the raw. Am I wrong? I'm speaking only for the Mark 2 - which is also what I own. I think the Mark 3 is where raw has major improvements in the dynamic range??

@bkthirumalai63 11 лет назад

You look like a honest guy with a true passion behind the lens. I wish you good luck man! Amazing how simple you visually explain!

@DoubleGauss 7 лет назад

Great video. The best thing about RAW is you can run it through Lightroom and color correct just as you would with still photos.

@imghetto1 11 лет назад

WOW!! That looks amazing ! Is is just my eyes or is the RAW footage much sharper than the normal footage!

@qtrust 11 лет назад

DSLR filmmaker here. For some reason, my eyes welled up when I saw the first RAW images in your video. Technology is beautiful. Well done.

@diegodelbarco2876 11 месяцев назад

Mark II? That’s was so great!!!

@LordGoatAlmighty 9 лет назад

I have an EOS500D that has been pretty much dead for a while now, in that the 'nifty fifty' lens is stuck on the body and the connections to the lens(es) and flash long since failed. I knew about Magic Lantern way back, but it didn't offer much more and was near impossible to install. With my camera dead(ish), I figured I might as well check out ML and play around. Now I wish I'd gone back to check ML a lot earlier, because the difference is astonishing. It doesn't seem possible that something as simple as ML could change the video quality so much. The level of control available for video and stills has really rekindled my love for photography.

@JordanDaFatMan 8 лет назад

I just wanted to say, Thank you Andyax. You have made it possible for me to follow my dream to becoming a film producer, by simply passing off your knowledge to others. Just a little bit of time and I will achieve that dream! I wish you the best of luck, and keep doing what you do. Cheers!

@SuperWigMaker 9 лет назад

The thing is that cameras are not powerful enough to make the best rendering in real time thus they ruin the quality. I can see here that the edges suffer so much, the raw video is at least more crispy in the good sense. also having the video in raw format gives the ability for rendering softwares to give the best result because this video is seen on youtube thus the final quality is H.264 but the post production compress could do a better job at giving more data where is needed. the differences in colour are made by the same factor, an object might have multiple tiny colours that make it, by smearing the edges of colours you literally create an average colour for the whoole object which is not "true colour" of the object.

@PolyesterCandy 8 лет назад

I have to laugh at the thumb's down. What the hell do people expect? Thank you for taking the time for yet another FREE video for the public. Fortunately you can see those who appreciate your time far outweigh the thankless few. Great vid.

@starilie 11 лет назад

Oh my God. The colors are incredible! And the detail is so refined.

@thebrothersthre3987 8 лет назад

yeah it would help it you properly white balanced the non raw photos. Either way though the raw video is much sharper.

@mmc5261 5 лет назад

theBrothersThre3 only cause he made it that way raw is not a sharper image just more colour information to work with before you compress it to make it a viewable video image

@Tonicwine999 10 лет назад

Fantastic video... only thing I would have liked is a small part on how to change to raw video and how you converted and worked with the video in post. Cheers

@Andyax 11 лет назад

Jepp. But I slightly overexposed the outside, to compensate for the indoor. But not to much, since I didn't want to make it completely white. Since the room is white an bright, it was enough light indoor as well. Since it's shot in raw, I could easily use fill light in post to raise the shadows :)

@HolaJulen 11 лет назад

The colors in the RAW are pretty amazing! WOW! ;)

@matty9460 9 лет назад

wow the sensor picks up so much more detail in raw

@TeamFlamingStones 9 лет назад

Alltid morsomt å støte på noen norske videoer, der det åpenbart er kvaliteten på innholdet og ikke min egen lokasjon som bestemmer at jeg får den som forslag :)

@keiralee 7 лет назад

Wow, the raw footage is absolutely gorgeous!

@Luigimenta 7 лет назад

Ti sono grato per questo video.

@robertshaw1635 9 лет назад

Is there a clip max time limit on the 5D Mark II in raw for Full HD at 2.35.1 ? In order to compare H.264 you really need to color correct it at least, as the raw treatment of Adobe AF creates a post production look not obtainable in camera so uncorrected H.264. I think even adding some grading to the H.264 would make the comparison even richer. I am of the thought that raw is great when you dont want to add lighting, but that with proper lighting even the humble H.264 can look cinematic.

@jake2eproductions 10 лет назад

I would absolutely love you if you could show us the process of getting the RAW .dng files to a video file to edit in a NLE

@wildernessandme1744 3 года назад

Uhhh... That piano music is HEAVEN to my ears! :)

@BeatsPlanetMusic 7 лет назад

Ignore the sharpness difference guys, as the picture style he choose for H264 likely has sharpness on default (in the middle) and witg Raw internal processing is bypassed altogether

@MrFavorite01 10 лет назад

Man, the color depth looks amazing in RAW. Definitely looks less dull. That, and the compression artifacts are pretty much nonexistent. Well, from what I can tell past RU-vid's compression anyway.

@DeathBlackWish 8 лет назад

It's definitely sharper, but it's a little too sharp at points. Like when things are far away they look like they have a very visible outline to them. I don't know if that makes sense. But I really do like the RAW footage. I would love to try this out with my new camera but I'm not sure I've got the skills for it or not. I haven't even made my first short film yet and I really don't want to screw up my camera which I just spent a pretty penny on.

@ikenj 11 лет назад

Wow, the RAW footage is beautiful!

@Andyax 11 лет назад

Agree. The moire is quite bad. I hope its possible to fix it with a new update :)

@ryanmatthewrusso4538 7 лет назад

Ive been shooting raw for awhile now and I can tell that for outside daylight shots, its incredible - but once you get into poorly lit environments, its a noise box. Got to the point where I went back to shooting from an external recorder to pro res for night time/ in door shots.

@muscleammo 9 лет назад

what lense was used? great video thank you

@marianivancioiu8853 6 лет назад

muscleammo xxx

@marianivancioiu8853 6 лет назад

Filme promo

@eugenc.3518 6 лет назад

Ce filme promo? :))

@filmendphotography2 3 года назад

choice of music is amazing

@howardmcmillian5764 2 года назад

WOW! Raw makes so much of a difference

@Athrunwong 7 лет назад

That's amazing! Everything should be in RAW!

@nskvasov 7 лет назад

Professional digital video/cinema is in raw. That is a production quality.

@TAGMedia7 6 лет назад

No contest, raw simply looks gorgeous, everything just pops more.

@chandannishad5569 5 лет назад

Outstanding Raw and Post production video sir love from India 🙏❤️

@andreffotografia 8 лет назад

Could you please tell How much time the a 64gb 1000x cf continuos footage can hold?

@WestOahuBrewers 10 лет назад

Great test footage. The colors really do pop in raw.

@jamesblanco5078 8 лет назад

Since you are dealing with H.264 and Raw how are you outputting the file, in Premiere or FCP what option are you choosing to upload?? Just curious

@Ben-rz9cf 6 лет назад

People are complaining that the RAW is graded wheras the h264 is not. The main difference in shooting raw is how far you can actually "push" the grading without breaking the image and causing artifacts. RAW has much more color and value depth, you can crush the blacks without them looking flat, squeeze more vibrance and saturation without it looking messed up or pixelated. Personally i prefer it for shadow quality--if you shoot overbearing chiaroscuro without the aid of raw, you're going to lose a lot of detail and the darks are going to look flat and homogeneous. If you want to boost the shadows in H264 the only thing you'll end up boosting is noise.

@atziluth12 11 лет назад

This is fantastic! The video really showcases the astounding difference between the formats. Thanks for sharing!

@Bmovieful 8 лет назад

Hva skjer med lyden egentlig når man filmer RAW? Må man bruke lydopptaker for og synce lyden etterpå? Eller kommer den med en lydfil?

@hdrnow9362 10 лет назад

This is amazing! Glad you show us the difference - thank you.

@Andyax 11 лет назад

Hei Per Magne. Skjedde det samme med meg. Trodde først det var noe galt med kortet, men fant ut at jeg ikke hadde lastet ned riktig build for RAW. Du må ha den aller nyeste og riktige versjonen. Husker ikke hvor jeg lastet den ned, men søk litt på nettet. Lykke til :)

@futbolx7vnn 4 года назад

this is amazing! I m so in love with this look. Its like a professional movie! congrats!

@waterspider599 5 лет назад

I had to subscribe because I think this guy is really nice and has great content.

@ceproductions8927 8 лет назад

Giant difference there... RAW is definetely worth it...

@zerobillz3450 7 лет назад

Thats Really cool... I love to shoot RAW... You have done an amazing job...

@digitalanaloguehamradio 4 года назад

Does RU-vid let you upload raw footage if not how did you convert it very informative thanks

@Firstsqd1 10 лет назад

Great info new to film production thanks for all your help!

@RyanPoseyofDean 10 лет назад

Night and day.... Thank you for making this video. Magic lantern, here I come.

@benpossehl 3 года назад

watching this in 2020, and I am still impressed.

@jeffijeff 8 лет назад

Great video! One question mate, how do you do the 1440p quality for the video? From the camera itself, or from the software you're using (premiere/after effects)?

@karlmaldensnose5889 6 лет назад

Raw is uncompressed data you cannot show raw it first has to be processed and put into a watchable file format, which takes time. Content is far more important than actual video quality. Ultimately anyone can watched a film from start to finish in 480p and throughly enjoy it, because of the content being shown. Yet most wouldn't sit through 15 minutes of 4k video of people walking around doing nothing. Sometimes too much detail can even ruin an experience

@CriticalTechReviews 5 лет назад

What you are saying is technically accurate, but also a massive cop out. Artistic merit does not excuse poor quality instruments when the shittiness of the instrument isn't being leveraged as a component of the artistic vision. Put another way, "but it's art though" is no excuse for being lazy about your quality. An engaging movie shot with shitty equipment would be objectively better with better equipment, unless the artist was trying to achieve a certain look that was centered around the inferiority of the equipment. Period pieces that utilize Hi8 tapes or even DVD at this point come to mind. Also, I have found situations where more detail is a bad thing to be incredibly rare. Again, artistic vision is important to consider, but in general, better instruments are better, all other variables controlled. But yeah no contest on raw video being a massive pain to deal with. Heartily agree there!

@chevonpetgrave4991 7 лет назад

A lot of people have made note of the difference in white balance in this video as an unfair comparison between the two formats. But go to 4:23-4:33 pause and analyze those two shots. Highlight detail, roll-off from bright sunspot to darker part of the sky, color gradation (the smoothness of transition from one color to the next or different shades of color), and the vividness of the color; it's a clear distinction regardless of the difference in white balance between the two. Its night and day. The only characteristic they share is some pretty bad moire. But the 5Diii does better at that.

@Andyax 11 лет назад

Yes, Eskild has this camera. Do you think it's because the mark iii is faster?

@yellintimber9337 8 лет назад

Thank you Andy. your videos are amazing and inspirational. Great work

@fridabionori 9 лет назад

Fantastiskt! Också kul att se en Skandinav här på RU-vid :)

@zingadebrothers 9 лет назад

Frida's Friday want to be friend i m also a mark III user

@GrantGannon8 9 лет назад

Awesome demonstration. Loved the soundtrack

@HotepOurobo Год назад

Time here; the raw video out of the Mark III is STILL just as good as any camera out there. Not only that, it’s full frame 3:2 video when done right. I haven’t found a good reason to upgrade from it for video in spite of how unstable it may be.

@jonnypanteloni 10 лет назад

Is h.264 ungraded? or is it because you can adjust white balance et. after image has been recorded is that why it looks better in terms of colour etc. Enhancing i.e sharpness and unsharp masks. It just doesn't look like a fair test out of the camera and as if you are trying to sell a 1000x CF card, but its still good to see the possibilities from a lot of work - but you can get pretty close to the image you had with a lot of work with H.264, so please I don't know if this was intentional but try to keep your information and evidence unbiased. Thanks again, Jonny.

@just4stringsnme 9 лет назад

Great video! Might you be able to offer any info/advice on exactly how to work with RAW footage? What should the settings be in ML anyhow?

@dreikonos 10 лет назад

Nice ! Thanks for sharing this. Actually this video conviced me to shoot Raw. But before buying any card do you guys think a 32gb at 95m/s will do the work ? Great video Andyax !

@wildernessandme1744 3 года назад

No.

@faridmahmudov 6 лет назад

I was very disappointed and surprised how low is dynamic range on 5d mark II and how noisy ist it in low light when I start shooting video. In room with good lighting details were lost on dark parts of wenge furniture and in shadows. It was not issue when I was shooting hdr photos with this camera. So now I am looking forward to Sony a7s II or Panasonic GH5. I hope they are much better with high dynamic range and low light.

@zouhairbenazzouz2536 3 года назад

What a synaptic man !

@bobonikita 10 лет назад

Wait for 5d mark IV. Maybe Canon will add 60 fps in 1080p and improve video quality. I bought 1DX and I am happy that I don't need raw video. Picture is sharper than on 5D III. Anyway - for good videos still the best are camcorders ;)

@Andyax 11 лет назад

No problem. My pleasure :) 1 min RAW in 2.35:1 with resolution 1880x800 its approximately 5GB...

@JesusChristIsLord__ 8 лет назад

Thanks for the vid! I just got a 6D. Is there a magic lantern hack for 6D?

@nskvasov 7 лет назад

Well, H.264 MPEG4 codec (as well as H.265) wasn't developed for production but for broadcasting purposes.

@minxi9101 6 лет назад

Tusen takk! Akkurat hva jeg lette etter!

@iglass_photo 10 лет назад

Awesome job Andy! Love your videos.... question: where do you get all of your soundtrack music from? Hope to hear from you.

@amanieux 10 лет назад

what was the h264 in camera bit rate ? is it much lower than the youtube bitrate ? can someone please explain why on this youtube h264 compressed video raw looks so much better than the in camera baked h264 - i mean , why the "in camera raw to h264 conversion" is loosing so much detail compared to the "in pc raw to h264 conversion", are the hardware chips that do the in camera raw to h264 conversion in real time so weak ? when we spend $1000 for a lens why cant we spend a few hundreds dollars more to get more powerfull h264 conversion chips that makes such a difference in image quality ? were do camera makers get their priorities ?

@nicklaytonUK 10 лет назад

Hi, thank you for taking the time to make this video accessible. I hope that you consider putting the findings up on Vimeo. My one question is this: at 3:16 there is a perfect match on two pieces of video, which would suggest that the video was recorded simultaneously in RAW and non RAW at the same time, a protocol you don't adopt for any other part of the video. Surely, if the card struggles to cope with RAW video (at 1440?) and then you add the burden of a further 25 MBits per second H.264 how does that work? Have you post produced the non RAW material on a PC to give it the non RAW look? Thanks in advance.

@seanyyg 11 лет назад

Andy, you're truly awesome! Thank you for yet another wonderful video =) The raw looks fantastic!!!

@metrofilm9 10 лет назад

Thanks for the demo! Really amazing!

@JimBlind 10 лет назад

Great viadeo, many thanks! I have a Canon EOS 700D and waiting for live ML release for it to shoot raw. God, can't wait!!!!

@fengwang3389 8 лет назад

Astonishing with RAW!!!

@Andyax 11 лет назад

The max video size when shooting 2.35:1 is 1880 x 800

@vialuciscanal 6 лет назад

So freaking different. Very Nice

@shaunfontaine8687 11 лет назад

depends on what your shooting and how prepared you are to work with raw, RAW is awesome and it's great to use but it's not an easy workflow, for instance 1 minute of footage is roughly 5GB. if your just going short clips or little short films then it's great, but if your shooting for hours on end everyday, you better have a lot of redundancy drives.