How Inbred is Prince Andrew? 

I'm going with "very" and I'm sticking to it. Now, if you asked how EMBARRASSING Andrew is I'd have to go with "very very", maybe even "very very very".

It's odd that royals married relatives thinking they were keeping royal purity pure while achieving the opposite.

Prince Andrew’s siblings all share the same bloodline hence the same level of inbreeding. Why did you single out Andrew, just curious.

Strange lot, all of them.

*Phil, the Greek - came over with a string-handled brown-paper bag and never looked back!*

So, his brother, the king, and sister must be too? Why target just Andrew? His brother was an adulterer, who's wish came true when his inconvenient virgin magically died in a bizarre car crash, and one of the longest ambulance rides in modern day history...in a foreign country. Only the truly sick could exalt such a sleazy family.

It's odd how royals married relatives thinking they were keeping royal purity pure while achieving the opposite.

It’s not just Andrew though .. the King and all his siblings have the same heritage

That goes not just for Andrew but all of the family even the younger royals are related

I watched a documentary about twenty four years ago on TV and read a book about the Royals. It said that Andrew's father was Lord Porchester also known as Lord Carnarvan. It showed photo's of them both and Andrew was the spitting image of Lord Porchester. He even has Lord Porchester's build which is stout. The rest of the Royal children are slim build. It happened when the Queen and Prince Phillip were apart for a long time. She sent Phillip on a ship for several months while she spent alot of time with Lord Porchester. They spent alot of time at Lord Mountbatten's home in Romsey and he had to speak to her and tell her to stop acting as they were because people were noticing. Andrew was conceived during these months. My mother told me that the Queen was flown to Prince Phillips ship for two days so that they could say he was the father.The Royal family papers that the public can read after 30 years, for Andrew it is one hundred years. Also Lord Porchester is interned in the Royal family vault where only Royals can be laid to rest.

And finally: *The **_Dead-Eyed_** Duke of Pork.*

If Andrew is indeed the biological son of Lord Porchester, does that mean that he is less inbred than Chuck, Anne and Edward? At least, Liz and Porchie weren't cousins.

Hooray! It’s about time we all know just how inbred the Drewmeister is! Maybe he can connect emotional impairment with this to use as a victim card for his psychopathy! Your videos are brilliant ❤️

Why just single out Andrew? He has three siblings of the whole blood - King Charles, Ann the Princess Royal and Edward, the new Duke of Edinburgh. As a group, there is nothing remarkable about their appearance or their behaviour.

Isn't he Lord Porchester's Son?

What's with the picture that looked like he was punched in eye socket?

How can he be inbred since his real father is rumoured to be Porchie? "He's depicted as the British monarch's close confident, and perhaps even a love interest". Lord Porchester would eventually go on to become Henry Herbert, the 7th Earl of Carnarvon. Andrew looks so like him.

I guess you've discounted the rumours about Lord Porchester then.

The Queen and Prince Phillip where third cousins so hardly any genetic problems with them having kids

Hi Shy, guess you are discounting those theories that Andrew was actually the son not of Philip, but of Porchy. later Lord Carnarvon, the Queen's Racing Manager. In any case he certainly did not acquit himself admirably at the Remembrance Service this week for the late King Constantine II of Greece, where Andrew was grinning like a buffoon. Afraid his brother the King needs to do some pruning of the family tree and lop off those diseased branches representing Andy and Harry if he wants to preserve the monarchy. Otherwise rot will continue and we all know where that will lead...which should be apparent to King Charles since his namesake lost his head and the crown.

There was a very bad Gene transferred. Hes beyond repair!!!

It's rumoured Lord Porchester who was very very close to the Queen is actually father to Andrew. He's certainly more body shape of Porchey.

Oh yesssss there is a God; a new video from my favorite RU-vid channel! Thank you.

You did a video about Andrew’s brother, Charles, and said that his inbreeding coefficient is 10%. So, since they are brothers, why shouldn’t Andrew’s inbreeding coefficient be exactly the same? That math don’t math…

Timestamp 00' 00": *Deep Mountbatten Look. Especially THE EYES.*

Him and his ex Chucky Doll should never be seen again !!!

I bet my friend that if Andrew went to the service, he would say he led the royal family for it. One news report said “Andrew led the family” and another said, although The Queen was leading the family…,”. I said, “ told you so”. Wasn’t hard to figure it out. Phew glad Harry didn’t show up unannounced.

Lizards the lot of ‘em ….

Notabene ! It is no just a question of DNA b. Ver. Much also about values during the upbring!

More unpopular than Henry ? Wow I very much doubt it.

It’s not just Andrew but Charles and the other one … Edward

Interesting, very interesting. I have many times wondered about the Family Trees of European Royal Family Trees.

There is a theory that Andrew's biological father was Lord Porchester - not Prince Philip. Any thoughts?

come on... every little village on the country side in any place... when going indepth like you do.. will be close family!!

If a man and woman get married in rural Tennessee, then years later divorce in West Virginia, ...are they still brother and sister?

Seems I’ve been living under a rock

Now I know where that saying comes from about the royals. Wow, it makes since now

Thx for the vid

hello, question,, can you make a video on how every polish monarch died?? (including the presidents cus why not lol)

The Queen was a good lady , She was Head of the Church of England , and she was spiritual. She loved her husband , and I would bet on my life that the Queen and Prince Philip were Prince Andrews parents . Unfortunately nobody ever said no to Prince Andrew .His brothers ans sister are good working royals . The Queen and her father mother and sister are at rest . As is her husband Prince Philip. I think history will tell he was a great support to her . Also I am so happy that she visited Republic of Ireland in 2011 .

To my understanding, Andrew has a different father ;-) ...

A variable not factured into your equation, Randy Andy had a different dad.

*An Ill-Cast Comedy For Fools.* 🍻😎 ⛎👈 🕊

Yes Andrew and Charles are heavily interbred. Just check out their Hapsburg ears.

I've done a dna test in Genera, would you know about a company that with a yes could define your level of inbreeding?

The way Andrew and Charles have behaved makes it appear as if their parents were brother and sister.

Interestingly high consanguinity level. Same as King Charles. Same as Princess Anne. Same as Prince Edward. My, my, who would have thunk it? 😒

How is Prince Andrew being named after his grandfather ironic? It’s literally the definition of NOT ironic

Jajajajajaja! He in bread me in bread!

Lefy bjack eye.Vril ceremony.

Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward...not just Andrew.

We know very little about Andrew &the only description I can render would be that his personality has always come across to me às one of apathy & contempt.

He's his own father.

😅the youngest Catherine's youngest George is that his name? He's too energetic ,silly,gets bored easily.And too wind up, he's hand full. And Andrew 64 or 70 teddy bears, and took a picture as to how the maids must arrange them on his bed, definitely a mental problem.

Not to cast aspersions on Andrews lack of inbreeding, but a look into Baron Patrick plunket & his friendship with old Queenie NRIP,, may pose a few questions about his father

They are thier own cousins, grand parents, siblings. Egyption octogon 🤺💐

Dislike Prince Andrew especially a drain on humanity’s good points

This just details the inbreeding not the physical or mental problems might bring out! He has a short temper as his father, King Charles and William do too!

Was Victoria and Albert first cousin, or second?

Yeah, recently I read on F***bXXk how cute it was that these folks still love each other so much... that they are still marrying each other due to the neverending mutual attraction... 🤨

And really finally: A regular Scotsman is walking through the (English) 'Laird's Land' in Scotland ... Laird: *'Get off of my land!'* Regular Scotsman: *Why?* Laird: *My ancestors fought for this land ...* Regular Scotsman (taking off his jacket and rolling up his sleeves): *I'll fight you for it!* Stay free. R 🍻😎 ⛎👈 🕊

My parents were 2 losers no one else wanted, so they married each other. Lucky me ! German Humu and Jooo Lezbot.

Is an American this video was very interesting 👍🏻

A lot of money for someone just he ...do...🙄🤔....

Psychopaths are notknowing

Very good video! But...I wonder why content creators have to tell us the info they will cover. I clicked because of the title. I already know what the video is about. Now just tell us about it - no need for the outline! I'm not being a wise-ass, really wonder why.

Would it be the same for our King as well nothing helpful here

I thought by your other findings Charles was 7% why is Andrew 8-9%?

The Spanish Hapsburg died with Charles II because Charles II parents share far more DNA, all 4 of their grandparents are descendants of Phillip and Joanna. Cousin married Cousin and Uncle married Niece. Especially there come to double 1st cousins, whose children have only 4 great grandparent

how inbred is 1:50 1:52 the current king? so gross.

hi sir its me sarrinah:)

Edward?

Andrew! Louis father

Very😂

better than fox hunting

George the sixff

What a pathetic waste of time

Sachscoben amny were cos charles looks like them

Personally , I think Andrew is a Psychopath ... His eyes are absolutely " dead " and he does not seen to have any grasp on feelings , such as empathy , shame , guilt , etc ... And let's not forget his " teddies " which have to be put back in exactly the same order daily by his " servants ... He has zero regard for anyone , and will do anything to get his own way .....

I KNOW THAT PRINCE PHILIP IS NOT THE FATHER OF ANDREW AND IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THEM THERE IS NO LOVE FROM PRINCE PHILIP TOWARDS ANDREW UNLIKE HE WAS WHEN WITH CHARLES ANNE AND EDWARD AND THAT'S MOST LIKELY WHY THE QWEEN LET ANDREW GET AWAY WITH EVERYTHING

The is pretty speculative. Better stay the "shy" historian...

How can Prince Andrew register an 8 to 9% rating while King Charles rates a full 10%? They have the exact same parental lineage.

Its shows in little prince louis as well as cute as he is!!

In the olden days and even into the 20th century the Royal Family's more usual than not intermarried with cousins or into other Royal Families throughout Europe. They didn't marry outsiders or non Royal, it's probably where the saying "blue blood" came from. I am an English Midwife and have seen the results of Incest. The children of these couplings some times have strange abnormalities like we see in King Charles 2nd of Spain who's jaw didn't line up with the upper jaw making it difficult to eat. Queen Elizabeth 2nd was 3rd cousin to her husband Prince Philip. In later years with studying medicine in more detail and genetic studies the Royal Families have marriages with common people. The then Prince Charles chose a wife from the aristocrats. Lady Diana's father was an Earl and now his son inherited the title. Prince William chose a commoner although Princess Catherine came from a wealthy family and their offspring are normal and healthy. King George 5th had a son named John who was hidden away in a Cottage on the Sandringham Estate. John had epilepsy and was a very slow learner. John's mother never visited him not even at Christmas time when they were at Sandringham. Queen Elizabeth had 2 first cousins, female who were mentally retarded and living in a home for mentally challenged people. The Queen pretended they did not exist and never visited or contacted them. When they died she didn't even provide a grave for them and consequently they were buried in a paupers grave. The Royal Family seems to like having the appearance of Walt Disney Princess movie where everything is perfect.

poopy pants

We've always been well informed of the comings & goings of the individuals in the Royal family & as a royal follower it is obvious to me that during Andrew's lifetime only 4 scenarios remain in my my mind. The earliest being his jaunt with the delightful actress, followed by his brave time during the war in the Falklands & latterly his marriage to Fergy followed obviously by theunmentionable friendship with Epstein. Forgive me if he's worthy of greater mention but I wouldn't rate him as having been high up amongst the group of working royals.

Sorry your figures don’t add up to me. You state that on Her late majesty’s side the inbreeding level was at one time 0% for two generations till Queen Victoria. So any inbreeding before that is null and void. The haemophilia you say was from Queen Victoria and was invisible in Victorian time. So that being the case. As we now know haemophilia can be found in people with no in breeding in their history what-so ever. To say it is. Through just inbreeding is now regarded as an out dated Victorian way of looking at it. Bearing in mind you have already said that on her parents side there was no inbreeding at all for two generations. So it can’t have come from that can it. To say that someone has a “ reputation “ of being inbred doesn’t mean he actually is. You go on to say the George V had a level of just 4% and marrying double second cousins results in a level of less than 2%. In other words about 1% or even possibly 0%. Is that what you mean by a “ bit more complicated “ now you say that his wife was also double second cousin on both her mothers and fathers side. Well if marrying a double second cousin results in less than 2% or 1% maybe 0% after all there’s not many to choose from if it’s les than 2 is there. So any children from that union I can not see as being any different from the previous king who had. 0% when you skipped to Queen Victoria. So where do you get their children had an inbred rate of 4-5% and George VI was inbred due to ancestral or historical inbreeding. However that line extinguished when you got to the point where you had to skip generations as there was no level of inbreeding. So can not attribute any illness to that. Hereditary or not. As for Her late Majesty’s history as you say you have to go back to mediaeval time to find anything. So we are back to lens’s than 2% or again maybe 1% or 0% so again none at this point me that throws your calculations out as to Andrew being 8-9% as only one side of his parentage his father had a history of inbreeding Mainly as there was inbreeding as they married first cousins and the grandfathers on both sides were brothers. I don’t see where that makes for inbreeding. As two brothers marrying two different wives. Would not mean their offspring on either side would be inbred. The mothers lineage is suspect I agree. With being first cousins. But there it seems to. End for me as you say nothing about the father except two brothers married two women completely Un related to each other. So where does that they were brothers even merit a mention. You go on to say that his mother and father were not related. So no inbreeding there. Maybe some on or before the grandparents side but not the levels you seem to suggest. As for Our Prince Andrew. You talk about a third cousin in the mix. But where. Even so that cousin must have a lower count than the 2% you say was the level for double second cousins. A third cousin is further away This leads you to say that the Prince Philip must have a level of already 3% due to historical inbreeding yet hi mother had less than 2% and you say his father had a 5% having stated that the 2nd and 3rd cousin relationship you speak of is pretty watery or no levels at all I don’t see where you get the 5% from specially as a you say Prince Philips mother and father were NOT related at all. So to me a calculation of 8-9% is to me wildly exaggerated. I noticed also you could not resist the dig at the Royal family of today as regards to Honesty etc Whilst previously saying that they made no secret of their lineage. It’s true to say throughout history all Royal Families through out the world have had selected breeding. And let’s not forget that it wasn’t always 10:00 the Royal family that suggested who marries who. But boffin types of “ Official advisors “ that had and hold the whip hand Unwisely as medicine and such eventually discovered. As time went on and they corrected the issues. Your renditions here do not really give any real evidence as to the “inbreeding “ of Prince Andrew or by extension our present King or the next Kings . To me it just sounds like yet another boar ish slur on the Royal family for whatever reason those that might agree will find to accept your findings. For me I’m afraid your sums do not properly add up. Sorry