How Inbred was the Queen? 

Thats very true.

Right? Like I think bullets and mutilation are going to kill you regardless of how ill you are. The same applies to Alexei’s granduncle, Grand Duke Paul Alexandrovich. He was deathly ill when he was executed but his illness wasn’t the cause of his death

1. Yes 2. He already made a video detailing how inbred ol' Charlie is, totalling at an inbreeding level of around 10 percent. Since Lizzie and Phil were related through multiple lines, it compounded the inbreeding level.

Yes, they have an inbreeding coefficient around 13%.

@@tinyetoile5503 Thanks I’ll go look for the video now ❤️

@@Laramaria2 wow! And also thanks for the reply also ❤️

Yes. Yes it does.

You would think marrying relatives would increase that percentage?

There has always been gossip going around that queen victory and her husband were not real Royals and were both products of either baby swapping or cheating

⁠​⁠@@bas4903men only need one copy of the hemophilia gene to suffer from hemophilia, women would need two copies of the gene. If a women is a carrier for hemophilia no matter who she married (relative or not) 50% of her sons will have hemophilia. I suppose constantly marrying relatives could increase the chance of a woman suffering from hemophilia. As far as I know (please correct me if I’m wrong)I have not heard of a female descendent of Queen Victoria suffering from hemophilia, for this to happen their father would have to have hemophilia and a mother who is a carrier. Back in the day very few male hemophiliacs live long enough to have children.

@@bas4903That’s not how X-linked genetic diseases work. The only thing inbreeding would do is increase the odds of a daughter being a hemophiliac if her father was a sufferer and her mother was a carrier, giving her a defective X from both parents, which was usually fatal in girls because of the severity. And even if you had a hemophiliac marry a carrier, while all their daughters would be carriers and some hemophiliacs themselves, there’s still only a 50% chance for their sons to get it.

I read from some wiki page that Queen Victoria likely started the carrier because she had an elderly father (Prince Edward Duke of Kent)at the time of her conception.

Yes

This is my geography teacher as well 😅

yes but it won't be bad again like it was unless the inbreeding starts up again

He already did a video on Charles

Yeah, Charles is at like 12%, but since he and Camilla are only distant cousins, Harry and William are around 7%. As far as I know all of Charles' grandkids have an average coefficient, which means they aren't inbred, and with the new trend of marrying the common people, it's unlikely the British royals will be playing the Tennessee Tango anymore

​@@SkinnerNoahCamilla is not William and Harry's mother. I read that Charles and his siblings are the most inbred of the bunch.

She's a 1 per cent inbred chances very low, now they worked out better to marry commoners to get fresh genes

There are spontaneous instances as well as inherited. This is because once someone is born with the gene, spontaneous or not they pass that gene down. Add to that inbreeding which increases the likelihood of consanguinity leading to the disease rises exponentially. One or two generations of cousin marriages isn’t likely to cause defects, the centuries of back breeding and familial marriages absolutely does though.

@@codename495 and yet, none of Queen Victoria’s descendants were the child of both a carrier and a sufferer of the disease. Also there is no near history in the royal family of hemophilia before Victoria.

@@codename495X-linked diseases like hemophilia aren’t impacted by inbreeding like that.

Women are carriers men suffer it lol 😆

That would be all of them😂

Completely different that's emphysema

Keep wealth and land in the family

Well by that logic then everyone is inbred, would you be willing to discuss the genetic complications of race mixing?

@@jbstarkiller4626 Yes everyone is a bit inbred. And of course we are, at one point there were as few as 600 modern humans left all in the area of South Africa. And that is all of humanity, only 70 people made it across the land bridge to make all native Americans. As for complications of race mixing, I have never herd of such problems and know plenty of people who are mixed race. If you have any links that explain this I would be happy to read it, especially if those links had evidence. I would be happy to discuss my thoughts after I have read those links however I can not really say anything on the subject as of yet as I have never herd anyone suggest it before, far from it, I have herd the opposite

@@holliluc3497 Saying "I have never heard of such problems and know plenty of people who are mixed race" is a worthless statement. I honestly would be surprised if you did hear about this since our culture has been artificially promoting race mixing for like 50 years. He’s just one for now, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22776059/#:~:text=Background%3A%20Differences%20in%20birth%20outcomes,experience%20higher%20adverse%20birth%20outcomes. There’s also research on the dehumanization of interracial couples using the implicit association test and IQ scores of mixed children falling intermediate between the races of their parents but I guess those are different topics.

Women carriers x chrome men suffer it y chrom

Rest in piss

In a box in a box

Rest in spaghetti, never forgetti

Smokin on that royal pack

@@Lord-Farquaad August 24, 1814 😂

That's sad but interesting about your grandpa was common then to marry ones relatives or cousins they never knew any better maybe trust was a big thing or who was available and apt? Sounds like grandpa was a narcissist sadly

The Queen Mother was worried that their disability would look bad on the monarchy.

I know why they hid them but caused their disability?

@@WarmSouthernSmilesThey weren’t royals so why would that matter?

@@tonibarrone854Inbreeding within their mother’s family, the Trefusises

It’s true that Charles is “inbred” in the sense that he shares the same ancestors in some cases on both sides of his family, but that is really only important in the extent of his parent’s relations to each other, which being 3rd cousins really isn’t that significant

As much I am against casually mocking people, I don’t think calling her Lizzie is a big deal. They’ve immense power & privilege so I think calling a nickname isn’t going bother any of them. After all most of the Royals are made of thick skin & very down to earth (as much as they can be). It’s an important part of modern democracy that people don’t show deference constantly, unless of course you’re invited to a Royal event, then I think most people would be cross if you went “oi Charlie, where’s mi cucumber sandwhiches”

@@sams3015But what if I don’t believe in democracy?

Maybe because deep down you yearn for a British Emperor again

A third cousin really isn’t close genetically

@@myamdane6895 They were cousins on BOTH sides. They were third cousins on one line and SECOND cousins on the other! Charles III is INBRED as hell.

Why

@@bibendum7608 monarchist

@@bibendum7608 so uhm… August 24, 1814

@@peanuts1744 hahahah so someone says rip and I say why and from that you get that I'm a monarchist? If there's a hell she's in it, and also you talk like your educating me about racism on tumblr so your opinion means nothing to me

@@bibendum7608 what is bro yapping about anyway August 24, 1814

*correction- You’re wrong. She’s a whiny entitled sociopath but she’s definitely better than marrying a cousin.

@@codename495Hard disagree.