31:52 Who said in south we dont use Bharat.. In all our local languages its called "Bharat" Or "Bharatam".... Here you showed How much English speaking people sitting in Delhi have knowledge on whole Bharat...
only Congress & it's Congress CHHAAP reporters like CNA is saying so because 👉THIS VIDEO itself is a "SOFT PROPAGANDA" SPONSORED by CONGRESS to fire hate among voters of INDIA against BJP. 👉The central govt. BJP should counter question CNA for spreading HALF TRUTH to manipulate people before election. Like in "BABRI MASJID" case, the CNA purposefully did not mention that "it was invader BABUR who broke Ram Mandir and CONSTRUCTED his MASJID on TOP of the REMAINS OF RAM MANDIR, in order to DESTROY our Hindu culture and religion. 👉Instead, narrator completely neglected ASI Report (Archeological Survey of INDIA) is simply blaming Hindus for destruction of masjid🙄🙄🙄🙄. 👉Also CNA has highlighted DISTORTED MAP of INDIA showing kashmir as pakistani part. For this CNA should be saked ASAP. 30:12
indian muslim are the best muslims in the world.they are much more open minded less islamic and believe in non violenece with respect to other muslims in the world
Land is not named after King, King is named after the land The land South to Himalayas and North to Indian Ocean is called land of Bharat and people are called bharatiyas It's a Sanskrit word and name of the land is mentioned in vedas and purana which are before the king himself.
@jaibholenath6900 Here is the contradiction. Bastards of Invaders are not of BHARAT. They are the Invaders. Bharat is a legendary tale. Even if not, the original inhabitants are long gone. The ones like you left over are tainted with bloods of the invaders. Only south Indians are not, and that is why old 1,500 years Hindu temples can only be found in the south. Your ancestry can be tested using DNA tests, and it tainted. Son and Daughters -bastards of invaders are not of 'Bharat', but you are of India @jaibholenath6900 9 minutes ago @biggpicture2930 What's the contradiction? I still can't understand whats the problem with u. If u don't understand English pls hire a proper translator.
For context, this is not a big issue that people make it out to be. Turkey changed its name to turkiye; Celon to Sri Lanka; Burma to Myanmar; Siam to Thailand; ETC. Some names just resonate with their people more. However people have not changed or thought of changing the name, Instead what is happening is a normalization of Bharat that is India instead of India that is Bharat. Dont see any issue with it.
It becomes an issue for the West because they need something to make make it look how uncivilize we are....their butt hurt to see nationalist Indian or Bharatiye being proud of their culture and rejecting western culture...😅
CNA, what's so difficult to understand ? 🤔 Most important countries refer to themselves with a distinct local lang. name Just like: - China calls itself 中国 / zhong go - Japan calls itself 日本 / Nihon - Germany calls itself Deutschland similarly India calls itself भारत / Bharat , a Sanskrit word, used in almost all current Indian languages too
I think it is India's right as a country to change their name The Myanmar that we know today was also previously known as Burma. they even changed their own flag
Yes, they changed their name but it didn't bring them any prosperity. Prosperity of a nation will depend upon the policies implemented by it's leaders. In the case of Myanmar, it's a country ruled by the military junta and the people there are highly influenced by radical Buddhism.
BJP will come back. Don't like BJP but hate Congress more and can't even think of parties like SP, TMC, NCP, etc. in power. Would have genuinely supported AAP, but it joined hands with Congress, so that's the end of it.
Actually I think congress is better than AAP. AAP always talks big but works even less than congress. The problem with congress is inconsistency on national issues.
there is no change. India is already Bharat and Bharat is already India as per constitution. Govt can use both interchangeability. No change in laws required.
@@yashchauhan7448 India is changing the colonial laws that were used to enslave us men. Now if you want to be their boot leaker, surely you are rright. Show your nationalism somewhere else I probably know your countries history more than you.
You have missed my point. I noticed lots of business in India choosing to use English letters and words - why does this happen? Would you like to see a complete ban of all use of English? maybe stop teaching it in schools would be a good change?
Bharat represents Indian culture at root level. Left parties have worked as colonial representatives, never worked for a common man, laws weren't changed since British Raj. No wonder indians have this colonial baggage and feel inferior. Modi is doing the right thing by fixing the insecure identity crisis among common Indians. Modi has done what no one else can do as he has faced it himself. In a way, Modi is like LKY of singapore, working for and representing common people and making changes to the constitution, removing idiot laws. It has long term benefits. People should know. ❤
Narendra Modi is nothing like Lee Kuan Yew, he inherited a country that was undeveloped and poor and help transition it into a developed modern nation that's known for it's business friendliness, low corruption and scientific innovation. He accepted Singapore's diverse population comprising of people who originated from various cultures and faiths. Narendra Modi is a hardcore Hindu nationalist who's primary objective as an RSS member is to turn India into a Hindu only country, that's why the BJP along with it's other Hindu nationalist allies like the VHP, Bajrang Dal etc. promote hatred against minorities.
@@nabeelmohammedcaLKY turned Singapore into a USA owned state, nothing more buddy. It only looks shiny on the outside, nothing about Singapore is different than Japan, they both recieved hundreds of trillions of us aid in exchange for permanent loyalty to USA. Do you even know after ww2, usa literally made the Japanese constitution?? How crazy is that?? A supposedly independent sovereign nation and yet every single word on its constitution is written by usa. India has a backbone, it will grow on its own without selling their soul to usa.
Wrong!!! BJP is not building the Ram temple in Ayodhya, nor the government! It is public funded and state has no stake in it. Post the Supreme Court's verdict a request for donation was raised across Bharat and the public responded in kind irrespective of social status, religion, dogma, etc. post which construction began.
I am not an Indian But has great respect for Bharat 🇮🇳 You don’t need figures, had India been a Muslim country with 80% Muslim and 14% Hindu at independence, Hindus would have been either annihilated or converted by now Look around you.. This is fact, most Muslim countries have a majority of 95-100% islam Facts are facts Bharatiya Hindus are very tolerant society.. history is the evidence Indians do not need a CNA or CNN or BBC report to acknowledge their society norms
Exactly! Look at Bangladesh and Pakistan, where there is muslim majority, all minorities have been persecuted to the point of almost non existence. They went from being 20-30% to now barely single digits, and live a precarious life, at the mercy of muslim mob violence and discriminatory apartheid laws such as blasphemy laws which are routinely incited to oppress any minoriyt who attempts to practice their non islamic religion in peace.
You do know that there are plenty of other religious groups other than Muslims even in Islamic countries in the Middle East? Maybe you don't. And why do you say you are 'not Indian'? Moving to another country makes you so? 😂
@@Jkl62200give data and stats, is there any country who has more religions coexist untill now, more ethnic groups, more linguistic groups. Our country is always been tolerant that actually leads more problems like invasion and colonization
@@sivasankars808 that's easy. Just 1 example.. US.. There are dozens of Christian denominations and all the Easyern and African religions. Millions of people from more faiths than in India migrate to US. Lol
@@oceanwave4502 The amount of NRIs living in UK are slowly sending remittances back home which will eventually amount to that. Not to mention indian companies in UK bringing some home as well.
well for someone thinking bjp will be ousted next year should question there thinking skill how can a party with 84% approval rating will be ousted lol
The fact that Nusantara itself means nusa meaning 'island' and antara meaning 'in between' or 'including' in SANSKRIT language 😊 It shows Our cultural exchange in ancient times ❤
26:00 Moghals are also invaders, how one can take different approach just because they are belong to so called peaceful community (same community who recently cut the throat of babies in Israel in the name of independence revolution) Moghals were invaders similar to britishers and both did mental and physical atrocities. So there shoul not be different approach when we decide to remove slave mentality and physical structure which stood as the symbol of that. In my view govt has not done enough on this front, Controlling only Hindu temples but not Masjid or Church is one of them.
36:17 He is not relatively rich farmer... He is ultra rich farmer... He has 125 acres... Ohh God....He is talking about inflation in food items... In some part of the country people have 1-2 acres of land and living the life merely comfortable.. THis guy Kalyan is an Ultra rich who happens to be a farmer, THis is the problem of india he won't pay a single rupee as tax because he has the title of farmer.. India should bring a law who owns above 15 acres of land must pay tax at least minimum tax...
There are two origin story of the origin story of bharat and origin name of india and the concept of the civilization identity keep in mind that nation states are 18th century invention and the points im giving you are summarization of certain verses from the vedas. 1) The first one is a Vedic origin story from the early Bronze Age. In this story, there was a tribe called the Bharatas residing in what is now Haryana, calling their homeland "sapta Sindhu" or the land of the Seven Rivers. The Bharatas were attacked by ten tribes from the west and defeated them in a great battle on the banks of the river Ravi. Subsequently, they turned eastward and defeated another chieftain called Veda on the banks of the Yamuna. The Bharatas, starting from their original homeland, spread out and created India's first empire. Their chieftain, Sudas, conducted the first ashwameda yagya and became a chakravartin (emperor) with the symbol of the wheel. And the name "Bharata" is associated with this ancient tribe and their homeland. Over time, the idea of being Bharatiya (related to Bharata) spread, and more gods were accepted, symbolizing pluralism and assimilation. By the Iron Age, the entire Indian subcontinent identified itself as Bharatiya. The term "sapta Sindhu" came to cover the whole of India, extending from what is now Haryana to the Kaveri river in the south. 2) Regarding the name "India," it originated from the Sanskrit word "Sindhu," referring to the river that passes across India. The ancient Avesta texts, which are Persian texts, underwent a phonetic shift where "S" became "H," leading to "Sindhu" becoming "Hindu." This term "Hindu" was then used by the Western Persians to refer to India, and eventually, it evolved into "India." This historical evolution demonstrates the interconnectedness of Bharat and India, rooted in ancient texts and cultural continuity.
it is but it flows from tibet to india to pakistan and there used to be 7 river in sapta sindhu people thought it was a myth which one of them is the saraswati river till they discovered not too long ago which confirms the rigveda claims@@VanaeCavae
Mr Gauhar Raza is cleverly lying. Muslims aren’t willing to sing the original national anthem of the freedom fighters - Vande mataram. Also they have voted enbloc in 1946 against congress party in favour of Jinnahs Muslim league which went on to create Pakistan. And then after majority stayed back in India after being the force that led to creation of Pakistan, they have been voting enbloc against BJP irrespective of other parties bad economic policies as if congress is the new Muslim league and BJP is the new Hindu congress of pre independence
The community you are referring as minority has divided and carved out a country from India in 1947 called as Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Whereas, the minority community in India has 200 million population which cannot be considered as minority. After partition now the land belongs to Sanatan Dharma. This is something you missed out in your documentary.
We’re trying to get people to not say “Indian” anymore over here but a huge chunk of our country is stupid. We ARE working on it. Sorry for the hold up.
@@_Pauper_ what are you sorry about?? It is american INDIANS who should be sorry. Europeans named them INDIANS Bcoz they thought they reached bharat 😂. India was originally name of bharat before natives americans Ofcourse Bharat name is much older & native of this land. But no need to feel sorry over This
@@_Pauper_ republic of India was referred as indica by greeks, it was india for other Europeans, technically it was name for bharat, even before indigenous Americans adopt that name
@jaibholenath6900 Here is the contradiction. Bastards of Invaders are not of BHARAT. They are the Invaders. Bharat is a legendary tale. Even if not, the original inhabitants are long gone. The ones like you left over are tainted with bloods of the invaders. Only south Indians are not, and that is why old 1,500 years Hindu temples can only be found in the south. Your ancestry can be tested using DNA tests, and it tainted. Son and Daughters -bastards of invaders are not of 'Bharat', but you are of India @jaibholenath6900 9 minutes ago @biggpicture2930 What's the contradiction? I still can't understand whats the problem with u.
For Indians, they are not going to refer to the country only as Bharat and they don't really care but among themselves, it depends on their mood what they refer as the name. For non-indians, saying Bharat will come off not sounding as good as Indians are used to hearing it , so they would probably prefer hearing India lol.
Why just change name...politicians should also change their dress code & start wearing old traditional clothes too instead of pants & shirts if they are ashamed of their colonial past. India that is Bharat or Bharat is the same...
So called minorities who do not respect Bharat's Hindu dharmic heritage can leave. The tolerance of Hindus has led to thousand years of subjugation first my muslims, then the british and now by the so called minorities under the garb of secularism. Enough is enough!
pushing the "South" to not use "Bharat" !... LOL the very native word in all the 4 major southern languages id "Bharata" , we call the Indians railways as "Bharatiya Railway", SBI itself prints its name as "Bharatiya State Bank" , Govt of India as "Bharata Sarkara"....... note: yes we add the "aaa" sound....
A well balanced documentary on the basis of opinions. Its extremely rare nowadays to see international media to show even daily news without propoganda against a nation. *Kudos to Singaporians and Kudos to CNA*
yeah cz national anthem is in hindi, and bharat is used in hindi and india in english, take passport for ex, ya'll stupid ass bitches, india and bharat have been our names for decades, why change it now, supreme court and even bjp rejected appeal to remove india as official name twice, now the opposition is named INDIA and bjp wants to change it, r u a brain ded potato?
In the Philippines there are many names, mostly towns and cities are changed, mostly are colonial names from Spanish and Americans like name of the saints and places of Spain like Nueva Caceres(named after Caceres in Spain) becomes Naga City, etc.
What a cheap argument that allahbad was changed to Prayagraj because it had allah in it. I mean he was some historian and he doesn't know the significance of that place and why deliberately it was changed by the Mughals
Both are valid - India and Bhaarat. But Personally, I would prefer Bhaarat. My question to those who love the word India - Why would you use a Colonial term ? Stockholm syndrome much ?
And why Indians love and are passionate about cricket more than any other countries inspite clearly knowing that it was introduced by the British? But doesn't give value to it's own hockey.
English have English names of their places : It's fine. Same goes for Chinese, Japanese and other cultures. But, When India does this, we are Nationalist? Why? Our civilization is based on Hindu religion, so it's not just religion, it's our culture. So, going back to original names, it should not seen as negative but respecting the existing oldest civilization.
Biased coverage as usual. The name Bharat means the place where one goes to seek knowledge. Bha means enlightenment. The name coming from king Bharata is only secondary.
Xi was absent from the G20 because he wss still traumatized by the image at a BRICS event in South Africa 🇿🇦 where his aid was body-slammed onto a door by a large blackman while Xi looked back shaken.
How much is India paying you to be part of their 50 center army? Literally any video I've seen concerning India or China, you're there to trash talk China.
@jaibholenath6900 Here is the contradiction. Bastards of Invaders are not of BHARAT. They are the Invaders. Bharat is a legendary tale. Even if not, the original inhabitants are long gone. The ones like you left over are tainted with bloods of the invaders. Only south Indians are not, and that is why old 1,500 years Hindu temples can only be found in the south. Your ancestry can be tested using DNA tests, and it tainted. Son and Daughters -bastards of invaders are not of 'Bharat', but you are of India @jaibholenath6900 9 minutes ago @biggpicture2930 What's the contradiction? I still can't understand whats the problem with u.
Renaming India into BHARAT will cost so so much. Electric Buses from USA- billions India cannot pay! Pay billion subsidies for US chip to start assembly operations in India. US military interoperability with India's military means More and More upcoming payment up for US military technology- serous billions that India needs to IOU (or sell infrastructures). Problem is India has to borrow lots and lots of money. It will cripple the economy. It will be Cripple man of ASIA! India will breakup like USSR, with so much is wasted. Spend Spend Spend on stupid stuff! And India has high hope to be Super indebted country which will eventuate as a pariah nation. If, and if only can print rupees and used it like USA. I see India break up in no time. What a fantastic government! US military interoperability with India's military(Pravin Sawney, The Force) mean they are clearly stuck on one side. So much for wanting to play both sides. But can India afford any of these? KAPUT NATION!
First, contrary to the popular misconception, "India" is NOT a colonial name given to this land by the British, but a Greek name with a 2500 year history. "India/Indos" is derived from the word "Hind/Hindu" which was the Persian variant of Sanskrit "Sindhu". Logically then, if "India" is foreign and unacceptable, so should the Persian words "Hind", "Hindu" and "Hindi" be. Are we going to change all that? Second, the name "India" has a great geo-political and historical significance as an ocean (Indian Ocean), the wider South Asian region (Indian subcontinent), and tectonic plate on which the region sits (Indian plate) is named after it, and so are names of many species of plants and animals - Indian leopard, Indian rhinoceros, Indian elephant, Indian peacock etc. Also, "India" being named after the Indus river, cements the country's link to the Indus Valley Civilization though most of that river and its sites are in modern Pakistan. Thirdly, this land and civilization was always called "India" in Western historical sources from the time of Greeks and Romans. And modern "Republic of India" can rightfully claim to be the continuation of that civilization by virtue of that name itself. Everyone knows "India" and its Persian equivalent "Hind", while hardly anyone outside of the country has ever heard of "Bharat" nor does it find any mention in historical literature outside the country. Fourthly, India is not alone in keeping distinctly different names in English (exonym) and native languages (endonym). Other examples include China (Chinese: Zhongguo), Japan (Japanese: Nippon), Greece (Greek: Ellas), Germany (German: Deutschland), Finland (Finnish: Suomi), Egypt (Arabic: Misr) etc. None of them feel any inhibitions or humiliation in retaining their "foreign" names. Then what is this particular inferiority complex that we feel with "India"? Fifth, "India" is much easier to foreigners to pronounce correctly than "BHAA-RATH". Our neo-deshbhakts should not feel offended if foreigners mispronounce the latter as "Borat". 😁 Sixth, if there is someone who would be happier than our bhakts if this country were to abandon "India", it will be Pakistan. We would be saving them from the humiliation they feel when they encounter names like "Indian Ocean" and "Indian subcontinent". And it is also worth remembering that the person who was vehemently against "India" retaining that name after independence was none other than M.A. Jinnah. He knew the significance of that name.
@@sk21719 No Indian scriptures mention the word "Hindu". It is the ancient Persian name of the river "Sindhu/Indus" and has no meaning whatsoever in Sanskrit. The ancient Greek name "India/Indos" also derives directly from "Hindu".
same problem in my country....In colonial times, British called my country '' Burma'' and it is now known as '' Myanmar '' in International community....the military dictatorship renamed the country from Burma to Myanmar coz they want to get rid of the colonial past while the opposition of military regime refused to use Myanmar , and still used the name '' Burma''....Anyway, the country is known as Barma ( or Burma ( meaning....the Land of Brahma the Creator ) in pre colonial period, and we called our country as '' Myanmar ( Fast and Strong nation)'' now.....
Like the way USA has own power standards, left hand driving, English words that was different from UK, why can’t colonial countries have their way of leaving the past identities like millions died during 1918 Spanish flu and few more millions in bengal famine. All because power was in the hands of few 100 thousands while 300 millions of Indians lived inhuman conditions … Canada might feel proud of colonial past. But developing nations in Africa and Asia, impoverished by British rule have the wounds of exploitation for 150 plus years, remember killings and loot when they think about UK and its queen or king. unlike Canada that has a significant white English population which originated from British lands during the time of British rule in North America, most colored skin people were left to deal with poor economic conditions after British left. White Canadians are beneficiaries of miseries of Indians and others. You may find it hard to imagine that your forefathers created the weath and society that you benefit from.
I see some bias in the presentation. It's India ( Bharat ) right to change the names which reflect the culture of India. The idea was to remove the colonial mindset and atrocities of the Mughal invaders. (Promote good identity against evil identity ). The opposition has destroyed the country ( 70 years) for their own agenda and benefits This is nothing related to religion instead moving towards nationalism ( common law)
India should cherish the British legacy and all the modernisation that was brought by colonial times. They are being lies now that this was bad, come to UK and you can see in museums how India was before... I have many Indian friends in UK and they all appreciate our good relations,.
Be wise, keep both names. That makes country invincible to enemies and mysterious to lovers. In that way whoever encounters INDIA would discover BHARAT, and whoever encounters BHARAT will face INDIA. On utilitarian note, keep BHARAT for National Glory, and INDIA for international affairs with the west.
India precedes Colonialism. India at the very least is 2300 years old. Calling it just a part of colonialism is a fallacy, an erroneous omission of our history. let's not paint everything black and white. there is a reason why endonyms and exonyms exists. if Germany can come out of their Nazi past without changing their name then India can very well look beyond colonialism and foreign invasion to reclaim the name India. India will always be Bharat and Bharat will always be India.
The issue isn't with origin of the name. Why its linked with colonism is bcoz they are the one who made the name popular globally instead of countries original name which was being used as bhart n still to this day we use it. They changed your globally identity according to their own comfort. They tried to make everything westernized
@@shasha0076not really, in Roman trade books during the largest Roman empire. They referred and used India, in their documents and politics. The name has been famous for centuries before colonialism all across the world. But this is just a wasteful discussion.. India and Bharat is equal and same… Dosen’t really matter and even if we make our constitution as We the people of Bharath and remove India. Though it’s already there in the Hindi constitution… The world will still call us India for centuries too come and we will call Bharath for centuries to come. Nothing changes.. its just a stupid debate… Every political party fought against the name change every-time. I think Modi is just trying to promote the use of Bharath more locally, thats all or playing politics. I bet you, if we win the upcoming World cup the chants will remain, India, India…
BHARAT IS NOT NEW.......IT'S ALREADY THERE FROM BEGINNING OF TIME..... INDIA HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH OUR COUNTRY NAME.....IT'S ALWAYS BHARAT......MY LOVE.
We see all invaders, be it Islamic invaders or English colonialism in same lens . We don't care if someone is hurt. This is our country and our culture.
Please find new words to replace "Hind", "Hindu" and "Hindi" as well. In case you aren't aware, those words are Persian and the Greek word "Indos/India" directly derives from it.
@@vineethg6259 sanatantva and Devnagri. Our aim is to get rid of all colonial things and we will go to any extent for that. By the way, Hind/Hindustan are coined by either Muslims or Persian. Our classic literature has no traces of it and it is easy to eradicate them.
@@mexicanmomo Devanagari is the name for the script, not the language. And how about "cleansing" that language of all Persian and Arabic words you use daily - Aadmi, Aurat, Insaan, Shaadi, Zameen, Aasmaan, Awaaz, Hawa, Mausam, Baarish, Waqt, Jaan, Dil, Jaanwar, Sar, Dard, Dawai, Mushkil, Aasaan, Sawaal, Jawaab, Dost, Dushman, Intezaar, Waqt, Azaad, Izzat, Mulaqaat, Safed, Laal, Khushi, Khubsoorat, Aarsoo, Khushbu, Alawa, Deewaar, Darwaaza, Jahaaz, Mumkin, Shayad, Afsoz etc? And if you want to get rid of all colonial things, how about stop wearing shirts and trousers that were imposed by the British. Lets go back to dhoti. And we should disband IPL and stop playing cricket. We should all play Kabbadi instead from now on. In short, if you go down that rabbit hole, there is no end to it, my friend. 😁
Didn't the country divide on religion?? So why do you have a problem with Bharat/India being a Hindu nation? Did anyone including the British ask Hindus if they want other religions in Bharat? Everything was just plunged on the country when the British left.
These things will fade away with better education and jobs but one thing i want to ask keep political propaganda beside, why the mosques chant 5 times a day with loud speakers "there is no god but allah". I am not a supporter of BJP Or RSS but what they are doing now should have been done earlier. You can find problems in hinduism and play politics on that but who said on the earth that you can not play that same with the muslims. Fine and balanced documentary by CNA kudos to you🎉
Ironically, India is Greek name of the region we call Pakistan today. The Greeks used to call the land around Indus river as India. Bharat was the name of a tribe and not the name of a nation as in those days we had kingdoms and not nations.
Sorry youre wrong when it comes to the "BHARAT IDENTITY" there are two origin story of the origin story of bharat and the concept of the civilization identity keep in mind that nation states are 18th century invention: 1) The first one is a Vedic origin story from the early Bronze Age. In this story, there was a tribe called the Bharatas residing in what is now Haryana, calling their homeland "sapta Sindhu" or the land of the Seven Rivers. The Bharatas were attacked by ten tribes from the west and defeated them in a great battle on the banks of the river Ravi. Subsequently, they turned eastward and defeated another chieftain called Veda on the banks of the Yamuna. The Bharatas, starting from their original homeland, spread out and created India's first empire. Their chieftain, Sudas, conducted the first ashwameda yagya and became a chakravartin (emperor) with the symbol of the wheel. And the name "Bharata" is associated with this ancient tribe and their homeland. Over time, the idea of being Bharatiya (related to Bharata) spread, and more gods were accepted, symbolizing pluralism and assimilation. By the Iron Age, the entire Indian subcontinent identified itself as Bharatiya. The term "sapta Sindhu" came to cover the whole of India, extending from what is now Haryana to the Kaveri river in the south. 2) Regarding the name "India," it originated from the Sanskrit word "Sindhu," referring to the river that passes across India. The ancient Avesta texts, which are Persian texts, underwent a phonetic shift where "S" became "H," leading to "Sindhu" becoming "Hindu." This term "Hindu" was then used by the Western Persians to refer to India, and eventually, it evolved into "India." This historical evolution demonstrates the interconnectedness of Bharat and India, rooted in ancient texts and cultural continuity.
Lol no, india was called the land east of indus river and so was Hindustan and no Bharat as a geographical areas have been mentioned many times in history.
wrong lmao we' re talking in context of what indians call themselves back then and sapta Sindhu(Haryana) is not the same as the geographical location of sindh but later became part of it during the assimilation , the natives who are hindus where their most important text gave this identity so idk what you on about lmao , funny enough even tdy in hindu rituals baths they use mantras like " गङ्गे च यमुने चैव गोदावरि सरस्वति । नर्मदे सिन्धु कावेरि जलेऽस्मिन् संनिधिं कुरु ॥ Gangge Ca Yamune Cai[a-E]va Godaavari Sarasvati | Narmade Sindhu Kaaveri Jale-[A]smin Sannidhim Kuru || O Holy Rivers Narmada, Sindhu and Kaveri; Please be Present in this Water (and make it Holy)" already an idea of a well inter connected sacred geography @@SafavidAfsharid3197
If youre talking in terms of foreign travelers who tryto describe india yeah they did call it india or hindu since traders and travelers have been calling it since forever than creating confusion you see it with other countries too @@SafavidAfsharid3197
It's not Pakistan didn't exist 75 years ago, neither did Bangladesh and half of Afghanistan, it was all for thousands of years part of India/bharat before British came. It's name was "Bhartvarsh"
Considering that student visas' expire it's not a shock that people return home and that's what most people expect you leave to get an education and come back to improve home. OMG foreign educated Indians RETURN!!!! shocking news!!!!
Its like calling Bharathi as Subbaiya.. Nonsense thought.. Right now all over the world known us as India and Indians.. The good name, culture, nature, values and the quality of the people are known to the world to be indians.. Means my identity that what I earned by my behavior and quality will vanish if I change my name to anything.. Name change matters allot.. India 🇮🇳 is a emotion and indians are attached to it.. We r proud to be indian..
Foreigners needs to know this: 1. The constitution which starts with "India that is Bharat". so India is Bharat. Both India and Bharat are equally valid. 2. Our national anthem has only mentioned "Bharat" in the song 3. India was a name given British colonialists. 4. Every recognized language in India has called this land "Bharat". rajasthani, gujarai, bengali, assamese, tamil, telegu or any langauage calls this land bharat.
Dude in every local sub dialect it's called Bharat If anyone has problem with it dude ur an slave of British past shme on you AKHANDA BHARAT MATA ki Jai Jai shree Ram Jai shree Krishna har har Mahadev
The Mohabbat Maqbara in Junagadh has been completely restored to its original glory by the BJP government only, so people should relax about Islamic architecture and culture being under threat in India
It was not the British who defeated evil invader mughal filth - it was the valiant Hindu Maratha empire. British fought Marathas for decades before getting a breakthrough.
I am an indian and this name change is nothing but a political gimmick that was started as a distraction from a very important news. India is not even a British name its a greek name. Comes from magesthanes or herodotus i think. India, Bharat, Hindustan are all names of our country that we Indians hold dear. Its only the far right that is telling us to hate the name India. When we go for a cricket match we shout the name "India..India" to support our team. Bharat is mostly used in hindi text and other indian languages. Hindustan is another informal and beloved name of the country that is also mentioned in a song "Saare jahaan se acchaa.." Constitution already recognises India and Bharat as official names.
stop the cap its not you see the importance of it amongst people from civilization states like the persians btw bharat and india are already two official names of the country
@@chander3338 yeah bro some people will sacrifice their 6000 years old identity in the name of secularism in the other hand converted Muslims are proud of Mughal invaders 🤣
@jaibholenath6900 Here is the contradiction. Bastards of Invaders are not of BHARAT. They are the Invaders. Bharat is a legendary tale. Even if not, the original inhabitants are long gone. The ones like you left over are tainted with bloods of the invaders. Only south Indians are not, and that is why old 1,500 years Hindu temples can only be found in the south. Your ancestry can be tested using DNA tests, and it tainted. Son and Daughters -bastards of invaders are not of 'Bharat', but you are of India @jaibholenath6900 9 minutes ago @biggpicture2930 What's the contradiction? I still can't understand whats the problem with u.
Everyone not native to bharat tried to gain foothold either by using religion like mughals or creating divisions like british or modern day media but none could destroy or divide soul and spirit of bharat and its culture cos its scientifically so advanced that modern science appears to be primitive comparitively. Capitalism has failed the world and pushed it in existensial crisis and it will be the era of Bharat which will lead and teach the world the actual meaning of coexistence without personal intrest of some elites.
India, Bharat, Hindustan ... you can try to make this a symbol for independence but it might rather turn its attention to things like infrastructure, clean water, eradicating a poverty that defies all other poverties and let's not forgot the heinous violence against women. Who honestly cares what you're called? The disaster still stands.
The first thing to get rid of the colonial mentality is to stop using the English language. I wish every book I read was in Hindi and I had never learned the English language. Bharatiyas are shamed across the world because of how they speak English. Bharatiyas do not speak the language correctly and they don’t even sound right. Bharat must embrace its own languages, develop its own education system in Hindi. The English language is probably the biggest reason why the colonial mentality still exists in Bharat.
It's not a change. It's literally written I'm the constant. Both are It's names. The only thing is bharat is being given more spotlight than in the past.
We have enough evidence to support our nation's name is Bharat. CNA bringing blindsided view of few people who didn't even bother to find out who they are.
@@shiningstone6771 Whole world know Bharat as land of wealth, knowledge and spirituality even before the British, that why they came to conquer and plunder Rich Bharat and left back poor India.
That's the issue all together. India as a nation, which got it's independence less than 100 years ago, fits the western narrative of being somehow superior. Whereas Bharat is a 5000 year old civilization (atleast) with a rich philosophical, cultural and religious background.
Changing Country's official name from India to Bharat because of past colonialism, then please also change from left side driving to right side driving and from Cricket national sport to Football.
How the hell this lady continuously offending by calling Baarat in African accent instead pronouncing correctly Bharat, Bha is not Baa here “h” must be called out with B
Such a balanced set of views, I usually see foreign documentaries on India with skeptical eyes because they usually follow the same narratives which looks far from ground reality if you are an Indian living in India. But this is such a great documentary. Even agree with some of the critiques.
Why western media always interact with people who have zero impact on people of Bharat..All those who failed to convince people now giving sermons to people.
