How Resident Evil 3 Fails as a Remake 

yo i remember you as the guy who fucks to metal gear osts

@@aidensnider9090 specifically mgs gz bloodstained anthem soundtrack lel

They did the same for re2r yet it's crickets on that end

@@arkhamasylum8972 You keep saying the same shit, but re2r was a some what decent remake. RE3r was very noticeable and with its cut content all the iconic areas are gone. Even the gore from RE2R was toned down in RE3R so there's that.

@@tyanas19 everything you said is ignorant and dishonest. I keep saying it because it's not getting through and all of my arguments haven't been countered at all. My point is that if you think re2r is good, bad, or mediocre, then you should feel the same way about re3r. The game did 90% the same thing. Critics lambast re3r for turning the clocktower into a Nemesis boss fight, but they don't say anything about zapping being removed or 90% of the content from the b scenario being removed. Be consistent in criticism. Either re2r is overrated, re3r is overhated, or both.

To be fair, the original RE 3 was actually supposed to be an RE 2 spin-off and Code Veronica was the actual sequel, so I think that's just a side effect of the original.

Code Veronica, now there’s a remake... fighting wesker and alexia... 🤤

I said that at one point and now I wish it were true, do like mk11 did and release an expansion just like a quarter to half the price of RE2

That's the vibe I got. Like, it feels so recycled, even in the demo. I was so unhype.

@@xDMikeyms To be fair as well, the original RE3 felt like an original standalone game (similar to Witcher 3 DLC's), and encouraged multiple playthroughs via multiple divisive elements such as decision-making systems, 2 endings, a reward system that *actually* felt rewarding, and no two playthroughs ever being exactly the same due to different enemy encounters. Meanwhile the Remake feels like a half-assed add-on that cut mechanics from the previous installment alongside content from the original. Could've been a $30 DLC. Especially since the Demo is basically the whole game (the good part, anyway). As someone else above said, the original game's map feels more open-world than the remake.

Yea that's my biggest issue. They blew RE3 remake so when will we get another? Probably never or if so years and years later.

@@colonelradec5956 i hope they remake it because it's so disappointing but unless enough people complain we probably aren't gonna get a faithful remake and it's especially tragic with how good the re4 remake is looking

I'm glad I never became a shill for Capcom tbh. People kept telling me that Capcom gives fans what they want but here's what they give us with following Disney's lead with making these terrible remakes.

@@Lips0fDeceit I'm excited about 4 honestly. I don't mind the modern versions just 3 was like missing 80% of the game play. And I honestly don't think they will regardless of what fans want. Like re3s ship has sailed. I don't think any amount of complaining is gonna get that re done better.

You are asking for a remaster here. This is a remake.....Capcom removes things they feel were unnecessary, remakes are to start over, to create something new, so of course there's going to be certain things removed. Again, this is remake not a remaster.

That is actually a good reason lol

So she went through an ordeal where getting so much a single scratch would have been enough to make her zombie out yet she is zen with running around with a majority of her flesh exposed? That's just retarded

According to RE Outbreak, though, the outbreak had been going on for at least a week prior. She would have had plenty of time to change.

You’re taking about the S.D Perry book right? I thought it was because she knew various streets out of town were blockaded and the clothes she picked would allow her maximum range of motion. The sweater tied around her waist was for once she got clear of the city because it was cold. Beginning of chapter 3 I think.

@@Nomad416 you’re right. The book does talk about how things have been getting progressively worse. You get a paragraph or two about how she’s been spending that week trying to find people in the city and help them get to a high school the police were using as a shelter. It’s her returning to that high school one morning and finding everybody dead that makes her give up on the city.

That's pretty sweet

Awesome

A diamond in the rough. That’s a pretty good find.

Dude went looking for trash and found pure gold

Her name was Karen, be sure of that.

F

You had to walk back and forth a lot more in Re3 Original. Remake feels like a big central hub with minimal backtracking ALSO ORIGINAL IS JUST BETTER :D

Because the original was. You had 3 objectives to get the train running and you could do them in whatever order you want

@Pieces109 well the hardware has nothing to do with maps being bigger

@@mro9466 even the clock tower section is more open

Not to mention most people didn't get to hear it as most people got hit by Nemesis interrupting her saying it

Personally, I would have been pretty much satisfied if the reimaginings of RE2 and RE3 at least did not flat out cut content with nothing to stand in for their roles. *Like for RE2 Remake...* Make the G4/Super Tyrant fights be based on the First/Second Runs instead of Leon/Claire campaigns, remove the G2/G3 boss repetitions, have alternate cutscenes for continuity, include all of the enemies, and give a complete new musical score like RE3 Remake seems to have done. Maybe create new mechanics that a zapping system could be centered around, even in light of things like hip pouches, SMG, and boards serving different roles. *For RE3...* Keep in the opening action scene, parts of the endings like Barry Burton, some kind of branching paths in environments/narrative, the Gravedigger boss encounters, an equivalent to the cemetery, the clocktower interior, the backtracking in Raccoon City, the puzzles, the Nemesis encounters after train cutscene, the quantity of bonus costumes, and a singleplayer bonus like Mercenaries mode. While I give credit for RE3make adding new enemies, the RE1make added new enemies and kept all the old ones.

The whole ''re-imagining " it's just an excuse for their laziness.

@@user-ry5vq8wy6z Yeah, it often does feel that way. Like I have always been saying. If Capcom wants to reimagine part of the original game, then that is fine by me... as long as they actually reimagine it... which implies that they are giving us something different... which implies they are giving us something at all. If Capcom is just needlessly leaving stuff out, then that does not count as "reimagining" the game, just hollowing out the game.

@@markcobuzzi826 Yes, exactly.

I feel like time constraints as well as no one putting in any good ideas to contribute to the remakes is more the problem rather than a lack of direction.

Some do. I for my part can't even try it, though, due to bad optimization for Win7 PC's :( And some enjoy Resistance. Just sucks if someone needs to pay for it, too, when buying RE3R without wanting to play or install it etc. So I agree on that.

It's not that nobody cares about resistance. Everyone would be either apathetic or excited having the game packaged with RE3R if they had finished RE3R.

Justin Ashman exactly! I think it would’ve been better if they took more time with the main game. Hell no one would complain if they released RE3 remake in 2021 but with all the missing content from the original and the new ones for the remake included.....

@@Tengokuchi they even cutted The Mercenaries ;-;

Well what would you want, nothing with re3 or restiance

If you have a PC get it with the HD mod.

@@yrh002b8 that's what i did. Amazing experience

Same, i got the gamecube version to play on my Wii

It’s hilarious the chop shopped rushed original resident evil 3 feels tighter and more uniform with the other two games before it compared to the remake.

That's the same with me. It made me play the original for the first time and I think I like the original more, especially when I replayed the remake immediately after this which made me see how much they cut from it.

The imaginations of these devs suck.

Well said.

No guys we called it reimagining so you still have the original. But you don’t. And that’s becoming an increasingly hard reality. Because old consoles won’t last forever.

I don't think it worked lol we still criticizing it. I was honestly against playing the original due to it's outdated graphics but now I'm considering it along with re2

@@dcaneil9565 So graphics mean that much to you huh? Sounds like someone couldn't stop modding games to look "realistic". Or thinks games are only good if they look good.

Wanna hear something even funnier about the RE3 Remake? Capcom stating that RE3 Remake is a finished product. That means they won’t be making more content for the game. The one game that needed more content. It’s funny how Capcom started rebuilding their reputation and then completely waste it with a terrible remake.

@@cecilharvey2005 damn Capcom is slippin on their pimpin. I bet if they remake 4 it'll be a half-hour long

well the og was pretty short too

@@samcortez420 they're still porting resident evil 4 to everything in existence, I doubt that they would remake it. Besides, code Veronica was only available on the dreamcast, that would be a good idea for remake.

@@MrGamelover23 I would buy Code Veronica over Resident Evil 4 Remake any day, Claire is my favorite right next to Rebecca. I loved Code Veronica so much.

Yeah I don't get why they keep removing the multiple endings! The barry one was my favorite. But multiple endings forced you to replay the games. Having 1 is just lazy.

Nope, no DLC. Resident Evil 3 is a finished game according to Capcom, and they've moved onto 4make, negating Code Veronica

@@SeaJayyyy Actually the 4 REmake was debunked.. RE8 is the next game

@@1Hol1Tiger yes obviously, but they're thinking on skipping CV entirely

No it’s just a reference. Literally he only appears in the ending of the original. There isn’t much there just for an appearance?

Not to mention, taking damage outside of cutscenes isn't canon, which explains why herbs are so magic.

And yet, people say that RE3make is scarier than the original.

@@ChiefMedicPururu it is scary the first time you play it, i'll give it that. But because every playthrough is the same, it gets old the minute you play it for the second time

Remember this is a series that had a man punch a boulder so yes Jill can survive because of plot armor.

Even worse, that car is recycled from RE7. And they turned a fun, goofy boss battle into QTE'S

Well that's what worked with Nemesis in the OG game so yeah. Obviously not to the same degree but you get the idea

and then they switched to re-imaginings

Because the Sequels aren't connected with the original RE1 director, if only they make shinji handle those projects it would be perfect like the RE1 remake.

@@receptionblcp6463 exactly

@@receptionblcp6463 this

You are right man

Yup. I was so open minded at some point, thinking how much they could actually do with it like they did with Remake. But that ended with me being even more disappointed. I twas fun and I appreciate the game, but it was by no means what it should've been. Platinum games are great as devs and a company and they probably managed to get out of this more than I'd have thought, but I prefer them doing stuff like with MGS:RRV.

Maximo Smith same here, imagine how much better the remake would’ve been if they applied the gameplay style of the demo to the whole game and didn’t cut important locations and content from the of? Also I think the main issue here is they rushed this. They could’ve did much more out of this if they released in 2021 and perfected it as much as possible

Don't forget they could have pulled a Mister X with Nemesis making him roam the city and Map looking for you instead of just being scripted

Because they spent the time making resident evil:resistance. With the hope that the resistance can be a cash cow like GTA V online .

And the clock tower. And a proper Nemesis

@@freakattack9616 Mr. X from Resident Evil 2: Remake is basically Nemesis, so they didn't need to take him seriously at all.

And more costumes. Carlos literally has one. His hair style change is such a cop out.

The choices too man, those actually affected what happens in the game and how every new game you start with will effectively change where the zombies are without having to go tona higher difficulty.

i guess they didn't had the budget to animate it

How about Her Resident Evil Operation Raccoon City Personality?

@@hurricane7727 that’s not the OG Jill as well. Jill in the RE1 Remake, RE5 etc is the real Jill coming from a Jill fan

​@@melrose0 Jill is a flat cardboard of a character in any RE game so not much of a downgrade

Jill never had any personality until the remake

yalls nostalgia goggles really shine with these older RE games

Most modern remakes are more of retellings with a more cinematic feel, good on their own, but not good remakes, RE1 Remake forever

@@Nemesis_T-Type RE 1 HD Remastered you mean?, cause remake and remastered is different

@@dannysetyawan2180 Uh, RE1 HD Remastered is just a remastered version of the original RE1 Remake for the Gamecube released back in 2002. In case you are confused: -Resident Evil (1996): Original RE game -Resident Evil "Remake" (2002): Remake of the first RE game -Resident Evil HD Remaster (2015): Remaster of RE1 Remake for 7th and 8th generation consoles

You just described a remake.

"and use the word "fuck" at least 200 times"

Reimagining is a made up word to use as a get out of jail free card when people critizes them for cut content

@@plaguedoctorjamespainshe6009 exactly. It's nothing more than moving the goalpost forward.

Even more so, it seems they need to be taught the difference between “reimagining a game’s content” and “hollowing out a game’s content”. For one detailed example below... The “Memories of a Lost City” chapters in Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles could be considered an even more drastic reimagining of RE2’s plot and narrative. He also pointed that out in a previous video. But aside from Kendo/Bertulocci/Irons barely getting any screen time, it felt like the Darkside Chronicles tried to include everything it possibly could with its alternate gameplay/story structure. You get a decent variety of updated soundtracks for the rooms/events it works in. The alligator is a more fleshed out boss. It actually includes all of the original’s enemies, plus adds Lurkers to the sewer sections. The files, cutscenes, and voice-acting also do a decent job of retelling RE2’s lore and events, while the designs are also pretty faithful to the original RE2. Not to mention, Ada Wong and HUNK already had their own solo scenarios in UC, while DC even includes its own spin on Tofu mode. The only other bits of RE2 content I recall being left out from DC include puzzles, finding keys, the use of blue herbs, the alternating A/B scenarios, etc. But because the game is an on-rails coop shooter, those exclusions make sense for its more simplified, fast-paced, arcade-style, and action-focused gameplay with Claire/Leon always sticking together. In contrast, because there is no reason why these elements should feel redundant or out-of-place, within the remakes of RE2 and RE3, The Darkside Chronicles still feels mostly complete for the type of reimagining it is, while the two latest remakes feel unfinished.

@@plaguedoctorjamespainshe6009 Cashcom: "Yes."

its a remake like it or not

Even Uncharted the lost legacy wasn't at full price

Exactly. It's a fucking robbery. That's why I waited for a Steam sale to buy this.

It wouldn't be as bad if it was an actual good remake. Sadly it is not.

If re2r is fine for its price tag, then so is re3r. They're both short games.

@@the757general2 if re2r was a good remake then re3r is fine.

This is exactly what i was thinking of

Play the gamecube version on a Wii or emulator

@@leonpaelinck Or on the Gamecube itself if you have one.

The Seamless HD version of RE3 on the Dolphin emulator is the definitive version of RE3 to play today IMO.

@@daveweaver3886 On consoles, the Gamecube version is the best, what with the best FMVs and the models being cleaner. Also, great controller.

especially funny considering the 90s is the decade of universal appeal basically

@Leonard M They're working on RE8 (different team) and RE4make. They're probably gonna cut a fuck ton of shit again on the remake because it's the same team that worked on re3make.

@Soldier-2Point0 Yeah, that would've been a little bit acceptable than releasing it as a whole game for 60 dollars which isn't even worth it.

the difference in the originals is the games were made in the 90's on 90's hardware. They weren't made to look like the 90's- they are the 90's. They were made to look like the modern timeframe. RE3remake tried but its hard to go back and try to recreate the 90's without looking goofy cause if you were to just make a realistic looking 90's it wouldnt look all that different.

@@nightmode3782 Please! Please! Please! Capcom, don't remake RE4... Seriously just STOP! with these fucking remakes and just let the series move forward > ; (

Oh the original Nemmy theme... that "DUN DUN DUN DUN" and the frantic violin or whatever.

The devs is aging and not scared anymore for what they want to do. And if they made it perfectly as the devs/fans want ..it is impossible.. Absolute imposible....

I was extremely disappointed with remake 3. When the credits rolled I was like “that’s fucking it?” I paid 15$ for it and I still feel robbed

​@@marcosrojano8825 doesn't really excuse that they made nemesis a joke.

Remade with a 5 minute unskippable intro cutscene? Speedrunners must be stoked

Yeah really! I think Jill at least weeps some after the initial nuclear explosion in the copter as she looks back to Raccoon City. That being her acknowledgement, "Goodbye, my beloved city...".

Barry is in the revelations 2 ;).

@@eburoviccelt Old news, dude, but you're right. Spoiler alert: in RE1, Barry has a wife and child Wesker is threatening to kill if Barry doesn't play along with his plan. In Revelations 2, they squish that daughter with a rock. TA-DA! Later, Moira! Quick entry, quick exit, maybe the shortest lived playable main character in any RE game.

I think you really mean.... Barry. Where's Barry (no inflection in voice)...lol

@@harleyjackson3708SPOILER ALERT: actually Moira lives and is rescued with Claire in the end. Moira, Barry, and Claire fly out destroying the beast with a rocket launcher

Yup, she does basically look like reboot Lara except for her shorter hair.

Jill's Reboot Tomb Raider, androgynous, generic tank top wearing strong female character outfit is really not that great.

@Fred Duwe Claire looks like a normal biker that rides a cruiser motorbike, even more if she is riding in the middle of the night and on a highway (imagine riding a cruiserbike with that original RE2 costume. It's just not right.) What the hell that has to do with Lara Reboot? LOL

Idk why people care about this so much I think they just modernized the characters and threw in a Easter egg to Alice in the movies

@@leezorn5682 It's not really modernized, as the outfit isn't any more or less 'modern' than the original. The outfit was arbitrarily changed just "because". Which is pretty much a big part of what people dislike about remakes in general; random and unnecessary changes purely for the sake of change (or politics, that tends to annoy people too). Especially since the things that get changed often seem to be things people like.

Re2 was an incredible remake. This dude has to be clowning for views. Re3 though I agree was half assed

@@justinmason757 He had some valid points about RE2 but overall, it was done well. RE3 was not. One thing that I really didn't like is that Jill sounds borderline woke at the beginning of the game, something no one mentions for some reason.

@@aurancrash4654 Elaborate

@@aurancrash4654 explain

@@aurancrash4654 how the hell was what she said woke do you even know what that word even means?

Exactly, a lot of people like her redesign but it doesn't make sense why she would be wearing tactical gear when she is just lounging around in her apartment.

@@BorsPepsi what tactical gear was she wearing?

@@bloodaonadeline8346 The belt?

Fr she was sleeping with Jeans💀

It also is an incredible boring redesign. Tank top and jeans, nowadays every female character seems to wear them. They did the same with Claire

yup

@qseftdeather12 At least my post has more likes than yours lol

@DarkSonic180 I still got more likes, than your post its pathetic LMAO

@qseftdeather12 what did you say? I can't hear you typing LMAO

Nothing beats a creep that has yet to discover PornHub.

When I thought about which remake maps best equate to which original maps, it also seemed like Dead Factory was the biggest loser, along with Uptown Raccoon City. The Dead Factory was pretty much reduced to a one-off arena for the penultimate Nemesis battle, similarly to the Clocktower. But unlike the Clocktower, I do not even see direct replacement for Dead Factory’s role, as far as the general level design and objectives go. This is the best comparison I could make, between the original and remake’s locations, excluding the monster/puzzles varieties used or lack thereof… Original’s Uptown Raccoon City = *insert a bunch of on-rails set-pieces* Original’s Downtown Raccoon City = Remake’s Downtown Raccoon City Original’s Small Sewer Areas = Remake’s One Large Sewer Area Jill in RPD = Carlos in RPD Original’s Clocktower = Remake’s Hospital Raccoon Park = Underground Warehouse Carlos in Original’s Raccoon Hospital = Jill in NEST 2 Dead Factory = ???

I have been saying before that a lot of the problems people had with the remake’s altered story could have been nullified, if the remake simply kept in the system of branching paths and had some of the original’s plot points be available choices. These below are just three examples off the top of my head: *1.) Either comply with Brad’s request to be left behind or push him to not give up and stay with you:* If you do the latter, then Brad will assist you throughout the opening and be in the car, as you ram into Nemesis. But when Jill gets back up, the first thing she sees is Brad In Nemesis’ grip, as he recreates Brad’s death in the original. However, Brad won’t show up later as a zombie, and only Jill will be able to have his card, for the opening the RPD’s S.T.A.R.S. crates early. *2.) Choose whether it is Jill or Carlos, who goes to the RPD rather than getting on the train with Mikhail and heading towards the park:* If the Raccoon Park was in the game, then that could have been an area for Jill/Carlos to navigate, right before the clocktower (since they now go to the Umbrella facility directly from the hospital, rather than through the park). If Jill goes to the RPD, she will have the same basic mission to contact Dr. Bard. Meanwhile, this would cause Carlos to accompany Mikhail through the park instead of exploring the RPD. All of Carlos’ unique items from the RPD will spawn in the park instead. Also, if Jill goes to the RPD, she will eventually be chased by Nemesis yet again, without Mikhail to sacrifice himself for her. But Carlos will have Mikhail sacrifice himself to blow up the Brown Gravedigger from within, making that hypothetical fight easier as a tradeoff. *3.) Right before Nikolai confronts Jill in the waste disposal room, either keep the vaccine in your inventory or leave it in the item box:* If you do the latter, then Nikolai cannot steal it from you, and pair will not be as desperate to stop Nikolai, before he escapes. However, this will give Nikolai time to commandeer the chopper without being intercepted by Carlos and try to kill you. Whether you shoot Nikolai out of the sky or just survive long enough to make him fly away before the city gets nuked, Barry will need to save you now.

@@markcobuzzi826 Love all of these scenarios.

Or RE2

at least the skin mods make for a few good faps

@@splash_067 yeah, fucking rip to the A and B scenarios

Exactly!!

Wtf do you expect lmfao they made the game for new audiences not old heads lmao

Re3 original had almost the exact same play time

@@jeremybianco8647 remake means it can be longer. Don't be dumb. Remake not remaster

@@josefelfinito6925 remake means they have taken the liberty to do whatever they want. Play time makes no difference in the classification of remake or remaster

@akamaro20 I've owned the game since release and gotten S on every difficulty. Making decisions that affect the story doesn't bother me at all. I actually enjoyed re3r far more than re3 original.

@akamaro20 I've played and beaten every resident evil thats ever come out so idk how I'm a fan boy with a limited mental capacity. I liked original re3 for what is was, but I also enjoyed re3r more for what they did with it.

i agree

In the original, Claire was wearing biker shorts, denim shorts cut off at the thigh over top of the biker shorts, a black t and the red vest she gave to Sherry. Very practical biker wear when traveling on a bike in moderate heat, especially with the hot bike engine her legs wrapped around. Not sure if she went through the mountains into Raccoon though, which would've required the jeans. I imagined the weather in Raccoon's post summer was warm based on Sherry and Jill's attire

No

Honestly the whole practicality thing is dumb, it shouldn't even be a thing when the game is so ungrounded in reality

Claire's original look is distinct, now she looks like every other female character from the 2010's

Don't forget them leaving the supervisor stuff and Nicholai's orders out etc. I agree with all of this. I hope we'll get a mod with Carlos' old UBCS uniform, too.

Genome Soldat Too late mate, they’re already working on the remake of RE4, or so I read somewhere…

True words

Nicholai was so much better in the original

Genome Soldat muh skort

I also wonder why they even bothered with the Clocktower backstory. I decided to finish my Hardcore run a few days ago before shelving the game and missed a note that basically gave some history to the tower. Only to never go inside it. Just weird to do that. Maybe it WAS gonna be an area to explore but cut. We may never know.

I assume it was done in an attempt to justify the reimagining-thing. Changing the content while still giving context to the cut stuff. It is an intriguing idea, but it does not really fit a world in which the remake is just going to replace the original due to lack of accessability and rewrite the entire timeline.

Great comment. RE3 was always my least favourite of the PS1 trilogy, but I still like it a lot. And your criticisms are exactly mine. I don't mind if the game takes less than 2 hours. Literally all old school REs are short. I don't care if they are short...but cutting out actual content? Especially if it already was there in the original? Remakes are supposed to add, not take. And this time it wasn't just extra rooms or minor enemies, it was entire areas and enemies. Nemesis was reduced to cutscene monster mostly, and when it transforms into dog/licker it's just... Why? He doesn't chase you across rooms anymore whenever you complete a key objective. He just becomes a boss encounter or worse, a cutscene.

So far, the only things RE3make is doing better than RE2make are actually including a complete new musical score and at least adding three extra enemy types in place of the four they cut. Plus, I actually like how it made the Hunter Gammas much more differentiated from the Betas, and they feel like the fourth free new enemy. The use of Hunters is how I think RE2make should have handled the Ivies, with the regular orange ones getting the redesign treatment like Gamma Hunters and the toxic purple ones behaving more like the traditional Ivies as Beta Hunters still do. However, if Capcom’s hired men were really that adamant about the Gravediggers no longer providing boss fights, I would honestly find it the lesser of the two evils, if Gravediggers were just given the RE2make G-Adult treatment and made into the common enemies swallowing you whole in the sewers, instead of the new Gamma Hunters. Maybe someone could make a mod for that. Unfortunately, it still retains the equivalent problem of RE2make not having any alternate cutscenes or penultimate bosses for Second Run, plus the two runs repeating more things in general. Removing the element of branching paths seems to have the same effect for RE3, detracting from the replay value. As he elaborated on within the video above, the main criticism of RE2make cutting content seems to have been ignored and RE3make doubled down, also removing the quantity of puzzles, ability to backtrack in early Raccoon City areas, the whole clocktower interior, Gravediggers that broke up the monotony of boss fights with Nemesis, later opportunities for Nemesis to continue chasing you in humanoid form, quantity of unlockable costumes, story bits at the beginning/ending, and Mercenaries mode.

I agree. After remake 3, I'm not wanting anymore of these garbage remakes.

Exactly

Well said

You're just mad cause the original Carlos gets all of the foxy ladies.

@@BigAssNigga311 Say that to the bitch slap he received in the original lol

the hell capcom was thinking

The originals you can simply play on an emulator. I agree that while Resident Evil 2 Remake was great for the most part, the way they did the 2nd runs felt rushed and low effort.

Ew, no. The controls of the original 3 Resident Evil games have aged HORRIBLY.

@@Skrenja They are fine, the issue is the player not knowing how the controls function

no way, the 2 was good on its own

@@thehunter5989 The OG's controls really aren't "fine" though. The controls of the RE 2/3 remake are an improvement in every possible way. If you think the OG's have better controls, then you aren't looking at things objectively and are blinded by nostalgia.

wasn't a complete disaster, i got my 12 bucks out of it. if you paid 60 bucks i would understand tho

Kenny Davis right! Imagine how better the remake would’ve been if they didn’t release it just a year after the RE2 remake 😭

@@drewm.2790 I know... I feel like the game just misses the mark. But I've been trying to stay positive and I do really like RE3R. It's given us the best version of Jill since the original re3 and Carlos was actually given a personality which is great! The dodge mechanic actually works and there's a lot of references to the mansion incident.

Kenny Davis ofc the RE3R is good, I love the graphics and the characters were more fleshed out than in the og. But at the same time I’ve been thinking a lot that this game could’ve been more.

@@drewm.2790 I feel the same way. Alot of the problems ppl have could easily be solved with updates.

Remakes can be largely their own thing if they promise to stick to the og material. As far as I am concerned: RE3make had all elements from RE3OG.

@@ChristianProtossDragoon there are no puzzles, a severe lack of chase sections with nemmy, no choice scenarios, no mercs, a missing boss, and two missing areas. You're just dead wrong. And remakes are never their own thing, they're always betting on nostalgia to bring in old fans while simultaneously trying to attract new fans to the series. It's insulting to existing fans to be calling it a remake while pulling out parts of the plot and adding nothing. REmake is the best remake of a game I've ever seen. It kept all of the same story beats and iconic areas while adding to them and not invalidating the old canon.

@@Tengokuchi REmake is a remaster. 😂

@@Tengokuchi and you keep focusing on locations, but completely ignore the characters and the story. 😛

@@ChristianProtossDragoon REmake is a remake. Resident Evil (2002) is the remake of Resident Evil 1 (1996). Resident Evil HD remaster, released on multiple platforms in 2014, is the remaster of REmake. Also Resident Evil: Origins Collection, released on multiple platforms in 2016 is also a remaster of REmake too.

@Alma Penada You obviously never played the og game. Or haven't watched Critical Nobody or RoB's analysis of it. The game removes features, flanderizes the characters, cut enemies, areas and weapons, throws good character design away for poorly executed realism, and mashes the A scenarios from the OG game together in a way that makes no logical sense.

@murat balamsa Yeah, it's a damn shame. RE7 was a return to survival horror at the cost of the series' identity. Ironic considering RE4 shifted the focus towards action at the cost of horror themes down the line. Capcom no longer understands what made the series good in the first place and now they're just swinging from one extreme to another with any sense of balance tossed to the wind.

But if they screw it up, won't that be the version newcomers go to when they want to play it? I feel like the terms "remake" and "remaster" are basically synonymous with "replacement" as for as the younger generation is concerned.

Re4 is still my fav re game but I will say it they re3 re the re4 re I'mma be mad

BlowBlow's Jiizare Headventure the point of a remake is to remake It. Like make it again not to remaster it. Re2 takes on certain things but not enough for most people to feel cheated. Re 2 remake has great combat, a great story with amazing graphics. It makes mr. X a looming threat that pumps fear into players. These games aren’t meant to appeal to the hardcore audience, it’s meant to appeal to new players and older players. You have to realize your the minority of people.

Oh so that's how he had those seeking mines during the acid valves fight?

Matheus Sousa right? The demo made it seem like it would be a perfect remake but oh boy... also yeah the city area is way underused and lacks a lot of areas to explore a bit more

Capcom fooled so many fans with the demo

Oh, brother, I feel you!

It was the first game i ever pre ordered. Now, I know to never pre order games at all and see how tge og fans react to it.

Played the game now for 20$ and finished it after 6-9hrs. I would have been so pissed if I bought this at release. At 20$ it was an ok game, just not very "Resident Evil".

Naw resident evil story is pretty fleshed out..

RE2 & RE3 are both happening at the same time during the outbreak, just in different sections of the city. Umbrella dropped the ball & the city became infected with the virus (Gvirus). Which is pretty much the progenitor virus combined with a virus that William developed. Everything before that was build up for these two games.. lore at its finest

@@KDot-ln6ud Actually the first half of RE3 takes place a day before RE2 and the 2nd half of RE3 takes place a week after RE2

@@the757general2you are right about the first half but wrong about the second half, it happens the same day as RE 2 actually, if it was a whole week, Jill would have died with the nuclear attack

Slowly turning into EA!!!!

That's all Crapcause are now. Money hungry pigs!

Well, the original is short itself. And they have to keep up with the schedule because there will be a resident evil 8

@@flipflappoo7571 The campaign may not have been so much more longer, but the replay value is miles better.

at least the skin mods make for a few good faps

I just can’t imagine being brain dead enough to call this game “half assed” lol. It’s a triple A title through and through.

@@jaja-2740 Yeah you did not play the original at all if you actaully think the "remake" isnt half assed.

Do you speedrun ? If so, do you stream? I’d watch

bet tomb raider games are longer than this xd

I can literally beat this game faster than this videos time length

@Kepler 186-F hey

@Kepler 186-F uh I don't even know who u r but yah I'm good!

They ran out of ideas, that's for sure.

For each company it's different EA=Need For Speed Ubisoft=Assassin's Creed Activision=Call of Duty Square Enix=Final Fantasy

Dude everything looks like a fucking boob to people at Ubisoft.. Rainbow six (14 games) Splinter cell (8 games) Assassin's creed (12 games, not including spin offs) Ghost recon (more than 10 with DLCs lmao) Far cry (8 games) God i hope they never think of remakes

As a Fallout fan, I can confirm Bethesda is milking it a lot through microtransactions

A faithful one like the original RE1 remake. I swear 90% of 3R is either completely changed or cut or relegated to simple easter eggs. The game is a joke.

@@latinaparfait maybe they can't wait to work on RE4

@@griver007able bruh it was like the B team that made 3 remake not the same team that made 2 remake.

@@latinaparfait or burn out. I hope they can release an update in the future reworking the gameplay and the story.

I personally find that it's a letdown even as a Resident Evil game. Its painfully linear and has less puzzles, basically the opposite of a regular RE game. If RE3make was merely dlc for RE2make, I would accept it as is. Sadly, it was sold to us at full price. Sigh.

Sevent77 yup, I feel ya. I’m disappointed too that the game doesn’t have that much backtracking. It is disappointing but I enjoyed it for what it was.

@@ultraspinalki11 I think RE6 is better than RE3 Remake & I've never been the biggest fan of it, but I have liked it better lately.

@@ultraspinalki11 Isn't the Story mode is just DLC of Resistance mode? Look like that what they want to sell the most tho.

Leekahn Wong right the Resistance mode is getting new cosmetics update right now. I really hope they’re making a dlc for the story mode right now and add at least a few cut content from the og

poncho828 true bro but then again capcom only cares about money and not there fans . This game was a nightmare

lol nemisis didnt even get a S.T.A.R.S. kill . pathetic.

poncho828 why would they need to expand dario? and they did expand all the characters you mentioned were you paying attention?

poncho828 exactly, it would’ve been better if we can backtrack and explore the location in the intro near Jill’s apartment and had Nemesis chase us all throughout the game instead of scripted boss fights

OG RE3 Nemesis was also scripted. It just happened he lacked cut scenes after his appearance.

Totally agree!

Andy Ps exactly! What the fuck makes it impossible for Capcom to apply the same things they did to the RE1 remake?

Also valid to remember that the OG RE3 was a throw away project, that in the middle of the road got the RE3 name and Jill as a protagonist. It was supposed to be a spin off. Considering that and how insanely replayable and iconic it became, that's actually crazy.

ChocolateRob right? Isn’t it crazy that a game almost 2 decades ago was far more expansive, had more variety throughout the game and had much more replay value than a game in 2020 with all the improved technology we have? I was expecting these new remakes would match and maybe even surpass the quality of the RE1 remake... What the fuck makes it impossible to do?

The more technology, the more expensive. The more expensive, the less content. I want to go back to the 90s, when content actually mattered.

They'll probably do the Final Fantasy 7 remake approach and make Resident Evil 4 episodic, $60 for each chapter. 🤔😬🤢

They will just completely skip CVX too.

It will have 3 stages: town, sewers and nest 3. And it won't be located in Spain anymore because people made fun of ganados' voice acting for over 15 years.

Rem4ke is gonna suck

@@samcortez420 ff7 remake at least has the excuse of 1) being a full 35-40 hour game with a lot of new and revamped content even just for Midgar 2) clearly being more of a sequel, with a changing storyline. you can argue that the latter is bad, but at least its not a shameless cash grab--it has legitimate content and work put into it.

RE4 Remake: Trash 😂😂😂😂😂

@@neildrunkmaam7040 Probably.

@@neildrunkmaam7040 Joel dies

RE 2 is just as fucked xD

@@TrenElZombie yeah it's got alot of cut content/changes. Some of it's good. Some of it sucks.

I actually liked what they did with RE2 remake (admit it - at least it is long enough and engaging enough horror suspense experience RE known for, despite its obvious flaws and problems majority of which have to do with Campaign “B” anyway...RE3 remake doesn’t even have that!…) And btw lots of remakes/remasters of PSOne classics are handled rather well actually, especially Crash Bandicoot and Spyro franchises, also Final Fantasy 7 is unique and quite faithful remake (yes it changed mechanics, but this is still great remake, cuz they made it work!) Also Crash Bandicoot 4 is amazing follow up of N Sane Trilogy!

Now now, OP. RE2r is pretty good.

RE1 HD Remaster quite literally is telling you it isn't a remake. It's not a ground up edit of the entire game.

@@Xibyth Last time I checked, the word “Remastered” was only added to the title for the 2015 version of RE1, indicating that it is a remaster of 2002’s RE1, which was a ground-up remake of the original 1996 game on PS1. This makes your statement sound like the equivalent to suggesting that the 2019/2020 versions of RE2 & RE3 should stop being referred to as remakes, if they each were to get remastered editions years later.

@@markcobuzzi826 You know what wasn't rebuilt from the ground up, the story, or the core game design, or the asthetics. You know, pretty much nothing but the graphics and some new additions that add to the story but take nothing from it. A template re-design is not a remake.

Because they are not remakes and they never were. Both are reimaginations

@@zerot480 They even scrapped the multiple Choice Sections. -.-

bryan c Tank controls and fixed camera were not design choices as much as they were just expected for the times and for performance. I’m not defending the remake here but Haley’s not pretend those controls were a good thing.

Um... Over the shoulder is good.

@@221Prohunter Fixed camera and tank controls are just as valid as any other presentation. I dont care if it was "just the times". Its a formula I happen to like and encourage more devs to explore it.

@Alma Penada Dude, I love RE4 and its OTS but it doesn't make the fixed cameras suddenly bad.

When someone just goes around claiming the Fixed Camera is a bad playing mechanic because of "NOSTALGIA", that is just no different from saying that anyone who likes OTS, likes it only because of the "NOSTALGIA" too. Aside from the fact that the Third Person Shooters mechanic is even more outdated than the Fixed Camera mechanic. Even games like CONTRA (1987) used the mechanics of Third Person Shooters in several segments of it!

Yup

I ripped last of us 2 to shreds this game I was only heartbroken and just return it

Me three

Booooooooooooo you suck

This is the serve

I think the way they could have handled it was to have the RE2 Remake keep in those moth-infested rooms and have that lab area provide the same general gameplay, as the RE3 Remake’s power station infested with those mini-Drain Deimos. The moths could latch onto Claire/Leon to suck blood and inflict a poisoned status. With the moths providing the kind of gameplay, the Drain Deimos in the next remake would be free to behave as common medium-sized enemies, like their original counterparts. To incorporate that new idea of Drain Deimos laying eggs inside people, they could be divided between males (whose proboscis inject digestive juices for raw damage) and females (who inject a neurotoxin, resulting in less immediate damage but also a lasting poisoned effect). If a male fatally grabs Jill, then it is implied that her insides are fully liquified and being “drained” out, while a fatal grab from a female results in Jill becoming paralyzed, before the female injects eggs inside with a separate stinger. Meanwhile, the Brainsucker could be promoted to a boss or mini-boss.

This game deserves all the hate it gets

@@freakattack9616 - Capcom deserve all the hate they get. Outsourcing it to a company that didn't have a clue what they were doing, and allowing Peter Fabiano to make cuts to it left, right and centre.

@@Inconvenient_NPC Yeah, proves they don't give a shit about their own franchise.

@@freakattack9616 this is what happen when a company goes too far and smell it's own fart.

It's bad game and it deserves to be mocked. Capcom phoned it in with RE3R and had the audacity to charge full price for glorified DLC.

tru

Optional tho

Black lizard still in the og tho

Nikolai*

I'm pretty sure the answer is yes