*This licence raj is reason why older generation forced us for govt jobs and doesn't let us to become an entrepreneur. Licence raj destroys entrepreneurship culture in India*
@@yj9032 caste system has nothing to do with it. Only if India adopted capitalist system then we would be rich like east asian countries. Caste system would have been erased due to liberalism.
There is one main reason for Japanese companies to dominate the world in automobile industry, which is, that the Japanese companies PAID their engineers to go on vacations to places like Detroit, Germany, Italy and see their cars being manufactured and also drive them. For some engineers they sponsored them to pursue Masters in those countries, which helped for a soft technology transfer through not making any deals. The entire world was against Japan and their companies after WW2, so they could not make any deals with other companies even if opened their market at that time.
The same evolutionary step was followed by China. They send their young brain overseas to gain knowledge and bring it back into the country to establish the Chinese economy. Indian government is at least a decade or two behind such policies so will see a growth slowly.
Watched the history of world's first bullet train, the Shinkansen and how it started operation in 1964 on the channel Mustard. Japanese are something else.
@@rudrapratappoonia4093 brother India has always been behind in car and automotors....even today modifying you car illegal...limousine and many cars are illegal in india bcz of safety reasons.....after 50 years you might be saying the same thing for current regulations of automotors in india
What were the force of 250 doing? After making minor tweaks in parking lamp front grill and tail lamp lens. Reverse light was luxury which the customer had to fit after purchasing. The whole body of the car had to be rewelded for reliability. Door mirrors was a big luxury.
GTRE (DRDO) is developing fighter plane engine Kaveri for last 40 years. Billions wasted but no solution. Tejas was initially supposed to be with Kaveri engine but finally using imported I think GE engine.
Let me tell you an insider story when maruti 800 was first launched in India , HM bought 2 cars and tried to figure out the engine. The entire R & D team of HM couldn't figure out then they were forced to tie up with Isuzu for their engines coz they were so overwhelmed with the modernity of Japanese engines. My family is involved with the automobile industry in Kolkata so thats how I know this story don't know if it's public or not
Maruti had tieup with Isuz for sometime to build more powerful engines. I had seen some Isuzu batched MS Zen so no surprise. India never built its own engine, all are imported or taken after company acquisition - like M&M took Daewoo, Tataa took JLR. else so far zero domestic engines. Dont be surprised with this bitter truth. We were always kaamchor.
@@techcloud2510Your View though partly true but not entirely accurate. Mahindra had their own engines before acquiring Daewoo or sannyong which they did so get some premium segment tech , Tata engines from indica had problems but yeah they did transfer JLR engine tech to modern tata cars hence we can see the refinement in Nexon , Safari , Harrier. Maruti doesn't exist only their service network does with a small share it's all Suzuki ...but Suzuki tying up with ISUZU makes not sense. It's not that the car companies r kamchor as u defined , the industry doesn't work like that most consumers have diff understanding of how stuff works in the car industry. Except for the chassis no car company builts anything inhouse that is also true for the rest of the world...the story is too long to comment here so I will leave at this ....Our companies are not kamchor it just doesn't make economic sense to build a new engine from scratch all the time ...
@@shashwatsinha2704 Nope after HM died nothing from the car industry is produced here and that goes for the component market as well. Most company plants are in Chennai coz the infrastructure for automobile market their is superb hence it's also called the Detroit of India , then there is maharastra nd Delhi,Punjab and Chandigarh as well .
Bro saare nehru bhakt bahut socialist or communist mindset ke log hai jo ki bas yahi sochte hai ki desh me koi Amir aadmi nahi hona chahiye aur sab ki income lagbhag equal hona chahiye. In logo ka mindset se lekar speech sun leta hu to khun khaul uthta hai😢
@@spy4623so you are in love with income inequality isn't it? Ultra rich billionaires control everything and things like "choice" and rule of law are illusions. Just wait till India becomes just like US, where everything including Healthcare is controlled by billionaires and corporations. Rich people can get off the hooks of law just by their influence and political connections. Is this what we really want? You are either a privileged person or just delusional if you think income inequality is good fir anybody.
Ambassador car represent Congress era of darkness... corruption, impotent leaders, nepotism, etc even Pakistan was doing much better than India economically then..
Ok, can you name a Pakistani company that made cars? I don't like congress either, but India is India. We made our own fighter jet when those as*holes were using the US jets. Pls don't compare our country with a rogue nation like Pakistan. By the way... They don't have a single car brand.
arey they still wanting to take India back 10-20 years. They are fighting to break the high speed roads and giving false promises to farmers that those lands on which roads are built can be used for farming and congress will give them that. This party just want money from us and does not want to see any advancement anywhere.
@@Adi_98_ even if cong comes in 2024, they will not change certain things like, they wont reduce gst rates, they wont allow VPN which got banned this year, they will not change policies with regards to telecom bill etc.
Same happened with HAL They destroyed Hal R&D Hal made the first Supersonic Jet in Asia with the help of west Germany scientists India was first in Asia to do (not china,Japan or anyone) But our government didn't alloted fund for engine Marut was made for 2 mark speed But they provided fund for 0.7mark speed And they bought Soviat junk mig 21
Even india could get uk engine after burning technology whivh was offered to india officialy but our beloved Netas sabotaged it by purchasing junk fighters.
We have been assembling soviet era machine guns, tanks, personnel carriers, rocket launchers , MiG-21, 23,25,27,29 and now Su-30Mkis etc. All these things were forced on India by Russia and Indian DPSUs and OFB who were getting good salaries and Overtime payments to assemble them in India.. This created leftist votebank who voted for Congress as these PSUs employed large workforce.. Russia still claims it saved India from US attack in 1971 Bangladesh war when US had brought it's aircraft carrier USS Enterprise in the Bay of Bengal.. Right now Modi govt is gradually corporatising DPSUs to run them cost-effectively..
@@kimjong-un1217 Modi is selling because socialist/communist scums made India beg infront of Imf, because of their socialist policy and imf forced those rotten brains to introduce LPG policy, P for privatisation.
@@kimjong-un1217 at the end of the day let’s check the results, only to realise that we are currently the fifth largest economy in the world and will become a 10 trillion-dollar economy in a few years😂😂 Modi hai toh mumkin hai!
Lack of understanding has a limit. Socialist policies gave us a growth rate of 4-5 % yearly, it was the best policy for that era. It gave us green revolution, white revolution, took large percentage out of poverty. We would have been pakistan if we had gone capitalist route. Every country was closed economy both capitalist and socialist of that time. Neoliberalism or free flow of capital started on 1974-80s. In india it began full fledged on 1992 LPG reforms.
Back in 2008, I got a job offer from HM in my college placement. During the interview rounds I asked one of the panelists why there are no changes in the design or no new models coming out of HM. The response was hilarious. They said, the car was designed in such a way that even changing anything as fine as a hair would disrupt the fine balance of the Ambassador car. Thankfully I never joined them and they got shut down some years later.
Remember Bajaj Chetak that had a defect because of which you had to tilt it in order for it to start? That succeeded in the Indian market for the same reason as well, Bajaj family was close to Government. They even managed to sell the same Chetak without fixing that flaw for couple of decades. In open market that product would have rotted in factories. Even Maruti Suzuki manage to enter India, because the Nehru's Grandchild Sanjay Gandhi wanted to start a car company. Even Royal Enfield remained as relevant in India while the original Enfield went bankrupt in UK when better alternatives became available.
@@devyanilimaye8560 My father used to buy a new Chetak every year. I think there was a wait of 8-9 months. He used to book it, as soon as he took the delivery of his new scooter. And sell it for about the same price as soon as he got the allotment. I always asked him to buy a Splendor or LML Select for their better designs but never understood the power of resale value in those days.
India has lost its potential for economic development due to this corruption of Nehru Gandhi family party congress and (hindi chino bhai bhai) due to this we have lost Aksai chin UN permanent seat PAKISTAN BANGLADESH many of Hindu that we killed due to indo pak devision and we have lost the growths that china has taken in 1960-90s
China started growing in the 90s before than India and China has almost the same gdp but I do agree corrupt government from the 50s and it's socialist policies destroyed the industrial potential of India
Chennai has renault nissan Hayundai BMW. Delhi has maruti and honda. Mumbai has mahindra,scoda, merc , audi and VW. Rven recent developed Gujrat has MG and TATA, Karnataka has Volvo and Toyota. We in Kolkata have none except the false pride of being the cultural capital.
India was literally USSR colony till 1990. As soon as USSR (socialism) collapsed, we also got bankrupt. Then came the American (capitalism) owned IMF to bail us out. But but but they came with strict conditions like adopting capitalism and making economic and foreign policies as per their conditions. So it was not Manmohan Singh who liberalised Indian economy but India was forced by IMF to do so. Any nation which takes loan from IMF literally looses it's sovereignty to USA. Latest example is Pakistan. It's only post 2014 we actually started becoming sovereign nation.
70 years of becoming lazy and non-productive under stupid socialist policies usually leads to such "desh bech raha hai" comments from those people. These same people will look with awe at infrastructure in foreign countries built with "desh bech raha" companies in those countries and complain why don't we have those in India, but will cry about privatization in India when those same infrastructure are being developed in India.
@@ArghyadeepPal & irony is same ppl supports manmohan singh & rajiv gandhi for privatisation & liberalisation of economy no doubt y gujrat & south indian states r in much better position in terms of economy & buisness environment as compared to bihar bengal etc
Story of Nehru family is the story of licence raj. Had Mr Narasimha Rao not become the PM of the country, India would have been not much different from Pakistan or Sri Lanka. Nehru family is a curse to the nation 😚
You could have touched upon Standard Motors of Chennai, their flagship Std 2000 was unmatched in performance and demand. I was told the govt under compulsion made that company face untold hurdles and die an indecent death ( may be because of Ambassodor)
@@vivekanandpattar1607 Standard 2000 did not fail. It was killed by TN based Minister who was adequately taken care of his Corporate boss. The Car was a great success. The manufacturer was a Iyengar -Brahmin and the TN based minister had used all his powers to close the company, adequately aided by local DMK mafia led. The murder of the company was deeply rooted in caste cum commercial / corrupt political basis.
Rover 2000 was discarded, and left over bodies were imported in knocked down condition. A small low rated power plant was fixed inside a huge space. Everyone who bought that monaster regretted soon.
Definitely Indian automotive industry could have been at very different heights if govt. hadn't put restrictions on other car companies. Greatly informative and interesting video 🔥
Problem wasn't putting restrictions, problem was putting restrictions for personal gains, filling their own pockets unlike Japan who actually took the initiative and time to develop it's automotive industry and actually developed it. If India did that we would've been so much further than what we are now
@@sumergill1351 Before Hindustan Motors, there no one Manufacturer of Cars In India. HM was only the first manufacturer of Cars in India. By B M Birla,1942.
Yes, what you said is perfectly fine. Ambassador was the only leading car in a row of 3 cars Herald and PAL. Ambassador occupied the lion's share of the market by monopoly with the help of politicians. You had to book an Ambassador car by paying advance I don't remember now how much. May be 1000 or 5000 Rs. No interest. You will get the car after 3 to 5 years. Influential people got faster. The Mark 1 to 4 were just minor changes like mirror, seat, etc. Shameful. We saw a real car when Indira Gandhi ordered a small car factory for her younger son uneducated unemployed Sanjay. In collaboration with Suzuki, a minor motor manufacturer then. I think it was one of the smallest cars Suzuki 800, very cheap. There was still cheaper one Isuzu. Very few purchased it. I am telling the situation outside India. For Indian executives who were pampered with Premier Padmini, an oldie car from PAL, Suzuki was a dream. Very few opted for Herald. Ambassador felt the heat after the eighties. They made Hindustan Contessa. I think Ambassador engine with a bigger better body. Unfortunately it was a mismatch and failure. Soon Rajiv Gandhi opened up foreign collaboration. Ambassador slowly lost its ground. Natural death. Well deserved. Exploitied Indians of 2 generations. Same design. Poor looks. Poor service.
Ambassador was the king of Indian roads... A king with no queen, minister or subjects... 😂 Indians are bred in such a way that they are always afraid of competition. But they need to believe that they are capable of becoming the leaders of competition. I hope someday Tata Mahindra and other Indian companies will rule the world if corruption remains low.
Lack of upskilling and finding solutions through teamwork is the cause of uncompetitive actions worldwide more like. The modern world upskilled their "uneducated" citizens via evening adult courses since the 1970s. Most of India was stuck in just blaming innocent citizens until around early 2000.
@@c.bulakh6231 you should shut up first. Tata outsources chassis from Land Rover, engine from Fiat and gearbox from Hyundai in the Safari. Most parts used in their cars are Chinese. Mahindra also has a research facility in Detroit, design studio in UK as well. Just being present in all segments doesn't guarantee quality. Tata cars are unreliable, bad after-sales service, bad spare part availability. Mahindra is slowly but surely improving in terms of quality.
I am a small town boy born and never sat on a car, At 1995 I went to Calcutta (now kolkata) I was only 10 years old this was the first time i sat in the car and that was a Yellow taxi Ambassador. For me it was a once in a life moment. Sitting on a car felt like a king sitting on the throne. I'll never forget that experience. You didn't hurt my feelings your video was very well made the details, its history and its timeline, your humbleness thank you for bringing out the details. Great job
@@sauron2000000 bhai ye aj ki govt ke talwe chatt RU-vidr hai.. Jinko pahle ke zamane ka zero Experience hai.. In ko lagta hai desh 2014 me azad hua hai.. 😂😂😂😂😂
My father bought his first Fiat 1100 Delight back in 1969. After using it for a long 14years and 2.5 laks kilometres, we upgraded to a bigger car THE AMBASSADOR Mark IV in 1983. I remember my father showing me the owner's manual which said ' We manufacture cars with or without sleeves '. Which means even the new engines needed boring and sleeves inserted to get proper compression. Sad state of affairs
@@swamivardana9911 If you don't like AMBY chhodo. Like Maruti- Tin ka dabba. We are used AMBASSADOR for 1983-2010. There are no engine problems. And very cheap to maintain. The bullisht crap is you people. Run BMW in Indian Rural ROADS.
Once india started liberalize both Birla and Bajaj went to Delhi and cried in front of Rajiv Gandhi not to do so. They reminded they were patriotic and step is against india! They reminded how they supported M. Gandhi. Not only Govt was at fault Indias industrial houses were very happy with socialism!
It was corporatism, that the industry was happy with. If the government had taken one more step towards socialism (such as nationalising those companies) they would have been the first to leave the country with all their wealth (just like how companies had left West Bengal). Their patriotism is nothing but a lie.
That's impressive, being a petrohead and fan of ambassador cars it hurts to digest the facts you showed but totally changed the perspective to look at policies implemented by governments. Appreciate your time and effort for such kind of informative videos bhai. The subscribers count is low when compared to content you bring up in your videos. Hope your channel reaches many. Miles to go!!!!!
Workd war 2 ke baad japan korea china adha Europe sab barbad ho gye the par sab ne kudh ko rebuild kar liya bas bharat mai hi ek pariwar ne ulte sidhe kam kr ke bharat ka development ko rok ke rakha
You did such deep research on it and made unbiased and unfiltered video about how corruption became a big obstacle for automobile Industry's growth. It's been an honour working on your projects like these. This channel is most definitely the smartest auto-info channel in India that I've ever seen.
That's how Indian govt worked pushing our country atleast 30-40 years back. See how ahead China is from India even after almost similar workforce. INC should never be allowed to return specially under leadership of same Gandhy family.
You are right about the ending part your told Our government officials are not even willing to get a change in this industry They are banning modifications You can't use old cars those were real classic Not supporting motor sports They just think that car is a item for going from one place to another I hate that too People who want to follow there dreams of NASCAR and le mans have to go abroad Coz in this country you if you are a car guy Than you are not supposed to be alive and government will not even support you
There were strong rumours in those days that.the Birlas had bribed L.K.Jha an advisor to the government to give a report in favour of Birlas to manufacture the car. He was then made Governor of Jammu and Kashmir.
Even after watching the whole video, people blaming nehru for this is the height of the attitude that indians are famous for. It's very clear that japan too was just like india, with the same policies, but with an even smaller domestic market. But the difference was in the mindset of the people. The japanese took the same opportunity (even though of a smaller scale) and blew it to great proportions. Just like any typical indian, HM was more focused on only taking money from the customer, not giving any return in worth for the money he was making in any development or improvement in what product he gave. It's not just in this case, but any case. The very mindset with which indians and other people do things just makes it all the more clear. The mindset and attitude of the indian beurocracy is the best example for this. If you study what china did for some years with its human resource and infrastructure, you'll get the point. They perfected their skills, and brought perfection to their skills. One thing every one in the entire world will agree on is that if the same product is compared from india and any other country, it is gojng to be so much inferior in perfection and performance. Since some years it has changed a lot, but still those who are familiar with indians in many countries can very well get it.
There are two separate mindsets in Indian business. One is Tata and the other is Birla or desi businessmen. Tata's support employee welfare and venture out in different markets, perform research and development, donate money for a good cause, create institutes of higher learning, build healthcare, and expand business for the greater good of the community. On the opposite side, we have Birlas, who never pay the salaries to their employee for several months, over work their employees by sucking the blood out of them, do not take risk in developing or improving, do not put money in research, and focus only on making profits at the cost of welfare and safety of their employees. Both Ambassador and Premier Padmini were owned by marwaris. Whatever cheap quality technology was handed out by a foreign company to Birla, they accept it, and produce that product for the next 50 years without any investment to improve that product. The original foreign company that provided that old technology must have already moved on and improvised the older version of the product. But Birlas are very happy making money on the product based on old outdated technology. They will never invest money in a new technology unless either competition comes out with a new product or consumers opt for imported newer product. If India were to be run by Birla's, there would have been extreme poverty in India, over-worked and underpaid employees, high malnourishment, people will only live on borrowed money from marwaris with lots of credit, no opportunity for non-marwari's to own business, will never share their wealth for community projects like Tata's, will never donate, and will remain economically under-developed. India would be doomed under Indian businessman or Marwari rule. They would in fact break down and the sell the country by each state to the highest bidders. Of course, there are exceptions to everything. Some marwari businessmen may be providing better compensation to their employees and donate money for a good cause. But majority of Indian businessmen are only there to take your money from your pocket, but give very little in return. Once a tv reporter asked this question to JRD Tata on tv, "Why don't you build temples like Birlas do?". His response, "I built Tata Cancer Research Center, and other hospitals to serve those cannot afford treatment". In our Santaa Dharma, serving people and doing Seva is the "param dharma". But majority of our Indian businessmen are totally ignorant. Ambani's are marginally better than Birlas, but they are crooks nevertheless. Now we have Gautam Adani, another fraud in the making. I have personally interviewed employees from Tata's in Jamshedpur and Birla's in Calcutta. Employees working for the Tata companies are happy and satisfied. But employees working for Birla's are miserable and complained that they never get paid on time. Tata's get blessings from their employees. Whereas Birla employees shower curses on the Birla family. Thanks to Tata's. We have Steel industries, Automobiles, Education institutes such as IISc in Bangalore, TFIR, Airline industry, TISS, Tata Cancer Research Center, Hospitals, and more.They are a devine blessing to India. Tata's are an asset of India. Then we have the Ambani's, Birlas, and rest of the rotten businessmen, who are the blood suckers, and they selfishly only look for profit everywhere, at the cost of community development. If we consider Tata's as the devata, of Gods of the world, then .... Ambani's, Birlas and majority of the desi businessmen are the asuras or rakshasas of the world. This is no offense to any particular business community. I have lots of good marwari friends and those who do business, who grudgingly agree with the above theory.
Ask me... I am ex TCS employee and TCS is worst any fresher can get. Do you know the attrition rates in TCS? It's freaking 16-17 percentage. And adani has already pledged 60k crores in charity. Among most charitable personalities this year by hurun, it's Adani and Shiv Nadar of HCL. And most of the charity that Tata does is just to reduce the tax. In India you don't get taxed on charity money. Do tell me a hospital run by Tata where the hospitalization is free. I'll just visit that hospital. 😂
@@KejriwalBhakt My understanding from one of the TCS employee was that TCS is called as Tamil Consulting Services, as people of Tamil origins have occupied the positions pushed out all non-Tamilians out of jobs. That is one of the reasons why TCS may be having issues. We just cannot compare, Tata's with Amani's, Birla's, and Adani's of the world. Tata is highly regarded around the world. I met one employee from Ukraine who worked for a Birla company in his home country, and he left the company after three months because they never paid his salary. The reason given was that the transfer of salary from India is taking time to get approved by the Reserve Bank of India. That was nonsense, as the from sales was collected in the home country. Birla's not have bad name is India, but even internationally they have a tarnished their image. Maybe things have improved. Adani seems nice, but I have a strong feeling, he will take a large loan from the Indian government, default, and then abscond to foreign land, like that businessman Modi, and Kingfisher guy. Today, only three groups of business can be trusted. Tata's, government of India, and a few well-known publicly traded companies. Most of the private Indian companies are known for three things: not paying salary to their employees on time, not following labor laws, and not providing safety to their employees. Because all these three factors cost more money. These low category Indian businessmen are cheap, do not take risk, and cut corners.
@@SatyaSanathani Can't confirm for the first point about TCS. I have seen so many Telgu guys. Can't confirm for ukraine guy as well because I have no one who works for Birla. Tata is not reputed but just another company. Yes it has works ethics better than AMbani or Adani. As for salary, Ambani jio pays better salary to freshers compared to Tata. Yes unlike Tata Jio expects you to work which is true for any product based company. Adani won't run as his buisness is booming and he is smart to invest in indemand tech like Green energy. Let see what future holds for us. But every business guy is same.
@@KejriwalBhakt I agree with you. I was just presenting my experience. Big business houses should not run away. Ambani's, and Birlas did not run away. But with recent events and with greed taking over the mind, some successful and intelligent people commit mistakes and indulge in illicit activities. I hope Adani bring reforms to Indian enterprises. I wish all businesses success, but you should also serve and pay your employers well. Only then our society can improve. As they say, we cannot have a rich king and a poor praja as was the case during bloody british raj. But this discussion is for another time. Nice chatting with you.
I never got the hype of Ambassador. Other t han having solid metal chassis, the car had nothing to write home about. Specially in the early 2000 onward. Design, safet, technology felt too ancient.
Ambassador was the most horrible car forced upon the Indian public by collusion between the congress and the owners . The owner man followed Mr. Gandhi ( the one whose picture is on the currency notes), everywhere he went . He was gifted this monopoly and the kingdom of West Bengal .
Swatantra Party was India's only Libertarian party till now. They were electrolarly unsuccessful, and party was dissolved. This is time now for Libertarian reboot.
I was born in 1955 and in my younger days the cars I used were Ambassador, Fiat / Premier, Standard Herald and the Willys / Mahindra jeeps. In bikes I rode the Bullet, Jawa / Yezdi and Rajdoot. Also the Vespa and Lambretta scooters. Basically most of the vehicles were petrol guzzlers, except Mahindra, and unreliable. It's only after Maruti and Hyundai etc. that the market opened up to international brands. Todays youth have hundreds of models to choose from. India wasted four decades before developing the auto industry. That too in a market with a rapidly growing population. I agree with the presentation. The licence Raj created a mindset of mediocrity which continues even today. Very few indigenous brands can compete in quality with developed countries.
Just to add to what I wrote earlier. My comments are not political but I notice lots of Congress baiters and Modi supporters around spreading a false narrative. Modi's contribution to the automobile industry is ZERO. Remember it was Rajiv Gandhi who created Maruti Udyog and many other firsts like color TV, multiple channels and the IT revolution. I feel ashamed of the parents of today's young generation talking nonsense here and blaming poor Nehru. He had no time for cars and bikes. He was more involved in the food security challenges and other macro problems of a young nation. Ask your grandfather or father about Nehru and grow up.
Fact you nailed it Our government is only interested in squeezing off money from our pockets. Look how much insensible the system is to hinder an enthusiast from doing any modifications on cars. They just want to channelize the stock trades of bigger corporations.
Excellent article. The take away here is not that the Ambassador was a bad car or that the HF-24 was superior to MiG -21, it is that if the government does not allow innovation, it stifles design, engineering and advancement. HM had no need for design, they were a manufacturing house that had a captive market. Similarly, HAL became a purely manufacturing house because the HF-24 design team was disbanded after their highly successful design (interesting way to reward performance). Also, a government has to be extremely naïve to trust their erstwhile colonial masters to give them a cutting edge jet engine to power a fighter designed by a German that could be a rival to the British Electric Lightning with two RR Avon engines. Expected outcomes occurred.
I do not think there is anything to be emotional about Ambassador car. In the 80S, it was a reflection of India, lazy, complacent and too much of false pride just like that car. It still runs on Kolkata roads and you know how Kolkata is in terms of modern industrialization - zilch even today. Maruti changed our mindset and then of course, P V Narasimha Rao by opening up the economy in 1991.
Nehru and Indira didn't liked development of India even when they were the rulers, but even in his small tenure, Rajiv Gandhi tried something to do. He brought in the Japanese companies to collaborate with Indian companies and manufacture goods. Though he wasn't so intelligent as his mother and did some mistakes, but in his heart he loved India.
Hamare government hi pahle se hi bekar thi chahe law bnana ho ya sarkar 😡 us vkt sirf risvat chalti thi aaj congress ki sarkari nhi hai TB bhi risvat chalti 😡agr congress ki sarkar bn jaye to des ko brbad hone koe nhi bcha skta🥺 e etihas khudko proof kr Chuka hai congress srkar ke vkt me
Awesome information. Kudos to Biturbo media team for such an informative video. Some people criticise RU-vid content creators of creating videos on government policies and how it's not related to private business development. Those people should see this eye opener.
C'on.. why were you apologetic in the end ?? You spoke the truth ... I still do not understand how on earth someone idolises that car .. and fun fact ..i was surprised to know that HM had an R&D wing .. lol ... Jackpot job .. you get paid for doing nothing
Very good video (Good research), Please make Video on "Bajaj Chetak" and how it dominated market for decades. Rahul Bajaj opposed economic liberalization in 1991. Aditya Birla left India in 1970s to do Business elsewhere as India was rotting under Nehruvian Secularism and Command economy. Read "India Unbound" book by GurCharan Das it has plenty of details like this.
Communism me yahi hota hai isliye Aaj Russians Indians ko apne se bahut developed mante hai.... Thanks to privatisation, liberalisation and globalisation.....
We are not materialistic we want car to transport us from point A to B with good cabin space and strong suspension for harsher road conditions with low maintenance and easy to fix and there you have it the ambassador the AK 47 of Indian car build by ☭
India should have been in superpower status by now. But we missed the opportunity -- thanks to Nehru We even lost UN council permanent membership. Thanks to Nehru Corruption scams. All introduced by the post independent govt policies which has now taken a heavy toll on India
You are 100% correct. The major chunk of Licence Raj is still present in India even today and politically lobbied monopoly still exist. The socialist elements are deeply engraved in our bureaucracy system...something that no company or organisation or individual can supersede.
I sometimes wonder that how some people fantasize about this car for almost no reason. This car was always a below quality product and unable to stand against the competion in every decade.
Ambassador car के बारे में जानकारी के लिए बहुत धन्यवाद। परंतु यह सच भी बता दे कि टाटा मोटर्स के ट्रक आज भी 50 साल पुराने Mercedes-Benz के इंजन से चलते है।
@@prince2.22 actually the smaller engines that tata makes like their inline 4 are Mercedes inspired. Just like many other motorcycle manufacturers made Honda horizontal engine inspired engines and still make.
Thank you so much for your candid observations. Competition motivates Innovation, while monopoly breeds complacency. Apart from Monopoly and Govt. policies, I feel there are many other factors like no incentive or promotion for improvement, lack of highly skilled engineers who could make changes, shortage of capital for modernization. etc. Even today it's an irony that Petrol with additives (HP Power, IOCL XPlus etc.) is treated as luxury product and higher taxes are levied on it. The truth is, by adding additives in Petrol, there is less pollution, less were and tear of the engine and better milage, resulting in direct benefit for the country. But instead of promoting, successive govts are trying to extract more tax from the user and indirectly discouraging use of a superior product.
Not just Ambassador, HMT tractor, Rajdoot bike shared similar destiny. Ok i can understand that government closed policy did not motivate R&D, but what about companies and people? Even today we have to beg for patents from international companies.
Nehruvian galat economy has wrecked havoc with Indias and having no other option Manmohon Singh was forced to open up economy under compulsion but Congis turned it as their credit instead of taking the blame.
Boss, your observations are so correct. Good discussion. Sad part is that government bureaucratic corruption and short sighted policies are still crippling Indian industry. The rules and policies are outdated, not relevant and cannot compete in the international arena. Taxation of automotive industry is completely unreasonable. Indian citizens are not able to enjoy the output of Indian industry, let alone international. Our tax structure limits potential for growth and limits aspirations...because of corruption and incompetent government servants. So sad.
Corruption is far higher today and the media is bought lock and stock by Ambani and adani. In those days media was still independent and would ask difficult questions from the politicans. Today media is only cheerleader for bjp.
@@msbatra3868Yes, I can see that every indian road is occupied with only a single model of ambassdor(probably corruption of bjp). Also we have lost so many opportunities of forming aviation industries with multinational gaints just like in 60s because Air india dominates the aviation industry as it is a family heirloom ,of course bjp's. We can see scam busts reports like 2G scam, coal scam, chopper scam etc. just like back in 2000s. And dont forget delaying economy liberalization which could have boosted the Indian evonomy growth 100 folds as it was bjp govt.
@@msbatra3868 Even lee kuan yew, the revolutionary leader, himself said that India lost many opportunities to achieve the great potential, probably due to bjp's rule. I completely agree with you my friend. What is your name my friend?
@@MentorjiIn in those India was weak and having to deal with a very powerful pakistan, China and usa. So a socialist economy that focused on creating strategic industries and war weapons was needed. Only after India created its nuclear weapons and large scale support from ussr in the 60s and 70s did India become strong enough to scare Pakistan and restrain China.with that India could move to liberalisation of economy as socialist systems are efficient at heavy machinery, military and industry but lack very much in other sectors like service economy, semiconductors and innovation. But yes the heavy industrial and military backbone created by socialism in india enabled India to smash Pakistan and weaken and created the soil on which liberalization, it industry and innovation prospered. Were it not for socialism, India would have been conquered by radical Islam(ghazwa e hind) and your sisters and large numbers of hindu women would have been traded in the Islamic slave markets of pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan. The reason why modi is able to act so boldly is that huge military industrial backbone that was created in 1960s to 1990s by congress. As coal scams, 2g there is enough nepotism of bjp like electoral bond scam, anti democratic farmer Bill created by bjp for adani and Ambani, the crony capitalist control of the press, evm vote rigging. Like how American prosecutors are accusing adani of mass bribery and tax evasion?like how adani and Ambani use law as their puppet. I will agree that congress is a corrupt and useless party but bjp is trying to crush all opposition with the Ed, evm rigging, Mafia like behavior. We have seen it in the case of how they destroyed the Aap party which was made of educated people
True, Our Trucking Industries is also still suffering, as European Trucks power ranges from 350-750 HP and here our trucks pull the same amount of loads with Puny engine HP ranging from 200-300 Hp, due to this our Market and Drivers also suffer.
Thank u for the vdo, it is well researched and well made on HM, however u should hve connected the reality of Maruti Suzuki also as to who owned it and bought it to Indian Auto Market.
