How the Mamluks Defended Against the Mongols - Medieval DOCUMENTARY

Подписаться 3,6 млн

Просмотров 404 тыс.

50% 1

Go to establishedtitles.com/Kings and help support the channel. They are now running a massive Black Friday Sale, plus 10% off on any purchase with code Kings. Thanks to Established Titles for sponsoring this video!
The Kings and Generals animated historical documentary series on Mongol History continues with a video explaining how the Mamluks defended against the Mongols. In our previous episode we discussed the European defence against the Mongol invasions ( • How the Europeans foug... )
Our podcast on Mongol history - kingsandgenerals.libsyn.com/2...
How the Mongol Empire Fell - • How the Mongol Empire ...
Lost History of Genghis Khan - • The Lost History of Ge...
Mongol Ideology - Why Chinggis Wanted to Conquer the World - • Mongol Ideology - Why ...
How the Mongols Became Muslim - • Why and How the Mongol...
Why the Mongols Tolerated Other Religions - • Why the Mongols Tolera...
Rabban Bar Sauma: Adventures of Mongol Marco Polo - • Rabban Bar Sauma: Adve...
Mongol Army - Tactics, Logistics, Siegecraft, Recruitment - • Mongol Army - Tactics,...
Is Genghis Khan Ancestor of the Millions? - • Is Genghis Khan Ancest...
What is the Truth about Tartaria: • What is the Truth abou...
Previous videos in our series on Mongol history - bit.ly/3eezUnW
Support us on Patreon: / kingsandgenerals or Paypal: paypal.me/kingsandgenerals or by joining the youtube membership: / @kingsandgenerals We are grateful to our patrons and sponsors, who made this video possible: docs.google.com/document/d/1o...
The video was made by Galang Pinandita, while the script was developed by Jack Wilson - The Jackmeister. Check out his channel dedicated to the history of the Mongols: / @thejackmeistermongolh... . This video was narrated by Officially Devin ( / @offydgg & / @gameworldnarratives )
✔ Merch store ► teespring.com/stores/kingsand...
✔ Patreon ► / kingsandgenerals
✔ Podcast ► kingsandgenerals.libsyn.com/ iTunes: apple.co/2QTuMNG
✔ PayPal ► paypal.me/kingsandgenerals
✔ Twitter ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Discord ► / discord
✔ Facebook ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Instagram ► / kings_generals
Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound: www.epidemicsound.com
#Documentary #Mongols #Mamluks

Кино

Опубликовано:

25 ноя 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 1,2 тыс.

@pogo8050 Год назад

>gets kidnapped as child by rival tribe > sold into slavery > goes through grueling training to become a loyal elite warrior >topples their new lord >takes over kingdom >successfully defends against the biggest empire of all time >kicks out the last crusaders >refuses to elaborate further >dies

@rwnin Год назад

😂😂

@arqamghaffar1996 Год назад

Refuses to elaborate part is the best one.

@yourroyalchungusness Год назад

Didn't know Mamluks were that chads

@EM-tx3ly Год назад

Baybers He fits the description perfectly

@EM-tx3ly Год назад

@@aze94 Baibers prepared the groundwork for kicking the crusaders out Unlike Saladin He was very ruthless but efficient No mercy or quarters especially for military orders Even giving letters to defeated crusader leaders full of mockery and contempt of their defeats Man of the job

@GreasusGoldtooth Год назад

As someone who has had to deal with several Mongol invasions over the past few years, this series has been hugely helpful to me and my family.

@MyBuzzL Год назад

I thought today mongol is conquered by china. which khan invade ur family?

@John-ir4id Год назад

Can't tell if you're being clever or racist...

@plebestrian9323 Год назад

@@John-ir4id As a mongol horse, I can confirm that it's definitely racism.

@GreasusGoldtooth Год назад

@@John-ir4id Don't worry, I'm just making a dumb joke about this series being about "how to defend against Mongol invasions." I've got no time for bigots of any kind. Being afraid of or angry at people who are different is stupid.

@BaalAdvocate Год назад

Aren't the ogre kingdoms basically mongols?

@googane7755 Год назад

I wished RU-vidrs stopped shilling for established titles, it's a literal scam.

@lordoblivion8038 Год назад

Sadly it won't. Cause they won't get the succulent ad mons

@SxTxferlife Год назад

Most didn't know it was a scam till recently, a very successful scam at that. I only hope that company gets ground to dust

@Darkcamera45 Год назад

@@SxTxferlife it’s a scam dam I didn’t know bro they’re getting good at these scams now a days

@thedude9461 Год назад

Why is it a scam?

@lordoblivion8038 Год назад

@@thedude9461 I think it was that you don't get free land cause a. It is illegal and b some sort of legal reasons

@Irfan87 Год назад

The Mamluks are fairly underrated.

@sagagis Год назад

probably due to Ottoman conquest in 1516-17

@md.shaghilsubhani.1639 Год назад

@@sagagis yep

@fatihahenouze2036 Год назад

@UCnWkd5Hav-3WXFKAwkF1s8Q baybars ended them at the siege of krak de chevalier castle

@SousouCell Год назад

Underated by who ....??

@SousouCell Год назад

@@IStevenSeagal well thats because apart from the battle of ain jalout , wherevhe was a commander under the orders of QUTUZ ( WHOm he killed ), he focused his attention after the battle on the arménians and the crusaders who sided with the mongols , it was his successors who had to deal with a vengeful hulagu .....

@m.meiburger1970 Год назад

Only can imagine how intense , quick and skilled the battle between two armies must had been , when they both were focused on cavalery combat range and melee since childhood . The level of expertise in any aspect of this conflict must had been unique .

@cool06alt Год назад

It was like one of the rare instance of manuver warfare, sort of like how Blitzkrieg waged in WW2. Infantry being barely if almost irrelevant because the battlefield is much closer to area of operation spanning miles.

@yamazakiJumpei Год назад

Isn't it technicaly "cammelry" ?

@SousouCell Год назад

Welll not;really , mongols used primarly Light horse archers , while the mameluk were mostly formed from kipchak tribesmen and khwarezmian turks who had fled , or were enslaved , in the first mongols onslaught ..... the kiptchak for instance, although they were nomadic people from the caucus, their fighting style was closer to heavy cavalry ( lance and protected horse and horseman ), In Ain jalut it was the vanguard of heavy cavalry Led by baibars who clashed the mongol vanguard ( armenian and georgian vassals ) and drew the rest of the mongols in a feigned retreat ......

@aburoach9268 Год назад

@@SousouCell mongol used primarily light horse archers only during the beginning of their conquests, But as they steadily acquired more loot and wealth, they become mostly Heavy horse archers, the Bow still remained their main weapon and the same goes for Mameluke heavy cavalry which also used bows in conjunction with their lances, shields and swords / Both armies mostly consisted of heavy cav that could also shoot arrows

@bilalkafa7856 Год назад

Because central asia people kept fighting each other all the written history, I dont think it was uniqe. Scale of the armies were not uniqe either.

@nenenindonu Год назад

Fun fact : Both Baibars and Qutuz had a common Turkic background, originating from lands that had been previously ravaged by Mongols, which were Cumania and Khwarezmia respectively. A shared fate and revenge

@Mysteriousman355 Год назад

Arab bro and and Turk

@nenenindonu Год назад

@@Mysteriousman355 Arab ? Baybars originated from the Kipchak Turkic Berish tribe whereas Qutuz was a royal descented Oghuz Turk who had belonged to the Anushtegin Dynasty of the Begdili tribe (ruling house of the Khwarezmian empire)

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

@@Mysteriousman355 Arabs were nobody in the time of Crusades and Mongol Empire😂

@thewarriorfrog Год назад

@9/11 was done by bush Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks " Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39 Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012

@ahmedkhaled8719 Год назад

@@Mysteriousman355 they had turkic origins but i don't understand why are you arguing about that at their time race didn't matter

@abdallaha92 Год назад

As someone who has studied Mamluk history of a decade, this video is.....perfect. You included virtually every important aspect of the Mamluk-Ilkhanate war. A few interesting details: When the Abbasid Caliph al-Mustansir II was on his ill-fated campaign, he ended up meeting another "Caliph", Al-Hakim I, and they ended up joining forces. Al-Hakim ended up taking refuge in Egypt, becoming Baybar's puppet Caliph. In terms of the use of spies, Baybars had once gotten Abaqa to execute one of his loyal commanders by fooling him into thinking he was a traitor. In the 1500s, Ismail I had executed the leader of the Crimean Tatars, and sent it to Sultan Ghawri. The move deeply offended the Mamluks, as they had considered them to be the successors of the Golden Horde, who was remembered as deep allies 200 years ago.

@DDKKAY Год назад

The Mamluks of the year 1500 were mostly Circassians (Cherkess)

@fab-freshaquaponicbiospher6335 Год назад

Baybar's letter to Berke: Bro, Allah hu Akbar Berke to Baybar: hmmmmm . But truth to be told,it is so beautiful that slaves were so well treated by Muslims that the Slaves rose to Level of Elites.. And were even seen humanely enough by other Lords and Elites to support these Slaves in overthrowing the Ruling Kings and Lords... . In Feudal Europe, a Slave was never allowed to educate himself.. Let alone sit with Lords and gain their support and respect..

@ibrahimyilmaz4861 Год назад

@@fab-freshaquaponicbiospher6335 plain disrespectful.

@SlavaSlavenima 11 месяцев назад

@@fab-freshaquaponicbiospher6335 they had more than one type of slave in the Muslim world

@orkunyucel3095 10 месяцев назад

Both armies had mainly good mounted archers and good light and heavy cavalry. The Mamluk Sultanate was ruled by Turkic Kipchaks and Caucasian Circassians. The army was made mainly of these two groups. The Mamluk Sultanate is the successor of the Ayyubid Sultanate, which is also of Turkic origin. In those years, Turkic Kipchak youth and Caucasian Circassian youth were enslaved in Central Asia and Eurasia during Mongol attacks and sold as slave soldiers to some countries in the Middle East. The Turkic Ayyubid Dynasty used these Turkic Kipchak and Caucasian Circassian youth in their armies after training them in a good military school. The Ayyubid army consisted mainly of these two groups. In the beginning, Turkic groups were much more. However, these soldiers had taken over the sultanate after a coup d'etat and established the Mamluk Sultanate. The word Mamluk means 'Slave' in Arabic. The language of agreement in the Mamluk Sultanate was Western Turkish, a mixture of Kipchak and Oghuz. In the past, only Arabic and Persian education was given in Madrasahs and Turkish was not a language taught in Madrasahs. For this reason, if someone in the Middle East speaks Turkish or writes in Turkish at that time, that person is Turkish. This is a litmus paper for understanding that period. "Kitâbu Bulgatü'l-Müştâk Fî Lügati't-Türk Ve'l-Kıfçak" , "Kitâbü'l-Ef'al" and "Kitâb-ı Mecmû-ı Tercümân-ı Türkî and Acemî ve Mugalî” are some examples written in Mamluk Kipchak language.

@Warmaker01 Год назад

The assassination of Qutuz after his smashing victory of Ain Julut really is shocking. He never got the chance to use it as a springboard for later actions and gaining more prestige since he was killed not long after the battle. The power struggle and mistrust while in power, the "game" never ends.

@khadaareofficial7992 Год назад

I think mongols woulda rule the if there was no Qutuz

@AntonNb Год назад

I think it's a culture from Turks... ottoman sultan also eliminate their own family up till suleman ..it's harsh but it's effective way to prevent power struggle in future

@teukufadel8293 Год назад

@@AntonNb just look at the Mughal war of sucessions

@PLayAshEFF72 6 месяцев назад

Allah gave him victory then shortly after let him rest, and God willing he has earned his place in Paradise. Arguable the most important Battle in Islamic history after the early Muslim battles.

@hallaldude3478 Год назад

I think the most strategically important reason that made the mamluks win was that they watched a kings and generals video before battle.

@Mysteriousman355 Год назад

😂😂

@abcd9283 Год назад

😁💪😁

@thalmoragent9344 Год назад

Imagine going back in time and uniting the locals of a region like the mamluks to just flex on the Mongols in a way they're not expecting 👀

@isseabdirahmanweheliye9010 Год назад

@@thalmoragent9344 we have that in Hollywood.

@StuffyMc Год назад

The mamluks are perhaps the most interesting historical fighting force to me. Their armor being stunningly beautiful and their huge variance throughout their time in social status, from slaves to kings, is so damn engaging to learn about.

@mencot89 5 месяцев назад

yeah. they are underrated at least in modern world. they should have make movies of them. i know i'd watch it

@blablableh724 Год назад

Baybars was clearly a military genius.

@abdaalahmad5483 Год назад

It would be an understatement if you knew what a life he lived.

@kalt4689 Год назад

First of all, “Barbarians”.. Second of all, they were way more intelligent than anyone else at that time, apparently. Third, “Barbarians” is a European monarchy that came up with the term to look down on people who are different than them. Yet, they were getting executed left & right by Mongols 😂

@sohype6827 Год назад

@@kalt4689 Baybars is the name of the military commander, he's not talking about the Amazigh people.

@Goaturbo Год назад

@@kalt4689 Big oof my guy.

@blakesexton2258 Год назад

@K Alt that is not at all where the term barbarian comes from

@mahmoudnh9690 Год назад

as a man who was born and raised In the small town of Krak des chevaliers, I felt kinda proud when it got mentioned since this is the first time I have seen it in a historical video

@khadaareofficial7992 Год назад

Qutuz knew letting Baibars back to Egypt would not only put risk to his power of possession, but also his life and he still choose to defend the umah no matter what. What a guy 🤌🏾

@ataranaoahakaraaf3786 Год назад

he was truly great strategic and tactic warrior-king named baibar the egyptian-mamluk with northern-steppe-origins to come so far from a slave-child to a king to defeat the mongols is just a impressive deed.

@s.omarhassan2560 Год назад

Thank you K&G for this video about an under explored area of our history.

@brokenbridge6316 Год назад

Baybars more than anyone else in history probably had the best strategy in fighting the Mongol threat. One that the Europeans sadly didn't take to heart.

@Abdullah_the_Palestinian 8 месяцев назад

The Hungarians did

@brokenbridge6316 8 месяцев назад

@@Abdullah_the_Palestinian---Explain. Please.

@Abdullah_the_Palestinian 8 месяцев назад

@@brokenbridge6316 they built a network of fortresses with catapults that where near each other. Each time the Mongols would besiege one fortress a relief force from another would Sally out in sorties.

@brokenbridge6316 8 месяцев назад

@@Abdullah_the_Palestinian---If you insist

@goldeneaglepower9845 Год назад

Beibairs was kypshak origin, Ketbuga was naiman origin. Both are highly praised among Kazakhs, because Beibars sultan was born in their stepps and Kypshaks are backbone of Kazakhs. Kazakhs also have a great folk melody called Aqsaq Qulan (crippled foal), about how the death of Jochi happened. When Genghis Khan heard that melody played by Ketbuga, he understood that his son was dead. The thing is, Genghis Khan told that any messenger who would tell him about death of his sons, would be killed immediately, and everyone was silent about the death of Juchi, but Ketbuga risked and played that melody without words, by the end Genghis was full of tears.

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

Turkic vs Mongolized Turkic😅 Naiman was a Siberian Turkic language before Mongolization and Kipchakization

@orton4357 Год назад

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 Doesn't matter, mongols and turks derive from one roots the main difference is linguistics

@user-wp7kg6qw1g Год назад

Dude stop your kazaksness. Kazak did not exist as a nation. Baibars was cuman, he was described like white man with blondish hair with blue eyes. Kazakh dont have any blondes. Kazakhs were not even muslim when they were raiding islamic world with mongols. Baibars would be closer to tatars, bashkirs, kumyks.

@goldeneaglepower9845 Год назад

@@user-wp7kg6qw1g Why do you made so aggressive comment? I just mentioned few things that I know. You need to be more constructive in your criticism. Kazakhs did exist at that point there some genetic evidences, developed in recent years. Thats why I highlighted that Kyphcaks are backbone of Kazakhs. Look at kazakhs, they look abosulutely different from one another. There ginger dudes with blue eyes, at the same time you can find pure mongolic features or even arabic, iranian features. So your point on kypchaks were white not really clear. Kyivan Rus principalities docs describes kypchaks as unity of different looking people. It might be also true that Kypchaks also backbone of Bashkirs and Tatars, but they were different tribes. Kumyks were predominantly different tribes, they coexisted with Kypchaks, perhaps they lived in north Caucasus region long before Mongols arrived. Ketbuga is a legend of naimans, majority of whom became a part of Kazakhs, and then Kyrgyz and Uzbek people. But only among Kazakh naimans Ketbuga remains for such a long time. Do your homework before being offensive for no reason.d

@user-wp7kg6qw1g Год назад

@@goldeneaglepower9845 just dont get it. You guys feel pride about Gengiz khan that he was or he may have been kazakh who killed million of muslims yet again feel pride about a muslim who won against them. Bro stop bullshit. The current kazakhs are 80-90% mongoloid. You guys dont have iranian or european appearance unless person mixed up with russians, germans, caucasian, uzbeks, uygurs.

@yaqubonnet Год назад

Superb! As always K&G never disappoints!

@hanooi7450 Год назад

That was quite the Go match played by Baybars against the Ilkhanate. He managed to reinforce his positions while surrounding the Ilkhan with the Golden Horde.

@MrMacavity Год назад

Awesome work as always 👍 always nice to see more videos and history

@ckaiborbor Год назад

Freakin’ love you guys. Thanks as always 🙏🏾

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

On the other hand, as has been recently pointed out, though the beginning of Bahri rule is usually dated to 1250, none of the first five sultans were, in fact, members of the Bahriyya. 32 The Arabic sources for the period refer to the dynasty as the dawlat al-atrak, dawlat al-turk, or al- dawla al-turkiyya (i.e. dynasty of the Turks), in recognition of the racial or ethnic group which predominated in the mamluk caste during this period, and to distinguish it from the Burji sultanate in which mamluks Northrup, L. (1998). The Bahrī Mamlūk sultanate, 1250-1390. In C. Petry (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt (The Cambridge History of Egypt, pp. 242-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory Год назад

How is it that there is always someone who arrives on these videos to immediately copy/paste sections like these? Do you just have them on hand in a document whenever a relevant videois posted? Do you find them from older videos?

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory Some people do advanced research on google books/Jstor/google scholar and share those sources via discord/telegram/instagram etc.

@tatarcavalry2342 Год назад

@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory Turkish source paste team you can find them nearly at all videos about turks and there is a guy named van dare who tries to deturcify ottomans he is at every single ottoman video lol

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

@@tatarcavalry2342 Van Dare/Vangelis Skia is extremely jealous/angry about the entire Turkic vs Hellenic topics

@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory Год назад

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 I am glad at least, there are people other than myself who have read the Cambridge history series

@olegnoleg8158 Год назад

i find it astonishing that the mongols throughout the entirety of its empire's life has almost fought everyone known in the civilized world. they fought from japan to india, from china to russia, and from egypt to vietnam. amazing.

@andanandan6061 Год назад

They went as far as Malay & Indonesia but they got defeated or maybe the correct word is they were deceived and back stabbed. Local ruler use Mongol troops to kick out Mongol troops. That may sound crazy but that is what happent

@penguasakucing8136 Год назад

I love how J.M. Smith titled his article on this: "Nomads on Ponies vs. Slaves on Horses"

@tedhubertcrusio372 Год назад

You mean slaves on stallions?

@penguasakucing8136 Год назад

Ask J.M. Smith who wrote the hilarious title. But yeah it rhymes better. Either way, Mamluks sourced their horses from Al-Barqa (Cyrenaica), and fine steeds they are

@MongoIndyleo Год назад

Hey K&G! People have already been complaining about this but I assume you have some kind of contract with Established Titles that you can't get out of. I hope you drop this as soon as you can! You guys have had tons of sponsors so I bet you can find someone to replace ET pretty easily. Also, just so you know, the Japanese knives box thing that I've seen going around is owned by the same people that own ET. I think this is less of a scam since you still actually get real knives but I might cut ties with them simply to not encourage anybody with shady products.

@blockmasterscott Год назад

I was about to bring this up, ET is getting a pretty bad rep for scamming.

@xKinjax Год назад

@@MintyLime703 i don't think it's a difference in contracts, i think these videos are just made a month or more in advance to begin with and the ads are already paid for. They're not gonna go back through them all to edit out the ads and send the money back.

@xKinjax Год назад

The knives are a scam as well, they're just generic knives made in China, not Japan as advertised, bought for a few dollars each and then resold at a huge profit. There's been videos about the knife scam around for a while now but people just care about their own pocket, they don't care if their viewers are getting scammed.

@fintonmainz7845 Год назад

@@xKinjax They would if they were honest.

@WastelandRegis Год назад

My Saturday morning routine is to make coffee and watch your channel. Love your videos. Keep up the fantastic work!

@iamyourfather9391 Год назад

Has there been a video on the Chinese defenses against Mongols? The 60 year campaign against the Mongols in Sichuan is very interesting and deserved remembering- it costed Mongke Khan his life against Chinese cannons. If there already is a video on it please help guide me to it :)

@IreliAmBad Год назад

There's a RU-vid channel called "strategy stuff" you might like. He has a video on the mongol conquest of china, with the strategic considerations of both sides. And another video on the older steppe peoples with a VERY indepth analysis on Chinese strategy against them.

@IreliAmBad Год назад

Neither really deal with mongke. But figured I'd mention it regardless.

@iamyourfather9391 Год назад

@@IreliAmBad Alright I'll check that out, thanks!

@ahmetsagay3137 Год назад

🙌🙌🙌

@weaver1507 Год назад

Lol his name was monkey Khan 🐒 lol 😂.

@Gadanfer Год назад

‏و مِن أعْجبِ العَجَب .. تَهديدُ الليوثِ بالرُّتوث .. و السباعِ بالضِباع .. و الكُماتِ بالكِراع .. لا يصدَعُ قلوبَنا شديد .. و جَمعُنا لا يُرَاعُ بتهديد .. بقوةِ العزيزِ الحميد .. - سيف الدين قطز

@rolex6170 Год назад

i refreshed my memory of the mamluks from ur video. thanks! i cud recollect much of it and yes ur references as always are correct

@ahmeda6591 Год назад

Bybars has married Berke's daughter as a sign of their alliance, so it is unlikely that Berke viewed the Mamluks as lower in rank or believed that they were his subjects

@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory Год назад

That's exactly what the Mongols would do. Such marriage ties were common means the Mongols used to try and ensure submission of their vassals; Berke also tried to arrange marriage ties with the Hungarians for this purpose.

@ahmeda6591 Год назад

@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory guess we conceive things differently nowadays then. I'm a fan of your channel btw

@LeeroyGgJenkins Год назад

Tldr: Established Titles is not legit check out Scott Shaffer's video about it. Is it true if you buy land in Scotland Are you a lord? "First and foremost, you are not the owner of any land in Scotland despite what this company might have led you to believe," Andy Wightman, a former Green Member of the Scottish Parliament, wrote in an open letter to nominees. “You have also not been given any right to style yourself Lord or Lady of Glencoe

@ManjeetSingh-ko6tj Год назад

Clicked the video within 10s after the upload . No second thoughts for k&g. Always the best👌

@yousseph777 Год назад

The music/ background sounds, excellent!

@Uzair_Of_Babylon465 Год назад

Fantastic video keep it up your doing amazing job

@sagaramskp Год назад

It's so interesting to note that race was so fluid in islamic world. The faith United and races didn't matter much, whether they were Arabs, moors, Turks, Qipchak, or mongol, or a sudani. U can climb the ladder if u r talented and ur racial background won't hold u back. A mongol sultan among Mamluks was a crazy thing. Can't imagine such a turn of events in western world where racism is so deep rooted. Remember an episode in K&G about a muslim African governor in India.

@tatarcavalry2342 Год назад

Qipchak is a branch of Turk Turk is the general term for Oghuzs Qipchaks etc.

@loulishadow1468 Год назад

@@user-cg2tw8pw7j كيف يا اخي؟

@loulishadow1468 Год назад

@@user-cg2tw8pw7j ما فهمت

@MyBuzzL Год назад

@الأزدي ummayad is still the most racist that muslim leader ever have. yes, they do not differentiate their subject like europe colonization, but the governor was always arabic, whether in eastest central asia or westest berber north africa. and because of this racism, abbasid can exploit the enemy especially persian to rebel against ummayad and make abbasid the new caliph

@achtet7480 Год назад

in a way they were more progressive than European colonists.

@khadaareofficial7992 Год назад

I Hope you could’ve talked more bout Qutuz, because he’s the man who defeated them. Of course Baibers was a huge boost, but Qutuz‘s words and the famous speach he made was what make the people face the mongols fearlessly.

@calidone7661 Год назад

as far as i know battle tactic in ain jalut came from baibars

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/ 1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517) amalia levanoni The Turkish era of the Mamlūk sultanate The Mamlūks’ rise to power: a decade of trial and error The Arabic term mamlūk literally means ‘owned’ or ‘slave’, and was used for the white Turkish slaves of pagan origins, purchased from Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes by Muslim rulers to serve as soldiers in their armies. Levanoni, A. (2010). The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: The Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517). In M. Fierro (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam (The New Cambridge History of Islam, pp. 237-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

@scourgeofgodattila579 Год назад

Jalal Al-Din Mangburni defeated the Mongols 11 times. Jalal Al-Din>Alauddin Khilji+Baibars

@husseinboulahlib2839 Год назад

White Turkish slaves ??? , Arabs always mentioned the Turkic tribes as brown looking people .

@JangoChained 29 дней назад

Man I can't explain how much I love these videos

@garydrawsandpaints7745 Год назад

Holy Moly!! I’m enthralled at the strategy and narrative AND THEN! That Homicidal Satanic Eskimo shows up at 11:55 and I was so scared I couldn’t focus on anything else. What were you folks in the art department thinking of anyways?

@mikemodugno5879 Год назад

A K&G video almost every day this week! Could it get any better?

@markusskram4181 Год назад

Another fascinating video !

@beachboy0505 Год назад

Excellent video 📹 A COMPREHENSIVE VIDEO FOR A SATURDAY AFTERNOON.

@iamleoooo Год назад

Berke: hmm... It's good to be a muslim and a mongol Hulagu: hmm... It's good to burn Baghdad to ash Berke: YOU WHAT?!

@sayuas4293 Год назад

Baybars was a genius level general and statesman, he is totally underrated and belongs up there with Saladin

@Mirko1913 Год назад

Hats off to Kings and Generals! With love, from Bulgaria

@ucraniaestamosjuntos326 Год назад

Great Work!

@Lord_Retrospect Год назад

best ad copy ever , big ups yourself

@ElBandito Год назад

Pre-gunpowder era, the only way to reliably defeat the Mongols on the field was to swiftly engage them with heavy cavalry and force a melee fight. Kinda like how Otto I won against the Magyars in the Battle of Lechfeld.

@aburoach9268 Год назад

No, you need to surprise and ambush them while quickly closing the distance or trapping them, Or else they'll destroy your heavy cavalry with arrow volleys while keeping their distance / You cannot beat them with just heavy cav in a conventional sense unless you have horse archer heavy cav of your own which the mamelukes had

@liamjm9278 Год назад

@@aburoach9268 Arrows don't penetrate heavy armor.

@batsman27 Год назад

@@aburoach9268 well ambushes would work against pretty much any army

@aburoach9268 Год назад

@@liamjm9278 they do penetrate heavy armor depending on the poundage, arrow weight and distance of shot, the limbs are never that well protected as the chest and helmet + plate wasn't common during that period and even if it was, only the breast plate, vizor and helmet would be arrow proof Horses often are not armored and even with armor the legs still remain vulnerable

@aburoach9268 Год назад

@@batsman27 that's exactly why one is supposed to use them against the mongols

@-RONNIE Год назад

Thanks for a good video

@muhammadtayyab2718 Год назад

Nice work

@thewarriorfrog Год назад

Then, on 3 September 1260, the Mongol forces met the army of the Egyptian Mamluks at the Spring of Goliath ('Ayn Jaliit) north of Jerusalem. The Mongol army contained a large admixture of Turks. The ethnic composition of the Mamluk army was very similar, in that it was mostly recruited from Turkish and Caucasian slaves, who had been purchased, trained and emancipated, whence the name: mamluk, 'possessed'. Spuler, B. (1977). The disintegration of the caliphate in the east. In P. Holt, A. Lambton, & B. Lewis (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Islam (The Cambridge History of Islam, pp. 141-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

@scourgeofgodattila579 Год назад

Jalal Al-Din Mangburni defeated the Mongols 11 times. Jalal Al-Din>Alauddin Khilji+Baibars

@meta196 Год назад

m̲o̲n̲g̲o̲l̲s̲ ̲h̲a̲d̲ ̲p̲l̲e̲n̲t̲y̲ ̲o̲f̲ ̲c̲h̲r̲i̲s̲t̲i̲a̲n̲s̲ ̲a̲c̲t̲u̲a̲l̲l̲y̲

@meta196 Год назад

m̟o̟n̟g̟o̟l̟s̟ ̟h̟a̟d̟ ̟p̟l̟e̟n̟t̟y̟ ̟o̟f̟ ̟c̟h̟r̟i̟s̟t̟i̟a̟n̟s̟ ̟a̟c̟t̟u̟a̟l̟l̟y̟

@156Rafi Год назад

Established Titles has a strong probability of being a scam, please be aware of it, investigate it on your own, and be vigilant for the next one. Honestly can't blame them for taking the sponsorship, it sounds amazing and mutually beneficial; but for the sake of the viewers, please be vigilant and careful of such a offer. Edited to sound less of a lecture.

@megadwarf4714 Год назад

this

@GC13 Год назад

I think they're just fulfilling their contracted obligation. There's no pinned comment for it this time, and oh boy did they get an earfull about Established Titles in their Why was Italy Disunited video.

@banerjeesiddharth05 Год назад

Nice documentary 👌 👍 👏

@jeremychau2322 Год назад

Baybars was such a great sultan

@MarouenAK Год назад

@@daniel_bart turks were slaves of everyone at that time

@Dieter-Doeddel Год назад

Could you do an Established vs Titles video next? 🤗

@craighaynes5885 Год назад

History is so mighty.

@SB-qm5wg Год назад

Great video.

@PristianoPenaldoSUIIII Год назад

As someone playing the medieval 2 total war campaign, this video has been very helpful.

@claudiapalermo9793 Год назад

Which faction did you choose?

@PristianoPenaldoSUIIII Год назад

@@claudiapalermo9793 turks 🗿

@okanisiert Год назад

How can we describe Sultan Baibars? IMAGINE SHOOTING A MAN WITH YOUR LAST BULLET AND HE STANDS THERE UNPHASED!!!!

@obebinaruobhuo3428 11 месяцев назад

Nice history of conquests and building of allies.

@thewarriorfrog Год назад

There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were unstoppable

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

@@yousafdaudzai3078 Afghanized Turkic people of Khalaj origin, there are like 6-7 Afghan tribes who have Turkic origins

@MrHoonza Год назад

Mongols conquered Sumatra Island. Viets are Mongols multi invade after they suggested to be Mongols alliance. They conquered Fukuoka island. But they know samurais will defend them midnight. Then they slept on the boats while hurricane. Turks are Turcix. Not today's Turkeys. Why Afghanistan's capitol is named Kabul who is establisher of Mongols! To be stupid must need document! LoL 😂

@yaralikatil Год назад

@@submeoff3297 simply no

@Khan_dakid Год назад

You do know that the 13th century and the 1200s are the same thing right

@tafad5138 Год назад

Japanese not defeteating mongol, it was typhoon

@nenenindonu Год назад

The Khalji Mamluks of the Delhi Sultanate also had a series of great defensive victories against the Mongols with Alauddin Khalji doing most of the work, Medieval Mamluks were a Mongol's nemesis :)

@nenenindonu Год назад

@Los Blancos Bruh... Mamluk is not an ethnicity all the five ruling Dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate were technically Mamluks

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

@9/11 was done by bush afghanized Turkic people KHALAJ PEOPLE

@hassanabdulsalam1000 Год назад

@@nenenindonu Khiljis only defeated jagatai khanate weakest of mongol khanate and they were more turkic than Mongols

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

@@hassanabdulsalam1000 They had still huge army (500k)

@hassanabdulsalam1000 Год назад

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 they say alaudin khilji had more than 1000 elephant in one battle

@Rodzyniastyyyy Год назад

Established Titles is a scam. Don't touch it even with a stick.

@jeffreyabell Год назад

Well done

@carlosfilho3402 Год назад

Thanks Tô Vídeo!

@marzblackbannerz6278 Год назад

I wish you guys understood Arabic to fully understand the weight of Sultan Qutuz's reply to Hulegu's written threat..stronger diss than Pac's hit em up lol

@ElBandito Год назад

K&G continues to provide us valuable knowledge in an entertaining form, without costing us anything.

@MasterMalrubius Год назад

Why not support them?

@ElBandito Год назад

@@MasterMalrubius I will definitely do that.

@TheSwirlyMango Год назад

Consider dropping the sponsor Established Titles, some recent controversy coming to light from them.

@jozzieokes3422 Год назад

Quality stuff

@sk1ppercat912 Год назад

I’m assuming they focused on defending against an early archer rush. Then used there market bonus to get up to castle fast. Then attempted to stop the mongols from getting too many castles up and getting to a death ball of mangudai. As they have a bonus against siege rams don’t work well so again using there bonuses to get up to imp and start Trebbing down the castles.

@muhammadalrubah8672 Год назад

Bahriya Mamluks actually means in arabic ( Naval Mamluks ) because their fort in cairo was on the shores of an area called Aljazeera which also means the Island

@abdelrahmanmahgoub8669 Год назад

The peak number of Mamluks in Egypt is around 8000 by the time of Qalawun's rule and not all of them were even soldiers some of them were personal servants and workers. The core of the army at that time were comprised of "Halaqa" soldiers who were free trained soldiers of native Egyptians, and their number were around 15 to 20 thousand during conflict time and the second to them were reserve soldiers and volunteers from various professions upon the call for "Jehad" in villages and cities across the country according to historians who recorded these events and some of these historians were sons of former mamluks who were eventually assimilated into the local community. There is an over-amplifying of the significance of slave trade on the success of the sultanate of Egypt specially on the early conflict with the Mongols when the inner conflicts and schism between the mamluks were still active and the mamluks assimilation system was still immature.

@calidone7661 Год назад

even majority of the army was local arabs; i think it's because the core professionals and leaders. especially ain jalut was a classical feigned retreat. i also think bedouin cavalry was highly skilled in this kind of tactical understanding.

@abdelrahmanmahgoub8669 Год назад

@@calidone7661 Bedouin Arabs also were not largely involved in the conflict due to their conflict with early Ayyubids and later with the sultanate of Egypt, Salaheddin himself had major incidents with Arab tribes and forced all Arab tribes living to the east of the Nile delta to be displaced to upper Egypt or to the Maghreb out of fear of their alliance with crusaders. The relationship between mamluk sultans and Arabs were even worse as they saw Arab tribes as source of disruption and forced majority of them out of Egypt to the Nubian kingdom of Makuria "North Sudan".

@arda213 Год назад

@@calidone7661 Arabs didnt call Mamluk Empire ed dewlet-ul Turkiyya for no reason. This revisionist friend above is having hard time admitting it but throughout the middle ages after the Abbasid Empire was no more, Turks have been the sword of islam for the last 1000 years.

@calidone7661 Год назад

@@arda213 nations age like people. once they were young; fast and furious. straight out from heart of the desert, all the way from france to china. this scale of conquest should not be overlooked.

@trillmoney263 Год назад

@@abdelrahmanmahgoub8669wrong the ayyubids were Arabs. And a lot of the mamluk soldiers were arab Bedouins. Isa ibn muhanna fought in 2 battle of Homs and he was the mvp on the mamluks side. The first battle of Homs was ayyubids vs mongols.

@benjauron5873 Год назад

Oh, shit! Established Titles is still finding promoters! I thought I was the last person to get the news that it was a scam! Guess not...

@matthewstromberg8272 Год назад

At the beginning of the video I thought I heard you say "memes" not "means", and I pictured hand drawn memes being sent to the Mongols to confuse or entertain them.

@AllFather-TheStoicGod Год назад

Honestly, *a separate Mongols channel* could easily be established by K & G. It would outnumber every other topic on this current channel. 😂💀

@mr.bluefox3511 Год назад

I doubt that would be the case, the Mongols has alot of subject to discuss for a year or two if you looking heavily into all kind if source metarial throughout the ages ... but definitely not going to outnumbered almost the entire human history from all corners of this Earth, that the channel has cover for years now :-/

@AllFather-TheStoicGod Год назад

@@mr.bluefox3511 You're incorrect. I counted them. This isn't my first post stating this, either. Run a search for all of 2020 including their podcasts. Second runner up, by far, is Rome which is understandable.

@mr.bluefox3511 Год назад

@@AllFather-TheStoicGod I'm not sure what its your points however, first post and all. I'm just thinking K&G making an entire Channel for Mongol contents isn't a good ideal for there team, in the long term. I'm pretty sure that would be a hell of a educational place, but the channel will have limited amount of contents to cover, with limited time. After that said channel won't be "alive" for long, unless they branches outside Mongols subject. Not to mention it may have a significantly smaller audiences compare to the current K&G that pull peoples studing & interest in all different historical era to checking things they don't know much about. You are suggesting to people who make videos not only for there passion in educational, but also as a job. Why should they created a smaller channel with limitations to mostly one group if peoples in fixed timeline for a year or two, rather than keep working & maintaining K&G with the freedom to talk about all different subject back & forward, for the next 5 or event 10 more years. Even a less popular video has hundred thousand of peoples watch & rewatch.

@AllFather-TheStoicGod Год назад

@@mr.bluefox3511 It's right there in the first sentence. The point was succinct: they run too much content on Mongols, full stop.

@jacquesfrancois4275 Год назад

You guys beat history dose to it!

@Nomadicenjoyer31 Год назад

Ketbuga was also had Turkic background just like Baibars

@arda213 Год назад

Yes he was a Naiman Turk. Naimans were Nestorian Christians. He was Hulagus favourite general.

@Ifyoucanreadthisgooglebroke Год назад

The specifics here are hard to incorporate into late game strats, just gonna stick to making more Mameluks(sp) to counter the Mangudai.

@tedhubertcrusio372 Год назад

Mongol stans in AoE2: *screaming internally as their Town center gets rekt by Saracen scorpions and Teuton trebuchets, while the Franks sit pretty in their farms, farming resources with the Spanish*

@perrytran9504 Год назад

@@tedhubertcrusio372 If it's AoE 2 they'd all just be raging at the Franks player the whole game for being OP. Spanish and Saracens both cry at being underpowered after they die early, Teutons loses despite his deathball because he's a noob who doesn't know how to protect his siege onagers, Mongols got knocked out slightly earlier because he failed to make full use of his insane dark age and sputtered out in castle age.

@arda213 Год назад

Aoe2 unfortunately is so vague as a history game. Mamluks are sword throwing Arabic speaking camelry.

@faeezf Год назад

Lord Mark Felton and Lord Kings & Generals, please make a video about the legitimacy of Establish Titles

@mtuguj6366 Год назад

Mamlukes were a mixture of turkic and circassian people, the first state, Albahreyya, was turkic ruled mostly, with circassian presence especially under the rule of Qalawun, the second state, alburjeyya, was circassian dominated, but had also turkic rulers within it, most sultans or emirs names were turkic originated, even for those who were not turkic,the name baybas and title Aldhaher, was also given to one who lived few years before him under the rule of Najm eldin Ayyoub the king of egypt,who baybars himself served under later. There was baybars aljashenkir, a circassian, who was also sultan during the Albahreyya turkic dominated era. The names they carried were given names to them by their masters, and not necessarily were the names they were born with.. there was also a burjy circassian sultan called bars-bay, same meaning of baybars, but flipped.. Tuman Bay, Qaitbay, and others, all the names they carried were given by the masters that bought and raised them, take Baybars as an example: Aldhaher Rukn Aldeen Baybars Albandaqdary AlSalehy Alnajmy, Aldhaher, a title he gave himself when became a sultan and means the one who over shadows or overcome others, RuknAldeen, an arabic given name to him by his master, Baybars, a turkic given name to him, Albandaqdary, in reference to his master, prince Alaa aldeen idekin Albandaqdary, AlSalehy, reference to him belonging to the late sultan of Egypt. King Alsaleh Najm Aldeen Ayyoub,, Alnajmy Reference to his later Emir Saif Aldeen Aqtay (Uktay) Alala'y Alnajmy.

@el_bronco77 Год назад

Would love to see a video on the Lake Batalon offensive (Operation Frulingserwachen) in March 1945. Last German offensive of WW2

@sidp5381 Год назад

I was wondering if you guys will redo the Ottoman conquest of Egypt with better graphics

@KingsandGenerals Год назад

Yep

@abdallaha92 Год назад

@@KingsandGenerals If you guys want to do the 1st Ottoman Mamluk war, I suggest Struggle for Domination in the Middle East: The Ottoman-Mamluk War, 1485-91. There he goes into detail about the battle of Aga cayiri.

@fatechance4013 Год назад

@@KingsandGenerals i think you're missing mongol invasion on SEA region especially on Singasari kingdom before the rise of Majapahit empire.

@kalt4689 Год назад

As a Mongol, I did not know this at all. Great to know. Thank you

@prinznoir7371 Год назад

You are not mongol :)

@prsimoibn2710 Год назад

Am not surprised, you are supposed to stay ignorant and to hate the people that we want you to hate, so we can use you for our goals. *I love the Mongols* especially when they kill my enemies

@kalt4689 Год назад

@@prsimoibn2710 You make no sense. Our ancestors wanted to unite the Earth under one sky “Tengeri.”. That was our goal, you can try to steal our thunder, but you can’t change history.

@prsimoibn2710 Год назад

@@kalt4689 do you a have old universities and books and tradition? We sell you vegetables and alcohol, you give us soldiers to invade middle east. That's the deal take it or leave it

@kalt4689 Год назад

@@prinznoir7371 grow up kid

@west_samurai0276 Год назад

It's great Sultan Beibarys 🇰🇿

@user-wp7kg6qw1g Год назад

Sultan Baibars had nothing to do with you guys. Read about his description. He was white man with more blondish hair and with blue eyes. Can you show me one kazak who is blonde? Baibars would be closer to tatars, bashkirs, kumyks not to kazakhs.

@turcarumimperator1395 Год назад

@@user-wp7kg6qw1g sultan baibars was not white. as you mentioned in your comment, he was a Tatar and Turkic, and most importantly he was a Muslim. according to westerners, a muslim and turk can not be white.

@ravil9634 Год назад

@@user-wp7kg6qw1g Stop whitewashing the Kipchaks and falsifying history for the sake of Eurocentrism and white supremacy. The Kipchaks, like the Türkics, have never been white. no matter how you white supremacists or their wannabes among the Caucasoid Turkic-speaking peoples do not want this.

@kirey5477 2 месяца назад

@@user-wp7kg6qw1g Imagine writing a comment so wrong

@orkunyucel3095 10 месяцев назад

@semperfidelis9083 Год назад

The barid is still used in the arab world to this day. the word nowadays referring to "mail" in general and also Bardi Ilictroni "Email". Waffidiya in Arabic also means the comers or newcomers. which is a fitting term for Mongol refugees in Egypt.

@thewarriorfrog Год назад

Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks " Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39 Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012

@williemherbert1456 Год назад

@@ziyadpepe6291 That's one of place where they were sourced from, but in truth these are vastly diverse folks from many origins, there are Cuman, Kipchak, Avar, Bolgar, Turks, Mongol, Tatar, Circassian, etc, but with one similarity, being enslaved and sold out into market in Persia and Arabia as slave that could either be hired as mercenary, household tenant, cattle slave, or even assisting scribe, but mostly those from Central Asia would be turned into personal mercenary.

@thanos7715 Год назад

turks trying to take credit, no they have nothing to do with modern day turks chill the fuck out

@scourgeofgodattila579 Год назад

Jalal Al-Din Mangburni defeated the Mongols 11 times. Jalal Al-Din>Alauddin Khilji+Baibars

@meta196 Год назад

>T̼̼̖̾͟͞h̨͚͚͖ͯ̒̄͗͞ḛ̡̰̳͓̥ͬ͋ͪͧ H͇͇̹͊ͪ́̕ͅḛ̡̰̳͓̥ͬ͋ͪͧb͔͔̳͈̊̆ͥ͂͜͝ṛ̣̬̫̍͌ͩ͟ḛ̡̰̳͓̥ͬ͋ͪͧw̡̻̻̣͚̒̀ͅ U̝̝̝̲̦ͣ͋͛̊n̫̫̘̗͕̲̲̎ͥi̧̻̻͉̜͑ͪ̾͟v̹̹̘̼̞̻͆ͩ̓ͪ͢ḛ̡̰̳͓̥ͬ͋ͪͧṛ̣̬̫̍͌ͩ͟s̨̞̞̰͎͎̪̩͕̈́̀ͯ̍ͧͅi̧̻̻͉̜͑ͪ̾͟t͖͖̠̬͛y͙͙̪̰ͫ͌́

@Dieter-Doeddel Год назад

Please do a video on Scottish medieval customs next, especially how to become a "laird" after purchasing a handful of Scottish soil! Heard a lot of Mamluks became Lords thanks to that custom. 🤣

@milanjudak7574 Год назад

cant believe people were stupid enough to take it seriously is everybody in Scotland a Lord because they have a house there?

@Dieter-Doeddel Год назад

@@milanjudak7574 Kings and Generals was apparently fully convinced of the sincerity of their ad partner. Quite dumb of them, I agree! 🤣

@milanjudak7574 Год назад

@@Dieter-Doeddel would still be a fun souvenir if it was cheaper and they actually plant some trees even when the entire tree-carbon thing is nonsense

@arthas640 Год назад

@@Dieter-Doeddel this charity always bugged me since they cant even sub divide the land the way they describe even if the custom was real. you cant just buy 1sqft of land in most countries. Companies claiming to plant trees for charity is also a field rife with scams since so few actually plant any trees and of those that do most dont do a good job of it and the trees are often planted in areas the trees cant survive so most die before the end of their first year.

@kennethflores93 Год назад

Fascinating vid, Baybars adopted some Roman ingenuity.

@RD-rm6qm Год назад

Downvoted for the established title ad. Your channel is big enough, get credible sponsors

@dustintacohands1107 Год назад

I keep trying to get my head around how much smaller the mongol horses were. It looks like about 5.5 inches average to me but I’d love to hear what you guys know or can find out cuz I was having lot of trouble finding Mamluk info for some reason.

@cool06alt Год назад

Steppe Mongols horse were small, often described as 11-12 hands. Turkoman horses howevermust have gained decent traits from Arabian horses and Caspian horses.They're as big as 14 hands.

@ahmaddddd100 Год назад

Mams had an accsess to Arabian horses, which are far superior to any breed, faster , stronger , smarter and more resilient

@kmmmsyr9883 Год назад

Guys, we love you and your incredible videos, but please stop the Established Titles sponsorship already. Sure, you maybe didn't know it was a scam at first, but everyone is commenting that it's a scam for the last few videos. It's the time to stop the sponsorship and let your viewers know about the situation. Your prestige in the eyes of viewers drop with every sponsorship you do with them after their scam became publicly known.

@daarom3472 Год назад

Mamlukes have bonus damage against Mangudai, drill Siege Ram also dies to Mamluke.

@drakehashimoto685 Год назад

@Kings and Generals Great video as always guys, but Established Titles is a scam, check out Scott Shafer's vid about it, as much as his list of many content creators.

@painitself8597 Год назад

Hey! I really love the free quality content.And been enjoying these new videos.This channel has so much video about turkish empires But there is not a video about origins of the Turks. Would love to see a video about that!

@imlaughinq7445 Год назад

High medieval history is my favorite

@alittlepeaceandkarma Год назад

Established Title, when you want to give someone a shit Christmas present 💩

@lerneanlion Год назад

Will the information of this video will be used in regarding what is going on in the Islamic world in the alternate universe about what if the Mongols inaveded Europe and the Seventh Crusade is formed to fight them?

@AdairCorbin Год назад

Please look into your sponsors . Established Titles is not a legit company.

@rationalsamrat3247 Год назад

Hey, can you make some videos covering India aswell, i was hoping to see few more videos covering India. It seems you havent done a video on India for some time. Specially about Chola empire , and Gupta empire ,rashtrakuta dynasty aswell .