How to Convert Recurring Decimals to Fractions (Proportions Part 6/6) #18 

Hm

Thank God it's free

Ah thank you so much!! 😊

Bro has acctually saved my skin those I smt ruffled with a lot but he explains it better than teachers lol

Hm

Yeah!❤

Ya you 'r right

Better tutorial

really 👍

why u lying

its still confusing but he still made things easier to understand ig

Glad you enjoyed the video even if others didn't 👍

Me too

Glad to hear it 😁

Best of luck Srijan! 🤞

Oh

fr

I think higher :)

It depends on the curriculum just check the spec you are doing, I am doing edexcel IGcse maths a higher tier so these are basically irrelevant because the book has more random stuff in it and even calculus whilst gcse and IGcse Cambridge are normal

@notsomeone special no I'm still in grade 9 just normal exams though you?

@notsomeone special i hope it went well was it hard

Not in this case, because it’s only the 3 that is recurring, not both the 2 and 3!

@@Cognitoedu shouldnt the recurring sighn be on the first three on the the 23.3 since it moved up ?

@@abdulrahmanakinade2879 the recurring symbol should only be placed on decimals. Since the first 3 is a whole number, the next 3 will have the recurring symbol.

Recruiting just means the number goes on forever, so the space after the decimal point will always have a three no matter how much you multiply it

It isnt 2.3, it is 2.33333333333333 and so on. The dot represents the number going on until infinity

You only put dots above the first and last digits which recur, because that's how things have historically been done in maths. The idea behind that is to show where the recurring sequence begins and ends... and if you recognise that the dots represent the beginning and end of a sequence, it can be taken as a given that every digit in-between the ones with dots above them are also part of that sequence. This can also save time, since if you have to write a long sequence of recurring digits, you would need to write alot of dots as well using your proposed method, whereas the standard practice allows you to show where the sequence begins and ends with just two dots. No will stop you putting dots above all the recurring digits if you want, but you could lose marks in an exam for that, since that's not the standard practice. If you're having trouble making sense of it, just think of the two dots as 'bookends' to the recurring sequence.

Because that's the value he got when he subtracted the bigger r value with the smaller one

calculator 💀

Because the dot notation only should come at the first and last digit

💀💀

It’s been 2 months but basically you only put dots above the first and last digits that recur. Think of it like this, when there is more than 1 dot above the numbers think of them like brackets; everything inside them will reoccur. Eg . . 0.24687 will recur like 0.246872468724687…….and so on

@@_everlark_ done my GCSEs now but thanks 🫡

The way he explained it made me understand it so much better

Slow learner

@@OratileLekgoko BIT-

Definitely not

I could try to help-