What should I do if opposing counsel writes a motion where he says "the Court admonished X in a previous status hearing" where actually what happened is the judge just gave me an instruction when I asked a question? ie. opposing counsel says "admonish" when it was really an instruction.
This type of language would generally be of no consequence (or relevance) to the merits of a case or any specific motion, so there is no need to address it. Hopefully, you have an attorney who works on the motion.
@@ArkadyItkin In the first hearing where the female judge ruled against me, the opposing counsel was allowed to say things like "So, X, did you say women should be barefoot and pregnant?" And, opposing counsel was allowed to introduce an exhibit AT the hearing (not before) that was texts of me calling her a b it ch and as shole I alledgedly sent the night before she filed. Problem is: I never sent those texts. But the judge said "I don't believe you." And, poof, my marriage is over. I am not confident. I will know in late July if my nice little family is finally destroyed.
I’d say to the lawyer yelling at me “you gonna bark all day little doggy, or are you gonna bite?” I’d say it right to his face, I swear. Also, the creator of this vid looks like a Die Hard villain.
