How to Design Two Way Slab | Simply Supported Corners Free to Lift | Limit State Method| IS 456-2000

All About Structural Analysis and Design

Подписаться 105 тыс.

Просмотров 119 тыс.

50% 1

Here its clearly explained detailed design of two way slab simply supported corners free to lift, the design is according to limit state design of IS 456-2000, all codal specifications are followed and have shown checks, and also explained what to do and when slab do not satisfy check for deflection.
ONE WAY SLAB DESIGN : • How to Design one way ...
My Phone : amzn.to/311uFDW
Amazon Basics 50-Inch Lightweight Tripod with Bag : amzn.to/3ayCdkG
Laptop : amzn.to/3hi2yGp
Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete Design by B.C.Punmia : amzn.to/315UEu2
Reinforced Concrete Design: IS:456-2000 Principles and Practice : amzn.to/315WLxY
Illustrated Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings : amzn.to/349rM62
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures : amzn.to/3142DYz
#designoftwowayslab #designofslab

Опубликовано:

19 ноя 2019

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 227

@najamuddin9164 4 года назад

Words are less to thank you sir for sharing knowledge plus for brilliantly explaining each & every step in detail ! Thanks alot for taking this much pain for us - eagerly in wait to learn from you about strap footings, watertank design & ramp slab plus sloping slab design ! Just following your lectures

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Thank you so much Najam, this appreciation is very special for me and this motivates me to come up with more videos, thanks a lot

@pavanp5vii567 2 года назад

❤️

@pavanp5vii567 2 года назад

❤️

@jurijjful Год назад

Ююю

@jurijjful Год назад

Юююю́

@myk-izhargroupicpl3749 2 года назад

What a explanation Sir, We love the video on Designing 2-Way Slab. Love from Karachi, Pakistan.

@dawatenzingtamang4848 3 года назад

Very clearly explained. I never understood with this clearity during my college days. Thank you sir🙏🙏

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

You're most welcome, thanks for appreciating, keep supporting us by watching and sharing

@gopalmalapati1446 10 месяцев назад

Respected sir, thanks a lot for spending your valuable time for us, and also thanks a lot for your valuable design aspect for two way slab.

@fijomj9240 3 года назад

Very useful for our exam. Thank you Sir❤️

@garvsaini9160 3 года назад

Great video sir!! Thanks a ton for the detailed explanation

@jeremihwasike2078 3 года назад

thank you sir for your teaching i will never get confused in design again i hope to get more teachings from you BIG UP SIR!!!!!!

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

So nice of you, i am happy my videos are helpful for you, keep watching and sharing and stay tuned for more videos

@sv-yk5gi 4 года назад

This is pure gold sir.thank you for detailed explaination.hoping for more videos like these on other topics.

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Thank you so much for this appreciation, yes i will be coming up with more detailed videos, keep watching, keep supporting

@chandrajitkumar2921 3 года назад

@@structuralanalysisanddesign z.

@Chinmay_271 Год назад

Thank you so much sir for showing interpolation method

@reemaawasthi681 2 года назад

Thankyou sir.ur teaching is awesome.cant explain in words

@bishal4721 Год назад

Thank you sir

@lokbahadurrokaya8292 2 года назад

Crystal clear explanation!!!

@structuralanalysisanddesign 2 года назад

Thank you so much, keep watching and sharing

@RahulGoyalloudburp 4 года назад

sir your videos are really very helpful and you explain as per is code only that is the best thing...you are one of the best tutor we have got on youtube...thanks a lot

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Thanks Rahul for the excellent words for me, your words are source of motivation and driving force to come up with lots of videos with simplicity

@devendranath5121 3 года назад

Thanks you..so much sir . I am speechless,,mind blowing explanation Big fan of you sir after seeing this lacture Thank you very much sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

So nice of you for appreciating, keep supporting and keep watching, all the best

@resona-qm7kz 5 месяцев назад

Thank you sir. Good information ❤

@structuralanalysisanddesign 5 месяцев назад

Welcome, keep watching and supporting

@noraskye007 4 года назад

I'm half way in the video and I'm so happy that everything is so clear, like from the reference clauses, how you SHOW where it is, and how you SHOW interpolation is done and give references to missing information and the writing is also very legible, :'D, thank you for this!

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

I am Glad it was helpful for you, your happiness and satisfaction gives boost for me to do more videos, thank you for the appreciation, keep watching and supporting and share with your friends

@engalaayo9387 2 года назад

Nice and clear thank u

@abubakerfayyaz448 Год назад

Excellent video.

@shelohama9612 3 года назад

You are so genius & it's nicely presented. Keep it up!

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Thank you so much! Keep watching and sharing

@adnanmohammed1257 3 года назад

Very useful information sir. Thnx sir for acknowledging us 😀

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

So nice of you, thank you, keep watching and supporting

@amitdeo5758 3 года назад

thank u so much for sharing ur knowledge

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

So nice of you, happy to share, keep watching and supporting

@arpitsisodiya95 3 года назад

Thanks a lot sir for such detailed explanation 🙏

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Most welcome, i am happy this video is helpful to you, all the best, keep watching and keep sharing

@mdjunaid1664 3 года назад

Excellent sir, thanks a lot

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Most welcome, all the best, keep supporting

@sreegyansan6817 3 года назад

Sir this channel is great and easy 👌 understanding......

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Thanks and welcome, keep watching and sharing

@rachanajha1186 Год назад

thank u sir😊

@pranavmanohaur391 3 года назад

Aapka bhut dhanyavaad sir, Aapko mera shat shat naman!

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

mere video se aapka doubt clear hua iske liye mujhe bahut khushi hai, all the very best

@khondokerazizulhaque357 Год назад

Just awesome

@structuralanalysisanddesign Год назад

Thank you so much, keep watching, all the best

@vamshikrishnahkhk3401 3 года назад

Thank you so much sir😍

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Most welcome, all the best

@mohithmohith5857 3 года назад

Thanks a lot sir this helped me a lot

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Glad to hear that, all the best, keep watching and sharing

@nuthanvokkaliga7839 3 года назад

Tq so much sir this has helped me alot

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

You are most welcome, i am happy it helped you, all the best, keep watching and sharing

@Pankaj_Dhariwal 4 года назад

I have done complete RCC from this channel.

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

I am happy my videos helped you to learn RCC, coming up with more designs

@ecosoft2332 3 года назад

Super sir exlent explanation

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Thank you so much, all the best

@Jaid17 2 года назад

Osm

@Gowshalya-xx4mb 3 года назад

Super super

@arunkondaji1277 3 года назад

Thanks sir

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Welcome, all the best

@108yashaswinikaranam2 Год назад

Just your videos before the exam day gives more than pass marks sir😂,thank you a lot

@structuralanalysisanddesign Год назад

All the best, I am happy that you will pass the exam, keep sharing and supporting

@bipinsharma645 4 года назад

you explain clearly in each and every step ,i clear all my doubt i following your lecture videos only..sir will do same as one way slab for development length calculation.....thank you so much

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Thank you so much Bipin, your trust is channel's pride, coming with more videos, keep watching and share with your friends

@satyamdhruwa911 3 года назад

Nice explanation.... 👍👍👍 Make more vdos...on each building members & RCC frame Analysis & design

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Thank you, and i will try my best to come up with more videos

@sunandabai.ksunandabai.k3183 3 года назад

Sir I like your video plz clarify about the effective depth

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Thanks for liking the video, what exactly is your doubt?

@sonukumar-bp4wb 4 года назад

I am learning a lot from your channel, I hope I learn more. You can also inform us about the building structure design. I hope you can design an entire building structure so that we can learn building design completely. Thanks Dear #abhijeet sir

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

I am happy that my channel is helping you to learn the concepts, this is our motto of our channel, entire design is difficult to show but you can use these basic concepts to design an entire building, but will accept your suggestion

@beardosrk8797 4 года назад

Nice video sir...please provide video on fixed and cantilever condition also...

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Sure 👍 will come up with it soon

@abhijeetsurwade2574 4 года назад

No doubt your projection of teaching is awesome, but i would like to request you to end your class with design drawing (even your one way slab class). It will be like sweet after dinner. Thanks

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Great suggestion! definitely i will provide drawings for the next rcc videos

@surykantchaudhary5138 Год назад

I've no word for such a great effort of urs in all video , u give best explanination such that no any doubt left . thanks a lot sir ji👌👌👍👍👍BUT YOU MADE A MISTAKE AT 48:02 in calculation of Pt , % area of steel is calculated at support so you should take half of Ast as alternate bars are bent up near the support

@YASH-iv2we 3 года назад

Sir pls make a video on Working Stess Method...... 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻pls sir make as early as possible sir......

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Sorry we are not making videos on working stress method

@yuwabharatshakti3603 4 года назад

plz make video on Reinforcement detailing in slab

@devanshishah24 2 года назад

Just started working in Design consultancy. My all doubts got cleared before I start using softwares. Thank you sir 🙌🏻🙏

@structuralanalysisanddesign 2 года назад

All the best for your future, keep watching and sharing

@vasantharajp6564 3 года назад

Sir, Thank you so much for your 1 way slab & 2 way slab. But kindly share the reinforcement detailing sketch. Then only the design understand completely.

@anilsuryatale7458 Год назад

Sir please make video on flat slab

@structuralanalysisanddesign Год назад

Will definitely try

@sonukumar-bp4wb 4 года назад

Please upload design for continuous beam or continuous slab waiting for this video . Thnks #abhijeet sir

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Thank you sonu, soon i will come up with this, stay tuned

@vilasvairal7964 3 года назад

👍

@ummidikavya5258 3 года назад

Sir plzz explain about types of foundations and footings sir plzz

@Sunitajorwal1506 Год назад

Sir please also teach us how to use a scientific calculator for solving equations in designing

@Director622 Год назад

36:47 (Ast)y And (Ast)x Formula Is Not Present In IS 456-2000 We Have Remember that Or Else Please Reply😌

@yuwabharatshakti3603 4 года назад

Plz make videos with full discriptoin long duration

@civilexplorer7038 2 года назад

Sir, pls make a video on One Way Continuous Slab.

@structuralanalysisanddesign 2 года назад

In coming days it will be uploaded, thank you for watching

@rohitbhagat9595 3 года назад

Please explain Continous slab design with detailed reinforcement

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Request noted, soon i will come up with it

@samviladnan7866 3 года назад

Sir what about slab restrained on corners do we need to go for torsion too in this case

@vigneshmudarapu1065 3 года назад

Sir,in load calculation the units are KN/m but you took KN/m2

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

It is slab that is why it has been shown KN/m2

@aayushrjl 4 года назад

sir please provide us with detailed reinforcement arrangement because it is incomplete without detailed reinforcement .

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

yes dear, soon i am coming up with separate detailing videos

@prateekbhatia8520 4 года назад

How the reinforcement are placed in the corners and beam slab interface?

@engineerrahul8457 Год назад

Can u plz explain about moment coeff when three edges continuous and short edge discontinous?itx not in the table?

@vjyvncnt 4 года назад

You should detailed draw for rft every design after

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Yes Vijay, i am giving details for the new videos

@vjyvncnt 4 года назад

All About Structural Analysis and Design can i have your mail id

@exambuster2994 Год назад

Sir! in practical conditions i think generally we need to design two way slabs in as restrained slabs but what about one way slabs and if we want to design one way restrained slab what is procedure?

@prajwolshrestha8541 2 года назад

After calculation of My and Mx in step.5. can you help me from where depth to resist moment came from code.

@dhananjoyroy375 3 года назад

Design of 02 way slab is explained elaborately with required codal provisions, however it is not understood why factored load/moment is not taken into account in the design.

@selvi3476 2 года назад

Because it is limit state design where highest factor that can be considered is 1.5 as per IS code

@ndubuisiaguihe340 Год назад

Please I need the other methods.

@civilexplorer7038 2 года назад

Sir, While calculating Load calculation u took per mtr width so Final unit should be kN/m & not kN/m2.

@bananimondal9389 Год назад

it must kn/m, in that case how kn/m2 is added with kn/m????? sir please check it.

@abishekirudayasamy8542 3 года назад

Sir Upload Two Way Continuous slab

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Sure will upload, keep watching

@amosopiyo6403 4 года назад

Also use British standards method for calculating moments

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Thank you for the suggestion, will consider this but it will take time

@pragathi4470 3 года назад

Each and every step is clear.., but sir I couldn't find the Ast calculation formula from where it has been arrived Sir. Could you please explain it Sir...

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Its a simplified formula, any standard text book if you refer you will get it

@masmhmd2488 3 года назад

How to analysis and design two way slab with openings?

@chubby2069 2 года назад

How to find the modification factor from that graph if fs=120 and pt=0.3. i cannot plot the corresponding modification factor value since its going out of the graph

@user-zd8ih8vs9z 3 месяца назад

What is the Lx/d ratio for Discontinuous slab

@nikhilteja434 2 года назад

should ast in shorter span be more than longer span always?

@surykantchaudhary5138 Год назад

BUT YOU MADE A MISTAKE AT 48:02 in calculation of Pt , % area of steel is calculated at support so you should take half of Ast as alternate bars are bent up near the support. also you didn't multiply the tau value with k for solid slab

@kkkkk47 2 месяца назад

At 29:40 we calculated required effective depth and it was 71mm. so how does it fail for deflection

@attSi7101 Год назад

Sir how to redesign this slab from step no. 2?

@helvinantony3707 2 года назад

Hi Sir, Excellent class. Have to ask you about Step one where in IS 456:2000 page 37 was made as a reference from your end however there is a note in Page 39 clause 24.1 of IS 456:2000 stating for solid slabs as : NOTES For two-way slabs of shorter spans(up to 3m) with mild steel reinforcement, the span to overall depth ratios given below may generally be assumed to satisfy vertical deflection limits for loading class up to 3 kN/m square• Simply supported slabs 35 Continuous slabs 40 For high strength deformed bars of grade Fe415, the values given above should be multiplied by 0.8 in this lecture class the span length is more than 3m hence, will this be the case to be considered or what ??? Expecting your reply as im studying through virtual classes about slab designing

@exambuster2994 Год назад

it is 3.5m in code book

@vallicreations408 2 года назад

While calculating small ast you assumed 8mm dia bars ... can we take 10mm bars insted 8mm?

@vallicreations408 2 года назад

Pls ..reply sir

@structuralanalysisanddesign 2 года назад

You can take, depends on moment how much we get, 6, 8, 10, 12 we can use

@souviksaha6408 11 месяцев назад

how much depth should we reduce so that the required depth > depth provided?

@subho7540 2 года назад

Sir why not we go with span to effective depth ratio mention on pg no 39 of Is code 456:2000 and in both the cases We see that deflection check is done but why not we follow the Annex C for checking the deflection ? Kindly reply me because I want to clear my doubt as soon as possible.

@nikhilteja434 2 года назад

should'nt dx be 116 in step 6?

@macavmoudbhawanxutra876 3 года назад

8:20 span depth ratio is wrong correct value is 35*conditions applied* given in pg39 of IS-456-200.

@amlakiealehegn6416 3 года назад

10q how can we analys when partition wall load is added to the slab!!

@pratikmeshram6942 3 года назад

i did not understand one thing --- why didn't you take MODIFICATION FACTOR while calculating effective depth of slab . is there any particular reason for skipping on M.F ?

@milakshyajyotisenchowa2741 2 года назад

An RCC column is to be provided in a building to carry an axial load is 1200 kN .Design the column assuming emin < 0.05D usingM20 and Fe415steel . How to solve it ?? Please help

@shailajakatkar9460 3 года назад

Hello Sir, I'm Vivek Katkar from Maharashtra.. If we take d = 120mm then the basic value of L/d ratio comes out to be 33 whereas in IS Code, the value should not be more than 20 for Simply Supported Slab.. If we take L/d ratio as 20, then d=200mm. But the criteria of Minimum reinforcement of 0.12% does not get satisfied for d=200 mm. Therefore, the problem remains unsolved.. Please Guide...

@Anku327 2 года назад

Yaa you are right help me out plzz......

@Anku327 2 года назад

Same problem with me

@Alern992 2 года назад

Sir, why didn't u use Modification factor?

@vedantsingh123 3 года назад

in the bending moment formula, why are both equations a function of Lx?

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Yes kindly refer IS 456-2000

@sonukumar-bp4wb 4 года назад

After fail in deflection than after I am takeing effective depth value 200 mm than its after calculation we found the value for astx and asty is 265.26 or 182.74 mm2 so its value is less than ast (min) = 276 mm2 than according to design criteria its not ok . Than what will do next step. Please

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

If you are getting both Ast less than Ast min than you have to provide Ast min as your reinforcement

@sonukumar-bp4wb 4 года назад

@@structuralanalysisanddesign thnks sir

@cherithhurdaisirigiri5584 2 года назад

Sir for corners not free to lift problem

@vasachisenjubean5944 4 года назад

What about negative bending moments?

@aayushrjl 4 года назад

I think negative bending moments in continuous slabs

@kullas8943 3 года назад

What if don't decrease the d from 200to 120 sir

@pranavmanohaur391 3 года назад

Sir since we took dx as 120 instead of 200, the slab failed in deflection then why did we reduce dx ?Still not clear sir. If we had taken 200 mm as dx then it would not have failed. Am i right sir?

@51_kalpeshrathod7 3 года назад

Sir, I have redesigned the slab with decrease the dia of bars to 6mm and increasing number of bars.. And the deflection get controlled..

@51_kalpeshrathod7 3 года назад

And also decrease the spacing to 100 mm. Is it better than increasing the thickness of slab?

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Nice attempt to understand the concept

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Different designers have different techniques to design

@kabitasharma1643 3 года назад

Sir, why did u not use the L/d ratio for slabs given in page 39, which is 35 for simply supported slabs?

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Hello Kabita, in one of the comments of the same video i have clarified this doubt, but once again i will tell, on page no. 39 it is said we can take those values if shorter span is upto 3.5m but where as in this problem shorter span is 4m so i have not taken that, i hope this clarified your doubt

@kabitasharma1643 3 года назад

@@structuralanalysisanddesign Thank you so much sir, could you tell me which value I should take if the dimensions are 3m * 5m? Here only one side span is less than 3 so little confused. Also, sir could you tell us how we can do the shear check for continuous slab?

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

If its upto 3.5m you can choose P 39 value, yes i am planning design of one way continuous slab

@kabitasharma1643 3 года назад

@@structuralanalysisanddesign okay sir, Thank you so much. Your videos are very helpful ❤️

@maheshchoudhari1952 3 года назад

Sir structure ke uper jo load ata hai kaise nikalte hai and seismic and wind ku nahi consider karte ho aap jab slab and beam design karte ho tab aur sab load kaise calculate kare

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Seismic load ka analysis alag hota hai

@kaushikjha484 3 года назад

can we use the Ast formula as given by you in the videos in our college exams? or should we resort to pg.96 formula?

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

There should not be any problem but i advise you to consult your teacher who has taken this subject and clarify

@tushargoel664 4 года назад

Sir is 456 me page 39 par two slab ki depth nikalne ke lx/35 ka use karne ka likha hai

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

Hello technical loot, you are absolutely correct, but if you read it carefully it has been mentioned on page 39 of IS 456-2000 that for shorter spans upto 3.5 meters with mild reinforcement ie Fe250 and we have to multiply by 0.8 if we use HYSD ie Fe 415 and 500, but in this problem short span itself is 4m that is why i have not taken page 39 value, i hope this clarification solves your doubt, thanks for watching and keep supporting

@tushargoel664 4 года назад

@@structuralanalysisanddesign ok sir its clear but in my book two slab question has dimensions of 5×5m so here is shorter span also 5m but they use span/35 to find out the value of d

@structuralanalysisanddesign 4 года назад

they use, but code clause is like that, atlast if all checks are satisfied than go ahead with that no problem

@tushargoel664 4 года назад

@@structuralanalysisanddesign ok sir

@sonukumar-bp4wb 4 года назад

@@structuralanalysisanddesign some people in youtube for calculating depth they are using formula l/d =MF *20 but why sir . In code not mentioned for multiplication by MF please clear my doubt.

@mahmoodabdullah4547 4 года назад

Thanks for teaching I have a doubt Span/overall depth = 35*0.8 = 25 For two way slab (Pg no 39 as per IS 456:2000) But you put span/effective depth = 20 Why?

@sumanthreddy4946 3 года назад

Yes for me also same doubt

@structuralanalysisanddesign 3 года назад

Hello Mahmood, i got your doubt, whatever you said is correct but only applicable for shorter spans upto 3.5m where as in video the shorter span itself is 4m therefore we cannot use values given on page 39 (point number 2) that is why i have taken point number 1 where it says span/effective depth. Also i Congratulate you for becoming member of channel, please mail me at avbaikerikar@gmail.com for sending benefits through mail

@maahitube3762 2 года назад

In Mx and My calculation from page 91 of IS 456, you have taken lx value as 4.12m which is effective lx span. Actually lx means just shorter span 4m, isn't it? I think we should take 4m in both Mx and My formulas. Pls clarify this sir. The code book also mentions lx and ly meanings to be just short and long spans in pg 90 IS 456.The code book also doesn't justify lx to effective length lx.

@shivamsharanlall672 2 года назад

Actually the lx and ly are the effective spans,not the clear spans. In the beginning when ly/lx is calculated, ratio of the clear spans are taken i.e. 5/4 = 1.25. But 5.12 / 4.12= 1.2427 So, there is not much difference in the values. The ratio of clear spans are taken to just get an approximation that it is which kind of slab. If you see in the book( B.c Punmia), there they calculate the effective spans first. Then any calculation afterwards. So lx and ly are the effective spans only. If things are confusing,then it is better to go with the derivations of the formula