Guys, we had a rendering issue. The video was suppose to end at minute 38:41, instead it ends at minute 46:5. Please ignore the black screen in the last 10 minutes of the video. This will be fixed in 1 hour according to RU-vid. Also, thanks for the heads up about Filippo's low mic volume. We will work on that moving forward 🤙🏽
A Concacaf and Conmebol merge would only benefit Concacaf, especially the Central American teams. As a Salvadorian American, I would love to see El Salvador constantly face Conmebol teams so they can learn how to play. Going back to the main topic, Mexico and the US will not qualify simply because these teams are not use to the atmosphere in South America so it would take them years to adjust.
Mexico en mundiales SIEMPRE queda entre los mejores 16 del mundo. 7 selecciones sudamericanas pocas veces califican al mundial y terminan en fase de grupos o en el repechaje.
@@luisabel5933 Te olvidaste de un dato MUY importante, el récord de México como el PEOR equipo de la HISTORIA de la Copa del Mundo. El que más partidos perdió. El que recibió más goleadas. El que peor diferencia de gol negativa tiene. El que terminó más veces en ÚLTIMO lugar. Recorda que hasta Chile y Estados Unidos fueron terceros en Mundiales, mientras que tu país no conoce lo que es jugar cuartos de final desde 1986, que es lo más lejos que ha llegado!
@@Lucas_Tulic tú si sabes, el mexicano que comentó solo comenta de una forma engañosa para inclinar la balanza a su favor pero se le olvida decir que la Conmebol es la única confederacion en haber clasificado 9 selecciones diferentes a copas del mundo y que 8 selecciones han superado la fase de grupos, no lo dice xq quedaría muy mal su punto de vista distorsionado. Sin duda la Cobembol es fuerte hasta en sus clubes pequeños, una selección débil de conmebol mínimo debe llegar a octavos y México su máxima aspiración es llegar a octavos jajaja eso lo dice todo los niveles son diferentes en Sudamérica son más competitivos.
I got to see him play in a CCL match against the dynamo. Houston won 1-0 with a goal from Brad Davis in the 90th minute. There were more Santos fans at that game in Houston than Dynamo fans.
You mean the guy who called the team that failed to qualify to Russia “ The most talented US Team in history” and got destroyed by Steve Nicols, Shaka and Burnley? This clown is very critical of this current generation but would not touch the Bradleys, or Arena.
Neither team would qualify directly unless the number of direct qualification spots increased. CONMEBOL has too much quality and road games would be a nightmare.
I very much disagree. They wouldnt be on par with the top-2 but they can trade punches with every other team and are on a equal talent level to those teams. They could easily qualify, would it be automatic? No but they are stronger teams than the likes of peru, chile ect
Not so. They would qualify. But unlike what the Mexican press claims it wouldn't be a walk in the park. They also wouldn't make all the world cups. Conmebol is so competitive that everyone except Brazil can be knocked off. Argentina themselves have had to both go to playoffs and also made it on the last game.
if concacaf and conmebol merge for qualifying, groups would probably be drawn like in uefa, africa and i think asia. it would always be difficult, some groups could be kinder than others.
@@20001mexico any team can compete but that doesn't mean they'll qualify. The US did well in the 2016 Copa America, but that was held in the US. The USMNT suck in away games, where they barely get past CONCACAF teams. So if the US played in the South American qualifying group, we'd probably lose all our away games. Do you think they'd win every home game to stand a chance of qualifying?? In the past or present, I'd say no.
@@chriskey7440 id argue the 2002 and 2010 USMNT could've had a chance at qualifying. But USA just doesn't have that experience competing away from home. Mexico has much more experience and I believe in past cycles they most definitely could've qualified. Both countries have the talent to compete, theres no denying that. Both countries need to branch out of Concacaf and test themselves against not only Conmebol, but set up more friendlies with top teams world wide instead of stagnating in Concacaf
@@chriskey7440 South American qualifying is basically everyone's game beneath Argentina and Brazil...I mean, a very average Australia handed Peru an L.
@@heppolo and the US tied with Costa Rica in points for 3rd, and had a horrible away record. Add in we got dominated by Japan and didn't do anything against a Saudi Arabia B team, this USMNT isn't anytime to brag about
I really enjoy how Herc has collabed so much with RU-vidrs and offered his opinions since he knows most of the die hard fans are here and not on the cable tv
WCQ should be kept the same and keep the two separate. I agree to expanding the Copa America to minimum 16 teams to be able to have a tournament style format. The same 10 teams is too played out. This also keeps it as a Copa America (north, central America). Maybe nation's league winners or gold cup top 6 make it to Copa America.
Hercs a real one for doing these. My favorite pundit. Futbol americas should just do away with sebi, but it gives the show a nice villain to hate. Keep up the good work guys. Come on you yanks!!!! 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
To Me They Should Create A New Copa Libertadores To All The Americas, Not Just Put MLS And Liga MX Teams There, This Wont Work, Maybe A Tournament With Counferences North And South, Maybe Put Some SA Countries In The North Conference Due To Travel, They Could Call This Tounament The "New Copa Libertadores" Or Something Like That
They played well in the US Copa America. That tournament should def rotate to the states. Could they make a run to the Semi Finals? Sure but I don't see them winning it.
@@flaviovelasquez4451 yeah I don’t think any Americans are thinking we would win anything outside of concacaf at the moment. US is a Decade or decades away from that level at least. It’s hard to know but the culture is def. changing for the better. It’s been super fun to watch the sport grow and it will inevitably get there if it keeps growing at the pace it has been.
@@zeroid5945 i can only see that if it takes place in usa or canada, i cant see the usa win copa america in a country like bolivia or Colombia where they would suffer with the weather
Great video like always Brazil is half of south America in size and population, that's the biggest reason for the wealth of their teams, their huge domestic market. Brazil's economy isn't actually doing too well right now. (not like Argentina, but sill not great)
U need to watch this video about Ecuador and Uruguay from tac then. These are small countries with great teams. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eC59CrVC0Kc.html
With This 48 Teams World Cups Comming In The Next Decades, Mexico And USA, Problably Still Would Quallify, With Conmebol And Concacaf Merged, At Least 9 Teams Would Qualify To The World Cup, If They Dont Qualify With This, Theres Something Really Wrong With This Teams
Brazil and Argentina rolled through the qualifiers this cycle. On other cups they have had their troubles as well. Usually either Argentina or Brazil run away with it, for both to do it in one cycle is extremely rare.
Imagine a joint concacaf and conmebol nations league. I think that would be great, give a chance to Mexico, usa, Canada etc to play against top competition. Lower concacaf teams would have the chance to move up and play tougher competition. And semi finals and final can be played in the US to generate insane amounts of money. There would def be hype and lots of tickets sold.
I think the thing that gets passed over in the merger discussion with qualification is that by nature, the number of qualification spots would have to be combined. No way does an Americas Federation of Football happen for the same 5 spots of CONMEBOL. Also, qualification in general is going to be diluted significantly from 26 on. Which to me, makes it more imperative to combine Federations. As those handful of matches vs elite teams are going to be even harder to find. And absolutely agree on Copa America, Libertadores, and Nations League. Both Federations need that competition. I could easily see a Combined Copa America being more marketable than the Euros.
@@brangomez1466 they do criticize mexico, but they still haven't quite given the usmnt their due. I think jorge ramos y su banda does a much better job of analysis
@@brangomez1466 I was just talking about the host and guests on that show. Cups and games tell you what a team did in the past. What is the position of the teams future that should be considered. They just find it hard to give usa props and recognize that usa has a bright future. Their bias won't let them
It’s just like watching Americans talking about how they’re going to win the World Cup in 2026! They’re 20 years late though! They USA had a ‘plan’ to conquer the World Cup 12 after their 1994 tournament...
@@tonya200 How can you assure that?! Not even Brazil can produce a championship winning team every generation, but suddenly the USA can?! That’s why you don’t get any recognition at all... Your greatest sporting achievement is beating Mexico in a final for the first time after fifteen years, that’s it, that’s your projection that somehow that would catapult the USA to compete with the likes of Germany, Italy and Brazil. You’re delusional!
With only 4.5 spots, no way. However if they were to add spots due to Mexico and USA joining plus an expanded World Cup, so maybe to 7.5 spots, they would have a shot.
This is good stuff here, I think the first step would be to secure a consistent structure for the Copa America and then slowly move towards participation in the Libertadores/Sudamericana. I think WCQ is a little bit more difficult to work around as I’m unsure that CONMEBOL would be happy with CONCACAF teams trying to take the limited spots they have.
I agree that the confederations can both profit from working together on Copa America, Libertadores and Sudamericana. But you will NOT see a merger anytime soon. For the same reason that is always cited: WC prize money. For those of you struggling to understand, think of 2026. The expanded WC means there will be 3.5 CONCACAF spots available even with the USA, Mexico, and Canada hosting. The remaining CONCACAF teams will be fighting each other for those spots and the FIFA payday that comes with it. If, however, the confederations merged, then those 3.5 spots could all be claimed by CONMEBOL sides. Which is viewed by the CONCACAF minnows as an unacceptable outcome. So, any merger proposal will be shot down by the C. American and Caribbean federations wanting to protect what chance they currently have of qualifying.
I have been saying this for decades! A merger would certainly benefit Conmebol teams at first and give very competitive teams the chance to qualify and make for a much more entertaining World Cup finals. Teams such as Colombia, Uruguay, Chile and Ecuador have not been part of the tournament several times in the past 30 years. Historically, Conmebol teams also outperform CONCACAF teams categorically with several teams making it to the quarterfinals more than once. Keep in mind as well that Conmebol has 3 former World Champions (Brazil 5, Uruguay 2 and Argentina 2). On the other hand, smaller nations in Central America and the Caribbean have the opportunity of playing with the giants of South America which should improve their development. It would also benefit the larger Concacaf nations by having to face with potential World Cup champions. With 51 member nations, this can certainly work in a qualifier format somewhat similar to UEFA's with 8 teams qualifying.
Well beating Argentina and Brazil is irrelevant. You gotta beat Ecuador, Paraguay, Colombia, Peru, etc. to qualify. If Mexico and USA were to join Conmebol with the same amount of spots as there are now (4.5), they wouldn't qualify. If there are 2 extra spots (up to 6.5), it's close. The World Cup is going to expand though, and if Conmebol with USA and Mexico gets like 8 spots, USA and Mexico should qualify
Interesting topics and discussion. I think C'BOL joining UEFA's NL will be great for competitiveness and financial reasons, it is better than combining with C'CAF. Copa America needs to get more teams involved. Libertadores should definitely include C'CAF club teams.
I think at best 1 of Canada, Mexico or the USMNT could have qualified (thru the playoff) in CONMEBOL but it's VERY possible none of them get through. Which one qualifies, I don't know but CONMEBOL is the hardest confederation to qualify out of imo.
@@coppilcus Lol because Concacaf doesn't also play home and away? Canada played as many qualifiers, irrelevant to difficulty. Half of EU groups have 0 WC winners, whereas in South America, 1/3 of qualifiers are vs WC winners
Another benefit for conmebol would be increased number of nations who would qualify. The expanded WC tournament has 6 1/3 spots for CONCACAF. qualifying as does CONMEBOL. The bottom teams in CONMEBOL would be very competitive with the teams below the top 3-4 in CONCACAF.
Ecuador will qualify for the next 2 WCs at least. Also their pipeline is constantly pumping out new "gems" As for them being slightly better than Peru...just go watch the last matches against Argentina and Brazil. Mexico doesn't have good crops coming up. The US is a little better but not by much. Canada is enjoying a good crop but not sure they have a pipeline of players.
I think the US and Mexico would have a great shot at qualifying from a combined confederation because if the two confederations were to combine, so would there allotted WC slots. US and Mexico would have a decent shot at finishing in the top 8.
If GGG fielded our best team and took qualifying a little more serious I think we could finish 4-5 on CONMEBOL, but there lies the problem, GGG and his lineups.
Hey tactical, quick question. Do you think we should as USMNT FAN create a petition to get John Brooks back to the team. Other countries petition stuff all the time to get their way.
Just cause he's the appointed coach with ties of MLS lead agenda don't make it right. As a fan, you can voice frustration. Yes we won against Mexico and won trophies, big whoop once the world stage begins. England favorites to win our group, then Iran is a powerhouse who switch coaches per politics reasoning then Wales, a solid team with 1 real star but team who plays with one another like who on concacaf o yea Costa Rica and we struggle against them. We could easily be eliminated in group stage but then what it's alright because 2026. Come on we should send the best players not just mls lifers
Which I doesn't really seem to support the argument that they are better than either Mexico or US but it was one game in a neutral site so anything can happen and maybe Peru would win 9 out of 9 if they played again. I did n' t see the game but I don't think Peru dominated in posession and shots from what I recall reading. I didn't wven tho k the game was going to be competive ...
@@robertgeist883 it does support the argument. CONMEBOL WC qualifiers is all about home advantage. Intercontinental playoffs is who shows off the sharpest to “win” that 1 match. Peru played better a bit more than Australia, definitely the best side in terms of tactics but Australia got the job done, and this match took place in Doha. Not in Lima Or Sydney.
Mexico got spanked 7-0 by Chile IN the US. Mexico got spanked 4-0 by Argentina IN the US. Hell, Mexico gets spanked 9 times out of every 10 by any Conmebol nation. Stop acting like Mexico is some sort of world class team.
I think they would be decent on their best years in the conmebol and extremely terrible on there down years. I don’t know if that made sense. The Benefits of playing with that competition are obvious though
Maybe I’m too biased but I don’t see the USA only getting 3 points total away in CONMEBOL. For some reason you guys kept giving the conmebol teams the benefit of the doubt, like forgetting how badly Uruguay was struggling for a long time and saying things like “Oh but Colombia are better than how they were playing.” That kind of logic doesn’t make sense to me at all, especially if you don’t apply it to every team. I’d guess the usa would finish in 5th. No doubt it’d be a struggle but I think sometimes you guys were forgetting things or exaggerating a little.
@@AndrewLaReal Ummmm... nope! Look at the most recent games of the top 3 teams in Concacaf against Conmebol teams, either point-paying matches or friendly matches. The best performance you're gonna see is 12 points out of 30 (at friendlies). In the last point-paying matches against the 10 Conmebol teams, Mexico has lost SIX, drew 2 and won 2. 8 points out of 30! U.S.A. lost to Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Uruguay and Bolivia, drew with Venezuela and won against Chile, Perú, Ecuador and Paraguay. 13 points out of 30! Canadá hasn't played alot of point-paying matches against Conmebol teams, only three. It lost to Ecuador, drew with Brazil and won against Colombia. 4 points out of 9. In friendlies, it's lost to Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Perú, Chile and Colombia / drew with Ecuador, Venezuela and Paraguay. 3 points out of 27. With those numbers, every one of them will be battling with Bolivia and Venezuela to see who ends up last.
There’s another logistical problem with regards to a Conmebol Concacaf merger: Weather. When it’s Summer in the Northern Hemisphere it’s Winter in the Southern Hemisphere and vice versa. You could have teams playing on the scorching heat one game and then in the freezing cold the next.
At this point, I'd say it would be a toss up. One qual out of 4 would probably be what we would be looking at, both USMNT and Mexico. If the qualifying team numbers went up, maybe one of 3 or 2, but not every WC. People forget that CONMEBOL qualifiers are grueling and long.
I think your missing a point that if they combined concacaf and comneibol there would be 7-9 spots. So considering that our chances to qualify go way up.
We should campaign to send Mexico to Conmebol. Concacaf let’s Mexico do whatever they want. Let’s be honest. With Mexico and without Mexico the teams in central America will stay at the same level. Invite them to the Gold Cup and still keep the money making machine going. Send Mexico to Compete in South America, they increase their level and Central America and the Caribean would compete for an extra spot.
Problem is is the Mexican Federation treats the game as a business. They see mediocre competition, but don't care as long as fans attend matches or watch and more importantly, sponsors keep sponsoring
Yes, but not every time, but I also feel that if we did we'd be a much better team. I think once every 3 or every 2 times we'd go. I also think Brazil and Argentina might slip up a couple times if we joined. A draw here aloss there and they very well could be out of the world cup
Dude!! Your country can barely make it in a confederation FILLED with amateurs and teams without ANY history in football whatsoever, and you think they would playing the toughest qualifiers in the world with the best players in the world, with some of the best teams in the world and in the most complicated stadiums with some of the meanest football fans out there? Please...
IMO this should be done - have 4 unique zones, each getting 12 guaranteed berths. 12 for Zone Europe (UEFA), 12 for Zone Africa (CAF), 12 for Zone Americas (CONCACAF + COMNEBOL) and 12 for Zone Asia and Oceania (AFC and OFC)
Tac... Your audio is bad for some reason. I love your videos, but I can't watch this until you fix it. Yours and Hercs dialogue Kris going up and down. The snap shot sound whenb the images change hurts my ears. Please fix so I can watch this
Nope... sorry guys but you would not qualify to any World Cups if you were to play in Conmebol. Up north you're used to another level of competition, another game speed, another intensity (all way slower). The teams in the vast majority have little to no history in football, and are pretty much amateurs. And no offense, but most of the supporters in the grandstands (especially from Mexico and the U.S.A.) are like high school cheerleaders, so their pressure towards the rival team is non-existent. For South American national teams would be a piece of cake playing on any stadium on the north, but for the Concacaf teams it would be an ordeal to play in ours. Look at the most recent non friendly matches of the top 3 teams from Concacaf against Conmebol teams (I'll only include games from the last 5 years): Canadá - Hasn't played against Conmebol teams in the last 5 years, although it has played with 9 out of the 10 teams in the past, all the way thru 2014. It has lost 6 and drew the other 3. In non-friendlies, it lost to Ecuador, drew with Brazil and won against Colombia. México - Loss to Argentina and Brazil in the last 5 years. But has also lost its most recent games with Chile, Colombia, Perú and Ecuador, drew with Bolivia and Venezuela, and won only against Uruguay and Paraguay. U.S.A. - No games with Conmebol teams in the last 5 years. But has faced them in the recent past and lost to Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Uruguay and Bolivia, drew with Venezuela and won against Chile, Perú, Ecuador and Paraguay. And these are the most recent friendly matches: Canadá - Lost to Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Perú, Chile and Colombia / drew with Ecuador, Venezuela and Paraguay. México - Lost to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Colombia / drew with Ecuador, Perú and Chile / won against Paraguay, Venezuela and Bolivia. U.S.A. - Lost to Brazil, Colombia and Venezuela / drew with Argentina, Uruguay, Chile and Perú / won against Bolivia, Ecuador and Paraguay.
CONMEBOL ahas been poor over the last years but it seems like most are making a comeback! Teams like Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Uruguay, Paraguay, Venezuela and Peru have improved in the last 8 years. Uruguay, Ecuador and Brazil look like they have a young core base for the future. Argentina seem to not rely on Messi as much most players are at their prime. I think Chile is on a decline, along with Peru in terms of talent and Qualifying to the WC. I’d say Colombia is also declining Although Colombia’s case is different because they do have some top players playing at elite club and most players are on their prime. Paraguay and Venezuela seem to be improving little by little and Bolivia seems like the only poor team but with the best Home advantage
Brazil, Ecuador, Venezuela have good young player crops. Paraguay is terrible Chile got old and no new crop coming up Colombia should be still good but they suffer from same malady as Mexico. An inflated self image. Also their youth is not flowing high quality players in numbers.
Gotta think you can't use the same format in a merger though....if it's more European style I could see USA or Mexico qualifying by either winning a weak group or winning out in a final chance group.
you guys are crazy a player in brazil do a lot of money...ronaldinho went from here when he was 17... of course at that age he was not doing a lot...but other when you get 22 ...23 years more you get the money and much more then in mexico for sure...
I think Copa can have same format as Euro 10 teams from South America 6 best teams from North America(by Fifa coefficient) 4 best teams from Europe(that failed to qualify for Euro) 4 teams from Africa and Asia Would be fun tournament ngl, imagine this Copa and Euros playing in same summer🤔
Lol why would South America and Europe add teams from confederations that have achieved nothing? SA only does so because there's not enough teams, so adding minimum makes sense, 6 is already diluting
Mexico qualified in 2nd place because they beat the worst teams in the octagonal. They struggled against the US and Canada. Most of the CONMEBOL teams are US level or better. I agree with the 50/50 chance for both US and Mexico though.
And usmnt couldn’t beat teams Panama, Canada, El Salvador, Jamaica, Costa Rica. They wouldn’t fair well against teams like Peru-Paraguay-Ecuador-Colombia let along the big 3.
This Mexico team isn't beating Ecuador or even Peru! I understand they're always competitive against Commebol sides and in previous Copa America's. Worse 🇲🇽 team in over a decade.
@@flaviovelasquez4451 The usmnt just right now despite the talent don’t have what it takes to pull out away wins against opponents like El Salvador or Panama or Costa, they’ve only managed to do it against Mexico because berhalter really seems to know how Tata system works. They could maybe scrape by pull it out against Teams like Paraguay-Chile-Bolivia. But their not getting wins at Argentina-Brazil-Uruguay-Colombia. Even Peru & Ecuador would be very hard.
I think the current USA, Mexico and Canada squads would have a decent chance. Australia were very poor in Asia and looked far better than Peru in their playoff. Times have changed.
I remember saying the same thing that text says about South American Copa libertadores to JD and he said I didn't know what I was talking about see your Boy tactical says the same thing I'm saying
TBH both MX and USA would find it very hard to qualify. Both MX and USA barely have players that play in the top leagues in Euro, and those that do play are good but not great. CONMEBOL has players that are great that are significant (Neymar, Messi, Valverde, Luis Diaz. Caicedo, Jesus, Nunez, Vinny Jr, Estupinan, Di Maria etc etc) from the USA their face player is cemented on the bench in Chelsea and MX does not have that face player (since they are all level from each other maybe chucky?)
I think just assuming the USMNT would only score 3 road points is kinda a joke sure they prob are not favorites but talent wise they are on par or better than 8/10 teams so almost all games home & away are all viewed as "able to get points" it wouldnt be easy, but they can trade punches with columbia, peru, chile ect and they can win those games. Would they? Sometimes yes, they would be right in the thick of it
Maybe I missed it, but I don’t think you guys covered the future of the Gold Cup if there would be a merger. Would it flat out be canceled? I would assume so.
Gold Cup is CONCACAF's equivalent of Copa America, Euros, African Cup of Nations, etc. So, if the confeds merge, then Gold Cup and Copa America would be merged into one tournament along with it.
If they're good they should've won AT THE VERY LEAST an Under-20 World Cup, or a Gold Medal in the Olympics. It's not a matter of time, or even money or infrastructure. You could have 20 more years up your sleeve and the team would not be better, because you're in a confederation in which you play against 90% of pretty much amatuers without ANY history in football whatsoever. Concacaf football is slower than Conmebol's, lower intensity, lower quality of players and of playing, so in that environment it's impossible to take the next step. That's why most teams from Concacaf are literally destroyed in most of the matches against teams from Conmebol, because they're not prepared for that kind of speed, that kind of intensity, that kind of pressure and they find themselves overwhelmed by all that in no time. To be almost 50 years behind is a lot.
@@Lucas_Tulic team with average age of 27 years old is much better than one of 23. The topic is "can the US qualify to the world cup from CONMEBOL" not "can the US win a world cup". I think you commented on the wrong video lol.
@@infinteuniverse No, I commented in the right video. You said that 'the future is bright' and you put a timeline of 3 to 4 years, supposedly for your NT's players to gain more experience or magically learn to play against big teams out of thin air I guess. As long as they play in Concacaf, they'll never get better. That's what I was talking about.
I feel like allot of Mexicans tend to forget the massacre of SANTA CLARA 7-0 lose to Chile 🇨🇱 . As the announcers said back then. Mexico doesn't know who they're playing, they think they're playing in the gold cup this isn't the gold cup this is the COPA AMERICA
Too be honest both Mexico and the USA won’t qualify if such actions occur but they will benefit in the the long run if they’re determined enough. I do believe that both USA and Mexico have a better STRUCTURED TEAM then some nations from South American, although it all determines in how well they preform collectively. Nevertheless these are just speculations, we will never know till then.
@@coppilcus yea the Mexico back then! But we are talking about today’s Mexico, not Hugo Sanchez Mexico, Luis Hernandez, Jared Burgetti etc. They made other teams nervous; but this Mexico🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 oh let’s not forget about our last game in Copa America 7-0 and our recent games are not all that great. Get real we would be in trouble
@@midnightscavenger1449 Accidents do not define the sporting level of a team, just as a good summer do not define your future sporting level... Hugo Sánchez played only one Copa América, Hernández or Jared were parts of a team and that has always been the case with Mexico: few figures and good average players that can play good football. Unfortunately for Mexico, they’re managed by a lousy coach and a mediocre federation, the former one allowing a serious decline in team play, and the latter one tying Mexico’s sporting future to CONCAKAFKA and the mediocre MLS... This team is facing a terrible end of World Cup process, but it hasn’t been the lousiest of them all, the worst was when they didn’t even qualified for the 82 World Cup or the 78 one in Argentina where they ended last. I’m afraid that with Martino they’re not going to get out of the group stage in Qatar, and that would be the first time in 40 years.
@@coppilcus I’m confident they will get out if they did it with Osorio and his rotations they can do it again besides Mexico has been constant in qualifying for the round of 16. No matter what situation they’re in they manage to move on.
@@midnightscavenger1449 Well, yeah, but not with this coach, it has been a steady decline throughout his last three years ‘leading’ Mexico... Osorio wasn’t as lousy as Martino, but still a terrible coach, he almost manages to eliminate Mexico at the last game of the group stage, even after Mexico had won the two previous games. It could’ve been the first time in history that a team with 6 points would had been out of the the next rounds, but obviously that final debacle obliged Mexico to play against Brazil...
Look at the most recent games of the top 3 teams in Concacaf against Conmebol teams, either point-paying matches or friendly matches. The best performance you're gonna see is 12 points out of 30 (at friendlies). In the last point-paying matches against the 10 Conmebol teams, Mexico has lost SIX, drew 2 and won 2. 8 points out of 30! U.S.A. lost to Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Uruguay and Bolivia, drew with Venezuela and won against Chile, Perú, Ecuador and Paraguay. 13 points out of 30! Canadá hasn't played alot of point-paying matches against Conmebol teams, only three. It lost to Ecuador, drew with Brazil and won against Colombia. 4 points out of 9. In friendlies, it's lost to Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Perú, Chile and Colombia / drew with Ecuador, Venezuela and Paraguay. 3 points out of 27. With those numbers, every one of them will be battling with Bolivia and Venezuela to see who ends up last.
