Hubble's UItra Deep Field in 3D is an amazing journey through space and time 

It takes your breath away, every time. Just 1 galaxy is already ridiculously large. 400-500 +/- billion stars in our own galaxy. Imagine drawing the tiniest spec (earth) you could with a pencil. If Our moon is at 5mm from this spec, our sun (size of a pea) would sit at 70cm from us. The next closest star to us 200km away. 5 million kilometers ( or 110 trips around the earth) to travel from one side of our galaxy to the other side.

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 That is a simple minded viewpoint that you have created to make you feel better about yourself. That fact that the universe continues to exist after you no longer do has ZERO impact on ANYTHING. Wake up, stop contemplating your navel and do something that matters.

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 lol how do you know celebrities have not reached this level of enlightenment lmfao what they can’t view this RU-vid video like your high school dropout ass?! Your trying to come across as an edgy beyond your years intelligent when all you have shown is a weak baseless example of how celebrities ( who you know fuck all about personally except what your read on Twitter or news SO IT MUST BE TRUE) are not enlightened! What like you are because you stood on the edge of the crappy Grand Canyon! Rich people get to do that shit and then some imagine what they have experienced to your shallow outlook.

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 I’m glad you acknowledge the hypocrisy and baseless accusations

I just hope the bloody thing gets there ...

@@terrywright9765 And then unfolds everything, and then works... Too far to fix

When and if they ever get the darn thing off the ground....they shoulda let Elon take over a while back lol

In 1996, it was thought there are 200 billion galaxies in the observable universe. In 2016, a new analysis of Hubble found there are about 10 times more galaxies than previously thought: about 2 trillion galaxies. In 2026, JWST Ultra-Deep Field may show us that there are at least 20 trillion galaxies?

20 trillion galaxies? I can probably comprehend 20 thousand stars, maybe.

billions!

It really makes your spine tingle with excitement🤯🤯🤯

At first I wished they'd left on the grid of the deep field size, but I think it would fill every pixel way before the end of the zoom.

@@Synky billions and billions! (Sagan)

​@@Synkythere isn't billions of patches the size of the UDF not even millions

I couldn’t have said it any better.

@@itachi1448 billions of suns in each, with multiple planets around most suns. Don't know about life.

and flat,tasteless and boring

@@danieldorsz1047 That may be your mind .

@@itomba of course it is

your music is beautiful and does justice to these beautiful images. Thank you for creating it

@@neojc128 thank you!

@@neojc128 heartily agree!!

Hi Sir.. evidence please?

@@Saifullah.Q i am sorry? how can i help you?

The images and animations in this clip are inspiringly beautiful and vastly fascinating. On the other hand, the music is so painfully depressive and so utterly mischosen, it's a pain to watch the clip while hearing this.

@@ParalysedGekko I rather liked the music but probably only because it featured a French horn and I happen to play that instrument. Regardless, it’s definitely somber music, and lacks the kind of sensationalism you would expect in a soundtrack to something like this

Yes it is! Praise our Creator for its existence. Truly awe inspiring and mesmerizing isn’t it. ❤️😍

CGI fest!

This video is indeed a masterpiece!

@@wellifthemediasaysit Well obviously the 3D part of the video is. Using spectroscopy and the widefield image (actually almost 350 long exposure images taken over 10 days, the images are cleaned of of stray light and artifacts, then stacked), they measured and mapped most of the visible objects and placed them at their respective distances. Technically, any picture taken by a digital camera is CGI. Put very simply, the CCD takes analog signals, that is, photons captured by the elements, which are then converted into digital information. CGI

@@frankkolton1780 Would love to just see a constant zoom of jupiter or saturn, rather than a lame, star trek intro-style mass of unknown stars passing!

We definitely aren’t the only ones I could only imagine what life is like for them how they live what’s their history how they view life as a whole

@@jaleenyarbrough5128 And I would add that the real question would be : Are we the only ones "in this present time" of the universe ?

Well you were right, it found absolutely nothing....of use. Waste of money and time, for what amounts to a bit of entertainment. "Oooo purrty" is all it's good for.

@@disco4535 your mind must be hollow to not find this of any significance.

@@Yarmox And? What is the significance? Should be pretty easy to explain if you unserstand it.

@@disco4535 if you need explaining after watching the video you prove my point.

@@Yarmox So you dont even know? Lol. There isn't, or you could easily explain it. " its super deep only ultra smarts get it" Theres nothing and youve proven my point.

I have the same feelings.

At the moment 2:40 i tried to imagine that monstruous distances, i felt something i cannot even describe when i realized the universe is even larger than that, there are also multiverses!!! It’s just mental!

your focus towards music in this case..lol

@@westtibetanadami6717 Yes.. My brain needs music in order to better understand the world around me.

@@emilialuisagiacomini8136then relax and stop discovering the universe! haha

*It hurts more when countries fight for small piece of land. How narrow minded we are*

Yes it truly is mind blowing. For me it hurts my head when I try to think where it started and where it ends. If in the beginning there was nothing, how did gasses and particles build up to create those galaxies? where did they come from? Is this the only universe? Or are there others? Everything has to have a beginning and an end (in out mindset) and I cannot comprehend where it ends and there is nothing. I wish given my old age, astrophysics (or any physics) were in the school curriculum. Maybe I could understand more.

@@deenieteenie3934 those are many questions that are as yet unanswered. So far, there is no evidence of an other universe, only this one. Some theorist think that if there were other universes, or infinite universes, it would answer many philosophical questions. But as far as proof? There is none. Seeing the universe is moving outwards we can just reverse the clock and see that at some point, it was all in one place, a tiny speck that was the whole universe. It was pure energy, and when it expanded it started to cool, and form matter, enough to fill the entire universe! And the weird thing that is hard to grasp, is that space is something, it’s not nothing, as it appears to be, space stretches and bends, causes gravity, and is believed to be made of quantum fields. where the fields interact with each other creates sub atomic particles, and so on. That is a tough one, and something not many really understand. Your questions are valid, and are the same questions many theoretical physicists are actively studying. I’m guessing it hurts their heads too.

Perhaps someone in one of these galaxy's is wondering too when they see our milky way as it was billion years ago.

@@nitinjain2089 I remember watching a programme and the astronauts saying from space the earth has no borders yet we seem to fight over them. I couldn’t agree with your comment more. We will be the architects of our own downfall in the end

It might be interesting to pick a spot in the sky directly opposite to this one, and see what it’s Deep field looks like? Will it be the same? Or even more crowded? Less crowded? They picked this spot because it appeared to be nothing there, a lonely spot in the sky, so other spots very well may be a lot more crowded than this? Which would increase their average for the number of galaxies in the universe.

Toward the end it was explained that there are 10,000,000 (yes, they said ten million) patches this size that could be viewed. That's what amazed me the most.

@@alphagt62 it looks like this everywhere we look. The cosmos is pretty well spread out. And it’s all expanding away from each other. So, from any telescope pointing out at the stars, no matter where it is in the universe, everything else would be expanding away from it like how we view it. That was the purpose of choosing such a blank empty piece of space, to show that it’s crowded every direction, even where it appears dark.

@@TheFlamingChips The foremost reason they chose that particular spot was to have as few as possible stars in the foreground, with such long exposures, stray light from them would of had a very negative impact on the CCD (the wide field/planetary cam.) from picking up faint light from such far distances.

@@alphagt62 Isn't everything distributed more or less uniformly everywhere when considered at the largest scale? I think that's what I learned by watching cosmological videos.

More probably billions ...

@@nigelstarkey9399 probably quadrillions

It's really incredible thinking of how many different life forms that could exist in such a vast universe

I swear you read my mind

Of course there are!!, But they might be a whole different creation all together!

just for clarity .. what is a 'bunch of years'. I understand say a 'bunch of flowers' .. is this a seasonal comparison ?

@@nigelstarkey9399 Early '90s...I remember the same one...''a bunch of years'' a good description I would think.

The section of sky is equal to if you held up a grain of sand on the tip of your thumb, outstretched and held at arms length in front of you. That’s the craziest thing; it equals to like 1/125 millionth of the entire night sky.

So small it doesn’t even exist to the cosmos but only within a human mind that is unconscious.

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 We will never last a 1000 years now that we have had nuclear weapons, its only 75 years how do you expect anybody to hold off another 925 years .Seems inevitable man destroys himself before then .

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 - probably a good thing. Enough with the hate. People wonder if we'll find "intelligent" life out there, but the truth is, we aren't very intelligent, we're bent on killing each other and hating everyone that differs from us. Intelligent life probably wouldn't waste their time trying to communicate with us.

I understand all of the negativity and share it too. But I thought about that quite a bit and have come to the conclusion that we are rather special or "blessed" to have evolved our level of intelligence in the epoch where we can detect the evidence of the big bang and due to cosmological expansion and redshift of light future extraterrestrial civilizations won't be able to detect that evidence as we have. So far as we know, there aren't any other extraterrestrial intelligences. We may be the first ! Some species has to be the first and since the Fermi Paradox exists we have to proceed as if that is the case, that we are alone as sufficiently advanced technological civilizations in our area of the galaxy. Therefore... I think Humanity has an obligation to far future advanced extraterrestrial civilizations (or our far future descendants) to archive our evidence, gleaned through painstaking observation over the course of scientific endeavor and leave it for galactic posterity.

It is a wonderful video, though this channel simply reuploaded it from the Hubble RU-vid channel… for some reason?

Yeah, me too... my jaw literally dropped at some points of this video !

For me, it's equal parts amazement and somewhat depressed. I don't know why. It somehow makes our little tiny planet even tinier.

@@4seeableTV Yes. Our planet is just an atom in the universe. But, it doesn’t mean we’re insignificant.

You are a very attractive fella thinking that way.

@@Clodd1 In reality , we really are .

Mortal minds cannot grasp the infinite.

@@zzanatos2001 "Thy power throughout the universe displayed".

dont say never. you cant know what future scientific progress will be.

Probably not in this life. However I agree with Stanley, never say never.

Maybe it's like a Mobius strip.

And yet, the insignificant human race is arrogant enough to think that we are the only living creatures in the universe. The human stupidity is only surpassed by the human arrogance.

@@TheChiefEng I agree. We’re getting one step closer to answering that ultimate question. James Webb will be up soon and I can’t wait what’s in store for us.

@@TheChiefEng More and more self-loathing humans. Seems to be a trend lately. Very unfortunate.

Traveling between galaxies will be rather difficult. Galaxies are light years apart. One light year is distance light travels in one Earth year or in numbers - 9,460,800,000,000 Km. That would make travel to another galaxy a rather longer than life trip at this point in time. We'll have to figure out how to either move faster than light which isn't possible according to physics today (e=mc2) or make space move around us instead of us moving through it (warping through space). Either way, it will take a vast amount of energy to achieve either goal. Who knows? Maybe one day in the distant future? Fingers crossed.🤞

@@DaveBuildsThings Given the distances, I think within the mode of travel we know we can reach the colonization of our solar system. to go beyond that, I see our human mortality as the greatest challenge. In the form we have biologically, you are actually talking about a new species because it will take generations to even reach the nearest star. these travelers will be thousands of years away from the stragglers who sent them on their way. so it will be an approach that is completely different. The question is whether we are prepared to invest in a goal beyond our own existence. The same also applies to sending robots, or to a mix of humans and machines. That first step will require a completely different approach. Beyond that, colonization of the galaxy will primarily be an extension of life itself and not an extension of the human species. life reaching the edge of our galaxy will be as strange to us as what we imagine when we think of aliens. They will remain as unreachable as they are now. for exrateresials vice versa the same will apply. So there is no universal knowledge possible. life and knowledge will always remain fragmented by the barrier of the speed at which information can reach us. Even assuming an almost eternally living entity, the expansion of the universe ensures that it can never be fully known. Back to the speed of light. The condition for the existence of "our" universe is precisely that it has a direction and thus a limit to the exchange of information. That also gives meaning to our existence. Our finiteness and limitations are a blessing in that regard. The limitation that we experience has also made it possible for us to experience that limitation. Even our dreams only exist within that frame. The struggle we experience is actually the real mystery

You’re a good brother.

Oh yes she did. Her awe was all she needed. Not understanding. Just awe. And you gave her the opportunity to have that.

Exactly, we still have been thinking everything is made for us and only for our really irrelevant tiny small existence... How could we be that conceited?

A man asked a preacher why did God go to all that trouble, the preacher replied, who said it was trouble or difficult.

@@Ginoalvara It' not conceit, it's understanding over time.

It does

It gives you some perspective of how insignificant we really are doesn’t it. Unless of coarse were really on a flat earth at the center of the universe. 😂😂

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 Who cares what they think. Believing is only relivant for the individual. These people only thrive on attention, negative or positive. The mind is a place nobody can go and you are free to be yourself. No mather what certain people would like you to think.

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3Don't worry bc at least us Buddhists aren't like that, we're also aware of the vast of these universe. Hence why we want to overcome lust, because there's more to this universe than just a demon inside our heart.

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 Don't worry it's fine

totally agree. it also proves my wife does not know everything. but seriously this is the literal climax of human endeavour to my mind

Some of them could be galaxies

I was just thinking the same thing. I can’t wait to point the James Webb at the same spot, and see just how much more powerful it is than Hubble. I particularly enjoyed the part where they stretched the galaxies out over distance. Showing how there seemed to be more galaxies in the past around 6 billion years ago. I suppose they’ve all merged into larger galaxies now? Or perhaps the universe was just a smaller place back then, and galaxies were closer together? But it was an interesting perspective I’ve not seen before.

@@alphagt62 I've never seen a 3D perspective like that and tremendously enjoyed it also.

Thanks for the info! I have reflector scopes so I know about the reflector diffraction lines for stars. But I didnt know that didn't translate to galaxies. Cool!

@@beta_cygni1950 From a photographer's POV I can understand the 'why' behind the phenomenon, but I can't do the math to 'prove the optics' of it. Perhaps a truly bright galaxy so far away that it _barely_ appears as a point MAY display the 'truss artifact', but since I learned of it, I've sorta' tried to find a contradictory example of the theory and I haven't yet...

you taught me. thank you

But that is wrong. A galaxy that is the same apparent size as a star in a given image, has exactly the same "spread" of photons as far as the allowed range of angle of incidence is concerned and the projected area from which the photons can originate. Thus they will have the same diffraction effects.

@@ianallen738 That **does** makes as much sense as anything I can figure. I guess I'll have to see where, if any, there are some notes on this effect. Instead of galaxy, or bright distant star, or closer, could it simply BE the apparent size? Or, bright objects being partially 'eclipsed' by support trusses? I wish I could now, but I can't do any experiments myself. I don't have a telescope... there's got to be some write-up somewhere... I ended up changing the comment to reflect the theory seems to have encountered contradiction issues ! :-)

God's just humans imagining that a giant invisible human made everything. It's just human ego and vanity. It like if giraffes had a religion and they said the universe is made by a giant invisible giraffe.

@@chriswilloughby48 You have it completely backwards Chris. It is sinful vanity to believe there is no God. Psalm 14:1

I think you meant fathom....not phantom

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 Where at in this video is evidence mentioned that proves that it takes billions of years for light to reach earth?

@@n.e.parkman2326 Its called...Science

You had me till the god shit.

@@gleanerman2195 And I mean what I say God is not mocked with a man so she shall reap trust.Him is the only way out of this mess PalJesus died so that we could live forever

@@macman3175 Just stop and listen to yourself, it all sounds nutty. It's not real man.

When will they send it?

@@ShauriePvs October 2021

@@Rucka_Inc. cool.. Will be looking forward to it

@@Rucka_Inc. any news on when the first image or news will come back from the telescope?

That's actually a very good scenario, I like it! :-)

Fuck that nigga

God doesn't exist

@@yourfaceisyourlife2323 Are you sure bout that? Look up at the night sky and ask yourself," how can all this be?" It all had to start somewhere, by someone, beyond our finite understanding. Everything in perfect order. The Eternal GOD of Heaven and Earth!! Our Creator !!

@@harris9784 You only believe in this nonsense because you are afraid of death. You can't accept your own mortality.

Do you have any idea how the relative distances are computed? It can't be from brightness because two galaxies may have same brightness yet one can be twice more distant and twice brighter... Or is it calculated from red shift?